Ring Automorphisms that fix 1. Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara ...

Naming the result of a source block

What does an IRS interview request entail when called in to verify expenses for a sole proprietor small business?

What does the "x" in "x86" represent?

How do I stop a creek from eroding my steep embankment?

Apollo command module space walk?

Why was the term "discrete" used in discrete logarithm?

List of Python versions

Can inflation occur in a positive-sum game currency system such as the Stack Exchange reputation system?

What is the role of the transistor and diode in a soft start circuit?

Should I discuss the type of campaign with my players?

Why am I getting the error "non-boolean type specified in a context where a condition is expected" for this request?

Why are there no cargo aircraft with "flying wing" design?

Why is "Consequences inflicted." not a sentence?

How to tell that you are a giant?

Can I cast Passwall to drop an enemy into a 20-foot pit?

Single word antonym of "flightless"

Why did the Falcon Heavy center core fall off the ASDS OCISLY barge?

How do pianists reach extremely loud dynamics?

Short Story with Cinderella as a Voo-doo Witch

What's the purpose of writing one's academic biography in the third person?

What is Arya's weapon design?

Why didn't this character "real die" when they blew their stack out in Altered Carbon?

How to align text above triangle figure

Bete Noir -- no dairy



Ring Automorphisms that fix 1.



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Automorphisms of $mathbb Q(sqrt 2)$Automorphisms of $mathbb{R}^n$group of automorphisms of the ring $mathbb{Z}timesmathbb{Z}$Trying to understand a proof for the automorphisms of a polynomial ringAll automorphisms of splitting fieldsDetermining automorphisms of this extensionRing automorphisms of $mathbb{Q}[sqrt[3]{5}]$Automorphism of ring and isomorphism of quotient ringsThe automorphisms of the extension $mathbb{Q}(sqrt[4]{2})/mathbb{Q}$.Extension theorem for field automorphismsAre all verbal automorphisms inner power automorphisms?












2












$begingroup$


This question is a follow - up to this question about Field Automorphisms of $mathbb{Q}[sqrt{2}]$.



Since $mathbb{Q}[sqrt{2}]$ is a vector space over $mathbb{Q}$ with basis ${1, sqrt{2}}$, I naively understand why it is the case that automorphisms $phi$ of $mathbb{Q}[sqrt{2}]$ are determined wholly by the image of $1$ and $sqrt{2}$. My problem is using this fact explicitly. For example, suppose I consider the automorphism $phi$ such that $phi(1) = 1$ and $phi(sqrt{2}) = sqrt{2}$, and I want to compute the value of $phi(frac{3}{2})$. I can do the following:



$$ phi(frac{3}{2}) = phi(3) phi(frac{1}{2}) = [phi(1) + phi(1) + phi(1)] phi(frac{1}{2}) = 3phi(frac{1}{2}).$$



I am unsure how to proceed from here. I would assume that it is true that $$phi(frac{1}{1 + 1}) = frac{phi(1)}{phi(1) + phi(1)} = frac{1}{2},$$ but I don't know what property of ring isomorphisms would allow me to do this.






abstract-algebra ring-theory field-theory galois-theory







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    This question is a follow - up to this question about Field Automorphisms of $mathbb{Q}[sqrt{2}]$.



    Since $mathbb{Q}[sqrt{2}]$ is a vector space over $mathbb{Q}$ with basis ${1, sqrt{2}}$, I naively understand why it is the case that automorphisms $phi$ of $mathbb{Q}[sqrt{2}]$ are determined wholly by the image of $1$ and $sqrt{2}$. My problem is using this fact explicitly. For example, suppose I consider the automorphism $phi$ such that $phi(1) = 1$ and $phi(sqrt{2}) = sqrt{2}$, and I want to compute the value of $phi(frac{3}{2})$. I can do the following:



    $$ phi(frac{3}{2}) = phi(3) phi(frac{1}{2}) = [phi(1) + phi(1) + phi(1)] phi(frac{1}{2}) = 3phi(frac{1}{2}).$$



    I am unsure how to proceed from here. I would assume that it is true that $$phi(frac{1}{1 + 1}) = frac{phi(1)}{phi(1) + phi(1)} = frac{1}{2},$$ but I don't know what property of ring isomorphisms would allow me to do this.






    abstract-algebra ring-theory field-theory galois-theory







    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      This question is a follow - up to this question about Field Automorphisms of $mathbb{Q}[sqrt{2}]$.



      Since $mathbb{Q}[sqrt{2}]$ is a vector space over $mathbb{Q}$ with basis ${1, sqrt{2}}$, I naively understand why it is the case that automorphisms $phi$ of $mathbb{Q}[sqrt{2}]$ are determined wholly by the image of $1$ and $sqrt{2}$. My problem is using this fact explicitly. For example, suppose I consider the automorphism $phi$ such that $phi(1) = 1$ and $phi(sqrt{2}) = sqrt{2}$, and I want to compute the value of $phi(frac{3}{2})$. I can do the following:



      $$ phi(frac{3}{2}) = phi(3) phi(frac{1}{2}) = [phi(1) + phi(1) + phi(1)] phi(frac{1}{2}) = 3phi(frac{1}{2}).$$



      I am unsure how to proceed from here. I would assume that it is true that $$phi(frac{1}{1 + 1}) = frac{phi(1)}{phi(1) + phi(1)} = frac{1}{2},$$ but I don't know what property of ring isomorphisms would allow me to do this.






      abstract-algebra ring-theory field-theory galois-theory







      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      This question is a follow - up to this question about Field Automorphisms of $mathbb{Q}[sqrt{2}]$.



      Since $mathbb{Q}[sqrt{2}]$ is a vector space over $mathbb{Q}$ with basis ${1, sqrt{2}}$, I naively understand why it is the case that automorphisms $phi$ of $mathbb{Q}[sqrt{2}]$ are determined wholly by the image of $1$ and $sqrt{2}$. My problem is using this fact explicitly. For example, suppose I consider the automorphism $phi$ such that $phi(1) = 1$ and $phi(sqrt{2}) = sqrt{2}$, and I want to compute the value of $phi(frac{3}{2})$. I can do the following:



      $$ phi(frac{3}{2}) = phi(3) phi(frac{1}{2}) = [phi(1) + phi(1) + phi(1)] phi(frac{1}{2}) = 3phi(frac{1}{2}).$$



      I am unsure how to proceed from here. I would assume that it is true that $$phi(frac{1}{1 + 1}) = frac{phi(1)}{phi(1) + phi(1)} = frac{1}{2},$$ but I don't know what property of ring isomorphisms would allow me to do this.






      abstract-algebra ring-theory field-theory galois-theory




      abstract-algebra ring-theory field-theory galois-theory






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 3 hours ago









      Solarflare0Solarflare0

      9813




      9813






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          $$
          2phi(frac{3}{2}) = phi(3) = 3phi(1) = 3
          implies
          phi(frac{3}{2}) =frac{3}{2}
          $$
          Generalizing this argument gives $phi(q) = q$ for all $q in mathbb Q$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            1












            $begingroup$

            Every automorphism fixes $mathbb{Q}$. That is, if $K$ is any field of characteristic zero, then any automorphism of $K$ fixes the unique subfield of $K$ isomorphic to $mathbb{Q}$.



            For the proof, we assume WLOG that $mathbb{Q} subseteq K$. Then:




            • $phi$ fixes $0$ and $1$, by definition.


            • $phi$ fixes all positive integers, since $phi(n) = phi(1 + 1 + cdots + 1) = n phi(1) = n$.


            • $phi$ fixes all negative integers, since $phi(n) + phi(-n) = phi(n-n) = 0$, so $phi(-n) = -phi(n) = -n$.


            • $phi$ fixes all rational numbers, since $n cdot phileft(frac{m}{n}right) = phi(m) = m$, so $phileft(frac{m}{n}right) = frac{m}{n}$.




            More generally, when we consider automorphisms of a field extension $K / F$, we often restrict our attention only to automorphisms which fix the base field $F$. But when $F = mathbb{Q}$, since all automorphisms fix $mathbb{Q}$, such a restriction is unnecessary.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$














              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3190546%2fring-automorphisms-that-fix-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              3












              $begingroup$

              $$
              2phi(frac{3}{2}) = phi(3) = 3phi(1) = 3
              implies
              phi(frac{3}{2}) =frac{3}{2}
              $$
              Generalizing this argument gives $phi(q) = q$ for all $q in mathbb Q$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                3












                $begingroup$

                $$
                2phi(frac{3}{2}) = phi(3) = 3phi(1) = 3
                implies
                phi(frac{3}{2}) =frac{3}{2}
                $$
                Generalizing this argument gives $phi(q) = q$ for all $q in mathbb Q$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  3












                  3








                  3





                  $begingroup$

                  $$
                  2phi(frac{3}{2}) = phi(3) = 3phi(1) = 3
                  implies
                  phi(frac{3}{2}) =frac{3}{2}
                  $$
                  Generalizing this argument gives $phi(q) = q$ for all $q in mathbb Q$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  $$
                  2phi(frac{3}{2}) = phi(3) = 3phi(1) = 3
                  implies
                  phi(frac{3}{2}) =frac{3}{2}
                  $$
                  Generalizing this argument gives $phi(q) = q$ for all $q in mathbb Q$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 3 hours ago









                  lhflhf

                  168k11172405




                  168k11172405























                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      Every automorphism fixes $mathbb{Q}$. That is, if $K$ is any field of characteristic zero, then any automorphism of $K$ fixes the unique subfield of $K$ isomorphic to $mathbb{Q}$.



                      For the proof, we assume WLOG that $mathbb{Q} subseteq K$. Then:




                      • $phi$ fixes $0$ and $1$, by definition.


                      • $phi$ fixes all positive integers, since $phi(n) = phi(1 + 1 + cdots + 1) = n phi(1) = n$.


                      • $phi$ fixes all negative integers, since $phi(n) + phi(-n) = phi(n-n) = 0$, so $phi(-n) = -phi(n) = -n$.


                      • $phi$ fixes all rational numbers, since $n cdot phileft(frac{m}{n}right) = phi(m) = m$, so $phileft(frac{m}{n}right) = frac{m}{n}$.




                      More generally, when we consider automorphisms of a field extension $K / F$, we often restrict our attention only to automorphisms which fix the base field $F$. But when $F = mathbb{Q}$, since all automorphisms fix $mathbb{Q}$, such a restriction is unnecessary.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        Every automorphism fixes $mathbb{Q}$. That is, if $K$ is any field of characteristic zero, then any automorphism of $K$ fixes the unique subfield of $K$ isomorphic to $mathbb{Q}$.



                        For the proof, we assume WLOG that $mathbb{Q} subseteq K$. Then:




                        • $phi$ fixes $0$ and $1$, by definition.


                        • $phi$ fixes all positive integers, since $phi(n) = phi(1 + 1 + cdots + 1) = n phi(1) = n$.


                        • $phi$ fixes all negative integers, since $phi(n) + phi(-n) = phi(n-n) = 0$, so $phi(-n) = -phi(n) = -n$.


                        • $phi$ fixes all rational numbers, since $n cdot phileft(frac{m}{n}right) = phi(m) = m$, so $phileft(frac{m}{n}right) = frac{m}{n}$.




                        More generally, when we consider automorphisms of a field extension $K / F$, we often restrict our attention only to automorphisms which fix the base field $F$. But when $F = mathbb{Q}$, since all automorphisms fix $mathbb{Q}$, such a restriction is unnecessary.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          1












                          1








                          1





                          $begingroup$

                          Every automorphism fixes $mathbb{Q}$. That is, if $K$ is any field of characteristic zero, then any automorphism of $K$ fixes the unique subfield of $K$ isomorphic to $mathbb{Q}$.



                          For the proof, we assume WLOG that $mathbb{Q} subseteq K$. Then:




                          • $phi$ fixes $0$ and $1$, by definition.


                          • $phi$ fixes all positive integers, since $phi(n) = phi(1 + 1 + cdots + 1) = n phi(1) = n$.


                          • $phi$ fixes all negative integers, since $phi(n) + phi(-n) = phi(n-n) = 0$, so $phi(-n) = -phi(n) = -n$.


                          • $phi$ fixes all rational numbers, since $n cdot phileft(frac{m}{n}right) = phi(m) = m$, so $phileft(frac{m}{n}right) = frac{m}{n}$.




                          More generally, when we consider automorphisms of a field extension $K / F$, we often restrict our attention only to automorphisms which fix the base field $F$. But when $F = mathbb{Q}$, since all automorphisms fix $mathbb{Q}$, such a restriction is unnecessary.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          Every automorphism fixes $mathbb{Q}$. That is, if $K$ is any field of characteristic zero, then any automorphism of $K$ fixes the unique subfield of $K$ isomorphic to $mathbb{Q}$.



                          For the proof, we assume WLOG that $mathbb{Q} subseteq K$. Then:




                          • $phi$ fixes $0$ and $1$, by definition.


                          • $phi$ fixes all positive integers, since $phi(n) = phi(1 + 1 + cdots + 1) = n phi(1) = n$.


                          • $phi$ fixes all negative integers, since $phi(n) + phi(-n) = phi(n-n) = 0$, so $phi(-n) = -phi(n) = -n$.


                          • $phi$ fixes all rational numbers, since $n cdot phileft(frac{m}{n}right) = phi(m) = m$, so $phileft(frac{m}{n}right) = frac{m}{n}$.




                          More generally, when we consider automorphisms of a field extension $K / F$, we often restrict our attention only to automorphisms which fix the base field $F$. But when $F = mathbb{Q}$, since all automorphisms fix $mathbb{Q}$, such a restriction is unnecessary.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered 2 hours ago









                          60056005

                          37.1k752127




                          37.1k752127






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid …



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3190546%2fring-automorphisms-that-fix-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              -

                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Anexo:Material bélico de la Fuerza Aérea de Chile Índice Aeronaves Defensa...

                              Image
                              Fuerza Aérea de Chile materialFuerza Aérea de ChileJDAMAdvanced HawkTA-50Alenia Aermacchi M-346FLIRHydrahttp://www.infodefensa.com/latam/2014/02/26/noticia-fuerza-aerea-chile-interesada-a400m.htmlhttps://www.scramble.nl/index.php?option=com_mildb&view=search Aquí esta todo el material bélico de la Fuerza Aérea de Chile. Índice 1 Aeronaves 2 Defensa Antiaérea 3 Armamento 4 Material de reserva 5 Véase también 6 Referencias Aeronaves Aeronave Origen Tipo Versiones en servicio Total [ 1 ] ​ Fotos Aeronaves de la FACH (225) Lockheed Martin F-16 Estados Unidos   Estados Unidos   Países Bajos Caza Polivalente -AIM120/AAM Derby/JDAM/WCMD -Serán modernizados con radares AESA, <br>Se sumarán unidades adicionales 11A 7B 6C 4D 46 Northrop F-5E Tigre III Estados Unidos   Estados Unidos Caza Polivalente -Sistema de guerra electrónica mejorado -Equipado con el misil AAM Derby y casco Dash II...
                              Read more

                              Always On Availability groups resolving state after failover - Remote harden of transaction...

                              Image
                              Should corporate security training be tailored based on a users' job role? Does human life have innate value over that of other animals? Limit involving inverse functions Father gets chickenpox, but doesn't infect his two children. How is this possible? Is it possible to re-order a List of continous entries? Who, if anyone, was the first astronaut to return to earth in a different vessel? The totem pole can be grouped into Identical projects by students at two different colleges: still plagiarism? Sci fi book, man buys a beat up spaceship and intervenes in a civil war on a planet and eventually becomes a space cop How to not...
                              Read more

                              update json value to null Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara ...

                              Image
                              Seeking colloquialism for “just because” Sci-Fi book where patients in a coma ward all live in a subconscious world linked together Understanding Ceva's Theorem Dating a Former Employee How to find out what spells would be useless to a blind NPC spellcaster? Why am I getting the error "non-boolean type specified in a context where a condition is expected" for this request? Why are both D and D# fitting into my E minor key? Do I really need recursive chmod to restrict access to a folder? How to override model in magento2? How do I stop a creek from eroding my steep embankment? Wit...
                              Read more