Arizona laws regarding ownership of ground glassware for chemistry usageArizona form to allow victim to speak...

Microphone on Mars

Manager has noticed coworker's excessive breaks. Should I warn him?

Could Comets or Meteors be used to Combat Global Warming?

Sing Baby Shark

Is Apex Sometimes Case Sensitive?

Self-join example review in Books Online

Badly designed reimbursement form. What does that say about the company?

Does an intelligent undead have a soul in 5e D&D?

How to not forget my phone in the bathroom?

How can I portray body horror and still be sensitive to people with disabilities?

How can changes in personality/values of a person who turned into a vampire be explained?

How bad is a Computer Science course that doesn't teach Design Patterns?

Using 14 ga on part of a 20A circuit?

Which was the first story to feature space elevators?

Can I legally make a website about boycotting a certain company?

Does changing "sa" password require a SQL restart (in mixed mode)?

How do I write a maintainable, fast, compile-time bit-mask in C++?

What happens if you declare more than $10,000 at the US border?

Do error bars on probabilities have any meaning?

What does “to the numbers” mean in landing clearance

How can a kingdom keep the secret of a missing monarch from the public?

1730 House how to make Ceiling Level

How to write painful torture scenes without being over-the-top

Do all Half-Elf subraces forgo the Skill Versatility feature?



Arizona laws regarding ownership of ground glassware for chemistry usage


Arizona form to allow victim to speak to defendentLegal action regarding a potentially violent neighborWhat is the best way to search through session laws?Are there laws regarding boarding cruise ships while at sea?Arizona Common Law Marriage and KidsLaws regarding fictitious public figures or celebrities/likenesses/etc.?Restrictions of private tow companies in Arizona regarding holding the vehicle for paymentHow do you laws apply through internet regarding the different countries?How does one evict a tenant in Arizona if they have a lease/purchase instead of a straight lease?Questions regarding laws on technology designed to avoid prosecution?













2















Not 100% certain that this is the right site to post this on, but if not, just let me know and I'll gladly move it to the proper site.



I was watching a YouTube video that included an interview with a Clandestine Chemist, and at the 8:50 mark, he states:




In Arizona, mere possession of ground glassware is a felony, if you're not a licensed chemist.




I live in Arizona, and I do some organic chemistry on my spare time. So hearing this worries me, especially when it's coming from someone who has so much experience with the law in regards to chemistry and ground glassware. Granted, everything I have is 14/20 or 14/10 scale (mini and micro scale, respectively), which is as small as it gets. So if I was manufacturing narcotics, that would be the most tedious operation.



Does anyone know if the above statement is accurate? I tried looking for some ARS stating that it was illegal to own ground glassware, but wasn't able to come up with anything specifically stating that it's illegal.



Thanks in advance.










share|improve this question





























    2















    Not 100% certain that this is the right site to post this on, but if not, just let me know and I'll gladly move it to the proper site.



    I was watching a YouTube video that included an interview with a Clandestine Chemist, and at the 8:50 mark, he states:




    In Arizona, mere possession of ground glassware is a felony, if you're not a licensed chemist.




    I live in Arizona, and I do some organic chemistry on my spare time. So hearing this worries me, especially when it's coming from someone who has so much experience with the law in regards to chemistry and ground glassware. Granted, everything I have is 14/20 or 14/10 scale (mini and micro scale, respectively), which is as small as it gets. So if I was manufacturing narcotics, that would be the most tedious operation.



    Does anyone know if the above statement is accurate? I tried looking for some ARS stating that it was illegal to own ground glassware, but wasn't able to come up with anything specifically stating that it's illegal.



    Thanks in advance.










    share|improve this question



























      2












      2








      2








      Not 100% certain that this is the right site to post this on, but if not, just let me know and I'll gladly move it to the proper site.



      I was watching a YouTube video that included an interview with a Clandestine Chemist, and at the 8:50 mark, he states:




      In Arizona, mere possession of ground glassware is a felony, if you're not a licensed chemist.




      I live in Arizona, and I do some organic chemistry on my spare time. So hearing this worries me, especially when it's coming from someone who has so much experience with the law in regards to chemistry and ground glassware. Granted, everything I have is 14/20 or 14/10 scale (mini and micro scale, respectively), which is as small as it gets. So if I was manufacturing narcotics, that would be the most tedious operation.



      Does anyone know if the above statement is accurate? I tried looking for some ARS stating that it was illegal to own ground glassware, but wasn't able to come up with anything specifically stating that it's illegal.



      Thanks in advance.










      share|improve this question
















      Not 100% certain that this is the right site to post this on, but if not, just let me know and I'll gladly move it to the proper site.



      I was watching a YouTube video that included an interview with a Clandestine Chemist, and at the 8:50 mark, he states:




      In Arizona, mere possession of ground glassware is a felony, if you're not a licensed chemist.




      I live in Arizona, and I do some organic chemistry on my spare time. So hearing this worries me, especially when it's coming from someone who has so much experience with the law in regards to chemistry and ground glassware. Granted, everything I have is 14/20 or 14/10 scale (mini and micro scale, respectively), which is as small as it gets. So if I was manufacturing narcotics, that would be the most tedious operation.



      Does anyone know if the above statement is accurate? I tried looking for some ARS stating that it was illegal to own ground glassware, but wasn't able to come up with anything specifically stating that it's illegal.



      Thanks in advance.







      criminal-law legal-research arizona






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 4 hours ago







      Justin

















      asked 4 hours ago









      JustinJustin

      1235




      1235






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5














          Arizona does not license chemists, though they do license pharmacists. There is a law against possession of drug paraphenalia, violation of which is a felony. The law also says




          In determining whether an object is drug paraphernalia, a court or
          other authority shall consider, in addition to all other logically
          relevant factors, the following:




          1. Statements by an owner or by anyone in control of the object concerning its use.


          2. Prior convictions, if any, of an owner, or of anyone in control of the object, under any state or federal law relating to any drug.


          3. The proximity of the object, in time and space, to a direct violation of this chapter.


          4. The proximity of the object to drugs.


          5. The existence of any residue of drugs on the object.


          6. Direct or circumstantial evidence of the intent of an owner, or of anyone in control of the object, to deliver it to persons whom he
            knows, or should reasonably know, intend to use the object to
            facilitate a violation of this chapter.


          7. Instructions, oral or written, provided with the object concerning its use.


          8. Descriptive materials accompanying the object which explain or depict its use.


          9. National and local advertising concerning its use.


          10. The manner in which the object is displayed for sale.


          11. Whether the owner, or anyone in control of the object, is a legitimate supplier of like or related items to the community, such as
            a licensed distributor or dealer of tobacco products.


          12. Direct or circumstantial evidence of the ratio of sales of the object to the total sales of the business enterprise.


          13. The existence and scope of legitimate uses for the object in the community.


          14. Expert testimony concerning its use.





          The size of your equipment would be relevant in defending against such a charge; your publications in the field of chemistry would be relevant. The burden of proof is on the prosecution to show that you were using the glassware to make drugs. Paraphenalia is defined as




          all equipment, products and materials of any kind which are used,
          intended for use or designed for use in planting, propagating,
          cultivating, growing, harvesting, manufacturing, compounding,
          converting, producing, processing, preparing, testing, analyzing,
          packaging, repackaging, storing, containing, concealing, injecting,
          ingesting, inhaling or otherwise introducing into the human body a
          drug in violation of this chapter.




          so a garden shovel can be used to grow marijuana, but that is not enough. The prosecution has to prove that the items "are used, intended for use or designed for use" in drug making – not just that could be so used.






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "617"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f37450%2farizona-laws-regarding-ownership-of-ground-glassware-for-chemistry-usage%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            5














            Arizona does not license chemists, though they do license pharmacists. There is a law against possession of drug paraphenalia, violation of which is a felony. The law also says




            In determining whether an object is drug paraphernalia, a court or
            other authority shall consider, in addition to all other logically
            relevant factors, the following:




            1. Statements by an owner or by anyone in control of the object concerning its use.


            2. Prior convictions, if any, of an owner, or of anyone in control of the object, under any state or federal law relating to any drug.


            3. The proximity of the object, in time and space, to a direct violation of this chapter.


            4. The proximity of the object to drugs.


            5. The existence of any residue of drugs on the object.


            6. Direct or circumstantial evidence of the intent of an owner, or of anyone in control of the object, to deliver it to persons whom he
              knows, or should reasonably know, intend to use the object to
              facilitate a violation of this chapter.


            7. Instructions, oral or written, provided with the object concerning its use.


            8. Descriptive materials accompanying the object which explain or depict its use.


            9. National and local advertising concerning its use.


            10. The manner in which the object is displayed for sale.


            11. Whether the owner, or anyone in control of the object, is a legitimate supplier of like or related items to the community, such as
              a licensed distributor or dealer of tobacco products.


            12. Direct or circumstantial evidence of the ratio of sales of the object to the total sales of the business enterprise.


            13. The existence and scope of legitimate uses for the object in the community.


            14. Expert testimony concerning its use.





            The size of your equipment would be relevant in defending against such a charge; your publications in the field of chemistry would be relevant. The burden of proof is on the prosecution to show that you were using the glassware to make drugs. Paraphenalia is defined as




            all equipment, products and materials of any kind which are used,
            intended for use or designed for use in planting, propagating,
            cultivating, growing, harvesting, manufacturing, compounding,
            converting, producing, processing, preparing, testing, analyzing,
            packaging, repackaging, storing, containing, concealing, injecting,
            ingesting, inhaling or otherwise introducing into the human body a
            drug in violation of this chapter.




            so a garden shovel can be used to grow marijuana, but that is not enough. The prosecution has to prove that the items "are used, intended for use or designed for use" in drug making – not just that could be so used.






            share|improve this answer




























              5














              Arizona does not license chemists, though they do license pharmacists. There is a law against possession of drug paraphenalia, violation of which is a felony. The law also says




              In determining whether an object is drug paraphernalia, a court or
              other authority shall consider, in addition to all other logically
              relevant factors, the following:




              1. Statements by an owner or by anyone in control of the object concerning its use.


              2. Prior convictions, if any, of an owner, or of anyone in control of the object, under any state or federal law relating to any drug.


              3. The proximity of the object, in time and space, to a direct violation of this chapter.


              4. The proximity of the object to drugs.


              5. The existence of any residue of drugs on the object.


              6. Direct or circumstantial evidence of the intent of an owner, or of anyone in control of the object, to deliver it to persons whom he
                knows, or should reasonably know, intend to use the object to
                facilitate a violation of this chapter.


              7. Instructions, oral or written, provided with the object concerning its use.


              8. Descriptive materials accompanying the object which explain or depict its use.


              9. National and local advertising concerning its use.


              10. The manner in which the object is displayed for sale.


              11. Whether the owner, or anyone in control of the object, is a legitimate supplier of like or related items to the community, such as
                a licensed distributor or dealer of tobacco products.


              12. Direct or circumstantial evidence of the ratio of sales of the object to the total sales of the business enterprise.


              13. The existence and scope of legitimate uses for the object in the community.


              14. Expert testimony concerning its use.





              The size of your equipment would be relevant in defending against such a charge; your publications in the field of chemistry would be relevant. The burden of proof is on the prosecution to show that you were using the glassware to make drugs. Paraphenalia is defined as




              all equipment, products and materials of any kind which are used,
              intended for use or designed for use in planting, propagating,
              cultivating, growing, harvesting, manufacturing, compounding,
              converting, producing, processing, preparing, testing, analyzing,
              packaging, repackaging, storing, containing, concealing, injecting,
              ingesting, inhaling or otherwise introducing into the human body a
              drug in violation of this chapter.




              so a garden shovel can be used to grow marijuana, but that is not enough. The prosecution has to prove that the items "are used, intended for use or designed for use" in drug making – not just that could be so used.






              share|improve this answer


























                5












                5








                5







                Arizona does not license chemists, though they do license pharmacists. There is a law against possession of drug paraphenalia, violation of which is a felony. The law also says




                In determining whether an object is drug paraphernalia, a court or
                other authority shall consider, in addition to all other logically
                relevant factors, the following:




                1. Statements by an owner or by anyone in control of the object concerning its use.


                2. Prior convictions, if any, of an owner, or of anyone in control of the object, under any state or federal law relating to any drug.


                3. The proximity of the object, in time and space, to a direct violation of this chapter.


                4. The proximity of the object to drugs.


                5. The existence of any residue of drugs on the object.


                6. Direct or circumstantial evidence of the intent of an owner, or of anyone in control of the object, to deliver it to persons whom he
                  knows, or should reasonably know, intend to use the object to
                  facilitate a violation of this chapter.


                7. Instructions, oral or written, provided with the object concerning its use.


                8. Descriptive materials accompanying the object which explain or depict its use.


                9. National and local advertising concerning its use.


                10. The manner in which the object is displayed for sale.


                11. Whether the owner, or anyone in control of the object, is a legitimate supplier of like or related items to the community, such as
                  a licensed distributor or dealer of tobacco products.


                12. Direct or circumstantial evidence of the ratio of sales of the object to the total sales of the business enterprise.


                13. The existence and scope of legitimate uses for the object in the community.


                14. Expert testimony concerning its use.





                The size of your equipment would be relevant in defending against such a charge; your publications in the field of chemistry would be relevant. The burden of proof is on the prosecution to show that you were using the glassware to make drugs. Paraphenalia is defined as




                all equipment, products and materials of any kind which are used,
                intended for use or designed for use in planting, propagating,
                cultivating, growing, harvesting, manufacturing, compounding,
                converting, producing, processing, preparing, testing, analyzing,
                packaging, repackaging, storing, containing, concealing, injecting,
                ingesting, inhaling or otherwise introducing into the human body a
                drug in violation of this chapter.




                so a garden shovel can be used to grow marijuana, but that is not enough. The prosecution has to prove that the items "are used, intended for use or designed for use" in drug making – not just that could be so used.






                share|improve this answer













                Arizona does not license chemists, though they do license pharmacists. There is a law against possession of drug paraphenalia, violation of which is a felony. The law also says




                In determining whether an object is drug paraphernalia, a court or
                other authority shall consider, in addition to all other logically
                relevant factors, the following:




                1. Statements by an owner or by anyone in control of the object concerning its use.


                2. Prior convictions, if any, of an owner, or of anyone in control of the object, under any state or federal law relating to any drug.


                3. The proximity of the object, in time and space, to a direct violation of this chapter.


                4. The proximity of the object to drugs.


                5. The existence of any residue of drugs on the object.


                6. Direct or circumstantial evidence of the intent of an owner, or of anyone in control of the object, to deliver it to persons whom he
                  knows, or should reasonably know, intend to use the object to
                  facilitate a violation of this chapter.


                7. Instructions, oral or written, provided with the object concerning its use.


                8. Descriptive materials accompanying the object which explain or depict its use.


                9. National and local advertising concerning its use.


                10. The manner in which the object is displayed for sale.


                11. Whether the owner, or anyone in control of the object, is a legitimate supplier of like or related items to the community, such as
                  a licensed distributor or dealer of tobacco products.


                12. Direct or circumstantial evidence of the ratio of sales of the object to the total sales of the business enterprise.


                13. The existence and scope of legitimate uses for the object in the community.


                14. Expert testimony concerning its use.





                The size of your equipment would be relevant in defending against such a charge; your publications in the field of chemistry would be relevant. The burden of proof is on the prosecution to show that you were using the glassware to make drugs. Paraphenalia is defined as




                all equipment, products and materials of any kind which are used,
                intended for use or designed for use in planting, propagating,
                cultivating, growing, harvesting, manufacturing, compounding,
                converting, producing, processing, preparing, testing, analyzing,
                packaging, repackaging, storing, containing, concealing, injecting,
                ingesting, inhaling or otherwise introducing into the human body a
                drug in violation of this chapter.




                so a garden shovel can be used to grow marijuana, but that is not enough. The prosecution has to prove that the items "are used, intended for use or designed for use" in drug making – not just that could be so used.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 4 hours ago









                user6726user6726

                59.2k451100




                59.2k451100






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f37450%2farizona-laws-regarding-ownership-of-ground-glassware-for-chemistry-usage%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Parapolítica Índice Antecedentes El escándalo Proceso judicial Consecuencias Véase...

                    How to remove border from elements in the last row?Targeting flex items on the last rowHow to vertically wrap...

                    Tecnologías entrañables Índice Antecedentes Desarrollo Tecnologías Entrañables en la...