Single-column user defined variable based on a comparisonSelecting minimum value using a subqueryInsert Row...

Why do we divide Permutations to get to Combinations?

How can a kingdom keep the secret of a missing monarch from the public?

Discouraging missile alpha strikes

Fired for using Stack Exchange. What did I do wrong?

Is Screenshot Time-tracking Common?

How do I write a maintainable, fast, compile-time bit-mask in C++?

Is it possible to detect 100% of SQLi with a simple regex?

Sing Baby Shark

Why did some CPUs use two Read/Write lines, and others just one?

How to write painful torture scenes without being over-the-top

What does "don't have a baby" imply or mean in this sentence?

Manager has noticed coworker's excessive breaks. Should I warn him?

Someone wants me to use my credit card at a card-only gas/petrol pump in return for cash

Relation between roots and coefficients - manipulation of identities

Why is ra lower than re while la is higher than le?

Have any astronauts or cosmonauts died in space?

Run a command that requires sudo after a time has passed

How many copper coins fit inside a cubic foot?

Are encryption algorithms with fixed-point free permutations inherently flawed?

React Native EXPO Apple upload fail

Why is quixotic not Quixotic (a proper adjective)?

Does the kobold player race feature, Pack Tactics, give ranged attacks advantage?

How to know if I am a 'Real Developer'

Buying a "Used" Router



Single-column user defined variable based on a comparison


Selecting minimum value using a subqueryInsert Row With Foreign Key Equal to ID - Circular ReferenceMySQL update one table from another joined many-to-manyMySQL code to show specific rows based on another…?Alfresco DB - Most perfomance effective way to replace valuesSQL - Restricted view for transient (stateless) userHow to calculate total distance by datetimeMySql - select from main table with a lot of connected tablesHow is it possible that a key of char+bigint has better performance than key of bigint+bigint?Unable to fix ROW size too large even with innodb_file_per_table













0















I have a database with over 300k lines and each row is a separate timed event. I have a column of system spec values for error, followed by a stochastic draw on an actual error for that event. I can change the confidence level for the actual error by multiplying the actual error by a constant.



I have tried this query and while it returns a 1 in each error code, what I am looking for is a way to develop a user defined variable called “myerror” that is filled by each rows error * the constant.



sample query statements:



((select(actual_error * “constant”) <= lowest_threshold) as level_1_error,
((select(actual_error * “constant”) between this and that) as level_2_error,
((select(actual_error * “constant”) between higher_this and higher_that) as level_3_error,



((select(actual_error * “constant”) >= highest_threshold) as max_error,


What I’m trying for is something like:



Case when (select(actual_error * “constant”) <= lowest_threshold  set @user_error  =  “level_1_error”
when (select(actual_error * “constant”) between this and that) set @user_error = “level_2_error”


but, alas…..can’t seem to get it to work…..I’ve tried putting the set statement in a sub-query and just using a sub-query to select a different error level also…..



help bitte sehr.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Jim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1





    SHOW CREATE TABLE {x} for the table structure, some sample data, and expected output. You description is quite hard to follow.

    – danblack
    10 hours ago











  • each row is a separate timed event. Does this mean that there exists some timestamp field in table's structure, and it is unique?

    – Akina
    4 hours ago
















0















I have a database with over 300k lines and each row is a separate timed event. I have a column of system spec values for error, followed by a stochastic draw on an actual error for that event. I can change the confidence level for the actual error by multiplying the actual error by a constant.



I have tried this query and while it returns a 1 in each error code, what I am looking for is a way to develop a user defined variable called “myerror” that is filled by each rows error * the constant.



sample query statements:



((select(actual_error * “constant”) <= lowest_threshold) as level_1_error,
((select(actual_error * “constant”) between this and that) as level_2_error,
((select(actual_error * “constant”) between higher_this and higher_that) as level_3_error,



((select(actual_error * “constant”) >= highest_threshold) as max_error,


What I’m trying for is something like:



Case when (select(actual_error * “constant”) <= lowest_threshold  set @user_error  =  “level_1_error”
when (select(actual_error * “constant”) between this and that) set @user_error = “level_2_error”


but, alas…..can’t seem to get it to work…..I’ve tried putting the set statement in a sub-query and just using a sub-query to select a different error level also…..



help bitte sehr.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Jim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1





    SHOW CREATE TABLE {x} for the table structure, some sample data, and expected output. You description is quite hard to follow.

    – danblack
    10 hours ago











  • each row is a separate timed event. Does this mean that there exists some timestamp field in table's structure, and it is unique?

    – Akina
    4 hours ago














0












0








0








I have a database with over 300k lines and each row is a separate timed event. I have a column of system spec values for error, followed by a stochastic draw on an actual error for that event. I can change the confidence level for the actual error by multiplying the actual error by a constant.



I have tried this query and while it returns a 1 in each error code, what I am looking for is a way to develop a user defined variable called “myerror” that is filled by each rows error * the constant.



sample query statements:



((select(actual_error * “constant”) <= lowest_threshold) as level_1_error,
((select(actual_error * “constant”) between this and that) as level_2_error,
((select(actual_error * “constant”) between higher_this and higher_that) as level_3_error,



((select(actual_error * “constant”) >= highest_threshold) as max_error,


What I’m trying for is something like:



Case when (select(actual_error * “constant”) <= lowest_threshold  set @user_error  =  “level_1_error”
when (select(actual_error * “constant”) between this and that) set @user_error = “level_2_error”


but, alas…..can’t seem to get it to work…..I’ve tried putting the set statement in a sub-query and just using a sub-query to select a different error level also…..



help bitte sehr.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Jim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I have a database with over 300k lines and each row is a separate timed event. I have a column of system spec values for error, followed by a stochastic draw on an actual error for that event. I can change the confidence level for the actual error by multiplying the actual error by a constant.



I have tried this query and while it returns a 1 in each error code, what I am looking for is a way to develop a user defined variable called “myerror” that is filled by each rows error * the constant.



sample query statements:



((select(actual_error * “constant”) <= lowest_threshold) as level_1_error,
((select(actual_error * “constant”) between this and that) as level_2_error,
((select(actual_error * “constant”) between higher_this and higher_that) as level_3_error,



((select(actual_error * “constant”) >= highest_threshold) as max_error,


What I’m trying for is something like:



Case when (select(actual_error * “constant”) <= lowest_threshold  set @user_error  =  “level_1_error”
when (select(actual_error * “constant”) between this and that) set @user_error = “level_2_error”


but, alas…..can’t seem to get it to work…..I’ve tried putting the set statement in a sub-query and just using a sub-query to select a different error level also…..



help bitte sehr.







mysql






share|improve this question









New contributor




Jim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Jim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 mins ago









Randolph West

2,649215




2,649215






New contributor




Jim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 11 hours ago









JimJim

1




1




New contributor




Jim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Jim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Jim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1





    SHOW CREATE TABLE {x} for the table structure, some sample data, and expected output. You description is quite hard to follow.

    – danblack
    10 hours ago











  • each row is a separate timed event. Does this mean that there exists some timestamp field in table's structure, and it is unique?

    – Akina
    4 hours ago














  • 1





    SHOW CREATE TABLE {x} for the table structure, some sample data, and expected output. You description is quite hard to follow.

    – danblack
    10 hours ago











  • each row is a separate timed event. Does this mean that there exists some timestamp field in table's structure, and it is unique?

    – Akina
    4 hours ago








1




1





SHOW CREATE TABLE {x} for the table structure, some sample data, and expected output. You description is quite hard to follow.

– danblack
10 hours ago





SHOW CREATE TABLE {x} for the table structure, some sample data, and expected output. You description is quite hard to follow.

– danblack
10 hours ago













each row is a separate timed event. Does this mean that there exists some timestamp field in table's structure, and it is unique?

– Akina
4 hours ago





each row is a separate timed event. Does this mean that there exists some timestamp field in table's structure, and it is unique?

– Akina
4 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














I'd recommend you to create static, temporary or dynamic table which contains the adjacent border ranges for each error level normalized with “constant” value to avoid additional calculations (schema):





CREATE TABLE error_level_ranges ( level, lower_bound, upper_bound )
AS
SELECT 1,-1,2 -- 2 as "lowest_threshold"/constant,
-- assume -1 is below min possible value of actual_error
UNION ALL
SELECT 2,2,10 -- 10 as "that"/constans, assume "this"="lowest_threshold"
UNION ALL
SELECT 3,10,25 -- 25 as "higher_that"/constant, assume "higher_this"="that"
-- ...
UNION ALL
SELECT 99,100,999 -- 100 as "highest_threshold"/constant, assume levels count < 99
-- and 999 is over max possible value of actual_error


and then



SELECT t1.*, t2.level
FROM error_events t1, error_level_ranges t2
WHERE t1.actual_error >= t2.lower_bound
AND t1.actual_error < t2.upper_bound
/* or alternatively, dependent by a real logic
WHERE t1.actual_error > t2.lower_bound
AND t1.actual_error <= t2.upper_bound */


If you have a lot of error categorization schemes with different level counts and their borders, you must add a field (named similar to categorizing_scheme) into error_level_ranges table and proper additional expression like AND t2.categorizing_scheme=@current_scheme to conditions section.






share|improve this answer

























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "182"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    Jim is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f230323%2fsingle-column-user-defined-variable-based-on-a-comparison%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    I'd recommend you to create static, temporary or dynamic table which contains the adjacent border ranges for each error level normalized with “constant” value to avoid additional calculations (schema):





    CREATE TABLE error_level_ranges ( level, lower_bound, upper_bound )
    AS
    SELECT 1,-1,2 -- 2 as "lowest_threshold"/constant,
    -- assume -1 is below min possible value of actual_error
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 2,2,10 -- 10 as "that"/constans, assume "this"="lowest_threshold"
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 3,10,25 -- 25 as "higher_that"/constant, assume "higher_this"="that"
    -- ...
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 99,100,999 -- 100 as "highest_threshold"/constant, assume levels count < 99
    -- and 999 is over max possible value of actual_error


    and then



    SELECT t1.*, t2.level
    FROM error_events t1, error_level_ranges t2
    WHERE t1.actual_error >= t2.lower_bound
    AND t1.actual_error < t2.upper_bound
    /* or alternatively, dependent by a real logic
    WHERE t1.actual_error > t2.lower_bound
    AND t1.actual_error <= t2.upper_bound */


    If you have a lot of error categorization schemes with different level counts and their borders, you must add a field (named similar to categorizing_scheme) into error_level_ranges table and proper additional expression like AND t2.categorizing_scheme=@current_scheme to conditions section.






    share|improve this answer






























      0














      I'd recommend you to create static, temporary or dynamic table which contains the adjacent border ranges for each error level normalized with “constant” value to avoid additional calculations (schema):





      CREATE TABLE error_level_ranges ( level, lower_bound, upper_bound )
      AS
      SELECT 1,-1,2 -- 2 as "lowest_threshold"/constant,
      -- assume -1 is below min possible value of actual_error
      UNION ALL
      SELECT 2,2,10 -- 10 as "that"/constans, assume "this"="lowest_threshold"
      UNION ALL
      SELECT 3,10,25 -- 25 as "higher_that"/constant, assume "higher_this"="that"
      -- ...
      UNION ALL
      SELECT 99,100,999 -- 100 as "highest_threshold"/constant, assume levels count < 99
      -- and 999 is over max possible value of actual_error


      and then



      SELECT t1.*, t2.level
      FROM error_events t1, error_level_ranges t2
      WHERE t1.actual_error >= t2.lower_bound
      AND t1.actual_error < t2.upper_bound
      /* or alternatively, dependent by a real logic
      WHERE t1.actual_error > t2.lower_bound
      AND t1.actual_error <= t2.upper_bound */


      If you have a lot of error categorization schemes with different level counts and their borders, you must add a field (named similar to categorizing_scheme) into error_level_ranges table and proper additional expression like AND t2.categorizing_scheme=@current_scheme to conditions section.






      share|improve this answer




























        0












        0








        0







        I'd recommend you to create static, temporary or dynamic table which contains the adjacent border ranges for each error level normalized with “constant” value to avoid additional calculations (schema):





        CREATE TABLE error_level_ranges ( level, lower_bound, upper_bound )
        AS
        SELECT 1,-1,2 -- 2 as "lowest_threshold"/constant,
        -- assume -1 is below min possible value of actual_error
        UNION ALL
        SELECT 2,2,10 -- 10 as "that"/constans, assume "this"="lowest_threshold"
        UNION ALL
        SELECT 3,10,25 -- 25 as "higher_that"/constant, assume "higher_this"="that"
        -- ...
        UNION ALL
        SELECT 99,100,999 -- 100 as "highest_threshold"/constant, assume levels count < 99
        -- and 999 is over max possible value of actual_error


        and then



        SELECT t1.*, t2.level
        FROM error_events t1, error_level_ranges t2
        WHERE t1.actual_error >= t2.lower_bound
        AND t1.actual_error < t2.upper_bound
        /* or alternatively, dependent by a real logic
        WHERE t1.actual_error > t2.lower_bound
        AND t1.actual_error <= t2.upper_bound */


        If you have a lot of error categorization schemes with different level counts and their borders, you must add a field (named similar to categorizing_scheme) into error_level_ranges table and proper additional expression like AND t2.categorizing_scheme=@current_scheme to conditions section.






        share|improve this answer















        I'd recommend you to create static, temporary or dynamic table which contains the adjacent border ranges for each error level normalized with “constant” value to avoid additional calculations (schema):





        CREATE TABLE error_level_ranges ( level, lower_bound, upper_bound )
        AS
        SELECT 1,-1,2 -- 2 as "lowest_threshold"/constant,
        -- assume -1 is below min possible value of actual_error
        UNION ALL
        SELECT 2,2,10 -- 10 as "that"/constans, assume "this"="lowest_threshold"
        UNION ALL
        SELECT 3,10,25 -- 25 as "higher_that"/constant, assume "higher_this"="that"
        -- ...
        UNION ALL
        SELECT 99,100,999 -- 100 as "highest_threshold"/constant, assume levels count < 99
        -- and 999 is over max possible value of actual_error


        and then



        SELECT t1.*, t2.level
        FROM error_events t1, error_level_ranges t2
        WHERE t1.actual_error >= t2.lower_bound
        AND t1.actual_error < t2.upper_bound
        /* or alternatively, dependent by a real logic
        WHERE t1.actual_error > t2.lower_bound
        AND t1.actual_error <= t2.upper_bound */


        If you have a lot of error categorization schemes with different level counts and their borders, you must add a field (named similar to categorizing_scheme) into error_level_ranges table and proper additional expression like AND t2.categorizing_scheme=@current_scheme to conditions section.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 3 hours ago

























        answered 3 hours ago









        AkinaAkina

        4,0361311




        4,0361311






















            Jim is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Jim is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            Jim is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Jim is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f230323%2fsingle-column-user-defined-variable-based-on-a-comparison%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Anexo:Material bélico de la Fuerza Aérea de Chile Índice Aeronaves Defensa...

            Always On Availability groups resolving state after failover - Remote harden of transaction...

            update json value to null Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara ...