Why would a new[] expression ever invoke a destructor?About constructors/destructors and new/delete operators...
Limits and Infinite Integration by Parts
Make a Bowl of Alphabet Soup
What to do when eye contact makes your subordinate uncomfortable?
Calculating total slots
Lowest total scrabble score
Why does a simple loop result in ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits?
It grows, but water kills it
Is there an injective, monotonically increasing, strictly concave function from the reals, to the reals?
Electoral considerations aside, what are potential benefits, for the US, of policy changes proposed by the tweet recognizing Golan annexation?
Quasinilpotent , non-compact operators
Pre-mixing cryogenic fuels and using only one fuel tank
How should I respond when I lied about my education and the company finds out through background check?
Can I still be respawned if I die by falling off the map?
Strong empirical falsification of quantum mechanics based on vacuum energy density?
Creepy dinosaur pc game identification
Temporarily disable WLAN internet access for children, but allow it for adults
Biological Blimps: Propulsion
Mimic lecturing on blackboard, facing audience
How do you respond to a colleague from another team when they're wrongly expecting that you'll help them?
Why should universal income be universal?
How should I address a possible mistake to co-authors in a submitted paper
Did arcade monitors have same pixel aspect ratio as TV sets?
Redundant comparison & "if" before assignment
Does malloc reserve more space while allocating memory?
Why would a new[] expression ever invoke a destructor?
About constructors/destructors and new/delete operators in C++ for custom objectsDoes delete call the destructor?Overloading operator delete in a base classWhen is %destructor invoked in BISON?Why should C++ programmers minimize use of 'new'?Why is ::operator new[] necessary when ::operator new is enough?Why am I permitted to declare an object with a deleted destructor?Does delete[] deallocate memory in one shot after invoking destructors?Why are non-placement `new` and `delete` built into the language and not just regular functions?Why deallocation function is not called when object constructor throw in a new expression?
From the C++17 standard (draft here), [expr.new]:
If the new-expression creates an object or an array of objects of class type, access and ambiguity control are done for the allocation function, the deallocation function, and the constructor. If the new-expression creates an array of objects of class type, the destructor is potentially invoked.
Why would new[] invoke a destructor? It's new, after all. It isn't delete.
c++ c++17 new-operator
edited 1 hour ago
Cody Gray♦
195k35382470
asked 1 hour ago
thbthb
8,66932355
add a comment |
From the C++17 standard (draft here), [expr.new]:
If the new-expression creates an object or an array of objects of class type, access and ambiguity control are done for the allocation function, the deallocation function, and the constructor. If the new-expression creates an array of objects of class type, the destructor is potentially invoked.
Why would new[] invoke a destructor? It's new, after all. It isn't delete.
c++ c++17 new-operator
edited 1 hour ago
Cody Gray♦
195k35382470
asked 1 hour ago
thbthb
8,66932355
add a comment |
From the C++17 standard (draft here), [expr.new]:
If the new-expression creates an object or an array of objects of class type, access and ambiguity control are done for the allocation function, the deallocation function, and the constructor. If the new-expression creates an array of objects of class type, the destructor is potentially invoked.
Why would new[] invoke a destructor? It's new, after all. It isn't delete.
c++ c++17 new-operator
edited 1 hour ago
Cody Gray♦
195k35382470
asked 1 hour ago
thbthb
8,66932355
From the C++17 standard (draft here), [expr.new]:
If the new-expression creates an object or an array of objects of class type, access and ambiguity control are done for the allocation function, the deallocation function, and the constructor. If the new-expression creates an array of objects of class type, the destructor is potentially invoked.
Why would new[] invoke a destructor? It's new, after all. It isn't delete.
c++ c++17 new-operator
c++ c++17 new-operator
edited 1 hour ago
Cody Gray♦
195k35382470
asked 1 hour ago
thbthb
8,66932355
edited 1 hour ago
Cody Gray♦
195k35382470
asked 1 hour ago
thbthb
8,66932355
edited 1 hour ago
Cody Gray♦
195k35382470
edited 1 hour ago
Cody Gray♦
195k35382470
edited 1 hour ago
Cody Gray♦
195k35382470
195k35382470
asked 1 hour ago
thbthb
8,66932355
asked 1 hour ago
thbthb
8,66932355
asked 1 hour ago
thbthb
8,66932355
8,66932355
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
If construction of any object in the buffer throws an exception, the previously constructed objects must be destructed. That requires an available destructor.
edited 1 hour ago
Sombrero Chicken
24.4k33281
answered 1 hour ago
StoryTellerStoryTeller
103k12215280
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55307381%2fwhy-would-a-new-expression-ever-invoke-a-destructor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
If construction of any object in the buffer throws an exception, the previously constructed objects must be destructed. That requires an available destructor.
edited 1 hour ago
Sombrero Chicken
24.4k33281
answered 1 hour ago
StoryTellerStoryTeller
103k12215280
add a comment |
If construction of any object in the buffer throws an exception, the previously constructed objects must be destructed. That requires an available destructor.
edited 1 hour ago
Sombrero Chicken
24.4k33281
answered 1 hour ago
StoryTellerStoryTeller
103k12215280
add a comment |
If construction of any object in the buffer throws an exception, the previously constructed objects must be destructed. That requires an available destructor.
edited 1 hour ago
Sombrero Chicken
24.4k33281
answered 1 hour ago
StoryTellerStoryTeller
103k12215280
If construction of any object in the buffer throws an exception, the previously constructed objects must be destructed. That requires an available destructor.
edited 1 hour ago
Sombrero Chicken
24.4k33281
answered 1 hour ago
StoryTellerStoryTeller
103k12215280
edited 1 hour ago
Sombrero Chicken
24.4k33281
edited 1 hour ago
Sombrero Chicken
24.4k33281
edited 1 hour ago
Sombrero Chicken
24.4k33281
24.4k33281
answered 1 hour ago
StoryTellerStoryTeller
103k12215280
answered 1 hour ago
StoryTellerStoryTeller
103k12215280
answered 1 hour ago
StoryTellerStoryTeller
103k12215280
103k12215280
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55307381%2fwhy-would-a-new-expression-ever-invoke-a-destructor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
