Distribution Coeffecient without concentrationsStandard solution and extracted solution : same...
Is it possible to narrate a novel in a faux-historical style without alienating the reader?
Why did Ylvis use "go" instead of "say" in phrases like "Dog goes 'woof'"?
Probability X1 ≥ X2
Color of alien seas
Multiple null checks in Java 8
How do I fight with Heavy Armor as a Wizard with Tenser's Transformation?
Are all power cords made equal?
In a post-apocalypse world, with no power and few survivors, would Satnav still work?
How unreachable are Jupiter's moons from Mars with the technology developed for going to Mars?
Players preemptively rolling, even though their rolls are useless or are checking the wrong skills
What happens to the first ionization potential when a hydrogen-like atom captures a particle?
Third wheel character
How do I avoid the "chosen hero" feeling?
How can I put a period right after the algorithm's number in the algorithm's title?
Disk space full during insert, what happens?
What is formjacking?
Would water spill from a bowl in a Bag of Holding?
Protagonist constantly has to have long words explained to her. Will this get tedious?
How to wrap a figure in exam document?
Why do single electrical receptacles exist?
Process substitution inside a subshell to set a variable
Is layered encryption more secure than long passwords?
Coworker asking me to not bring cakes due to self control issue. What should I do?
Linearity Assumption
Distribution Coeffecient without concentrations
Standard solution and extracted solution : same concentration?Equilibrium Concentrations of Products/Reactantssolution concentrationsSolubility of Gold in low concentrationsHow to determine the mole fraction of the liquid phase from a given mole fraction of the vapour phase for a benzene/toluene mixture?Chemical Reagent Test sensitive at low concentrationsHow to find pH of an aqueous ammonia solution at high pressures?Increasing partition coefficient in an extractionWhy do my equilibrium calculations on this HF/NH4OH buffer system not match those in literature?How to without calculations understand the liquid-liquid extraction efficiency?
$begingroup$
From what I understand about distribution coefficient is straight from my book-- which does NOT give any practice examples-- is that:
D= CA(ext) ÷ CA(orig)
where CA(ext) and CA(orig) represent the total concentration of all analyte species present in the two phases regardless of chemical state. Below is a homework problem that I'm try to solve, but having no luck, since I'm not given any concentrations, only weight and volume.
In an extraction experiment, it is found that 0.0376 g of an analyte are extracted into 50 mL of solvent from 150 mL of a water sample. If there was originally 0.192 g of analyte in this volume of the water sample, what is the distribution coefficient?
The answer for this problem is 0.731%, but no matter which way I plug in the numbers that are given do I reach this answer. Any ideas on what I'm missing?
equilibrium solutions analytical-chemistry extraction
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
From what I understand about distribution coefficient is straight from my book-- which does NOT give any practice examples-- is that:
D= CA(ext) ÷ CA(orig)
where CA(ext) and CA(orig) represent the total concentration of all analyte species present in the two phases regardless of chemical state. Below is a homework problem that I'm try to solve, but having no luck, since I'm not given any concentrations, only weight and volume.
In an extraction experiment, it is found that 0.0376 g of an analyte are extracted into 50 mL of solvent from 150 mL of a water sample. If there was originally 0.192 g of analyte in this volume of the water sample, what is the distribution coefficient?
The answer for this problem is 0.731%, but no matter which way I plug in the numbers that are given do I reach this answer. Any ideas on what I'm missing?
equilibrium solutions analytical-chemistry extraction
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
From what I understand about distribution coefficient is straight from my book-- which does NOT give any practice examples-- is that:
D= CA(ext) ÷ CA(orig)
where CA(ext) and CA(orig) represent the total concentration of all analyte species present in the two phases regardless of chemical state. Below is a homework problem that I'm try to solve, but having no luck, since I'm not given any concentrations, only weight and volume.
In an extraction experiment, it is found that 0.0376 g of an analyte are extracted into 50 mL of solvent from 150 mL of a water sample. If there was originally 0.192 g of analyte in this volume of the water sample, what is the distribution coefficient?
The answer for this problem is 0.731%, but no matter which way I plug in the numbers that are given do I reach this answer. Any ideas on what I'm missing?
equilibrium solutions analytical-chemistry extraction
New contributor
$endgroup$
From what I understand about distribution coefficient is straight from my book-- which does NOT give any practice examples-- is that:
D= CA(ext) ÷ CA(orig)
where CA(ext) and CA(orig) represent the total concentration of all analyte species present in the two phases regardless of chemical state. Below is a homework problem that I'm try to solve, but having no luck, since I'm not given any concentrations, only weight and volume.
In an extraction experiment, it is found that 0.0376 g of an analyte are extracted into 50 mL of solvent from 150 mL of a water sample. If there was originally 0.192 g of analyte in this volume of the water sample, what is the distribution coefficient?
The answer for this problem is 0.731%, but no matter which way I plug in the numbers that are given do I reach this answer. Any ideas on what I'm missing?
equilibrium solutions analytical-chemistry extraction
equilibrium solutions analytical-chemistry extraction
New contributor
New contributor
edited 1 hour ago
andselisk
16.6k654115
16.6k654115
New contributor
asked 2 hours ago
Molly HahnMolly Hahn
113
113
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Molar concentration can be expressed via mass $m$ and volume $V$ all right:
$$C_i = frac{n_i}{V_i} = frac{m_i}{M_iV_i}$$
Analyte doesn't change during the extraction and its molar mass $M$ remains the same $(M_i = text{const})$ so the distribution coefficient $D$ can be rewritten as such:
$$D = frac{C_mathrm{s}}{C_mathrm{w}} = frac{m_mathrm{s}V_mathrm{w}}{m_mathrm{w}V_mathrm{s}}$$
where "s" refers to the solvent phase and "w" to aqueous phase.
At equilibrium
$$m_mathrm{w} = m_0 - m_mathrm{s}$$
where $m_0$ is the initial mass of the analyte.
Finally, the distribution coefficient is
$$D = frac{m_mathrm{s}V_mathrm{w}}{(m_0 - m_mathrm{s})V_mathrm{s}} = frac{pu{0.0376 g}cdotpu{150 mL}}{(pu{0.192 g} - pu{0.0376 g})cdotpu{50 mL}} = 0.731$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "431"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Molly Hahn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f110002%2fdistribution-coeffecient-without-concentrations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Molar concentration can be expressed via mass $m$ and volume $V$ all right:
$$C_i = frac{n_i}{V_i} = frac{m_i}{M_iV_i}$$
Analyte doesn't change during the extraction and its molar mass $M$ remains the same $(M_i = text{const})$ so the distribution coefficient $D$ can be rewritten as such:
$$D = frac{C_mathrm{s}}{C_mathrm{w}} = frac{m_mathrm{s}V_mathrm{w}}{m_mathrm{w}V_mathrm{s}}$$
where "s" refers to the solvent phase and "w" to aqueous phase.
At equilibrium
$$m_mathrm{w} = m_0 - m_mathrm{s}$$
where $m_0$ is the initial mass of the analyte.
Finally, the distribution coefficient is
$$D = frac{m_mathrm{s}V_mathrm{w}}{(m_0 - m_mathrm{s})V_mathrm{s}} = frac{pu{0.0376 g}cdotpu{150 mL}}{(pu{0.192 g} - pu{0.0376 g})cdotpu{50 mL}} = 0.731$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Molar concentration can be expressed via mass $m$ and volume $V$ all right:
$$C_i = frac{n_i}{V_i} = frac{m_i}{M_iV_i}$$
Analyte doesn't change during the extraction and its molar mass $M$ remains the same $(M_i = text{const})$ so the distribution coefficient $D$ can be rewritten as such:
$$D = frac{C_mathrm{s}}{C_mathrm{w}} = frac{m_mathrm{s}V_mathrm{w}}{m_mathrm{w}V_mathrm{s}}$$
where "s" refers to the solvent phase and "w" to aqueous phase.
At equilibrium
$$m_mathrm{w} = m_0 - m_mathrm{s}$$
where $m_0$ is the initial mass of the analyte.
Finally, the distribution coefficient is
$$D = frac{m_mathrm{s}V_mathrm{w}}{(m_0 - m_mathrm{s})V_mathrm{s}} = frac{pu{0.0376 g}cdotpu{150 mL}}{(pu{0.192 g} - pu{0.0376 g})cdotpu{50 mL}} = 0.731$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Molar concentration can be expressed via mass $m$ and volume $V$ all right:
$$C_i = frac{n_i}{V_i} = frac{m_i}{M_iV_i}$$
Analyte doesn't change during the extraction and its molar mass $M$ remains the same $(M_i = text{const})$ so the distribution coefficient $D$ can be rewritten as such:
$$D = frac{C_mathrm{s}}{C_mathrm{w}} = frac{m_mathrm{s}V_mathrm{w}}{m_mathrm{w}V_mathrm{s}}$$
where "s" refers to the solvent phase and "w" to aqueous phase.
At equilibrium
$$m_mathrm{w} = m_0 - m_mathrm{s}$$
where $m_0$ is the initial mass of the analyte.
Finally, the distribution coefficient is
$$D = frac{m_mathrm{s}V_mathrm{w}}{(m_0 - m_mathrm{s})V_mathrm{s}} = frac{pu{0.0376 g}cdotpu{150 mL}}{(pu{0.192 g} - pu{0.0376 g})cdotpu{50 mL}} = 0.731$$
$endgroup$
Molar concentration can be expressed via mass $m$ and volume $V$ all right:
$$C_i = frac{n_i}{V_i} = frac{m_i}{M_iV_i}$$
Analyte doesn't change during the extraction and its molar mass $M$ remains the same $(M_i = text{const})$ so the distribution coefficient $D$ can be rewritten as such:
$$D = frac{C_mathrm{s}}{C_mathrm{w}} = frac{m_mathrm{s}V_mathrm{w}}{m_mathrm{w}V_mathrm{s}}$$
where "s" refers to the solvent phase and "w" to aqueous phase.
At equilibrium
$$m_mathrm{w} = m_0 - m_mathrm{s}$$
where $m_0$ is the initial mass of the analyte.
Finally, the distribution coefficient is
$$D = frac{m_mathrm{s}V_mathrm{w}}{(m_0 - m_mathrm{s})V_mathrm{s}} = frac{pu{0.0376 g}cdotpu{150 mL}}{(pu{0.192 g} - pu{0.0376 g})cdotpu{50 mL}} = 0.731$$
answered 1 hour ago
andseliskandselisk
16.6k654115
16.6k654115
add a comment |
add a comment |
Molly Hahn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Molly Hahn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Molly Hahn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Molly Hahn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f110002%2fdistribution-coeffecient-without-concentrations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown