The Ohm's law calculations of the parts do not agree with the wholeOhm's Law for voltage dividerWhy doesn't...

Has Wakanda ever accepted refugees?

Where is this quote about overcoming the impossible said in "Interstellar"?

Should I use HTTPS on a domain that will only be used for redirection?

Called into a meeting and told we are being made redundant (laid off) and "not to share outside". Can I tell my partner?

Specific Chinese carabiner QA?

Plagiarism of code by other PhD student

Can a space-faring robot still function over a billion years?

How can I be pwned if I'm not registered on the compromised site?

Inconsistent behaviour between dict.values() and dict.keys() equality in Python 3.x and Python 2.7

How to mitigate "bandwagon attacking" from players?

Are there other characters in the Star Wars universe who had damaged bodies and needed to wear an outfit like Darth Vader?

“I had a flat in the centre of town, but I didn’t like living there, so …”

How can neutral atoms have exactly zero electric field when there is a difference in the positions of the charges?

Correct physics behind the colors on CD (compact disc)?

Difference between 'stomach' and 'uterus'

Reason why dimensional travelling would be restricted

Why did the Cray-1 have 8 parity bits per word?

What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?

Must 40/100G uplink ports on a 10G switch be connected to another switch?

Make me a metasequence

Do AL rules let me pick different starting equipment?

Are small insurances worth it

Wardrobe above a wall with fuse boxes

It doesn't matter the side you see it



The Ohm's law calculations of the parts do not agree with the whole


Ohm's Law for voltage dividerWhy doesn't it matter if a resistor is before or behind an LED wrt voltage drop?brief explanation of Ohm's lawOhm's Law confusion — can there be voltage without current?Voltage Drop Between Battery and LoadPlacing just an LED in a circuit?Voltage drops are not adding up to voltage of the sourceHow is open-circuit voltage calculated?What is the problem with this circuit? ( MOSFET + OPAMP) Battery protection circuit (draw current from battery)Resistor for buzzer current consumption limiting calculation













0












$begingroup$


In the circuit below, the Ohm's law calculations of the parts do not agree with the whole:




  1. the voltage drops of the parts do not add up to the total voltage, and

  2. the current does not calculate to be the same throughout the entire circuit.


Why? Actual VOM readings are in red and done with a digital VOM.



Circuit anomaly










share|improve this question









New contributor




Sanity Check is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What instrument was used to measure the voltages?
    $endgroup$
    – TimWescott
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    I assume you realize that I should have asked "Why?" before adding the last sentence, but I can see how that might be confusing. Maybe I can still edit my original comment and put "why?" in the correct place. The device I used is a E SUN DT830 Digital Multimeter.
    $endgroup$
    – Sanity Check
    1 hour ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Is there a resistance or loss between the components? Meaning if you check from the lead of 1 bulb to the other lead of the other is there a loss there? Is there a voltage drop between the last bulb and the battery? Voltage doesn't just disappear there is something that is measured when you measure both that is not being measured when measuring individually. If not then you have a bad meter.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Fay
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    Mine was a poorly-phrased request for instrument type and model number -- because a meter with an offset could give you results such as you see. Voltage loss in the wires, or shooting at a moving target as the battery voltage decreases, is much more likely.
    $endgroup$
    – TimWescott
    1 hour ago
















0












$begingroup$


In the circuit below, the Ohm's law calculations of the parts do not agree with the whole:




  1. the voltage drops of the parts do not add up to the total voltage, and

  2. the current does not calculate to be the same throughout the entire circuit.


Why? Actual VOM readings are in red and done with a digital VOM.



Circuit anomaly










share|improve this question









New contributor




Sanity Check is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What instrument was used to measure the voltages?
    $endgroup$
    – TimWescott
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    I assume you realize that I should have asked "Why?" before adding the last sentence, but I can see how that might be confusing. Maybe I can still edit my original comment and put "why?" in the correct place. The device I used is a E SUN DT830 Digital Multimeter.
    $endgroup$
    – Sanity Check
    1 hour ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Is there a resistance or loss between the components? Meaning if you check from the lead of 1 bulb to the other lead of the other is there a loss there? Is there a voltage drop between the last bulb and the battery? Voltage doesn't just disappear there is something that is measured when you measure both that is not being measured when measuring individually. If not then you have a bad meter.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Fay
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    Mine was a poorly-phrased request for instrument type and model number -- because a meter with an offset could give you results such as you see. Voltage loss in the wires, or shooting at a moving target as the battery voltage decreases, is much more likely.
    $endgroup$
    – TimWescott
    1 hour ago














0












0








0





$begingroup$


In the circuit below, the Ohm's law calculations of the parts do not agree with the whole:




  1. the voltage drops of the parts do not add up to the total voltage, and

  2. the current does not calculate to be the same throughout the entire circuit.


Why? Actual VOM readings are in red and done with a digital VOM.



Circuit anomaly










share|improve this question









New contributor




Sanity Check is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




In the circuit below, the Ohm's law calculations of the parts do not agree with the whole:




  1. the voltage drops of the parts do not add up to the total voltage, and

  2. the current does not calculate to be the same throughout the entire circuit.


Why? Actual VOM readings are in red and done with a digital VOM.



Circuit anomaly







voltage voltage-measurement






share|improve this question









New contributor




Sanity Check is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Sanity Check is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 59 mins ago









Dave Tweed

120k9149257




120k9149257






New contributor




Sanity Check is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 1 hour ago









Sanity CheckSanity Check

43




43




New contributor




Sanity Check is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Sanity Check is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Sanity Check is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What instrument was used to measure the voltages?
    $endgroup$
    – TimWescott
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    I assume you realize that I should have asked "Why?" before adding the last sentence, but I can see how that might be confusing. Maybe I can still edit my original comment and put "why?" in the correct place. The device I used is a E SUN DT830 Digital Multimeter.
    $endgroup$
    – Sanity Check
    1 hour ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Is there a resistance or loss between the components? Meaning if you check from the lead of 1 bulb to the other lead of the other is there a loss there? Is there a voltage drop between the last bulb and the battery? Voltage doesn't just disappear there is something that is measured when you measure both that is not being measured when measuring individually. If not then you have a bad meter.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Fay
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    Mine was a poorly-phrased request for instrument type and model number -- because a meter with an offset could give you results such as you see. Voltage loss in the wires, or shooting at a moving target as the battery voltage decreases, is much more likely.
    $endgroup$
    – TimWescott
    1 hour ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What instrument was used to measure the voltages?
    $endgroup$
    – TimWescott
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    I assume you realize that I should have asked "Why?" before adding the last sentence, but I can see how that might be confusing. Maybe I can still edit my original comment and put "why?" in the correct place. The device I used is a E SUN DT830 Digital Multimeter.
    $endgroup$
    – Sanity Check
    1 hour ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Is there a resistance or loss between the components? Meaning if you check from the lead of 1 bulb to the other lead of the other is there a loss there? Is there a voltage drop between the last bulb and the battery? Voltage doesn't just disappear there is something that is measured when you measure both that is not being measured when measuring individually. If not then you have a bad meter.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Fay
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    Mine was a poorly-phrased request for instrument type and model number -- because a meter with an offset could give you results such as you see. Voltage loss in the wires, or shooting at a moving target as the battery voltage decreases, is much more likely.
    $endgroup$
    – TimWescott
    1 hour ago








1




1




$begingroup$
What instrument was used to measure the voltages?
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
What instrument was used to measure the voltages?
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
I assume you realize that I should have asked "Why?" before adding the last sentence, but I can see how that might be confusing. Maybe I can still edit my original comment and put "why?" in the correct place. The device I used is a E SUN DT830 Digital Multimeter.
$endgroup$
– Sanity Check
1 hour ago






$begingroup$
I assume you realize that I should have asked "Why?" before adding the last sentence, but I can see how that might be confusing. Maybe I can still edit my original comment and put "why?" in the correct place. The device I used is a E SUN DT830 Digital Multimeter.
$endgroup$
– Sanity Check
1 hour ago






1




1




$begingroup$
Is there a resistance or loss between the components? Meaning if you check from the lead of 1 bulb to the other lead of the other is there a loss there? Is there a voltage drop between the last bulb and the battery? Voltage doesn't just disappear there is something that is measured when you measure both that is not being measured when measuring individually. If not then you have a bad meter.
$endgroup$
– Robert Fay
1 hour ago






$begingroup$
Is there a resistance or loss between the components? Meaning if you check from the lead of 1 bulb to the other lead of the other is there a loss there? Is there a voltage drop between the last bulb and the battery? Voltage doesn't just disappear there is something that is measured when you measure both that is not being measured when measuring individually. If not then you have a bad meter.
$endgroup$
– Robert Fay
1 hour ago














$begingroup$
Mine was a poorly-phrased request for instrument type and model number -- because a meter with an offset could give you results such as you see. Voltage loss in the wires, or shooting at a moving target as the battery voltage decreases, is much more likely.
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Mine was a poorly-phrased request for instrument type and model number -- because a meter with an offset could give you results such as you see. Voltage loss in the wires, or shooting at a moving target as the battery voltage decreases, is much more likely.
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

the most probable causses for the discrepancies are the following:




  1. The DT830 is not known as a quality meter. Inaccuracies in the readings are one cause of the problem.

  2. You are drawing almost 300 ma from a D battery. At that level the voltage of the battery will tend to drop fairly quickly. Depending on how fast you take the measurements, the readings can vary due to that factor. Note that your own readings show a 0.2 drop in voltage from no load to full load.
    As a test of your meter try measuring the voltage of each of your D cells and compare it to the total voltage.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    Ohm's Law and KVL always applies but the voltage drop is nonlinear with time due to thermal effects so bulbs never match perfectly and the voltages are never equal.



    Bulbs are nonlinear PTC ( positive temp coefficient ) conductors that rise in R by 10x at rated power with temperatures of say 2500'K.



    So R (hot/cold) ratio ~ 10:1 for bright warm white light (hot) and room temp (cold).



    This means if you put two 6V bulbs in series with a 6V battery, you will never ever get 3V each.



    The bulb with even the slightest higher cold resistance heats up faster in temperature will rise in resistance faster and thus drop more voltage than the other bulb, resulting in a runaway condition where that bulb will have full power and the other about 10 %. Putting a resistor in series as you have done reduces the balance difference between R cold= est. 0.5 Ohms and R hot est= 5 Ohms x 0.3A 1.5V



    Although this is the extreme case where the bulbs are most sensitive to resistance changes at half voltage, it means your measurements probably changed while you were taking the readings.



    Is it repeatable? Is it stable? Measure again.



    If the load voltage is 5.9V @ 0.3A and the no-load Vbat=6.1V then the 4 battery cells have an internal resistance ESR = 0.2V/0.3A= 0.67 Ohms total.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      let me run a quick simulation to prove that
      $endgroup$
      – Sunnyskyguy EE75
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      Close approximation tinyurl.com/yxvdmqyk
      $endgroup$
      – Sunnyskyguy EE75
      40 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      Here using 1.05W@3V bulb and 1.1W bulb @ 3V tinyurl.com/y6etgsxk
      $endgroup$
      – Sunnyskyguy EE75
      30 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      Wow, give me a chance to digest all that. Very sharp action diagram, but with my limited knowledge I don't see the + end distinguished on the circuits. And right now the wife says dinner is ready...later!
      $endgroup$
      – Sanity Check
      11 mins ago











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
    StackExchange.schematics.init();
    });
    }, "cicuitlab");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "135"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    Sanity Check is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f425985%2fthe-ohms-law-calculations-of-the-parts-do-not-agree-with-the-whole%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4












    $begingroup$

    the most probable causses for the discrepancies are the following:




    1. The DT830 is not known as a quality meter. Inaccuracies in the readings are one cause of the problem.

    2. You are drawing almost 300 ma from a D battery. At that level the voltage of the battery will tend to drop fairly quickly. Depending on how fast you take the measurements, the readings can vary due to that factor. Note that your own readings show a 0.2 drop in voltage from no load to full load.
      As a test of your meter try measuring the voltage of each of your D cells and compare it to the total voltage.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      4












      $begingroup$

      the most probable causses for the discrepancies are the following:




      1. The DT830 is not known as a quality meter. Inaccuracies in the readings are one cause of the problem.

      2. You are drawing almost 300 ma from a D battery. At that level the voltage of the battery will tend to drop fairly quickly. Depending on how fast you take the measurements, the readings can vary due to that factor. Note that your own readings show a 0.2 drop in voltage from no load to full load.
        As a test of your meter try measuring the voltage of each of your D cells and compare it to the total voltage.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        the most probable causses for the discrepancies are the following:




        1. The DT830 is not known as a quality meter. Inaccuracies in the readings are one cause of the problem.

        2. You are drawing almost 300 ma from a D battery. At that level the voltage of the battery will tend to drop fairly quickly. Depending on how fast you take the measurements, the readings can vary due to that factor. Note that your own readings show a 0.2 drop in voltage from no load to full load.
          As a test of your meter try measuring the voltage of each of your D cells and compare it to the total voltage.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        the most probable causses for the discrepancies are the following:




        1. The DT830 is not known as a quality meter. Inaccuracies in the readings are one cause of the problem.

        2. You are drawing almost 300 ma from a D battery. At that level the voltage of the battery will tend to drop fairly quickly. Depending on how fast you take the measurements, the readings can vary due to that factor. Note that your own readings show a 0.2 drop in voltage from no load to full load.
          As a test of your meter try measuring the voltage of each of your D cells and compare it to the total voltage.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 1 hour ago









        Dave Tweed

        120k9149257




        120k9149257










        answered 1 hour ago









        BarryBarry

        9,95211516




        9,95211516

























            1












            $begingroup$

            Ohm's Law and KVL always applies but the voltage drop is nonlinear with time due to thermal effects so bulbs never match perfectly and the voltages are never equal.



            Bulbs are nonlinear PTC ( positive temp coefficient ) conductors that rise in R by 10x at rated power with temperatures of say 2500'K.



            So R (hot/cold) ratio ~ 10:1 for bright warm white light (hot) and room temp (cold).



            This means if you put two 6V bulbs in series with a 6V battery, you will never ever get 3V each.



            The bulb with even the slightest higher cold resistance heats up faster in temperature will rise in resistance faster and thus drop more voltage than the other bulb, resulting in a runaway condition where that bulb will have full power and the other about 10 %. Putting a resistor in series as you have done reduces the balance difference between R cold= est. 0.5 Ohms and R hot est= 5 Ohms x 0.3A 1.5V



            Although this is the extreme case where the bulbs are most sensitive to resistance changes at half voltage, it means your measurements probably changed while you were taking the readings.



            Is it repeatable? Is it stable? Measure again.



            If the load voltage is 5.9V @ 0.3A and the no-load Vbat=6.1V then the 4 battery cells have an internal resistance ESR = 0.2V/0.3A= 0.67 Ohms total.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              let me run a quick simulation to prove that
              $endgroup$
              – Sunnyskyguy EE75
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              Close approximation tinyurl.com/yxvdmqyk
              $endgroup$
              – Sunnyskyguy EE75
              40 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              Here using 1.05W@3V bulb and 1.1W bulb @ 3V tinyurl.com/y6etgsxk
              $endgroup$
              – Sunnyskyguy EE75
              30 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              Wow, give me a chance to digest all that. Very sharp action diagram, but with my limited knowledge I don't see the + end distinguished on the circuits. And right now the wife says dinner is ready...later!
              $endgroup$
              – Sanity Check
              11 mins ago
















            1












            $begingroup$

            Ohm's Law and KVL always applies but the voltage drop is nonlinear with time due to thermal effects so bulbs never match perfectly and the voltages are never equal.



            Bulbs are nonlinear PTC ( positive temp coefficient ) conductors that rise in R by 10x at rated power with temperatures of say 2500'K.



            So R (hot/cold) ratio ~ 10:1 for bright warm white light (hot) and room temp (cold).



            This means if you put two 6V bulbs in series with a 6V battery, you will never ever get 3V each.



            The bulb with even the slightest higher cold resistance heats up faster in temperature will rise in resistance faster and thus drop more voltage than the other bulb, resulting in a runaway condition where that bulb will have full power and the other about 10 %. Putting a resistor in series as you have done reduces the balance difference between R cold= est. 0.5 Ohms and R hot est= 5 Ohms x 0.3A 1.5V



            Although this is the extreme case where the bulbs are most sensitive to resistance changes at half voltage, it means your measurements probably changed while you were taking the readings.



            Is it repeatable? Is it stable? Measure again.



            If the load voltage is 5.9V @ 0.3A and the no-load Vbat=6.1V then the 4 battery cells have an internal resistance ESR = 0.2V/0.3A= 0.67 Ohms total.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              let me run a quick simulation to prove that
              $endgroup$
              – Sunnyskyguy EE75
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              Close approximation tinyurl.com/yxvdmqyk
              $endgroup$
              – Sunnyskyguy EE75
              40 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              Here using 1.05W@3V bulb and 1.1W bulb @ 3V tinyurl.com/y6etgsxk
              $endgroup$
              – Sunnyskyguy EE75
              30 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              Wow, give me a chance to digest all that. Very sharp action diagram, but with my limited knowledge I don't see the + end distinguished on the circuits. And right now the wife says dinner is ready...later!
              $endgroup$
              – Sanity Check
              11 mins ago














            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            Ohm's Law and KVL always applies but the voltage drop is nonlinear with time due to thermal effects so bulbs never match perfectly and the voltages are never equal.



            Bulbs are nonlinear PTC ( positive temp coefficient ) conductors that rise in R by 10x at rated power with temperatures of say 2500'K.



            So R (hot/cold) ratio ~ 10:1 for bright warm white light (hot) and room temp (cold).



            This means if you put two 6V bulbs in series with a 6V battery, you will never ever get 3V each.



            The bulb with even the slightest higher cold resistance heats up faster in temperature will rise in resistance faster and thus drop more voltage than the other bulb, resulting in a runaway condition where that bulb will have full power and the other about 10 %. Putting a resistor in series as you have done reduces the balance difference between R cold= est. 0.5 Ohms and R hot est= 5 Ohms x 0.3A 1.5V



            Although this is the extreme case where the bulbs are most sensitive to resistance changes at half voltage, it means your measurements probably changed while you were taking the readings.



            Is it repeatable? Is it stable? Measure again.



            If the load voltage is 5.9V @ 0.3A and the no-load Vbat=6.1V then the 4 battery cells have an internal resistance ESR = 0.2V/0.3A= 0.67 Ohms total.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Ohm's Law and KVL always applies but the voltage drop is nonlinear with time due to thermal effects so bulbs never match perfectly and the voltages are never equal.



            Bulbs are nonlinear PTC ( positive temp coefficient ) conductors that rise in R by 10x at rated power with temperatures of say 2500'K.



            So R (hot/cold) ratio ~ 10:1 for bright warm white light (hot) and room temp (cold).



            This means if you put two 6V bulbs in series with a 6V battery, you will never ever get 3V each.



            The bulb with even the slightest higher cold resistance heats up faster in temperature will rise in resistance faster and thus drop more voltage than the other bulb, resulting in a runaway condition where that bulb will have full power and the other about 10 %. Putting a resistor in series as you have done reduces the balance difference between R cold= est. 0.5 Ohms and R hot est= 5 Ohms x 0.3A 1.5V



            Although this is the extreme case where the bulbs are most sensitive to resistance changes at half voltage, it means your measurements probably changed while you were taking the readings.



            Is it repeatable? Is it stable? Measure again.



            If the load voltage is 5.9V @ 0.3A and the no-load Vbat=6.1V then the 4 battery cells have an internal resistance ESR = 0.2V/0.3A= 0.67 Ohms total.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 28 mins ago

























            answered 1 hour ago









            Sunnyskyguy EE75Sunnyskyguy EE75

            68k22398




            68k22398












            • $begingroup$
              let me run a quick simulation to prove that
              $endgroup$
              – Sunnyskyguy EE75
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              Close approximation tinyurl.com/yxvdmqyk
              $endgroup$
              – Sunnyskyguy EE75
              40 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              Here using 1.05W@3V bulb and 1.1W bulb @ 3V tinyurl.com/y6etgsxk
              $endgroup$
              – Sunnyskyguy EE75
              30 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              Wow, give me a chance to digest all that. Very sharp action diagram, but with my limited knowledge I don't see the + end distinguished on the circuits. And right now the wife says dinner is ready...later!
              $endgroup$
              – Sanity Check
              11 mins ago


















            • $begingroup$
              let me run a quick simulation to prove that
              $endgroup$
              – Sunnyskyguy EE75
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              Close approximation tinyurl.com/yxvdmqyk
              $endgroup$
              – Sunnyskyguy EE75
              40 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              Here using 1.05W@3V bulb and 1.1W bulb @ 3V tinyurl.com/y6etgsxk
              $endgroup$
              – Sunnyskyguy EE75
              30 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              Wow, give me a chance to digest all that. Very sharp action diagram, but with my limited knowledge I don't see the + end distinguished on the circuits. And right now the wife says dinner is ready...later!
              $endgroup$
              – Sanity Check
              11 mins ago
















            $begingroup$
            let me run a quick simulation to prove that
            $endgroup$
            – Sunnyskyguy EE75
            1 hour ago




            $begingroup$
            let me run a quick simulation to prove that
            $endgroup$
            – Sunnyskyguy EE75
            1 hour ago












            $begingroup$
            Close approximation tinyurl.com/yxvdmqyk
            $endgroup$
            – Sunnyskyguy EE75
            40 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            Close approximation tinyurl.com/yxvdmqyk
            $endgroup$
            – Sunnyskyguy EE75
            40 mins ago












            $begingroup$
            Here using 1.05W@3V bulb and 1.1W bulb @ 3V tinyurl.com/y6etgsxk
            $endgroup$
            – Sunnyskyguy EE75
            30 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            Here using 1.05W@3V bulb and 1.1W bulb @ 3V tinyurl.com/y6etgsxk
            $endgroup$
            – Sunnyskyguy EE75
            30 mins ago












            $begingroup$
            Wow, give me a chance to digest all that. Very sharp action diagram, but with my limited knowledge I don't see the + end distinguished on the circuits. And right now the wife says dinner is ready...later!
            $endgroup$
            – Sanity Check
            11 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            Wow, give me a chance to digest all that. Very sharp action diagram, but with my limited knowledge I don't see the + end distinguished on the circuits. And right now the wife says dinner is ready...later!
            $endgroup$
            – Sanity Check
            11 mins ago










            Sanity Check is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Sanity Check is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            Sanity Check is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Sanity Check is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f425985%2fthe-ohms-law-calculations-of-the-parts-do-not-agree-with-the-whole%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Parapolítica Índice Antecedentes El escándalo Proceso judicial Consecuencias Véase...

            How to remove border from elements in the last row?Targeting flex items on the last rowHow to vertically wrap...

            Tecnologías entrañables Índice Antecedentes Desarrollo Tecnologías Entrañables en la...