PTIJ: Why do we make a Lulav holder?Purim and Shushan PurimParashat TzavWhat is the traditional Jewish name...

When should a starting writer get his own webpage?

Recursively updating the MLE as new observations stream in

What is the tangent at a sharp point on a curve?

What is the reasoning behind standardization (dividing by standard deviation)?

Fair way to split coins

PTIJ: At the Passover Seder, is one allowed to speak more than once during Maggid?

Pre-Employment Background Check With Consent For Future Checks

Unfrosted light bulb

Can other pieces capture a threatening piece and prevent a checkmate?

Air travel with refrigerated insulin

Have any astronauts/cosmonauts died in space?

Exit shell with shortcut (not typing exit) that closes session properly

Jem'Hadar, something strange about their life expectancy

Should I be concerned about student access to a test bank?

What is 管理しきれず?

UK Tourist Visa- Enquiry

Asserting that Atheism and Theism are both faith based positions

Emojional cryptic crossword

If I cast the Enlarge/Reduce spell on an arrow, what weapon could it count as?

Is xar preinstalled on macOS?

Why didn’t Eve recognize the little cockroach as a living organism?

Can "few" be used as a subject? If so, what is the rule?

What is the difference between something being completely legal and being completely decriminalized?

Is this Pascal's Matrix?



PTIJ: Why do we make a Lulav holder?



Purim and Shushan Purim
Parashat TzavWhat is the traditional Jewish name for this dish?PtIJ: why a twisted 6PTIJ: Why does Hashem have an onionPTIJ: OTD DocumentariesPTIJ: How to make a palace out of peoplePTIJ: Why did the Torah forbid itself?PTIJ: Why can't I eat anything?PTIJ: Why did Mordecai wax his surfboard?PTIJ: Why is Rav Yitzchak's name backwards?PTIJ: Why do we blow Shofar on Rosh Hashana and use a Lulav on Sukkos?












4















The Gemara says:




אין עושין מצות חבילות חבילות



One does not make mitzvot into bundles.




But I've seen lots of people do just that: They put the four species into a bundle.



ואם תומר, and if you'll say:



The issue is making a Mitzva into a bundle, not putting the Mitzvah into a bundle.



You can't say that since the bundle is made from Lulav leaves. So we quite literally made a Mitzvah into a bundle.



Oh, and there are some who only make a bundle out of the Lulav, without even making a basket.



enter image description here



That should definitely be an issue.





This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.










share|improve this question























  • VTC as not Purim Torah

    – Double AA
    6 hours ago











  • @DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?

    – Leitz
    6 hours ago






  • 2





    If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?

    – Double AA
    6 hours ago













  • Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA

    – Dr. Shmuel
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    @DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.

    – DonielF
    5 hours ago
















4















The Gemara says:




אין עושין מצות חבילות חבילות



One does not make mitzvot into bundles.




But I've seen lots of people do just that: They put the four species into a bundle.



ואם תומר, and if you'll say:



The issue is making a Mitzva into a bundle, not putting the Mitzvah into a bundle.



You can't say that since the bundle is made from Lulav leaves. So we quite literally made a Mitzvah into a bundle.



Oh, and there are some who only make a bundle out of the Lulav, without even making a basket.



enter image description here



That should definitely be an issue.





This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.










share|improve this question























  • VTC as not Purim Torah

    – Double AA
    6 hours ago











  • @DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?

    – Leitz
    6 hours ago






  • 2





    If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?

    – Double AA
    6 hours ago













  • Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA

    – Dr. Shmuel
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    @DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.

    – DonielF
    5 hours ago














4












4








4








The Gemara says:




אין עושין מצות חבילות חבילות



One does not make mitzvot into bundles.




But I've seen lots of people do just that: They put the four species into a bundle.



ואם תומר, and if you'll say:



The issue is making a Mitzva into a bundle, not putting the Mitzvah into a bundle.



You can't say that since the bundle is made from Lulav leaves. So we quite literally made a Mitzvah into a bundle.



Oh, and there are some who only make a bundle out of the Lulav, without even making a basket.



enter image description here



That should definitely be an issue.





This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.










share|improve this question














The Gemara says:




אין עושין מצות חבילות חבילות



One does not make mitzvot into bundles.




But I've seen lots of people do just that: They put the four species into a bundle.



ואם תומר, and if you'll say:



The issue is making a Mitzva into a bundle, not putting the Mitzvah into a bundle.



You can't say that since the bundle is made from Lulav leaves. So we quite literally made a Mitzvah into a bundle.



Oh, and there are some who only make a bundle out of the Lulav, without even making a basket.



enter image description here



That should definitely be an issue.





This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.







purim-torah-in-jest






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 6 hours ago









LeitzLeitz

903212




903212













  • VTC as not Purim Torah

    – Double AA
    6 hours ago











  • @DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?

    – Leitz
    6 hours ago






  • 2





    If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?

    – Double AA
    6 hours ago













  • Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA

    – Dr. Shmuel
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    @DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.

    – DonielF
    5 hours ago



















  • VTC as not Purim Torah

    – Double AA
    6 hours ago











  • @DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?

    – Leitz
    6 hours ago






  • 2





    If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?

    – Double AA
    6 hours ago













  • Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA

    – Dr. Shmuel
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    @DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.

    – DonielF
    5 hours ago

















VTC as not Purim Torah

– Double AA
6 hours ago





VTC as not Purim Torah

– Double AA
6 hours ago













@DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?

– Leitz
6 hours ago





@DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?

– Leitz
6 hours ago




2




2





If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?

– Double AA
6 hours ago







If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?

– Double AA
6 hours ago















Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA

– Dr. Shmuel
6 hours ago





Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA

– Dr. Shmuel
6 hours ago




1




1





@DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.

– DonielF
5 hours ago





@DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.

– DonielF
5 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















1














In Aramaic the word אין means yes. The PTIJ explanation of this is Yes we make Mitzvas into bundles.






share|improve this answer
























  • It also means if.

    – Dr. Shmuel
    3 hours ago



















1














the gemara didnt need to repeat the word חבילות must be אין מיעוט אחר מיעוט אלא לרבות and the gemara is teaching you that if you are bundling them many times it is mutar



so if you dont have a basket you are fine because you bundle it several times and the problem is only if you have one basket






share|improve this answer































    1














    The proper way to punctuate it is




    אין עושין מצוות חבילות - חבילות



    One should not make bundles of mitzvos into bundles




    So, taking just one mitzvah, like the lulav, and making it into a bundle is perfectly fine. If you were to take your whole lulav-bundle and wrap a lulav with that, using a bundle of mitzvos to bundle, that would be a problem.






    share|improve this answer
























    • +1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-

      – Asher
      10 mins ago



















    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    In Aramaic the word אין means yes. The PTIJ explanation of this is Yes we make Mitzvas into bundles.






    share|improve this answer
























    • It also means if.

      – Dr. Shmuel
      3 hours ago
















    1














    In Aramaic the word אין means yes. The PTIJ explanation of this is Yes we make Mitzvas into bundles.






    share|improve this answer
























    • It also means if.

      – Dr. Shmuel
      3 hours ago














    1












    1








    1







    In Aramaic the word אין means yes. The PTIJ explanation of this is Yes we make Mitzvas into bundles.






    share|improve this answer













    In Aramaic the word אין means yes. The PTIJ explanation of this is Yes we make Mitzvas into bundles.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 3 hours ago









    Gershon GoldGershon Gold

    111k8178425




    111k8178425













    • It also means if.

      – Dr. Shmuel
      3 hours ago



















    • It also means if.

      – Dr. Shmuel
      3 hours ago

















    It also means if.

    – Dr. Shmuel
    3 hours ago





    It also means if.

    – Dr. Shmuel
    3 hours ago











    1














    the gemara didnt need to repeat the word חבילות must be אין מיעוט אחר מיעוט אלא לרבות and the gemara is teaching you that if you are bundling them many times it is mutar



    so if you dont have a basket you are fine because you bundle it several times and the problem is only if you have one basket






    share|improve this answer




























      1














      the gemara didnt need to repeat the word חבילות must be אין מיעוט אחר מיעוט אלא לרבות and the gemara is teaching you that if you are bundling them many times it is mutar



      so if you dont have a basket you are fine because you bundle it several times and the problem is only if you have one basket






      share|improve this answer


























        1












        1








        1







        the gemara didnt need to repeat the word חבילות must be אין מיעוט אחר מיעוט אלא לרבות and the gemara is teaching you that if you are bundling them many times it is mutar



        so if you dont have a basket you are fine because you bundle it several times and the problem is only if you have one basket






        share|improve this answer













        the gemara didnt need to repeat the word חבילות must be אין מיעוט אחר מיעוט אלא לרבות and the gemara is teaching you that if you are bundling them many times it is mutar



        so if you dont have a basket you are fine because you bundle it several times and the problem is only if you have one basket







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 19 mins ago









        AsherAsher

        995




        995























            1














            The proper way to punctuate it is




            אין עושין מצוות חבילות - חבילות



            One should not make bundles of mitzvos into bundles




            So, taking just one mitzvah, like the lulav, and making it into a bundle is perfectly fine. If you were to take your whole lulav-bundle and wrap a lulav with that, using a bundle of mitzvos to bundle, that would be a problem.






            share|improve this answer
























            • +1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-

              – Asher
              10 mins ago
















            1














            The proper way to punctuate it is




            אין עושין מצוות חבילות - חבילות



            One should not make bundles of mitzvos into bundles




            So, taking just one mitzvah, like the lulav, and making it into a bundle is perfectly fine. If you were to take your whole lulav-bundle and wrap a lulav with that, using a bundle of mitzvos to bundle, that would be a problem.






            share|improve this answer
























            • +1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-

              – Asher
              10 mins ago














            1












            1








            1







            The proper way to punctuate it is




            אין עושין מצוות חבילות - חבילות



            One should not make bundles of mitzvos into bundles




            So, taking just one mitzvah, like the lulav, and making it into a bundle is perfectly fine. If you were to take your whole lulav-bundle and wrap a lulav with that, using a bundle of mitzvos to bundle, that would be a problem.






            share|improve this answer













            The proper way to punctuate it is




            אין עושין מצוות חבילות - חבילות



            One should not make bundles of mitzvos into bundles




            So, taking just one mitzvah, like the lulav, and making it into a bundle is perfectly fine. If you were to take your whole lulav-bundle and wrap a lulav with that, using a bundle of mitzvos to bundle, that would be a problem.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 14 mins ago









            Y     e     zY     e     z

            45k369201




            45k369201













            • +1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-

              – Asher
              10 mins ago



















            • +1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-

              – Asher
              10 mins ago

















            +1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-

            – Asher
            10 mins ago





            +1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-

            – Asher
            10 mins ago



            Popular posts from this blog

            Anexo:Material bélico de la Fuerza Aérea de Chile Índice Aeronaves Defensa...

            Always On Availability groups resolving state after failover - Remote harden of transaction...

            update json value to null Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara ...