Please help me understand the following solutionWhat is the second principle of finite induction?(Inductive...

Pendulum Rotation

Eww, those bytes are gross

Overfitting and Underfitting

Rear brake cable temporary fix possible?

What kind of hardware implements Fourier transform?

Can a hotel cancel a confirmed reservation?

What is the purpose of easy combat scenarios that don't need resource expenditure?

How would one buy a used TIE Fighter or X-Wing?

Program that converts a number to a letter of the alphabet

Are there any monsters that consume a player character?

Why do neural networks need so many training examples to perform?

Strange Sign on Lab Door

Does the "particle exchange" operator have any validity?

What makes the Forgotten Realms "forgotten"?

Why is working on the same position for more than 15 years not a red flag?

"On one hand" vs "on the one hand."

Everyone is beautiful

Can we use the stored gravitational potential energy of a building to produce power?

Is there a better way to make this?

How is the Incom shipyard still in business?

Can polymorphing monsters spam their ability to effectively give themselves a massive health pool?

When does coming up with an idea constitute sufficient contribution for authorship?

I am on the US no-fly list. What can I do in order to be allowed on flights which go through US airspace?

Why is button three on trumpet almost never used alone?



Please help me understand the following solution


What is the second principle of finite induction?(Inductive Proofs) Show why one inductive hypothesis works, and the other does not.Proving Inequalities using InductionFrobenius coin problem, 5 and 9Practice Examples of Proofs by Induction, Direct/Indirect MethodWhat does the constant mean in Big O notation?Showing a sequence defined recursively is convergentProving that $n! leq 2*(frac{n}2)^n$Prove by Induction help please???Proof by Mathematical Induction for Inequality













2












$begingroup$


Prove by induction of n



$sumlimits_{k=1}^n frac k{k+1} leq n - frac1{n+1}$





begin{align}sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1}&leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}\&=n-frac 1{n+1}+1-frac 1{n+2}\&=(n+1)-frac{2(n+2)-1}{(n+1)(n+2)}\&=(n+1)-frac 2{n+1}+frac 1{(n+1)(n+2)}\&leq (n+1)-frac 2{n+2}+frac 1{n+2}=(n+1)-frac 1{n+2}end{align}





Now I'm a beginner at induction, and couldn't follow this solution very well.I was hoping someone could help break down the steps and explain them.



Questions




  1. How the inequality works


Wouldn't



$sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1} $



become



$sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1} +frac{n+1}{n+2} leq n-frac 1{n+1}$



and then



$sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}-frac{n+1}{n+2} $



instead of



$sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2} $






  1. My largest issue with induction, is when the inequalities change like in the first and last step. I don't understand how that works. Any explanation, or good resources to help with my understanding of how the inequality changes when performing induction would be helpful.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    Prove by induction of n



    $sumlimits_{k=1}^n frac k{k+1} leq n - frac1{n+1}$





    begin{align}sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1}&leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}\&=n-frac 1{n+1}+1-frac 1{n+2}\&=(n+1)-frac{2(n+2)-1}{(n+1)(n+2)}\&=(n+1)-frac 2{n+1}+frac 1{(n+1)(n+2)}\&leq (n+1)-frac 2{n+2}+frac 1{n+2}=(n+1)-frac 1{n+2}end{align}





    Now I'm a beginner at induction, and couldn't follow this solution very well.I was hoping someone could help break down the steps and explain them.



    Questions




    1. How the inequality works


    Wouldn't



    $sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1} $



    become



    $sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1} +frac{n+1}{n+2} leq n-frac 1{n+1}$



    and then



    $sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}-frac{n+1}{n+2} $



    instead of



    $sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2} $






    1. My largest issue with induction, is when the inequalities change like in the first and last step. I don't understand how that works. Any explanation, or good resources to help with my understanding of how the inequality changes when performing induction would be helpful.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      Prove by induction of n



      $sumlimits_{k=1}^n frac k{k+1} leq n - frac1{n+1}$





      begin{align}sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1}&leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}\&=n-frac 1{n+1}+1-frac 1{n+2}\&=(n+1)-frac{2(n+2)-1}{(n+1)(n+2)}\&=(n+1)-frac 2{n+1}+frac 1{(n+1)(n+2)}\&leq (n+1)-frac 2{n+2}+frac 1{n+2}=(n+1)-frac 1{n+2}end{align}





      Now I'm a beginner at induction, and couldn't follow this solution very well.I was hoping someone could help break down the steps and explain them.



      Questions




      1. How the inequality works


      Wouldn't



      $sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1} $



      become



      $sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1} +frac{n+1}{n+2} leq n-frac 1{n+1}$



      and then



      $sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}-frac{n+1}{n+2} $



      instead of



      $sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2} $






      1. My largest issue with induction, is when the inequalities change like in the first and last step. I don't understand how that works. Any explanation, or good resources to help with my understanding of how the inequality changes when performing induction would be helpful.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Prove by induction of n



      $sumlimits_{k=1}^n frac k{k+1} leq n - frac1{n+1}$





      begin{align}sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1}&leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}\&=n-frac 1{n+1}+1-frac 1{n+2}\&=(n+1)-frac{2(n+2)-1}{(n+1)(n+2)}\&=(n+1)-frac 2{n+1}+frac 1{(n+1)(n+2)}\&leq (n+1)-frac 2{n+2}+frac 1{n+2}=(n+1)-frac 1{n+2}end{align}





      Now I'm a beginner at induction, and couldn't follow this solution very well.I was hoping someone could help break down the steps and explain them.



      Questions




      1. How the inequality works


      Wouldn't



      $sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1} $



      become



      $sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1} +frac{n+1}{n+2} leq n-frac 1{n+1}$



      and then



      $sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}-frac{n+1}{n+2} $



      instead of



      $sum_1^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2} $






      1. My largest issue with induction, is when the inequalities change like in the first and last step. I don't understand how that works. Any explanation, or good resources to help with my understanding of how the inequality changes when performing induction would be helpful.







      discrete-mathematics induction






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 1 hour ago









      BrownieBrownie

      947




      947






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          Remember that in induction proofs, we start by assuming that the claim we're trying to prove is true for $n$, and then conclude that it must also be true for $n + 1$. In this case, we start with the induction assumption
          $$sum_{k = 1}^{n} frac{k}{k + 1} leq n - frac{1}{n + 1},$$
          and want to end with the conclusion that $$sum_{k = 1}^{n + 1} frac{k}{k + 1} leq n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} .$$
          Here's the argument written out in a bit more detail with commentary on each step.
          begin{align*}
          sum_{k = 1}^{n + 1} frac{k}{k + 1} & = frac{n + 1}{n + 2} + sum_{k = 1}^{n} frac{k}{k + 1} & textrm{ (just writing out the sum)} \
          & leq frac{n + 1}{n + 2} + n - frac{1}{n + 1} & textrm{ (applying the induction hypothesis)} \
          & = 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} + n - frac{1}{n + 1} & textrm{ (rewriting $frac{n+ 1}{n + 2}$ as $frac{n + 2 - 1}{n + 2} = 1 - frac{1}{n + 2}$)} \
          & = n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 1} - frac{1}{n + 2} & textrm{ (regrouping)} \
          & = n + 1 - frac{(n + 2) + (n + 1)}{(n + 2)(n + 1)} & textrm{ (combining fractions)} \
          & = n + 1 - frac{2(n + 2) - 1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (regrouping the numerator)} \
          & = n + 1 - frac{2(n + 2)}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} + frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (breaking the fraction back apart)} \
          & = n + 1 - frac{2}{n + 1} + frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (simplifying the fraction)} \
          & leq n + 1 - frac{2}{n + 2} + frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (we slightly modified the second-to-last summand)} \
          & leq n + 1 - frac{2}{n + 2} + frac{1}{n + 2} & textrm{ (modifying the last summand)} \
          & = n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} & textrm{ (combining the fractions)} .
          end{align*}

          So in summary, we began with the assumption that the claim held for $n$, and through some arithmetic trickery concluded that it therefore held for $n + 1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            This is an amazing break down, could explain your second-to-last and third-to-last steps where you modify the summand? Oh I think I might understand, is it to make the inequality <= ?
            $endgroup$
            – Brownie
            1 hour ago








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Brownie In the third-to-last step, we observe that $n + 1 leq n + 2$, so $frac{2}{n + 1} geq frac{2}{n + 2}$, so $- frac{2}{n + 1} leq - frac{2}{n + 2}$. For the second-to-last step, we can see that $frac{1}{n + 2} = frac{n + 1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} = (n + 1) frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} geq frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)}$.
            $endgroup$
            – AJY
            1 hour ago








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            So is this a step you saw you could implement to get the final equal to $ n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} $ ? Or is there something that would push you towards doing this?
            $endgroup$
            – Brownie
            54 mins ago








          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @Brownie The short answer is that these kinds of tricks come easier with practice. We wanted to get to a very particular estimate, and just kinda made what estimates we could until it fell out just right. Sometimes (often) it just takes trial and error.
            $endgroup$
            – AJY
            51 mins ago



















          1












          $begingroup$

          Regarding the first inequality you're asking about, they are actually adding the term $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to both sides, but on the left hand side it is added by increasing the upper limit in the sum by $1$, and to not change the inequality you have to add $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to the right hand side.



          The subsequent steps in the proof you posted are just rearrangements of fractions using algebra, nothing actually changes there until the last line. Then they just use the fact that $frac{1}{(n+1)(n+2)} leq frac{1}{n+2}$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Cool just last quick question, for the left hand side if instead of increasing the upper limit of the sum by 1, I added $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to both sides, that would be the same?
            $endgroup$
            – Brownie
            1 hour ago










          • $begingroup$
            Yes, that would be the same.
            $endgroup$
            – Thomas Fjærvik
            1 hour ago



















          1












          $begingroup$

          If $aleq b $, then $a+cleq b+c $ for any $cin Bbb R $. By assumption, we have $$sum_{k=1}^{n}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}.$$ Now add $dfrac{n+1}{n+2}$ on both sides, i.e., $$sum_{k=1}^{n}frac k{k+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}.$$ Note that $$sum_{k=1}^{n}frac k{k+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}=sum_{k=1}^{n+1}frac k{k+1}.$$ Hence we have $$sum_{k=1}^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3133089%2fplease-help-me-understand-the-following-solution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$

            Remember that in induction proofs, we start by assuming that the claim we're trying to prove is true for $n$, and then conclude that it must also be true for $n + 1$. In this case, we start with the induction assumption
            $$sum_{k = 1}^{n} frac{k}{k + 1} leq n - frac{1}{n + 1},$$
            and want to end with the conclusion that $$sum_{k = 1}^{n + 1} frac{k}{k + 1} leq n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} .$$
            Here's the argument written out in a bit more detail with commentary on each step.
            begin{align*}
            sum_{k = 1}^{n + 1} frac{k}{k + 1} & = frac{n + 1}{n + 2} + sum_{k = 1}^{n} frac{k}{k + 1} & textrm{ (just writing out the sum)} \
            & leq frac{n + 1}{n + 2} + n - frac{1}{n + 1} & textrm{ (applying the induction hypothesis)} \
            & = 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} + n - frac{1}{n + 1} & textrm{ (rewriting $frac{n+ 1}{n + 2}$ as $frac{n + 2 - 1}{n + 2} = 1 - frac{1}{n + 2}$)} \
            & = n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 1} - frac{1}{n + 2} & textrm{ (regrouping)} \
            & = n + 1 - frac{(n + 2) + (n + 1)}{(n + 2)(n + 1)} & textrm{ (combining fractions)} \
            & = n + 1 - frac{2(n + 2) - 1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (regrouping the numerator)} \
            & = n + 1 - frac{2(n + 2)}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} + frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (breaking the fraction back apart)} \
            & = n + 1 - frac{2}{n + 1} + frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (simplifying the fraction)} \
            & leq n + 1 - frac{2}{n + 2} + frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (we slightly modified the second-to-last summand)} \
            & leq n + 1 - frac{2}{n + 2} + frac{1}{n + 2} & textrm{ (modifying the last summand)} \
            & = n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} & textrm{ (combining the fractions)} .
            end{align*}

            So in summary, we began with the assumption that the claim held for $n$, and through some arithmetic trickery concluded that it therefore held for $n + 1$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$









            • 1




              $begingroup$
              This is an amazing break down, could explain your second-to-last and third-to-last steps where you modify the summand? Oh I think I might understand, is it to make the inequality <= ?
              $endgroup$
              – Brownie
              1 hour ago








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @Brownie In the third-to-last step, we observe that $n + 1 leq n + 2$, so $frac{2}{n + 1} geq frac{2}{n + 2}$, so $- frac{2}{n + 1} leq - frac{2}{n + 2}$. For the second-to-last step, we can see that $frac{1}{n + 2} = frac{n + 1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} = (n + 1) frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} geq frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)}$.
              $endgroup$
              – AJY
              1 hour ago








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              So is this a step you saw you could implement to get the final equal to $ n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} $ ? Or is there something that would push you towards doing this?
              $endgroup$
              – Brownie
              54 mins ago








            • 2




              $begingroup$
              @Brownie The short answer is that these kinds of tricks come easier with practice. We wanted to get to a very particular estimate, and just kinda made what estimates we could until it fell out just right. Sometimes (often) it just takes trial and error.
              $endgroup$
              – AJY
              51 mins ago
















            3












            $begingroup$

            Remember that in induction proofs, we start by assuming that the claim we're trying to prove is true for $n$, and then conclude that it must also be true for $n + 1$. In this case, we start with the induction assumption
            $$sum_{k = 1}^{n} frac{k}{k + 1} leq n - frac{1}{n + 1},$$
            and want to end with the conclusion that $$sum_{k = 1}^{n + 1} frac{k}{k + 1} leq n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} .$$
            Here's the argument written out in a bit more detail with commentary on each step.
            begin{align*}
            sum_{k = 1}^{n + 1} frac{k}{k + 1} & = frac{n + 1}{n + 2} + sum_{k = 1}^{n} frac{k}{k + 1} & textrm{ (just writing out the sum)} \
            & leq frac{n + 1}{n + 2} + n - frac{1}{n + 1} & textrm{ (applying the induction hypothesis)} \
            & = 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} + n - frac{1}{n + 1} & textrm{ (rewriting $frac{n+ 1}{n + 2}$ as $frac{n + 2 - 1}{n + 2} = 1 - frac{1}{n + 2}$)} \
            & = n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 1} - frac{1}{n + 2} & textrm{ (regrouping)} \
            & = n + 1 - frac{(n + 2) + (n + 1)}{(n + 2)(n + 1)} & textrm{ (combining fractions)} \
            & = n + 1 - frac{2(n + 2) - 1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (regrouping the numerator)} \
            & = n + 1 - frac{2(n + 2)}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} + frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (breaking the fraction back apart)} \
            & = n + 1 - frac{2}{n + 1} + frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (simplifying the fraction)} \
            & leq n + 1 - frac{2}{n + 2} + frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (we slightly modified the second-to-last summand)} \
            & leq n + 1 - frac{2}{n + 2} + frac{1}{n + 2} & textrm{ (modifying the last summand)} \
            & = n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} & textrm{ (combining the fractions)} .
            end{align*}

            So in summary, we began with the assumption that the claim held for $n$, and through some arithmetic trickery concluded that it therefore held for $n + 1$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$









            • 1




              $begingroup$
              This is an amazing break down, could explain your second-to-last and third-to-last steps where you modify the summand? Oh I think I might understand, is it to make the inequality <= ?
              $endgroup$
              – Brownie
              1 hour ago








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @Brownie In the third-to-last step, we observe that $n + 1 leq n + 2$, so $frac{2}{n + 1} geq frac{2}{n + 2}$, so $- frac{2}{n + 1} leq - frac{2}{n + 2}$. For the second-to-last step, we can see that $frac{1}{n + 2} = frac{n + 1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} = (n + 1) frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} geq frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)}$.
              $endgroup$
              – AJY
              1 hour ago








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              So is this a step you saw you could implement to get the final equal to $ n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} $ ? Or is there something that would push you towards doing this?
              $endgroup$
              – Brownie
              54 mins ago








            • 2




              $begingroup$
              @Brownie The short answer is that these kinds of tricks come easier with practice. We wanted to get to a very particular estimate, and just kinda made what estimates we could until it fell out just right. Sometimes (often) it just takes trial and error.
              $endgroup$
              – AJY
              51 mins ago














            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            Remember that in induction proofs, we start by assuming that the claim we're trying to prove is true for $n$, and then conclude that it must also be true for $n + 1$. In this case, we start with the induction assumption
            $$sum_{k = 1}^{n} frac{k}{k + 1} leq n - frac{1}{n + 1},$$
            and want to end with the conclusion that $$sum_{k = 1}^{n + 1} frac{k}{k + 1} leq n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} .$$
            Here's the argument written out in a bit more detail with commentary on each step.
            begin{align*}
            sum_{k = 1}^{n + 1} frac{k}{k + 1} & = frac{n + 1}{n + 2} + sum_{k = 1}^{n} frac{k}{k + 1} & textrm{ (just writing out the sum)} \
            & leq frac{n + 1}{n + 2} + n - frac{1}{n + 1} & textrm{ (applying the induction hypothesis)} \
            & = 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} + n - frac{1}{n + 1} & textrm{ (rewriting $frac{n+ 1}{n + 2}$ as $frac{n + 2 - 1}{n + 2} = 1 - frac{1}{n + 2}$)} \
            & = n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 1} - frac{1}{n + 2} & textrm{ (regrouping)} \
            & = n + 1 - frac{(n + 2) + (n + 1)}{(n + 2)(n + 1)} & textrm{ (combining fractions)} \
            & = n + 1 - frac{2(n + 2) - 1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (regrouping the numerator)} \
            & = n + 1 - frac{2(n + 2)}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} + frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (breaking the fraction back apart)} \
            & = n + 1 - frac{2}{n + 1} + frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (simplifying the fraction)} \
            & leq n + 1 - frac{2}{n + 2} + frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (we slightly modified the second-to-last summand)} \
            & leq n + 1 - frac{2}{n + 2} + frac{1}{n + 2} & textrm{ (modifying the last summand)} \
            & = n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} & textrm{ (combining the fractions)} .
            end{align*}

            So in summary, we began with the assumption that the claim held for $n$, and through some arithmetic trickery concluded that it therefore held for $n + 1$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Remember that in induction proofs, we start by assuming that the claim we're trying to prove is true for $n$, and then conclude that it must also be true for $n + 1$. In this case, we start with the induction assumption
            $$sum_{k = 1}^{n} frac{k}{k + 1} leq n - frac{1}{n + 1},$$
            and want to end with the conclusion that $$sum_{k = 1}^{n + 1} frac{k}{k + 1} leq n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} .$$
            Here's the argument written out in a bit more detail with commentary on each step.
            begin{align*}
            sum_{k = 1}^{n + 1} frac{k}{k + 1} & = frac{n + 1}{n + 2} + sum_{k = 1}^{n} frac{k}{k + 1} & textrm{ (just writing out the sum)} \
            & leq frac{n + 1}{n + 2} + n - frac{1}{n + 1} & textrm{ (applying the induction hypothesis)} \
            & = 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} + n - frac{1}{n + 1} & textrm{ (rewriting $frac{n+ 1}{n + 2}$ as $frac{n + 2 - 1}{n + 2} = 1 - frac{1}{n + 2}$)} \
            & = n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 1} - frac{1}{n + 2} & textrm{ (regrouping)} \
            & = n + 1 - frac{(n + 2) + (n + 1)}{(n + 2)(n + 1)} & textrm{ (combining fractions)} \
            & = n + 1 - frac{2(n + 2) - 1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (regrouping the numerator)} \
            & = n + 1 - frac{2(n + 2)}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} + frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (breaking the fraction back apart)} \
            & = n + 1 - frac{2}{n + 1} + frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (simplifying the fraction)} \
            & leq n + 1 - frac{2}{n + 2} + frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} & textrm{ (we slightly modified the second-to-last summand)} \
            & leq n + 1 - frac{2}{n + 2} + frac{1}{n + 2} & textrm{ (modifying the last summand)} \
            & = n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} & textrm{ (combining the fractions)} .
            end{align*}

            So in summary, we began with the assumption that the claim held for $n$, and through some arithmetic trickery concluded that it therefore held for $n + 1$.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 1 hour ago

























            answered 1 hour ago









            AJYAJY

            4,18521128




            4,18521128








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              This is an amazing break down, could explain your second-to-last and third-to-last steps where you modify the summand? Oh I think I might understand, is it to make the inequality <= ?
              $endgroup$
              – Brownie
              1 hour ago








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @Brownie In the third-to-last step, we observe that $n + 1 leq n + 2$, so $frac{2}{n + 1} geq frac{2}{n + 2}$, so $- frac{2}{n + 1} leq - frac{2}{n + 2}$. For the second-to-last step, we can see that $frac{1}{n + 2} = frac{n + 1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} = (n + 1) frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} geq frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)}$.
              $endgroup$
              – AJY
              1 hour ago








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              So is this a step you saw you could implement to get the final equal to $ n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} $ ? Or is there something that would push you towards doing this?
              $endgroup$
              – Brownie
              54 mins ago








            • 2




              $begingroup$
              @Brownie The short answer is that these kinds of tricks come easier with practice. We wanted to get to a very particular estimate, and just kinda made what estimates we could until it fell out just right. Sometimes (often) it just takes trial and error.
              $endgroup$
              – AJY
              51 mins ago














            • 1




              $begingroup$
              This is an amazing break down, could explain your second-to-last and third-to-last steps where you modify the summand? Oh I think I might understand, is it to make the inequality <= ?
              $endgroup$
              – Brownie
              1 hour ago








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @Brownie In the third-to-last step, we observe that $n + 1 leq n + 2$, so $frac{2}{n + 1} geq frac{2}{n + 2}$, so $- frac{2}{n + 1} leq - frac{2}{n + 2}$. For the second-to-last step, we can see that $frac{1}{n + 2} = frac{n + 1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} = (n + 1) frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} geq frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)}$.
              $endgroup$
              – AJY
              1 hour ago








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              So is this a step you saw you could implement to get the final equal to $ n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} $ ? Or is there something that would push you towards doing this?
              $endgroup$
              – Brownie
              54 mins ago








            • 2




              $begingroup$
              @Brownie The short answer is that these kinds of tricks come easier with practice. We wanted to get to a very particular estimate, and just kinda made what estimates we could until it fell out just right. Sometimes (often) it just takes trial and error.
              $endgroup$
              – AJY
              51 mins ago








            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            This is an amazing break down, could explain your second-to-last and third-to-last steps where you modify the summand? Oh I think I might understand, is it to make the inequality <= ?
            $endgroup$
            – Brownie
            1 hour ago






            $begingroup$
            This is an amazing break down, could explain your second-to-last and third-to-last steps where you modify the summand? Oh I think I might understand, is it to make the inequality <= ?
            $endgroup$
            – Brownie
            1 hour ago






            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            @Brownie In the third-to-last step, we observe that $n + 1 leq n + 2$, so $frac{2}{n + 1} geq frac{2}{n + 2}$, so $- frac{2}{n + 1} leq - frac{2}{n + 2}$. For the second-to-last step, we can see that $frac{1}{n + 2} = frac{n + 1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} = (n + 1) frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} geq frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)}$.
            $endgroup$
            – AJY
            1 hour ago






            $begingroup$
            @Brownie In the third-to-last step, we observe that $n + 1 leq n + 2$, so $frac{2}{n + 1} geq frac{2}{n + 2}$, so $- frac{2}{n + 1} leq - frac{2}{n + 2}$. For the second-to-last step, we can see that $frac{1}{n + 2} = frac{n + 1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} = (n + 1) frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)} geq frac{1}{(n + 1)(n + 2)}$.
            $endgroup$
            – AJY
            1 hour ago






            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            So is this a step you saw you could implement to get the final equal to $ n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} $ ? Or is there something that would push you towards doing this?
            $endgroup$
            – Brownie
            54 mins ago






            $begingroup$
            So is this a step you saw you could implement to get the final equal to $ n + 1 - frac{1}{n + 2} $ ? Or is there something that would push you towards doing this?
            $endgroup$
            – Brownie
            54 mins ago






            2




            2




            $begingroup$
            @Brownie The short answer is that these kinds of tricks come easier with practice. We wanted to get to a very particular estimate, and just kinda made what estimates we could until it fell out just right. Sometimes (often) it just takes trial and error.
            $endgroup$
            – AJY
            51 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            @Brownie The short answer is that these kinds of tricks come easier with practice. We wanted to get to a very particular estimate, and just kinda made what estimates we could until it fell out just right. Sometimes (often) it just takes trial and error.
            $endgroup$
            – AJY
            51 mins ago











            1












            $begingroup$

            Regarding the first inequality you're asking about, they are actually adding the term $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to both sides, but on the left hand side it is added by increasing the upper limit in the sum by $1$, and to not change the inequality you have to add $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to the right hand side.



            The subsequent steps in the proof you posted are just rearrangements of fractions using algebra, nothing actually changes there until the last line. Then they just use the fact that $frac{1}{(n+1)(n+2)} leq frac{1}{n+2}$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Cool just last quick question, for the left hand side if instead of increasing the upper limit of the sum by 1, I added $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to both sides, that would be the same?
              $endgroup$
              – Brownie
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              Yes, that would be the same.
              $endgroup$
              – Thomas Fjærvik
              1 hour ago
















            1












            $begingroup$

            Regarding the first inequality you're asking about, they are actually adding the term $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to both sides, but on the left hand side it is added by increasing the upper limit in the sum by $1$, and to not change the inequality you have to add $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to the right hand side.



            The subsequent steps in the proof you posted are just rearrangements of fractions using algebra, nothing actually changes there until the last line. Then they just use the fact that $frac{1}{(n+1)(n+2)} leq frac{1}{n+2}$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Cool just last quick question, for the left hand side if instead of increasing the upper limit of the sum by 1, I added $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to both sides, that would be the same?
              $endgroup$
              – Brownie
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              Yes, that would be the same.
              $endgroup$
              – Thomas Fjærvik
              1 hour ago














            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            Regarding the first inequality you're asking about, they are actually adding the term $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to both sides, but on the left hand side it is added by increasing the upper limit in the sum by $1$, and to not change the inequality you have to add $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to the right hand side.



            The subsequent steps in the proof you posted are just rearrangements of fractions using algebra, nothing actually changes there until the last line. Then they just use the fact that $frac{1}{(n+1)(n+2)} leq frac{1}{n+2}$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Regarding the first inequality you're asking about, they are actually adding the term $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to both sides, but on the left hand side it is added by increasing the upper limit in the sum by $1$, and to not change the inequality you have to add $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to the right hand side.



            The subsequent steps in the proof you posted are just rearrangements of fractions using algebra, nothing actually changes there until the last line. Then they just use the fact that $frac{1}{(n+1)(n+2)} leq frac{1}{n+2}$







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 1 hour ago









            Thomas FjærvikThomas Fjærvik

            2038




            2038












            • $begingroup$
              Cool just last quick question, for the left hand side if instead of increasing the upper limit of the sum by 1, I added $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to both sides, that would be the same?
              $endgroup$
              – Brownie
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              Yes, that would be the same.
              $endgroup$
              – Thomas Fjærvik
              1 hour ago


















            • $begingroup$
              Cool just last quick question, for the left hand side if instead of increasing the upper limit of the sum by 1, I added $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to both sides, that would be the same?
              $endgroup$
              – Brownie
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              Yes, that would be the same.
              $endgroup$
              – Thomas Fjærvik
              1 hour ago
















            $begingroup$
            Cool just last quick question, for the left hand side if instead of increasing the upper limit of the sum by 1, I added $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to both sides, that would be the same?
            $endgroup$
            – Brownie
            1 hour ago




            $begingroup$
            Cool just last quick question, for the left hand side if instead of increasing the upper limit of the sum by 1, I added $frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to both sides, that would be the same?
            $endgroup$
            – Brownie
            1 hour ago












            $begingroup$
            Yes, that would be the same.
            $endgroup$
            – Thomas Fjærvik
            1 hour ago




            $begingroup$
            Yes, that would be the same.
            $endgroup$
            – Thomas Fjærvik
            1 hour ago











            1












            $begingroup$

            If $aleq b $, then $a+cleq b+c $ for any $cin Bbb R $. By assumption, we have $$sum_{k=1}^{n}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}.$$ Now add $dfrac{n+1}{n+2}$ on both sides, i.e., $$sum_{k=1}^{n}frac k{k+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}.$$ Note that $$sum_{k=1}^{n}frac k{k+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}=sum_{k=1}^{n+1}frac k{k+1}.$$ Hence we have $$sum_{k=1}^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}.$$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              If $aleq b $, then $a+cleq b+c $ for any $cin Bbb R $. By assumption, we have $$sum_{k=1}^{n}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}.$$ Now add $dfrac{n+1}{n+2}$ on both sides, i.e., $$sum_{k=1}^{n}frac k{k+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}.$$ Note that $$sum_{k=1}^{n}frac k{k+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}=sum_{k=1}^{n+1}frac k{k+1}.$$ Hence we have $$sum_{k=1}^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}.$$






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                If $aleq b $, then $a+cleq b+c $ for any $cin Bbb R $. By assumption, we have $$sum_{k=1}^{n}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}.$$ Now add $dfrac{n+1}{n+2}$ on both sides, i.e., $$sum_{k=1}^{n}frac k{k+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}.$$ Note that $$sum_{k=1}^{n}frac k{k+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}=sum_{k=1}^{n+1}frac k{k+1}.$$ Hence we have $$sum_{k=1}^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}.$$






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                If $aleq b $, then $a+cleq b+c $ for any $cin Bbb R $. By assumption, we have $$sum_{k=1}^{n}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}.$$ Now add $dfrac{n+1}{n+2}$ on both sides, i.e., $$sum_{k=1}^{n}frac k{k+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}.$$ Note that $$sum_{k=1}^{n}frac k{k+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}=sum_{k=1}^{n+1}frac k{k+1}.$$ Hence we have $$sum_{k=1}^{n+1}frac k{k+1}leq n-frac 1{n+1}+frac{n+1}{n+2}.$$







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited 1 hour ago

























                answered 1 hour ago









                Thomas ShelbyThomas Shelby

                3,7192525




                3,7192525






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3133089%2fplease-help-me-understand-the-following-solution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    ORA-01691 (unable to extend lob segment) even though my tablespace has AUTOEXTEND onORA-01692: unable to...

                    Always On Availability groups resolving state after failover - Remote harden of transaction...

                    Circunscripción electoral de Guipúzcoa Referencias Menú de navegaciónLas claves del sistema electoral en...