Capture COPY & UPDATE command tag from an EXECUTE statement in a PL/pgSQL function?CTE works as expected,...

What is Tony Stark injecting into himself in Iron Man 3?

(Codewars) Linked Lists - Remove Duplicates

Help understanding 1986 schematic for Rohde & Schwarz cryptographic key generator

Is this Paypal Github SDK reference really a dangerous site?

How to write a chaotic neutral protagonist and prevent my readers from thinking they are evil?

Which situations would cause a company to ground or recall a aircraft series?

What will be the sign of work done?

From an axiomatic set theoric approach why can we take uncountable unions?

What is the generally accepted pronunciation of “topoi”?

Source permutation

Which classes are needed to have access to every spell in the PHB?

Is it possible that a question has only two answers?

How to design an organic heat-shield?

Power Strip for Europe

What can I do if someone tampers with my SSH public key?

Gaining more land

Why is there an extra space when I type "ls" in the Desktop directory?

Is a piano played in the same way as a harmonium?

Plausibility of Mushroom Buildings

Rationale to prefer local variables over instance variables?

After `ssh` without `-X` to a machine, is it possible to change `$DISPLAY` to make it work like `ssh -X`?

Vocabulary for giving just numbers, not a full answer

Signed and unsigned numbers

Getting the || sign while using Kurier



Capture COPY & UPDATE command tag from an EXECUTE statement in a PL/pgSQL function?


CTE works as expected, but not when wrapped into a functionPostgreSQL and storing configsCan we execute an optimal plan instead of a generic one in the first execution of a PL/pgSQL function?PL/pgSQL issues when function used twice (caching problem ?)PL/pgsql: use cursor to update next record based on a condition from current recordUPDATE with LIMIT / OFFSET in PL/pgSQL functionExecute dynamic INSERT ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE in plpgsql functionPostgres: query on huge (11gb ) index does not returnFire a trigger function when checks changeReturn both one value and one column from pl/pgsql function













0















When I populate a table from the psql terminal:



COPY schema.table (
column_1
, column_2
, column_3
)
FROM 'file.csv'
WITH (OPTIONS);


the message:



COPY x


is displayed in the terminal if successful. But when I embed the COPY statement in a function e.g. populate_table with:



EXECUTE format(
'COPY schema.%I (
column1
, column2
, column3
)
FROM ''file.txt''
WITH (FORMAT);'
, table_name);


and run the function the terminal output is different in that I see:



 populate_table 
-----------------------

(1 row)


Similarly, if I UPDATE with a function I lose the message:



UPDATED x x


Is it possible to print these messages to the terminal and capture them when working with functions?










share|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community 9 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.




















    0















    When I populate a table from the psql terminal:



    COPY schema.table (
    column_1
    , column_2
    , column_3
    )
    FROM 'file.csv'
    WITH (OPTIONS);


    the message:



    COPY x


    is displayed in the terminal if successful. But when I embed the COPY statement in a function e.g. populate_table with:



    EXECUTE format(
    'COPY schema.%I (
    column1
    , column2
    , column3
    )
    FROM ''file.txt''
    WITH (FORMAT);'
    , table_name);


    and run the function the terminal output is different in that I see:



     populate_table 
    -----------------------

    (1 row)


    Similarly, if I UPDATE with a function I lose the message:



    UPDATED x x


    Is it possible to print these messages to the terminal and capture them when working with functions?










    share|improve this question
















    bumped to the homepage by Community 9 mins ago


    This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.


















      0












      0








      0








      When I populate a table from the psql terminal:



      COPY schema.table (
      column_1
      , column_2
      , column_3
      )
      FROM 'file.csv'
      WITH (OPTIONS);


      the message:



      COPY x


      is displayed in the terminal if successful. But when I embed the COPY statement in a function e.g. populate_table with:



      EXECUTE format(
      'COPY schema.%I (
      column1
      , column2
      , column3
      )
      FROM ''file.txt''
      WITH (FORMAT);'
      , table_name);


      and run the function the terminal output is different in that I see:



       populate_table 
      -----------------------

      (1 row)


      Similarly, if I UPDATE with a function I lose the message:



      UPDATED x x


      Is it possible to print these messages to the terminal and capture them when working with functions?










      share|improve this question
















      When I populate a table from the psql terminal:



      COPY schema.table (
      column_1
      , column_2
      , column_3
      )
      FROM 'file.csv'
      WITH (OPTIONS);


      the message:



      COPY x


      is displayed in the terminal if successful. But when I embed the COPY statement in a function e.g. populate_table with:



      EXECUTE format(
      'COPY schema.%I (
      column1
      , column2
      , column3
      )
      FROM ''file.txt''
      WITH (FORMAT);'
      , table_name);


      and run the function the terminal output is different in that I see:



       populate_table 
      -----------------------

      (1 row)


      Similarly, if I UPDATE with a function I lose the message:



      UPDATED x x


      Is it possible to print these messages to the terminal and capture them when working with functions?







      plpgsql postgresql-9.6






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Sep 22 '17 at 14:18







      dw8547

















      asked Sep 20 '17 at 14:28









      dw8547dw8547

      3271313




      3271313





      bumped to the homepage by Community 9 mins ago


      This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







      bumped to the homepage by Community 9 mins ago


      This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          I found an answer to this question here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/16610449/get-the-count-of-rows-from-a-copy-command. The answer points to a new feature of PL/pgSQL whereby




          COPY executed in a PL/pgSQL function now updates the value
          retrieved by GET DIAGNOSTICS x = ROW_COUNT.




          Using this information I've tried it as:



          CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION populate_table (
          table_name CHARACTER VARYING
          )
          RETURNS INTEGER AS
          $$
          DECLARE
          rows_copied INTEGER;
          BEGIN
          EXECUTE format(
          'COPY schema.%I (
          column1
          , column2
          , column3 )
          FROM ''file.txt''
          WITH (FORMAT);'
          , table_name);

          GET DIAGNOSTICS rows_copied := ROW_COUNT;
          RETURN rows_copied;
          END
          $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;


          and the terminal message now is:



          populate_table 
          --------------
          x
          (1 row)


          If I further tweak the psql settings with:



          t [on|off]            show only rows (currently on)
          a toggle between unaligned and aligned output mode


          the terminal output is:



          x


          which is exactly what I wanted.






          share|improve this answer
























          • @ErwinBrandstetter, it was your question on SO and the answer to it that helped me out here so this question is really a duplicate. I am not sure what the protocol here is but I am happy to delete this question from here, as it's already been answered over on SO.

            – dw8547
            Sep 22 '17 at 14:59











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "182"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f186435%2fcapture-copy-update-command-tag-from-an-execute-statement-in-a-pl-pgsql-functi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0














          I found an answer to this question here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/16610449/get-the-count-of-rows-from-a-copy-command. The answer points to a new feature of PL/pgSQL whereby




          COPY executed in a PL/pgSQL function now updates the value
          retrieved by GET DIAGNOSTICS x = ROW_COUNT.




          Using this information I've tried it as:



          CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION populate_table (
          table_name CHARACTER VARYING
          )
          RETURNS INTEGER AS
          $$
          DECLARE
          rows_copied INTEGER;
          BEGIN
          EXECUTE format(
          'COPY schema.%I (
          column1
          , column2
          , column3 )
          FROM ''file.txt''
          WITH (FORMAT);'
          , table_name);

          GET DIAGNOSTICS rows_copied := ROW_COUNT;
          RETURN rows_copied;
          END
          $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;


          and the terminal message now is:



          populate_table 
          --------------
          x
          (1 row)


          If I further tweak the psql settings with:



          t [on|off]            show only rows (currently on)
          a toggle between unaligned and aligned output mode


          the terminal output is:



          x


          which is exactly what I wanted.






          share|improve this answer
























          • @ErwinBrandstetter, it was your question on SO and the answer to it that helped me out here so this question is really a duplicate. I am not sure what the protocol here is but I am happy to delete this question from here, as it's already been answered over on SO.

            – dw8547
            Sep 22 '17 at 14:59
















          0














          I found an answer to this question here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/16610449/get-the-count-of-rows-from-a-copy-command. The answer points to a new feature of PL/pgSQL whereby




          COPY executed in a PL/pgSQL function now updates the value
          retrieved by GET DIAGNOSTICS x = ROW_COUNT.




          Using this information I've tried it as:



          CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION populate_table (
          table_name CHARACTER VARYING
          )
          RETURNS INTEGER AS
          $$
          DECLARE
          rows_copied INTEGER;
          BEGIN
          EXECUTE format(
          'COPY schema.%I (
          column1
          , column2
          , column3 )
          FROM ''file.txt''
          WITH (FORMAT);'
          , table_name);

          GET DIAGNOSTICS rows_copied := ROW_COUNT;
          RETURN rows_copied;
          END
          $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;


          and the terminal message now is:



          populate_table 
          --------------
          x
          (1 row)


          If I further tweak the psql settings with:



          t [on|off]            show only rows (currently on)
          a toggle between unaligned and aligned output mode


          the terminal output is:



          x


          which is exactly what I wanted.






          share|improve this answer
























          • @ErwinBrandstetter, it was your question on SO and the answer to it that helped me out here so this question is really a duplicate. I am not sure what the protocol here is but I am happy to delete this question from here, as it's already been answered over on SO.

            – dw8547
            Sep 22 '17 at 14:59














          0












          0








          0







          I found an answer to this question here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/16610449/get-the-count-of-rows-from-a-copy-command. The answer points to a new feature of PL/pgSQL whereby




          COPY executed in a PL/pgSQL function now updates the value
          retrieved by GET DIAGNOSTICS x = ROW_COUNT.




          Using this information I've tried it as:



          CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION populate_table (
          table_name CHARACTER VARYING
          )
          RETURNS INTEGER AS
          $$
          DECLARE
          rows_copied INTEGER;
          BEGIN
          EXECUTE format(
          'COPY schema.%I (
          column1
          , column2
          , column3 )
          FROM ''file.txt''
          WITH (FORMAT);'
          , table_name);

          GET DIAGNOSTICS rows_copied := ROW_COUNT;
          RETURN rows_copied;
          END
          $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;


          and the terminal message now is:



          populate_table 
          --------------
          x
          (1 row)


          If I further tweak the psql settings with:



          t [on|off]            show only rows (currently on)
          a toggle between unaligned and aligned output mode


          the terminal output is:



          x


          which is exactly what I wanted.






          share|improve this answer













          I found an answer to this question here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/16610449/get-the-count-of-rows-from-a-copy-command. The answer points to a new feature of PL/pgSQL whereby




          COPY executed in a PL/pgSQL function now updates the value
          retrieved by GET DIAGNOSTICS x = ROW_COUNT.




          Using this information I've tried it as:



          CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION populate_table (
          table_name CHARACTER VARYING
          )
          RETURNS INTEGER AS
          $$
          DECLARE
          rows_copied INTEGER;
          BEGIN
          EXECUTE format(
          'COPY schema.%I (
          column1
          , column2
          , column3 )
          FROM ''file.txt''
          WITH (FORMAT);'
          , table_name);

          GET DIAGNOSTICS rows_copied := ROW_COUNT;
          RETURN rows_copied;
          END
          $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;


          and the terminal message now is:



          populate_table 
          --------------
          x
          (1 row)


          If I further tweak the psql settings with:



          t [on|off]            show only rows (currently on)
          a toggle between unaligned and aligned output mode


          the terminal output is:



          x


          which is exactly what I wanted.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Sep 22 '17 at 14:56









          dw8547dw8547

          3271313




          3271313













          • @ErwinBrandstetter, it was your question on SO and the answer to it that helped me out here so this question is really a duplicate. I am not sure what the protocol here is but I am happy to delete this question from here, as it's already been answered over on SO.

            – dw8547
            Sep 22 '17 at 14:59



















          • @ErwinBrandstetter, it was your question on SO and the answer to it that helped me out here so this question is really a duplicate. I am not sure what the protocol here is but I am happy to delete this question from here, as it's already been answered over on SO.

            – dw8547
            Sep 22 '17 at 14:59

















          @ErwinBrandstetter, it was your question on SO and the answer to it that helped me out here so this question is really a duplicate. I am not sure what the protocol here is but I am happy to delete this question from here, as it's already been answered over on SO.

          – dw8547
          Sep 22 '17 at 14:59





          @ErwinBrandstetter, it was your question on SO and the answer to it that helped me out here so this question is really a duplicate. I am not sure what the protocol here is but I am happy to delete this question from here, as it's already been answered over on SO.

          – dw8547
          Sep 22 '17 at 14:59


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f186435%2fcapture-copy-update-command-tag-from-an-execute-statement-in-a-pl-pgsql-functi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Parapolítica Índice Antecedentes El escándalo Proceso judicial Consecuencias Véase...

          How to remove border from elements in the last row?Targeting flex items on the last rowHow to vertically wrap...

          Tecnologías entrañables Índice Antecedentes Desarrollo Tecnologías Entrañables en la...