Updating inverse side bidirectional association The Next CEO of Stack OverflowDatabase design...

Why didn't Theresa May consult with Parliament before negotiating a deal with the EU?

India just shot down a satellite from the ground. At what altitude range is the resulting debris field?

Term for the "extreme-extension" version of a straw man fallacy?

The King's new dress

Why did we only see the N-1 starfighters in one film?

Can a single photon have an energy density?

Why do professional authors make "consistency" mistakes? And how to avoid them?

Anatomically Correct Strange Women In Ponds Distributing Swords

How to start emacs in "nothing" mode (`fundamental-mode`)

Is it safe to use c_str() on a temporary string?

Natural language into sentence logic

Customer Requests (Sometimes) Drive Me Bonkers!

Why does C# sound extremely flat when saxophone is tuned to G?

Grabbing quick drinks

Is a stroke of luck acceptable after a series of unfavorable events?

How to write papers efficiently when English isn't my first language?

Unreliable Magic - Is it worth it?

Opposite of a diet

Example of a Mathematician/Physicist whose Other Publications during their PhD eclipsed their PhD Thesis

Why does standard notation not preserve intervals (visually)

What does this shorthand mean?

Rotate a column

How to be diplomatic in refusing to write code that breaches the privacy of our users

What can we do to stop prior company from asking us questions?



Updating inverse side bidirectional association



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowDatabase design for changing number of fieldsSchema for an RBAC (Role-based Access Control System)Can triggers be used to implement automated polymorphic association?incorrect result when filtering by associationPerformance impact of NOT using a foreign key (many dedicated 1:many key-key tables vs non-fk generic key-key table)Storing revisions and relations between revised items in 1:N and N:N scenarios for auditsNormalize repeated indefinite ongoing dates for an eventDB Design ChallengeWhat's the overhead of updating all columns, even the ones that haven't changedCan the Chase test algorithm only modify attributes on the right side of a functional dependency?












0















I understand (more or less) the concept of unidirectional and bidirectional association in a relationship, but I don't see the correct practical application of it.



For example, I want an contact table which contains a FK for the country, so I don't have to store the countries every time I create an address but just keep a reference to an already existing country.



enter image description here



As far as I understand, this should be a ManyToOne relationship contact(M) --> country(1) as one contact can only have one country but one country can be used by many contacts. This makes contacts the ONWING side of the relationship and country the INVERSE side as contact will hold the FK.



In the Doctrine documentation I read that it will only look after changes in the owning side. Does this mean that the table contact won't be updated if a country ID changes, which is exactly what I want it to do?



Also, what I would need is to get the country name to join it in the contact entry and not in reverse. This is the purpose of the bidirectional association, right?



Hope not be messing things up (too much)










share|improve this question














bumped to the homepage by Community 4 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.




















    0















    I understand (more or less) the concept of unidirectional and bidirectional association in a relationship, but I don't see the correct practical application of it.



    For example, I want an contact table which contains a FK for the country, so I don't have to store the countries every time I create an address but just keep a reference to an already existing country.



    enter image description here



    As far as I understand, this should be a ManyToOne relationship contact(M) --> country(1) as one contact can only have one country but one country can be used by many contacts. This makes contacts the ONWING side of the relationship and country the INVERSE side as contact will hold the FK.



    In the Doctrine documentation I read that it will only look after changes in the owning side. Does this mean that the table contact won't be updated if a country ID changes, which is exactly what I want it to do?



    Also, what I would need is to get the country name to join it in the contact entry and not in reverse. This is the purpose of the bidirectional association, right?



    Hope not be messing things up (too much)










    share|improve this question














    bumped to the homepage by Community 4 mins ago


    This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.


















      0












      0








      0








      I understand (more or less) the concept of unidirectional and bidirectional association in a relationship, but I don't see the correct practical application of it.



      For example, I want an contact table which contains a FK for the country, so I don't have to store the countries every time I create an address but just keep a reference to an already existing country.



      enter image description here



      As far as I understand, this should be a ManyToOne relationship contact(M) --> country(1) as one contact can only have one country but one country can be used by many contacts. This makes contacts the ONWING side of the relationship and country the INVERSE side as contact will hold the FK.



      In the Doctrine documentation I read that it will only look after changes in the owning side. Does this mean that the table contact won't be updated if a country ID changes, which is exactly what I want it to do?



      Also, what I would need is to get the country name to join it in the contact entry and not in reverse. This is the purpose of the bidirectional association, right?



      Hope not be messing things up (too much)










      share|improve this question














      I understand (more or less) the concept of unidirectional and bidirectional association in a relationship, but I don't see the correct practical application of it.



      For example, I want an contact table which contains a FK for the country, so I don't have to store the countries every time I create an address but just keep a reference to an already existing country.



      enter image description here



      As far as I understand, this should be a ManyToOne relationship contact(M) --> country(1) as one contact can only have one country but one country can be used by many contacts. This makes contacts the ONWING side of the relationship and country the INVERSE side as contact will hold the FK.



      In the Doctrine documentation I read that it will only look after changes in the owning side. Does this mean that the table contact won't be updated if a country ID changes, which is exactly what I want it to do?



      Also, what I would need is to get the country name to join it in the contact entry and not in reverse. This is the purpose of the bidirectional association, right?



      Hope not be messing things up (too much)







      mysql relational-theory orm






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Aug 6 '15 at 18:40









      lusoluso

      1085




      1085





      bumped to the homepage by Community 4 mins ago


      This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







      bumped to the homepage by Community 4 mins ago


      This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          Huh? Sounds like the textbooks are making things too complicated, with too much terminology.



          Yes, "country" involves a many:1 relationship. Yes there are 2 tables. Yes, country_id is in both tables. OK, you could have a FK relationship. Or you could simply make sure you insert into Countries whenever you come across a new country.






          share|improve this answer
























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "182"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f109270%2fupdating-inverse-side-bidirectional-association%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0














            Huh? Sounds like the textbooks are making things too complicated, with too much terminology.



            Yes, "country" involves a many:1 relationship. Yes there are 2 tables. Yes, country_id is in both tables. OK, you could have a FK relationship. Or you could simply make sure you insert into Countries whenever you come across a new country.






            share|improve this answer




























              0














              Huh? Sounds like the textbooks are making things too complicated, with too much terminology.



              Yes, "country" involves a many:1 relationship. Yes there are 2 tables. Yes, country_id is in both tables. OK, you could have a FK relationship. Or you could simply make sure you insert into Countries whenever you come across a new country.






              share|improve this answer


























                0












                0








                0







                Huh? Sounds like the textbooks are making things too complicated, with too much terminology.



                Yes, "country" involves a many:1 relationship. Yes there are 2 tables. Yes, country_id is in both tables. OK, you could have a FK relationship. Or you could simply make sure you insert into Countries whenever you come across a new country.






                share|improve this answer













                Huh? Sounds like the textbooks are making things too complicated, with too much terminology.



                Yes, "country" involves a many:1 relationship. Yes there are 2 tables. Yes, country_id is in both tables. OK, you could have a FK relationship. Or you could simply make sure you insert into Countries whenever you come across a new country.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Aug 7 '15 at 4:25









                Rick JamesRick James

                43.7k22259




                43.7k22259






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f109270%2fupdating-inverse-side-bidirectional-association%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    ORA-01691 (unable to extend lob segment) even though my tablespace has AUTOEXTEND onORA-01692: unable to...

                    Always On Availability groups resolving state after failover - Remote harden of transaction...

                    Circunscripción electoral de Guipúzcoa Referencias Menú de navegaciónLas claves del sistema electoral en...