How do Japanese speakers determine the implied topic when none has been mentioned?How does the use of...
I am on the US no-fly list. What can I do in order to be allowed on flights which go through US airspace?
Where was Karl Mordo in Infinity War?
It took me a lot of time to make this, pls like. (YouTube Comments #1)
Wanted: 5.25 floppy to usb adapter
How to satisfy a player character's curiosity about another player character?
Why do members of Congress in committee hearings ask witnesses the same question multiple times?
Is my plan for fixing my water heater leak bad?
Criticizing long fiction. How is it different from short?
Meaning of すきっとした
What is the purpose of easy combat scenarios that don't need resource expenditure?
When does coming up with an idea constitute sufficient contribution for authorship?
What is the meaning of "pick up" in this sentence?
F1 visa even for a three-week course?
Can a hotel cancel a confirmed reservation?
How can I mix up weapons for large groups of similar monsters/characters?
What's the purpose of these copper coils with resitors inside them in A Yamaha RX-V396RDS amplifier?
Has the Isbell–Freyd criterion ever been used to check that a category is concretisable?
What does a violin mute do?
What can I substitute for soda pop in a sweet pork recipe?
Do my Windows system binaries contain sensitive information?
Incompressible fluid definition
What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?
Dilemma of explaining to interviewer that he is the reason for declining second interview
Should I choose Itemized or Standard deduction?
How do Japanese speakers determine the implied topic when none has been mentioned?
How does the use of いかんによっては in this question determine one answer over another?How do you say “like when you” or “the way you” in Japanese?How would you say “A has the meaning of B” or “A conveys B”How do I determine the indirect object of a command?How do ことになる and ようになる differ? (When ことになる cannot = “It has been decided that”)How has japanese writing changed in the last century?How to determine the scope of subject?How to determine the scope of modifiers in long sentences?てくれる vs てもらう when the topic or subject is impliedHow do I figure out what the implied subject is?
I imagine this is something that Japanese speakers naturally build up as they are exposed and communicate in the language for many years. However, take the following scene:
「おお、豪華な魚料理だなぁ」
「港町だけあって魚がやっぱり自慢みたい」- From context this is clearly not referring to the speaker or listener.
「それと地酒も集まるからそっちも沢山」
「お酒か……普段はあんまり飲まないけど、それならたまには……」 - Speaker
「ああ、いただくとしよう」- Speaker
「それじゃ、かんぱーい」
(they all get drunk and have a hang over and get woken up the next
morning)
「朝ーーーーー!」
「ほらほら、みんな起きてー!」
「うう……頭痛い……」- SPeaker
「私も、です……」- Speaker
「少し昨日は、飲み過ぎたな……」- Ambiguous? The speaker (at the bare minimum) is saying that they drank too much yesterday, however they could also be saying "We" drank too much. How does one differentiate between these? Would the wording be slightly different or could the same wording be used for I/You/We?
「普段あまり飲まないからなぁ……加減が分からなくなってしまった」I guess that this is referring to the speaker as it is the same person as before who said they don't drink very much
grammar
New contributor
add a comment |
I imagine this is something that Japanese speakers naturally build up as they are exposed and communicate in the language for many years. However, take the following scene:
「おお、豪華な魚料理だなぁ」
「港町だけあって魚がやっぱり自慢みたい」- From context this is clearly not referring to the speaker or listener.
「それと地酒も集まるからそっちも沢山」
「お酒か……普段はあんまり飲まないけど、それならたまには……」 - Speaker
「ああ、いただくとしよう」- Speaker
「それじゃ、かんぱーい」
(they all get drunk and have a hang over and get woken up the next
morning)
「朝ーーーーー!」
「ほらほら、みんな起きてー!」
「うう……頭痛い……」- SPeaker
「私も、です……」- Speaker
「少し昨日は、飲み過ぎたな……」- Ambiguous? The speaker (at the bare minimum) is saying that they drank too much yesterday, however they could also be saying "We" drank too much. How does one differentiate between these? Would the wording be slightly different or could the same wording be used for I/You/We?
「普段あまり飲まないからなぁ……加減が分からなくなってしまった」I guess that this is referring to the speaker as it is the same person as before who said they don't drink very much
grammar
New contributor
add a comment |
I imagine this is something that Japanese speakers naturally build up as they are exposed and communicate in the language for many years. However, take the following scene:
「おお、豪華な魚料理だなぁ」
「港町だけあって魚がやっぱり自慢みたい」- From context this is clearly not referring to the speaker or listener.
「それと地酒も集まるからそっちも沢山」
「お酒か……普段はあんまり飲まないけど、それならたまには……」 - Speaker
「ああ、いただくとしよう」- Speaker
「それじゃ、かんぱーい」
(they all get drunk and have a hang over and get woken up the next
morning)
「朝ーーーーー!」
「ほらほら、みんな起きてー!」
「うう……頭痛い……」- SPeaker
「私も、です……」- Speaker
「少し昨日は、飲み過ぎたな……」- Ambiguous? The speaker (at the bare minimum) is saying that they drank too much yesterday, however they could also be saying "We" drank too much. How does one differentiate between these? Would the wording be slightly different or could the same wording be used for I/You/We?
「普段あまり飲まないからなぁ……加減が分からなくなってしまった」I guess that this is referring to the speaker as it is the same person as before who said they don't drink very much
grammar
New contributor
I imagine this is something that Japanese speakers naturally build up as they are exposed and communicate in the language for many years. However, take the following scene:
「おお、豪華な魚料理だなぁ」
「港町だけあって魚がやっぱり自慢みたい」- From context this is clearly not referring to the speaker or listener.
「それと地酒も集まるからそっちも沢山」
「お酒か……普段はあんまり飲まないけど、それならたまには……」 - Speaker
「ああ、いただくとしよう」- Speaker
「それじゃ、かんぱーい」
(they all get drunk and have a hang over and get woken up the next
morning)
「朝ーーーーー!」
「ほらほら、みんな起きてー!」
「うう……頭痛い……」- SPeaker
「私も、です……」- Speaker
「少し昨日は、飲み過ぎたな……」- Ambiguous? The speaker (at the bare minimum) is saying that they drank too much yesterday, however they could also be saying "We" drank too much. How does one differentiate between these? Would the wording be slightly different or could the same wording be used for I/You/We?
「普段あまり飲まないからなぁ……加減が分からなくなってしまった」I guess that this is referring to the speaker as it is the same person as before who said they don't drink very much
grammar
grammar
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 4 hours ago
sacredz1sacredz1
61
61
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Would the wording be slightly different or could the same wording be used for I/You/We?
If you're lucky, the choice of a sentence-ending can be an indicator of the subject. For example, the subject of 昨日は飲み過ぎたんでしょう would only be "you" or "you guys", because it doesn't make sense to use でしょう referring to the speaker themselves.
In this case, however, the subject of 少し昨日は飲み過ぎたな is indeed somewhat ambiguous. It can be "I", "we" or "you guys". If the context clearly indicates the speaker did not drink (e.g., the speaker is a teenager boy who was not in the yesterday's party), then the subject would be "you guys". Otherwise, it would be either "I" or "we", and the difference is not important here. If the singular-plural distinction were important, he would have added either 俺は or みんな.
Regarding the last line, 普段あまり飲まない probably applies only to the speaker of this line, so the subject of 加減が分からなくなってしまった should be the same, i.e., singular "I".
It's hard to generalize, but both context and word choice are critically important to determine an implied subject. For example, an honorific verb can automatically indicate the subject is higher than you.
Even If the last line is not there, Japanese Could understand/guess the subject. The way of speaking implicitly telling the subject.飲み過ぎたな...
– suish
1 hour ago
One of my ideas is that the language generally makes it impossible to assume other people's feeling ; by default you should only consider that a speaker speaks for themselves only. See for example 寒い meaning "I feel cold (subjectively)" (not assuming that the interlocutor also feels cold) ; or "子供がおもちゃを欲しがっている", "kid seems to want the toy" (not pretending to actually knowing what the kid thinks).
– wip
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "257"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
sacredz1 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fjapanese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f65825%2fhow-do-japanese-speakers-determine-the-implied-topic-when-none-has-been-mentione%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Would the wording be slightly different or could the same wording be used for I/You/We?
If you're lucky, the choice of a sentence-ending can be an indicator of the subject. For example, the subject of 昨日は飲み過ぎたんでしょう would only be "you" or "you guys", because it doesn't make sense to use でしょう referring to the speaker themselves.
In this case, however, the subject of 少し昨日は飲み過ぎたな is indeed somewhat ambiguous. It can be "I", "we" or "you guys". If the context clearly indicates the speaker did not drink (e.g., the speaker is a teenager boy who was not in the yesterday's party), then the subject would be "you guys". Otherwise, it would be either "I" or "we", and the difference is not important here. If the singular-plural distinction were important, he would have added either 俺は or みんな.
Regarding the last line, 普段あまり飲まない probably applies only to the speaker of this line, so the subject of 加減が分からなくなってしまった should be the same, i.e., singular "I".
It's hard to generalize, but both context and word choice are critically important to determine an implied subject. For example, an honorific verb can automatically indicate the subject is higher than you.
Even If the last line is not there, Japanese Could understand/guess the subject. The way of speaking implicitly telling the subject.飲み過ぎたな...
– suish
1 hour ago
One of my ideas is that the language generally makes it impossible to assume other people's feeling ; by default you should only consider that a speaker speaks for themselves only. See for example 寒い meaning "I feel cold (subjectively)" (not assuming that the interlocutor also feels cold) ; or "子供がおもちゃを欲しがっている", "kid seems to want the toy" (not pretending to actually knowing what the kid thinks).
– wip
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Would the wording be slightly different or could the same wording be used for I/You/We?
If you're lucky, the choice of a sentence-ending can be an indicator of the subject. For example, the subject of 昨日は飲み過ぎたんでしょう would only be "you" or "you guys", because it doesn't make sense to use でしょう referring to the speaker themselves.
In this case, however, the subject of 少し昨日は飲み過ぎたな is indeed somewhat ambiguous. It can be "I", "we" or "you guys". If the context clearly indicates the speaker did not drink (e.g., the speaker is a teenager boy who was not in the yesterday's party), then the subject would be "you guys". Otherwise, it would be either "I" or "we", and the difference is not important here. If the singular-plural distinction were important, he would have added either 俺は or みんな.
Regarding the last line, 普段あまり飲まない probably applies only to the speaker of this line, so the subject of 加減が分からなくなってしまった should be the same, i.e., singular "I".
It's hard to generalize, but both context and word choice are critically important to determine an implied subject. For example, an honorific verb can automatically indicate the subject is higher than you.
Even If the last line is not there, Japanese Could understand/guess the subject. The way of speaking implicitly telling the subject.飲み過ぎたな...
– suish
1 hour ago
One of my ideas is that the language generally makes it impossible to assume other people's feeling ; by default you should only consider that a speaker speaks for themselves only. See for example 寒い meaning "I feel cold (subjectively)" (not assuming that the interlocutor also feels cold) ; or "子供がおもちゃを欲しがっている", "kid seems to want the toy" (not pretending to actually knowing what the kid thinks).
– wip
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Would the wording be slightly different or could the same wording be used for I/You/We?
If you're lucky, the choice of a sentence-ending can be an indicator of the subject. For example, the subject of 昨日は飲み過ぎたんでしょう would only be "you" or "you guys", because it doesn't make sense to use でしょう referring to the speaker themselves.
In this case, however, the subject of 少し昨日は飲み過ぎたな is indeed somewhat ambiguous. It can be "I", "we" or "you guys". If the context clearly indicates the speaker did not drink (e.g., the speaker is a teenager boy who was not in the yesterday's party), then the subject would be "you guys". Otherwise, it would be either "I" or "we", and the difference is not important here. If the singular-plural distinction were important, he would have added either 俺は or みんな.
Regarding the last line, 普段あまり飲まない probably applies only to the speaker of this line, so the subject of 加減が分からなくなってしまった should be the same, i.e., singular "I".
It's hard to generalize, but both context and word choice are critically important to determine an implied subject. For example, an honorific verb can automatically indicate the subject is higher than you.
Would the wording be slightly different or could the same wording be used for I/You/We?
If you're lucky, the choice of a sentence-ending can be an indicator of the subject. For example, the subject of 昨日は飲み過ぎたんでしょう would only be "you" or "you guys", because it doesn't make sense to use でしょう referring to the speaker themselves.
In this case, however, the subject of 少し昨日は飲み過ぎたな is indeed somewhat ambiguous. It can be "I", "we" or "you guys". If the context clearly indicates the speaker did not drink (e.g., the speaker is a teenager boy who was not in the yesterday's party), then the subject would be "you guys". Otherwise, it would be either "I" or "we", and the difference is not important here. If the singular-plural distinction were important, he would have added either 俺は or みんな.
Regarding the last line, 普段あまり飲まない probably applies only to the speaker of this line, so the subject of 加減が分からなくなってしまった should be the same, i.e., singular "I".
It's hard to generalize, but both context and word choice are critically important to determine an implied subject. For example, an honorific verb can automatically indicate the subject is higher than you.
edited 1 hour ago
answered 1 hour ago
narutonaruto
159k8153298
159k8153298
Even If the last line is not there, Japanese Could understand/guess the subject. The way of speaking implicitly telling the subject.飲み過ぎたな...
– suish
1 hour ago
One of my ideas is that the language generally makes it impossible to assume other people's feeling ; by default you should only consider that a speaker speaks for themselves only. See for example 寒い meaning "I feel cold (subjectively)" (not assuming that the interlocutor also feels cold) ; or "子供がおもちゃを欲しがっている", "kid seems to want the toy" (not pretending to actually knowing what the kid thinks).
– wip
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Even If the last line is not there, Japanese Could understand/guess the subject. The way of speaking implicitly telling the subject.飲み過ぎたな...
– suish
1 hour ago
One of my ideas is that the language generally makes it impossible to assume other people's feeling ; by default you should only consider that a speaker speaks for themselves only. See for example 寒い meaning "I feel cold (subjectively)" (not assuming that the interlocutor also feels cold) ; or "子供がおもちゃを欲しがっている", "kid seems to want the toy" (not pretending to actually knowing what the kid thinks).
– wip
1 hour ago
Even If the last line is not there, Japanese Could understand/guess the subject. The way of speaking implicitly telling the subject.
飲み過ぎたな...
– suish
1 hour ago
Even If the last line is not there, Japanese Could understand/guess the subject. The way of speaking implicitly telling the subject.
飲み過ぎたな...
– suish
1 hour ago
One of my ideas is that the language generally makes it impossible to assume other people's feeling ; by default you should only consider that a speaker speaks for themselves only. See for example 寒い meaning "I feel cold (subjectively)" (not assuming that the interlocutor also feels cold) ; or "子供がおもちゃを欲しがっている", "kid seems to want the toy" (not pretending to actually knowing what the kid thinks).
– wip
1 hour ago
One of my ideas is that the language generally makes it impossible to assume other people's feeling ; by default you should only consider that a speaker speaks for themselves only. See for example 寒い meaning "I feel cold (subjectively)" (not assuming that the interlocutor also feels cold) ; or "子供がおもちゃを欲しがっている", "kid seems to want the toy" (not pretending to actually knowing what the kid thinks).
– wip
1 hour ago
add a comment |
sacredz1 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
sacredz1 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
sacredz1 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
sacredz1 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Japanese Language Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fjapanese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f65825%2fhow-do-japanese-speakers-determine-the-implied-topic-when-none-has-been-mentione%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown