Create a temp table that consolidates start and end dates plus generates a uniqueid for each consolidated...
Can one live in the U.S. and not use a credit card?
MySQL importing CSV files really slow
Having the player face themselves after the mid-game
Source permutation
I need help with tikz tree node and label, offsets and inclination
Is it safe to abruptly remove Arduino power?
Can I negotiate a patent idea for a raise, under French law?
Vocabulary for giving just numbers, not a full answer
Confusion about Complex Continued Fraction
How can I manipulate the output of Information?
I can't die. Who am I?
Why is there an extra space when I type "ls" in the Desktop directory?
What materials can be used to make a humanoid skin warm?
Is divide-by-zero a security vulnerability?
Street obstacles in New Zealand
How to resolve: Reviewer #1 says remove section X vs. Reviewer #2 says expand section X
Possible to detect presence of nuclear bomb?
Was it really inappropriate to write a pull request for the company I interviewed with?
Doesn't allowing a user mode program to access kernel space memory and execute the IN and OUT instructions defeat the purpose of having CPU modes?
Is a piano played in the same way as a harmonium?
How can I find out information about a service?
How do spaceships determine each other's mass in space?
Specifying a starting column with colortbl package and xcolor
The meaning of ‘otherwise’
Create a temp table that consolidates start and end dates plus generates a uniqueid for each consolidated record
best practice for 'staging' relation in stored procedure: use temp table, or view?Create and fill temp tableCreate separate temporary table/view and variables for every queryMySQL : Avoid Temporary/Filesort Caused by GROUP BY Clause in ViewsCreate View For All Table Names Listed In TableSQL - Restricted view for transient (stateless) userQuery to calculate start and end dates from a list of only start datesHow to create a stored procedure that can insert a record into two tables [Informix]Why does truncating a temp table at the end of the stored procedure that creates it free tempdb space faster?Refactoring subquery to JOIN and CROSS APPLY, get only row for each record in parent table
Hey Microsoft SQL Gurus I need your help, please. This is my
first post, and I have a table called projecthistory,
it’s actually a view so I could take advantage of the Rank()function to get a unique record number. From this view I need to create a temp table that has a uniqueid field which would be calculated bases on these rules. Rule 1 - The next sequential record for the id changes from one project to another or Rule 2 - If the id and project match for the next sequential record , but the days between the end date of the current record and start date of the next record for the is more than 7 days. It would also consolidate the start and end dates appropriately for each group. I believe this would be best done in a stored procedure that can call the data when needed, but I'm fairly new to stored procedures. Here is an example of the table data, as well as the desired output.
Projecthistory
╔════════╦══════╦═════════╦═══════════╦═══════════╗
║ Record ║ Id ║ Project ║ Start ║ End ║
╠════════╬══════╬═════════╬═══════════╬═══════════╣
║ 1 ║ 1111 ║ A ║ 1/1/2016 ║ 1/7/2016 ║
║ 2 ║ 1111 ║ A ║ 1/10/2016 ║ 1/20/2016 ║
║ 3 ║ 1111 ║ B ║ 1/21/2016 ║ 1/25/2016 ║
║ 4 ║ 1111 ║ A ║ 1/26/2016 ║ NULL ║
║ 5 ║ 2222 ║ A ║ 1/1/2016 ║ 2/1/2016 ║
║ 6 ║ 2222 ║ B ║ 2/2/2016 ║ NULL ║
║ 7 ║ 3333 ║ D ║ 1/15/2016 ║ 2/1/2016 ║
║ 8 ║ 4444 ║ B ║ 2/10/2016 ║ NULL ║
║ 9 ║ 5555 ║ A ║ 2/1/2016 ║ 2/5/2016 ║
║ 10 ║ 5555 ║ A ║ 2/20/2016 ║ 2/27/2016 ║
║ 11 ║ 5555 ║ A ║ 2/28/2016 ║ 3/10/2016 ║
║ 12 ║ 5555 ║ A ║ 3/11/2016 ║ NULL ║
╚════════╩══════╩═════════╩═══════════╩═══════════╝
Desired output
╔════════╦══════╦═════════╦══════════════╦════════════╗
║ unique ║ Id ║ Project ║ ProjectStart ║ ProjectEnd ║
╠════════╬══════╬═════════╬══════════════╬════════════╣
║ 1111A1 ║ 1111 ║ A ║ 1/1/2016 ║ 1/20/2016 ║
║ 1111B1 ║ 1111 ║ B ║ 1/21/2016 ║ 1/25/2016 ║
║ 1111A2 ║ 1111 ║ A ║ 1/26/2016 ║ NULL ║
║ 2222A1 ║ 2222 ║ A ║ 1/1/2016 ║ 2/1/2016 ║
║ 2222B1 ║ 2222 ║ B ║ 2/2/2016 ║ NULL ║
║ 3333D1 ║ 3333 ║ D ║ 1/15/2016 ║ 2/1/2016 ║
║ 4444B1 ║ 4444 ║ B ║ 2/10/2016 ║ NULL ║
║ 5555A1 ║ 5555 ║ A ║ 2/1/2016 ║ 2/5/2016 ║
║ 5555A2 ║ 5555 ║ A ║ 2/20/2016 ║ Null ║
╚════════╩══════╩═════════╩══════════════╩════════════╝
Here are some notes about the desired output and some of
more difficult scenario’s in this data.
Take note that records 1-2 became 1111A1, record 3 becomes 1111b1,
record 4 became the second instance of that project for id 1111 so its uniqueid became 1111A2, be careful this doesn’t get lumped
in with records 1&2. Record 9 become 55555A1 and because of the date gap
between records 9&10, record 10-12 became uniqueid
5555A2
I look forward to any solutions, feedback or questions. I’m
truly grateful in advance.
sql-server-2008-r2 stored-procedures view
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 4 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
Hey Microsoft SQL Gurus I need your help, please. This is my
first post, and I have a table called projecthistory,
it’s actually a view so I could take advantage of the Rank()function to get a unique record number. From this view I need to create a temp table that has a uniqueid field which would be calculated bases on these rules. Rule 1 - The next sequential record for the id changes from one project to another or Rule 2 - If the id and project match for the next sequential record , but the days between the end date of the current record and start date of the next record for the is more than 7 days. It would also consolidate the start and end dates appropriately for each group. I believe this would be best done in a stored procedure that can call the data when needed, but I'm fairly new to stored procedures. Here is an example of the table data, as well as the desired output.
Projecthistory
╔════════╦══════╦═════════╦═══════════╦═══════════╗
║ Record ║ Id ║ Project ║ Start ║ End ║
╠════════╬══════╬═════════╬═══════════╬═══════════╣
║ 1 ║ 1111 ║ A ║ 1/1/2016 ║ 1/7/2016 ║
║ 2 ║ 1111 ║ A ║ 1/10/2016 ║ 1/20/2016 ║
║ 3 ║ 1111 ║ B ║ 1/21/2016 ║ 1/25/2016 ║
║ 4 ║ 1111 ║ A ║ 1/26/2016 ║ NULL ║
║ 5 ║ 2222 ║ A ║ 1/1/2016 ║ 2/1/2016 ║
║ 6 ║ 2222 ║ B ║ 2/2/2016 ║ NULL ║
║ 7 ║ 3333 ║ D ║ 1/15/2016 ║ 2/1/2016 ║
║ 8 ║ 4444 ║ B ║ 2/10/2016 ║ NULL ║
║ 9 ║ 5555 ║ A ║ 2/1/2016 ║ 2/5/2016 ║
║ 10 ║ 5555 ║ A ║ 2/20/2016 ║ 2/27/2016 ║
║ 11 ║ 5555 ║ A ║ 2/28/2016 ║ 3/10/2016 ║
║ 12 ║ 5555 ║ A ║ 3/11/2016 ║ NULL ║
╚════════╩══════╩═════════╩═══════════╩═══════════╝
Desired output
╔════════╦══════╦═════════╦══════════════╦════════════╗
║ unique ║ Id ║ Project ║ ProjectStart ║ ProjectEnd ║
╠════════╬══════╬═════════╬══════════════╬════════════╣
║ 1111A1 ║ 1111 ║ A ║ 1/1/2016 ║ 1/20/2016 ║
║ 1111B1 ║ 1111 ║ B ║ 1/21/2016 ║ 1/25/2016 ║
║ 1111A2 ║ 1111 ║ A ║ 1/26/2016 ║ NULL ║
║ 2222A1 ║ 2222 ║ A ║ 1/1/2016 ║ 2/1/2016 ║
║ 2222B1 ║ 2222 ║ B ║ 2/2/2016 ║ NULL ║
║ 3333D1 ║ 3333 ║ D ║ 1/15/2016 ║ 2/1/2016 ║
║ 4444B1 ║ 4444 ║ B ║ 2/10/2016 ║ NULL ║
║ 5555A1 ║ 5555 ║ A ║ 2/1/2016 ║ 2/5/2016 ║
║ 5555A2 ║ 5555 ║ A ║ 2/20/2016 ║ Null ║
╚════════╩══════╩═════════╩══════════════╩════════════╝
Here are some notes about the desired output and some of
more difficult scenario’s in this data.
Take note that records 1-2 became 1111A1, record 3 becomes 1111b1,
record 4 became the second instance of that project for id 1111 so its uniqueid became 1111A2, be careful this doesn’t get lumped
in with records 1&2. Record 9 become 55555A1 and because of the date gap
between records 9&10, record 10-12 became uniqueid
5555A2
I look forward to any solutions, feedback or questions. I’m
truly grateful in advance.
sql-server-2008-r2 stored-procedures view
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 4 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Based on your opening statement, this is SQL Server? Could you tag it as the correct version?
– Dan
Mar 9 '16 at 20:58
Sorry about that Dan. I've updated the tag.
– Josh
Mar 9 '16 at 21:22
Ok. I think I figured it out, but its really slow. Takes about 30 seconds to run against 3000 projecthistory records, but I do get the results I'm looking for. One thing I did forget in my initial question, was the location field.
– Josh
Mar 11 '16 at 14:58
add a comment |
Hey Microsoft SQL Gurus I need your help, please. This is my
first post, and I have a table called projecthistory,
it’s actually a view so I could take advantage of the Rank()function to get a unique record number. From this view I need to create a temp table that has a uniqueid field which would be calculated bases on these rules. Rule 1 - The next sequential record for the id changes from one project to another or Rule 2 - If the id and project match for the next sequential record , but the days between the end date of the current record and start date of the next record for the is more than 7 days. It would also consolidate the start and end dates appropriately for each group. I believe this would be best done in a stored procedure that can call the data when needed, but I'm fairly new to stored procedures. Here is an example of the table data, as well as the desired output.
Projecthistory
╔════════╦══════╦═════════╦═══════════╦═══════════╗
║ Record ║ Id ║ Project ║ Start ║ End ║
╠════════╬══════╬═════════╬═══════════╬═══════════╣
║ 1 ║ 1111 ║ A ║ 1/1/2016 ║ 1/7/2016 ║
║ 2 ║ 1111 ║ A ║ 1/10/2016 ║ 1/20/2016 ║
║ 3 ║ 1111 ║ B ║ 1/21/2016 ║ 1/25/2016 ║
║ 4 ║ 1111 ║ A ║ 1/26/2016 ║ NULL ║
║ 5 ║ 2222 ║ A ║ 1/1/2016 ║ 2/1/2016 ║
║ 6 ║ 2222 ║ B ║ 2/2/2016 ║ NULL ║
║ 7 ║ 3333 ║ D ║ 1/15/2016 ║ 2/1/2016 ║
║ 8 ║ 4444 ║ B ║ 2/10/2016 ║ NULL ║
║ 9 ║ 5555 ║ A ║ 2/1/2016 ║ 2/5/2016 ║
║ 10 ║ 5555 ║ A ║ 2/20/2016 ║ 2/27/2016 ║
║ 11 ║ 5555 ║ A ║ 2/28/2016 ║ 3/10/2016 ║
║ 12 ║ 5555 ║ A ║ 3/11/2016 ║ NULL ║
╚════════╩══════╩═════════╩═══════════╩═══════════╝
Desired output
╔════════╦══════╦═════════╦══════════════╦════════════╗
║ unique ║ Id ║ Project ║ ProjectStart ║ ProjectEnd ║
╠════════╬══════╬═════════╬══════════════╬════════════╣
║ 1111A1 ║ 1111 ║ A ║ 1/1/2016 ║ 1/20/2016 ║
║ 1111B1 ║ 1111 ║ B ║ 1/21/2016 ║ 1/25/2016 ║
║ 1111A2 ║ 1111 ║ A ║ 1/26/2016 ║ NULL ║
║ 2222A1 ║ 2222 ║ A ║ 1/1/2016 ║ 2/1/2016 ║
║ 2222B1 ║ 2222 ║ B ║ 2/2/2016 ║ NULL ║
║ 3333D1 ║ 3333 ║ D ║ 1/15/2016 ║ 2/1/2016 ║
║ 4444B1 ║ 4444 ║ B ║ 2/10/2016 ║ NULL ║
║ 5555A1 ║ 5555 ║ A ║ 2/1/2016 ║ 2/5/2016 ║
║ 5555A2 ║ 5555 ║ A ║ 2/20/2016 ║ Null ║
╚════════╩══════╩═════════╩══════════════╩════════════╝
Here are some notes about the desired output and some of
more difficult scenario’s in this data.
Take note that records 1-2 became 1111A1, record 3 becomes 1111b1,
record 4 became the second instance of that project for id 1111 so its uniqueid became 1111A2, be careful this doesn’t get lumped
in with records 1&2. Record 9 become 55555A1 and because of the date gap
between records 9&10, record 10-12 became uniqueid
5555A2
I look forward to any solutions, feedback or questions. I’m
truly grateful in advance.
sql-server-2008-r2 stored-procedures view
Hey Microsoft SQL Gurus I need your help, please. This is my
first post, and I have a table called projecthistory,
it’s actually a view so I could take advantage of the Rank()function to get a unique record number. From this view I need to create a temp table that has a uniqueid field which would be calculated bases on these rules. Rule 1 - The next sequential record for the id changes from one project to another or Rule 2 - If the id and project match for the next sequential record , but the days between the end date of the current record and start date of the next record for the is more than 7 days. It would also consolidate the start and end dates appropriately for each group. I believe this would be best done in a stored procedure that can call the data when needed, but I'm fairly new to stored procedures. Here is an example of the table data, as well as the desired output.
Projecthistory
╔════════╦══════╦═════════╦═══════════╦═══════════╗
║ Record ║ Id ║ Project ║ Start ║ End ║
╠════════╬══════╬═════════╬═══════════╬═══════════╣
║ 1 ║ 1111 ║ A ║ 1/1/2016 ║ 1/7/2016 ║
║ 2 ║ 1111 ║ A ║ 1/10/2016 ║ 1/20/2016 ║
║ 3 ║ 1111 ║ B ║ 1/21/2016 ║ 1/25/2016 ║
║ 4 ║ 1111 ║ A ║ 1/26/2016 ║ NULL ║
║ 5 ║ 2222 ║ A ║ 1/1/2016 ║ 2/1/2016 ║
║ 6 ║ 2222 ║ B ║ 2/2/2016 ║ NULL ║
║ 7 ║ 3333 ║ D ║ 1/15/2016 ║ 2/1/2016 ║
║ 8 ║ 4444 ║ B ║ 2/10/2016 ║ NULL ║
║ 9 ║ 5555 ║ A ║ 2/1/2016 ║ 2/5/2016 ║
║ 10 ║ 5555 ║ A ║ 2/20/2016 ║ 2/27/2016 ║
║ 11 ║ 5555 ║ A ║ 2/28/2016 ║ 3/10/2016 ║
║ 12 ║ 5555 ║ A ║ 3/11/2016 ║ NULL ║
╚════════╩══════╩═════════╩═══════════╩═══════════╝
Desired output
╔════════╦══════╦═════════╦══════════════╦════════════╗
║ unique ║ Id ║ Project ║ ProjectStart ║ ProjectEnd ║
╠════════╬══════╬═════════╬══════════════╬════════════╣
║ 1111A1 ║ 1111 ║ A ║ 1/1/2016 ║ 1/20/2016 ║
║ 1111B1 ║ 1111 ║ B ║ 1/21/2016 ║ 1/25/2016 ║
║ 1111A2 ║ 1111 ║ A ║ 1/26/2016 ║ NULL ║
║ 2222A1 ║ 2222 ║ A ║ 1/1/2016 ║ 2/1/2016 ║
║ 2222B1 ║ 2222 ║ B ║ 2/2/2016 ║ NULL ║
║ 3333D1 ║ 3333 ║ D ║ 1/15/2016 ║ 2/1/2016 ║
║ 4444B1 ║ 4444 ║ B ║ 2/10/2016 ║ NULL ║
║ 5555A1 ║ 5555 ║ A ║ 2/1/2016 ║ 2/5/2016 ║
║ 5555A2 ║ 5555 ║ A ║ 2/20/2016 ║ Null ║
╚════════╩══════╩═════════╩══════════════╩════════════╝
Here are some notes about the desired output and some of
more difficult scenario’s in this data.
Take note that records 1-2 became 1111A1, record 3 becomes 1111b1,
record 4 became the second instance of that project for id 1111 so its uniqueid became 1111A2, be careful this doesn’t get lumped
in with records 1&2. Record 9 become 55555A1 and because of the date gap
between records 9&10, record 10-12 became uniqueid
5555A2
I look forward to any solutions, feedback or questions. I’m
truly grateful in advance.
sql-server-2008-r2 stored-procedures view
sql-server-2008-r2 stored-procedures view
edited Mar 9 '16 at 21:22
Josh
asked Mar 9 '16 at 20:13
JoshJosh
1
1
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 4 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 4 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Based on your opening statement, this is SQL Server? Could you tag it as the correct version?
– Dan
Mar 9 '16 at 20:58
Sorry about that Dan. I've updated the tag.
– Josh
Mar 9 '16 at 21:22
Ok. I think I figured it out, but its really slow. Takes about 30 seconds to run against 3000 projecthistory records, but I do get the results I'm looking for. One thing I did forget in my initial question, was the location field.
– Josh
Mar 11 '16 at 14:58
add a comment |
Based on your opening statement, this is SQL Server? Could you tag it as the correct version?
– Dan
Mar 9 '16 at 20:58
Sorry about that Dan. I've updated the tag.
– Josh
Mar 9 '16 at 21:22
Ok. I think I figured it out, but its really slow. Takes about 30 seconds to run against 3000 projecthistory records, but I do get the results I'm looking for. One thing I did forget in my initial question, was the location field.
– Josh
Mar 11 '16 at 14:58
Based on your opening statement, this is SQL Server? Could you tag it as the correct version?
– Dan
Mar 9 '16 at 20:58
Based on your opening statement, this is SQL Server? Could you tag it as the correct version?
– Dan
Mar 9 '16 at 20:58
Sorry about that Dan. I've updated the tag.
– Josh
Mar 9 '16 at 21:22
Sorry about that Dan. I've updated the tag.
– Josh
Mar 9 '16 at 21:22
Ok. I think I figured it out, but its really slow. Takes about 30 seconds to run against 3000 projecthistory records, but I do get the results I'm looking for. One thing I did forget in my initial question, was the location field.
– Josh
Mar 11 '16 at 14:58
Ok. I think I figured it out, but its really slow. Takes about 30 seconds to run against 3000 projecthistory records, but I do get the results I'm looking for. One thing I did forget in my initial question, was the location field.
– Josh
Mar 11 '16 at 14:58
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
ok I think I got it. I was able to get the results I was looking for using the following code, but it is slow when executing it to get the results. One thing I forget, was the location column, so I was sure to account for this in my code. I did end up breaking the uid and instance into two separate fields, but I know I could have merged them into one. I figured this would give me greater flexibility when pulling data against it in the future. Feel free to improve, I know I would appreciate it. I'm also happy to be posting my first answer. Thanks!
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[ProjectTracking]
AS
BEGIN
-- Insert statements for procedure here
SET NOCOUNT ON;
DECLARE @max int
DECLARE @i int
Declare @tinstance int
Declare @tuid varchar(20)
DECLARE @puid varchar(20)
Declare @pinstance int
DECLARE @pid int
DECLARE @pproject varchar(10)
DECLARE @plocation varchar(10)
DECLARE @pstart datetime
DECLARE @pend datetime
DECLARE @cuid varchar(20)
Declare @crecord int
DECLARE @cid int
DECLARE @cproject varchar(10)
DECLARE @clocation varchar(10)
DECLARE @cstart datetime
DECLARE @cend datetime
select @max = count([Record])+1 from [ProjetHistory]
print @max
-- Insert the first record so there will be a previous record for the first cycle of while
SELECT * INTO #PTEMP
FROM (SELECT CONVERT(varchar(15),[id])+[project]+rtrim([location]) as Uid,1 as instance, [id],[project],
[location],[Start],[End]
FROM [ProjectHistory]
WHERE [RECORD] = 1) As x
select @tuid = [Uid],@tinstance = [instance] from #PTEMP where [instance] = 1
set @i = 1
While @i < @max
BEGIN --Begin while
SELECT @puid=[uid],@pinstance = [instance], @pid = [id],@pproject = [project],
@plocation = [location], @pstart=[ProjectStart], @pend = [ProjectEnd] FROM #ptemp
Where [instance] = @tinstance and [uid]=@tuid
Select @crecord =[record], @cid = [id], @clocation = [location], @cproject = [project], @cstart = [Start], @cend=[End]
from [ProjectHistory] where [record] = @i
SET @cuid = CONVERT(varchar(15), @cid)+@cproject+@clocation
IF @pid = @cid
Begin --First check if its the project instance
IF(@cuid = @puid and DATEDIFF(day,@cstart,@pend)<=7)
Begin --this happens if its the same project period
update #PTEMP set [ProjectStart] = @cstart, [ProjectEnd] = @cend where [Uid] = @puid and [instance] = @pinstance
set @i=@i+1
set @tinstance = @pinstance
set @tuid = @puid
END -- done with updating existing project instance
ELSE
BEGIN -- Since it didnt match pervious record must be new project instance
select @tinstance = COUNT([instance])+1 from #ptemp where [uid] = @cuid
insert into #PTEMP ( uid, instance,id, project, location, ProjectStart, ProjectEnd)
values(@cuid,@tinstance,@cid,@cproject,@clocation, @cstart,@cend)
set @i=@i+1
set @tuid = @cuid
End -- Done with the new project instance for same id
END -- Done with same id
ELSE -- this is a new id so insert uid for id project combo
begin -- new id so need to insert first record
select @tinstance = COUNT([instance])+1 from #ptemp where [uid] = @cuid
insert into #PTEMP ( uid, instance,id, project, location, ProjectStart, ProjectEnd)
values(@cuid,@tinstance,@cid,@cproject,@clocation, @cstart,@cend)
set @i=@i+1
set @tuid = @cuid
END -- Done inserting new record for next id
End -- End While
select * from #ptemp
drop table #PTEMP
END
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "182"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f131750%2fcreate-a-temp-table-that-consolidates-start-and-end-dates-plus-generates-a-uniqu%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
ok I think I got it. I was able to get the results I was looking for using the following code, but it is slow when executing it to get the results. One thing I forget, was the location column, so I was sure to account for this in my code. I did end up breaking the uid and instance into two separate fields, but I know I could have merged them into one. I figured this would give me greater flexibility when pulling data against it in the future. Feel free to improve, I know I would appreciate it. I'm also happy to be posting my first answer. Thanks!
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[ProjectTracking]
AS
BEGIN
-- Insert statements for procedure here
SET NOCOUNT ON;
DECLARE @max int
DECLARE @i int
Declare @tinstance int
Declare @tuid varchar(20)
DECLARE @puid varchar(20)
Declare @pinstance int
DECLARE @pid int
DECLARE @pproject varchar(10)
DECLARE @plocation varchar(10)
DECLARE @pstart datetime
DECLARE @pend datetime
DECLARE @cuid varchar(20)
Declare @crecord int
DECLARE @cid int
DECLARE @cproject varchar(10)
DECLARE @clocation varchar(10)
DECLARE @cstart datetime
DECLARE @cend datetime
select @max = count([Record])+1 from [ProjetHistory]
print @max
-- Insert the first record so there will be a previous record for the first cycle of while
SELECT * INTO #PTEMP
FROM (SELECT CONVERT(varchar(15),[id])+[project]+rtrim([location]) as Uid,1 as instance, [id],[project],
[location],[Start],[End]
FROM [ProjectHistory]
WHERE [RECORD] = 1) As x
select @tuid = [Uid],@tinstance = [instance] from #PTEMP where [instance] = 1
set @i = 1
While @i < @max
BEGIN --Begin while
SELECT @puid=[uid],@pinstance = [instance], @pid = [id],@pproject = [project],
@plocation = [location], @pstart=[ProjectStart], @pend = [ProjectEnd] FROM #ptemp
Where [instance] = @tinstance and [uid]=@tuid
Select @crecord =[record], @cid = [id], @clocation = [location], @cproject = [project], @cstart = [Start], @cend=[End]
from [ProjectHistory] where [record] = @i
SET @cuid = CONVERT(varchar(15), @cid)+@cproject+@clocation
IF @pid = @cid
Begin --First check if its the project instance
IF(@cuid = @puid and DATEDIFF(day,@cstart,@pend)<=7)
Begin --this happens if its the same project period
update #PTEMP set [ProjectStart] = @cstart, [ProjectEnd] = @cend where [Uid] = @puid and [instance] = @pinstance
set @i=@i+1
set @tinstance = @pinstance
set @tuid = @puid
END -- done with updating existing project instance
ELSE
BEGIN -- Since it didnt match pervious record must be new project instance
select @tinstance = COUNT([instance])+1 from #ptemp where [uid] = @cuid
insert into #PTEMP ( uid, instance,id, project, location, ProjectStart, ProjectEnd)
values(@cuid,@tinstance,@cid,@cproject,@clocation, @cstart,@cend)
set @i=@i+1
set @tuid = @cuid
End -- Done with the new project instance for same id
END -- Done with same id
ELSE -- this is a new id so insert uid for id project combo
begin -- new id so need to insert first record
select @tinstance = COUNT([instance])+1 from #ptemp where [uid] = @cuid
insert into #PTEMP ( uid, instance,id, project, location, ProjectStart, ProjectEnd)
values(@cuid,@tinstance,@cid,@cproject,@clocation, @cstart,@cend)
set @i=@i+1
set @tuid = @cuid
END -- Done inserting new record for next id
End -- End While
select * from #ptemp
drop table #PTEMP
END
add a comment |
ok I think I got it. I was able to get the results I was looking for using the following code, but it is slow when executing it to get the results. One thing I forget, was the location column, so I was sure to account for this in my code. I did end up breaking the uid and instance into two separate fields, but I know I could have merged them into one. I figured this would give me greater flexibility when pulling data against it in the future. Feel free to improve, I know I would appreciate it. I'm also happy to be posting my first answer. Thanks!
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[ProjectTracking]
AS
BEGIN
-- Insert statements for procedure here
SET NOCOUNT ON;
DECLARE @max int
DECLARE @i int
Declare @tinstance int
Declare @tuid varchar(20)
DECLARE @puid varchar(20)
Declare @pinstance int
DECLARE @pid int
DECLARE @pproject varchar(10)
DECLARE @plocation varchar(10)
DECLARE @pstart datetime
DECLARE @pend datetime
DECLARE @cuid varchar(20)
Declare @crecord int
DECLARE @cid int
DECLARE @cproject varchar(10)
DECLARE @clocation varchar(10)
DECLARE @cstart datetime
DECLARE @cend datetime
select @max = count([Record])+1 from [ProjetHistory]
print @max
-- Insert the first record so there will be a previous record for the first cycle of while
SELECT * INTO #PTEMP
FROM (SELECT CONVERT(varchar(15),[id])+[project]+rtrim([location]) as Uid,1 as instance, [id],[project],
[location],[Start],[End]
FROM [ProjectHistory]
WHERE [RECORD] = 1) As x
select @tuid = [Uid],@tinstance = [instance] from #PTEMP where [instance] = 1
set @i = 1
While @i < @max
BEGIN --Begin while
SELECT @puid=[uid],@pinstance = [instance], @pid = [id],@pproject = [project],
@plocation = [location], @pstart=[ProjectStart], @pend = [ProjectEnd] FROM #ptemp
Where [instance] = @tinstance and [uid]=@tuid
Select @crecord =[record], @cid = [id], @clocation = [location], @cproject = [project], @cstart = [Start], @cend=[End]
from [ProjectHistory] where [record] = @i
SET @cuid = CONVERT(varchar(15), @cid)+@cproject+@clocation
IF @pid = @cid
Begin --First check if its the project instance
IF(@cuid = @puid and DATEDIFF(day,@cstart,@pend)<=7)
Begin --this happens if its the same project period
update #PTEMP set [ProjectStart] = @cstart, [ProjectEnd] = @cend where [Uid] = @puid and [instance] = @pinstance
set @i=@i+1
set @tinstance = @pinstance
set @tuid = @puid
END -- done with updating existing project instance
ELSE
BEGIN -- Since it didnt match pervious record must be new project instance
select @tinstance = COUNT([instance])+1 from #ptemp where [uid] = @cuid
insert into #PTEMP ( uid, instance,id, project, location, ProjectStart, ProjectEnd)
values(@cuid,@tinstance,@cid,@cproject,@clocation, @cstart,@cend)
set @i=@i+1
set @tuid = @cuid
End -- Done with the new project instance for same id
END -- Done with same id
ELSE -- this is a new id so insert uid for id project combo
begin -- new id so need to insert first record
select @tinstance = COUNT([instance])+1 from #ptemp where [uid] = @cuid
insert into #PTEMP ( uid, instance,id, project, location, ProjectStart, ProjectEnd)
values(@cuid,@tinstance,@cid,@cproject,@clocation, @cstart,@cend)
set @i=@i+1
set @tuid = @cuid
END -- Done inserting new record for next id
End -- End While
select * from #ptemp
drop table #PTEMP
END
add a comment |
ok I think I got it. I was able to get the results I was looking for using the following code, but it is slow when executing it to get the results. One thing I forget, was the location column, so I was sure to account for this in my code. I did end up breaking the uid and instance into two separate fields, but I know I could have merged them into one. I figured this would give me greater flexibility when pulling data against it in the future. Feel free to improve, I know I would appreciate it. I'm also happy to be posting my first answer. Thanks!
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[ProjectTracking]
AS
BEGIN
-- Insert statements for procedure here
SET NOCOUNT ON;
DECLARE @max int
DECLARE @i int
Declare @tinstance int
Declare @tuid varchar(20)
DECLARE @puid varchar(20)
Declare @pinstance int
DECLARE @pid int
DECLARE @pproject varchar(10)
DECLARE @plocation varchar(10)
DECLARE @pstart datetime
DECLARE @pend datetime
DECLARE @cuid varchar(20)
Declare @crecord int
DECLARE @cid int
DECLARE @cproject varchar(10)
DECLARE @clocation varchar(10)
DECLARE @cstart datetime
DECLARE @cend datetime
select @max = count([Record])+1 from [ProjetHistory]
print @max
-- Insert the first record so there will be a previous record for the first cycle of while
SELECT * INTO #PTEMP
FROM (SELECT CONVERT(varchar(15),[id])+[project]+rtrim([location]) as Uid,1 as instance, [id],[project],
[location],[Start],[End]
FROM [ProjectHistory]
WHERE [RECORD] = 1) As x
select @tuid = [Uid],@tinstance = [instance] from #PTEMP where [instance] = 1
set @i = 1
While @i < @max
BEGIN --Begin while
SELECT @puid=[uid],@pinstance = [instance], @pid = [id],@pproject = [project],
@plocation = [location], @pstart=[ProjectStart], @pend = [ProjectEnd] FROM #ptemp
Where [instance] = @tinstance and [uid]=@tuid
Select @crecord =[record], @cid = [id], @clocation = [location], @cproject = [project], @cstart = [Start], @cend=[End]
from [ProjectHistory] where [record] = @i
SET @cuid = CONVERT(varchar(15), @cid)+@cproject+@clocation
IF @pid = @cid
Begin --First check if its the project instance
IF(@cuid = @puid and DATEDIFF(day,@cstart,@pend)<=7)
Begin --this happens if its the same project period
update #PTEMP set [ProjectStart] = @cstart, [ProjectEnd] = @cend where [Uid] = @puid and [instance] = @pinstance
set @i=@i+1
set @tinstance = @pinstance
set @tuid = @puid
END -- done with updating existing project instance
ELSE
BEGIN -- Since it didnt match pervious record must be new project instance
select @tinstance = COUNT([instance])+1 from #ptemp where [uid] = @cuid
insert into #PTEMP ( uid, instance,id, project, location, ProjectStart, ProjectEnd)
values(@cuid,@tinstance,@cid,@cproject,@clocation, @cstart,@cend)
set @i=@i+1
set @tuid = @cuid
End -- Done with the new project instance for same id
END -- Done with same id
ELSE -- this is a new id so insert uid for id project combo
begin -- new id so need to insert first record
select @tinstance = COUNT([instance])+1 from #ptemp where [uid] = @cuid
insert into #PTEMP ( uid, instance,id, project, location, ProjectStart, ProjectEnd)
values(@cuid,@tinstance,@cid,@cproject,@clocation, @cstart,@cend)
set @i=@i+1
set @tuid = @cuid
END -- Done inserting new record for next id
End -- End While
select * from #ptemp
drop table #PTEMP
END
ok I think I got it. I was able to get the results I was looking for using the following code, but it is slow when executing it to get the results. One thing I forget, was the location column, so I was sure to account for this in my code. I did end up breaking the uid and instance into two separate fields, but I know I could have merged them into one. I figured this would give me greater flexibility when pulling data against it in the future. Feel free to improve, I know I would appreciate it. I'm also happy to be posting my first answer. Thanks!
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[ProjectTracking]
AS
BEGIN
-- Insert statements for procedure here
SET NOCOUNT ON;
DECLARE @max int
DECLARE @i int
Declare @tinstance int
Declare @tuid varchar(20)
DECLARE @puid varchar(20)
Declare @pinstance int
DECLARE @pid int
DECLARE @pproject varchar(10)
DECLARE @plocation varchar(10)
DECLARE @pstart datetime
DECLARE @pend datetime
DECLARE @cuid varchar(20)
Declare @crecord int
DECLARE @cid int
DECLARE @cproject varchar(10)
DECLARE @clocation varchar(10)
DECLARE @cstart datetime
DECLARE @cend datetime
select @max = count([Record])+1 from [ProjetHistory]
print @max
-- Insert the first record so there will be a previous record for the first cycle of while
SELECT * INTO #PTEMP
FROM (SELECT CONVERT(varchar(15),[id])+[project]+rtrim([location]) as Uid,1 as instance, [id],[project],
[location],[Start],[End]
FROM [ProjectHistory]
WHERE [RECORD] = 1) As x
select @tuid = [Uid],@tinstance = [instance] from #PTEMP where [instance] = 1
set @i = 1
While @i < @max
BEGIN --Begin while
SELECT @puid=[uid],@pinstance = [instance], @pid = [id],@pproject = [project],
@plocation = [location], @pstart=[ProjectStart], @pend = [ProjectEnd] FROM #ptemp
Where [instance] = @tinstance and [uid]=@tuid
Select @crecord =[record], @cid = [id], @clocation = [location], @cproject = [project], @cstart = [Start], @cend=[End]
from [ProjectHistory] where [record] = @i
SET @cuid = CONVERT(varchar(15), @cid)+@cproject+@clocation
IF @pid = @cid
Begin --First check if its the project instance
IF(@cuid = @puid and DATEDIFF(day,@cstart,@pend)<=7)
Begin --this happens if its the same project period
update #PTEMP set [ProjectStart] = @cstart, [ProjectEnd] = @cend where [Uid] = @puid and [instance] = @pinstance
set @i=@i+1
set @tinstance = @pinstance
set @tuid = @puid
END -- done with updating existing project instance
ELSE
BEGIN -- Since it didnt match pervious record must be new project instance
select @tinstance = COUNT([instance])+1 from #ptemp where [uid] = @cuid
insert into #PTEMP ( uid, instance,id, project, location, ProjectStart, ProjectEnd)
values(@cuid,@tinstance,@cid,@cproject,@clocation, @cstart,@cend)
set @i=@i+1
set @tuid = @cuid
End -- Done with the new project instance for same id
END -- Done with same id
ELSE -- this is a new id so insert uid for id project combo
begin -- new id so need to insert first record
select @tinstance = COUNT([instance])+1 from #ptemp where [uid] = @cuid
insert into #PTEMP ( uid, instance,id, project, location, ProjectStart, ProjectEnd)
values(@cuid,@tinstance,@cid,@cproject,@clocation, @cstart,@cend)
set @i=@i+1
set @tuid = @cuid
END -- Done inserting new record for next id
End -- End While
select * from #ptemp
drop table #PTEMP
END
answered Mar 11 '16 at 15:13
JoshJosh
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f131750%2fcreate-a-temp-table-that-consolidates-start-and-end-dates-plus-generates-a-uniqu%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Based on your opening statement, this is SQL Server? Could you tag it as the correct version?
– Dan
Mar 9 '16 at 20:58
Sorry about that Dan. I've updated the tag.
– Josh
Mar 9 '16 at 21:22
Ok. I think I figured it out, but its really slow. Takes about 30 seconds to run against 3000 projecthistory records, but I do get the results I'm looking for. One thing I did forget in my initial question, was the location field.
– Josh
Mar 11 '16 at 14:58