Pure Functions: Does “No Side Effects” Imply “Always Same Output, Given Same Input”?2019 Community...

Why is working on the same position for more than 15 years not a red flag?

How to deny access to SQL Server to certain login over SSMS, but allow over .Net SqlClient Data Provider

What is a term for a function that when called repeatedly, has the same effect as calling once?

It took me a lot of time to make this, pls like. (YouTube Comments #1)

How would we write a misogynistic character without offending people?

Which aircraft had such a luxurious-looking navigator's station?

Is there a low-level alternative to Animate Objects?

Second-rate spelling

Why does the author believe that the central mass that gas cloud HCN-0.009-0.044 orbits is smaller than our solar system?

What is this waxed root vegetable?

Does music exist in Panem? And if so, what kinds of music?

What can I substitute for soda pop in a sweet pork recipe?

Why does Starman/Roadster have radial acceleration?

Waiting for the gravy at a dinner table

What am I? I am in theaters and computer programs

If nine coins are tossed, what is the probability that the number of heads is even?

Most significant research articles for practical investors with research perspectives

Is my plan for fixing my water heater leak bad?

Reason Why Dimensional Travelling Would be Restricted

How do ISS astronauts "get their stripes"?

How can atoms be electrically neutral when there is a difference in the positions of the charges?

What is the wife of a henpecked husband called?

Casually inserting sexuality

Skis versus snow shoes - when to choose which for travelling the backcountry?



Pure Functions: Does “No Side Effects” Imply “Always Same Output, Given Same Input”?



2019 Community Moderator ElectionHow to check for an undefined or null variable in JavaScript?Large-scale design in Haskell?How can a time function exist in functional programming?Why are “pure” functions called “pure”?Is Safari on iOS 6 caching $.ajax results?Moment js date time comparisonIs a nested pure function still a pure function?Can a function which returns a new object be considered “pure”?Can a pure function change input arguments?What is the philosophy behind “functional programming” when you actually want to create a side effect?












6















The two conditions that define a function as pure are as follows:




  1. No side effects (i.e. only changes to local scope are allowed)

  2. Always return the same output, given the same input


If the first condition is always true, are there any times the second condition is not true?



I.e. is it really only necessary with the first condition?










share|improve this question





























    6















    The two conditions that define a function as pure are as follows:




    1. No side effects (i.e. only changes to local scope are allowed)

    2. Always return the same output, given the same input


    If the first condition is always true, are there any times the second condition is not true?



    I.e. is it really only necessary with the first condition?










    share|improve this question



























      6












      6








      6








      The two conditions that define a function as pure are as follows:




      1. No side effects (i.e. only changes to local scope are allowed)

      2. Always return the same output, given the same input


      If the first condition is always true, are there any times the second condition is not true?



      I.e. is it really only necessary with the first condition?










      share|improve this question
















      The two conditions that define a function as pure are as follows:




      1. No side effects (i.e. only changes to local scope are allowed)

      2. Always return the same output, given the same input


      If the first condition is always true, are there any times the second condition is not true?



      I.e. is it really only necessary with the first condition?







      javascript functional-programming pure-function






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 43 mins ago









      Code-Apprentice

      48k1490178




      48k1490178










      asked 2 hours ago









      MagnusMagnus

      1,39011025




      1,39011025
























          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          8














          Here are a few counterexamples that do not change the outer scope but are still considered impure:




          • function a() { return Date.now(); }

          • function b() { return window.globalMutableVar; }

          • function c() { return prompt("you choose"); }


          • function d() { return Math.random(); } (which admittedly does change the PRNG, but is not considered observable)


          Accessing non-constant non-local variables is enough to be able to violate the second condition, the function doesn't need to have any side effect itself if it is going to be affected by other side effects.






          share|improve this answer

































            2














            You could have a source of randomness from outside the system. Say part of your calculation includes the room temperature. Executing the function will yield different results each time (depending on the external random element) but you don't really change the state of your program by executing it.



            All I can think of, anyway.






            share|improve this answer































              2














              It seems to me that the second condition you have described is a weaker constraint than the first.



              Let me give you an example, suppose you have a function to add one that also logs to the console:



              function addOneAndLog(x) {
              console.log(x);
              return x + 1;
              }


              The second condition you supplied is satisfied: this function always returns the same output when given the same input. It is, however, not a pure function because it includes the side effect of logging to the console.



              A pure function is, strictly speaking, a function that satisfies the property of referential transparency. That is the property that we can replace a function application with the value it produces without changing the behaviour of the program.



              Suppose we have a function that simply adds:



              function addOne(x) {
              return x + 1;
              }


              We can replace addOne(5) with 6 anywhere in our program and nothing will change.



              By contrast, we cannot replace addOneAndLog(x) with the value 6 anywhere in our program without changing behaviour because the first expression results in something being written to the console whereas the second one does not.



              We consider any of this extra behaviour that addOneAndLog(x) performs besides returning output as a side-effect.






              share|improve this answer































                0














                I would say that the point 2 (Always return the same output, given the same input) is not a condition but a consequence of point 1 : a function without side effects will always return the same output given the same input.






                share|improve this answer
























                • That is the whole point of the question. The OP is asking why is it necessary to list both when it seems that one is a consequence of the other. However, the examples above show some good counter examples.

                  – Code-Apprentice
                  43 mins ago











                Your Answer






                StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
                StackExchange.snippets.init();
                });
                });
                }, "code-snippets");

                StackExchange.ready(function() {
                var channelOptions = {
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "1"
                };
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                createEditor();
                });
                }
                else {
                createEditor();
                }
                });

                function createEditor() {
                StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: true,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: 10,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader: {
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                },
                onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                });


                }
                });














                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function () {
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54992302%2fpure-functions-does-no-side-effects-imply-always-same-output-given-same-inp%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                }
                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes








                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                8














                Here are a few counterexamples that do not change the outer scope but are still considered impure:




                • function a() { return Date.now(); }

                • function b() { return window.globalMutableVar; }

                • function c() { return prompt("you choose"); }


                • function d() { return Math.random(); } (which admittedly does change the PRNG, but is not considered observable)


                Accessing non-constant non-local variables is enough to be able to violate the second condition, the function doesn't need to have any side effect itself if it is going to be affected by other side effects.






                share|improve this answer






























                  8














                  Here are a few counterexamples that do not change the outer scope but are still considered impure:




                  • function a() { return Date.now(); }

                  • function b() { return window.globalMutableVar; }

                  • function c() { return prompt("you choose"); }


                  • function d() { return Math.random(); } (which admittedly does change the PRNG, but is not considered observable)


                  Accessing non-constant non-local variables is enough to be able to violate the second condition, the function doesn't need to have any side effect itself if it is going to be affected by other side effects.






                  share|improve this answer




























                    8












                    8








                    8







                    Here are a few counterexamples that do not change the outer scope but are still considered impure:




                    • function a() { return Date.now(); }

                    • function b() { return window.globalMutableVar; }

                    • function c() { return prompt("you choose"); }


                    • function d() { return Math.random(); } (which admittedly does change the PRNG, but is not considered observable)


                    Accessing non-constant non-local variables is enough to be able to violate the second condition, the function doesn't need to have any side effect itself if it is going to be affected by other side effects.






                    share|improve this answer















                    Here are a few counterexamples that do not change the outer scope but are still considered impure:




                    • function a() { return Date.now(); }

                    • function b() { return window.globalMutableVar; }

                    • function c() { return prompt("you choose"); }


                    • function d() { return Math.random(); } (which admittedly does change the PRNG, but is not considered observable)


                    Accessing non-constant non-local variables is enough to be able to violate the second condition, the function doesn't need to have any side effect itself if it is going to be affected by other side effects.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited 1 hour ago

























                    answered 2 hours ago









                    BergiBergi

                    375k60566898




                    375k60566898

























                        2














                        You could have a source of randomness from outside the system. Say part of your calculation includes the room temperature. Executing the function will yield different results each time (depending on the external random element) but you don't really change the state of your program by executing it.



                        All I can think of, anyway.






                        share|improve this answer




























                          2














                          You could have a source of randomness from outside the system. Say part of your calculation includes the room temperature. Executing the function will yield different results each time (depending on the external random element) but you don't really change the state of your program by executing it.



                          All I can think of, anyway.






                          share|improve this answer


























                            2












                            2








                            2







                            You could have a source of randomness from outside the system. Say part of your calculation includes the room temperature. Executing the function will yield different results each time (depending on the external random element) but you don't really change the state of your program by executing it.



                            All I can think of, anyway.






                            share|improve this answer













                            You could have a source of randomness from outside the system. Say part of your calculation includes the room temperature. Executing the function will yield different results each time (depending on the external random element) but you don't really change the state of your program by executing it.



                            All I can think of, anyway.







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered 2 hours ago









                            user3340459user3340459

                            7027




                            7027























                                2














                                It seems to me that the second condition you have described is a weaker constraint than the first.



                                Let me give you an example, suppose you have a function to add one that also logs to the console:



                                function addOneAndLog(x) {
                                console.log(x);
                                return x + 1;
                                }


                                The second condition you supplied is satisfied: this function always returns the same output when given the same input. It is, however, not a pure function because it includes the side effect of logging to the console.



                                A pure function is, strictly speaking, a function that satisfies the property of referential transparency. That is the property that we can replace a function application with the value it produces without changing the behaviour of the program.



                                Suppose we have a function that simply adds:



                                function addOne(x) {
                                return x + 1;
                                }


                                We can replace addOne(5) with 6 anywhere in our program and nothing will change.



                                By contrast, we cannot replace addOneAndLog(x) with the value 6 anywhere in our program without changing behaviour because the first expression results in something being written to the console whereas the second one does not.



                                We consider any of this extra behaviour that addOneAndLog(x) performs besides returning output as a side-effect.






                                share|improve this answer




























                                  2














                                  It seems to me that the second condition you have described is a weaker constraint than the first.



                                  Let me give you an example, suppose you have a function to add one that also logs to the console:



                                  function addOneAndLog(x) {
                                  console.log(x);
                                  return x + 1;
                                  }


                                  The second condition you supplied is satisfied: this function always returns the same output when given the same input. It is, however, not a pure function because it includes the side effect of logging to the console.



                                  A pure function is, strictly speaking, a function that satisfies the property of referential transparency. That is the property that we can replace a function application with the value it produces without changing the behaviour of the program.



                                  Suppose we have a function that simply adds:



                                  function addOne(x) {
                                  return x + 1;
                                  }


                                  We can replace addOne(5) with 6 anywhere in our program and nothing will change.



                                  By contrast, we cannot replace addOneAndLog(x) with the value 6 anywhere in our program without changing behaviour because the first expression results in something being written to the console whereas the second one does not.



                                  We consider any of this extra behaviour that addOneAndLog(x) performs besides returning output as a side-effect.






                                  share|improve this answer


























                                    2












                                    2








                                    2







                                    It seems to me that the second condition you have described is a weaker constraint than the first.



                                    Let me give you an example, suppose you have a function to add one that also logs to the console:



                                    function addOneAndLog(x) {
                                    console.log(x);
                                    return x + 1;
                                    }


                                    The second condition you supplied is satisfied: this function always returns the same output when given the same input. It is, however, not a pure function because it includes the side effect of logging to the console.



                                    A pure function is, strictly speaking, a function that satisfies the property of referential transparency. That is the property that we can replace a function application with the value it produces without changing the behaviour of the program.



                                    Suppose we have a function that simply adds:



                                    function addOne(x) {
                                    return x + 1;
                                    }


                                    We can replace addOne(5) with 6 anywhere in our program and nothing will change.



                                    By contrast, we cannot replace addOneAndLog(x) with the value 6 anywhere in our program without changing behaviour because the first expression results in something being written to the console whereas the second one does not.



                                    We consider any of this extra behaviour that addOneAndLog(x) performs besides returning output as a side-effect.






                                    share|improve this answer













                                    It seems to me that the second condition you have described is a weaker constraint than the first.



                                    Let me give you an example, suppose you have a function to add one that also logs to the console:



                                    function addOneAndLog(x) {
                                    console.log(x);
                                    return x + 1;
                                    }


                                    The second condition you supplied is satisfied: this function always returns the same output when given the same input. It is, however, not a pure function because it includes the side effect of logging to the console.



                                    A pure function is, strictly speaking, a function that satisfies the property of referential transparency. That is the property that we can replace a function application with the value it produces without changing the behaviour of the program.



                                    Suppose we have a function that simply adds:



                                    function addOne(x) {
                                    return x + 1;
                                    }


                                    We can replace addOne(5) with 6 anywhere in our program and nothing will change.



                                    By contrast, we cannot replace addOneAndLog(x) with the value 6 anywhere in our program without changing behaviour because the first expression results in something being written to the console whereas the second one does not.



                                    We consider any of this extra behaviour that addOneAndLog(x) performs besides returning output as a side-effect.







                                    share|improve this answer












                                    share|improve this answer



                                    share|improve this answer










                                    answered 1 hour ago









                                    TheInnerLightTheInnerLight

                                    10.4k11942




                                    10.4k11942























                                        0














                                        I would say that the point 2 (Always return the same output, given the same input) is not a condition but a consequence of point 1 : a function without side effects will always return the same output given the same input.






                                        share|improve this answer
























                                        • That is the whole point of the question. The OP is asking why is it necessary to list both when it seems that one is a consequence of the other. However, the examples above show some good counter examples.

                                          – Code-Apprentice
                                          43 mins ago
















                                        0














                                        I would say that the point 2 (Always return the same output, given the same input) is not a condition but a consequence of point 1 : a function without side effects will always return the same output given the same input.






                                        share|improve this answer
























                                        • That is the whole point of the question. The OP is asking why is it necessary to list both when it seems that one is a consequence of the other. However, the examples above show some good counter examples.

                                          – Code-Apprentice
                                          43 mins ago














                                        0












                                        0








                                        0







                                        I would say that the point 2 (Always return the same output, given the same input) is not a condition but a consequence of point 1 : a function without side effects will always return the same output given the same input.






                                        share|improve this answer













                                        I would say that the point 2 (Always return the same output, given the same input) is not a condition but a consequence of point 1 : a function without side effects will always return the same output given the same input.







                                        share|improve this answer












                                        share|improve this answer



                                        share|improve this answer










                                        answered 47 mins ago









                                        Joseph M. DionJoseph M. Dion

                                        1764




                                        1764













                                        • That is the whole point of the question. The OP is asking why is it necessary to list both when it seems that one is a consequence of the other. However, the examples above show some good counter examples.

                                          – Code-Apprentice
                                          43 mins ago



















                                        • That is the whole point of the question. The OP is asking why is it necessary to list both when it seems that one is a consequence of the other. However, the examples above show some good counter examples.

                                          – Code-Apprentice
                                          43 mins ago

















                                        That is the whole point of the question. The OP is asking why is it necessary to list both when it seems that one is a consequence of the other. However, the examples above show some good counter examples.

                                        – Code-Apprentice
                                        43 mins ago





                                        That is the whole point of the question. The OP is asking why is it necessary to list both when it seems that one is a consequence of the other. However, the examples above show some good counter examples.

                                        – Code-Apprentice
                                        43 mins ago


















                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded




















































                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid



                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function () {
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54992302%2fpure-functions-does-no-side-effects-imply-always-same-output-given-same-inp%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                        }
                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        Parapolítica Índice Antecedentes El escándalo Proceso judicial Consecuencias Véase...

                                        How to remove border from elements in the last row?Targeting flex items on the last rowHow to vertically wrap...

                                        Tecnologías entrañables Índice Antecedentes Desarrollo Tecnologías Entrañables en la...