Confusion about non-derivable continuous functions The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey...
How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect
How to manage monthly salary
How to deal with fear of taking dependencies
Polarization lost upon 2nd reflection?
Why Did Howard Stark Use All The Vibranium They Had On A Prototype Shield?
Why can Shazam do this?
How are circuits which use complex ICs normally simulated?
What are the motivations for publishing new editions of an existing textbook, beyond new discoveries in a field?
Why is Grand Jury testimony secret?
Is there a name of the flying bionic bird?
Inflated grade on resume at previous job, might former employer tell new employer?
Unbreakable Formation vs. Cry of the Carnarium
What is the motivation for a law requiring 2 parties to consent for recording a conversation
Deadlock Graph and Interpretation, solution to avoid
"Riffle" two strings
Is this food a bread or a loaf?
Does light intensity oscillate really fast since it is a wave?
I see my dog run
Is three citations per paragraph excessive for undergraduate research paper?
Spanish for "widget"
Can't find the latex code for the ⍎ (down tack jot) symbol
What does "rabbited" mean/imply in this sentence?
Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?
Is bread bad for ducks?
Confusion about non-derivable continuous functions
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InAre there any implicit, continuous, non-differentiable functions?Logical Relations Between Three Statements about Continuous FunctionsCombination of continuous and discontinuous functionsIs there only one continuous-everywhere non-differentiable function?Intuition behind uniformly continuous functionsWhy weren't continuous functions defined as Darboux functions?Examples of functions that do not belong to any Baire classFind all continuous functions that satisfy the Jensen inequality(?) $f(frac{x+y}{2})=frac{f(x)+f(y)}{2}$Confused About Limit Points and Closed SetsConfusion About Differentiability of Function
$begingroup$
I am reading a definition which claims that a function is continuous in point $p$ iff all its first derivations exist and are continuous in the point $p$.
And what confuses me are functions such as $f(x)=|x|$ which should be continuous by intuition, but is clearly not derivable in $x=0$.
I am almost certain I am getting something wrong here, but I can not even pin-point what.
real-analysis functions derivatives continuity
asked 2 hours ago
fazanfazan
537
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am reading a definition which claims that a function is continuous in point $p$ iff all its first derivations exist and are continuous in the point $p$.
And what confuses me are functions such as $f(x)=|x|$ which should be continuous by intuition, but is clearly not derivable in $x=0$.
I am almost certain I am getting something wrong here, but I can not even pin-point what.
real-analysis functions derivatives continuity
asked 2 hours ago
fazanfazan
537
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
$endgroup$
– avs
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Where did you read that erroneous definition?
$endgroup$
– bof
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
$endgroup$
– fazan
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@avs That is false.
$endgroup$
– zhw.
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am reading a definition which claims that a function is continuous in point $p$ iff all its first derivations exist and are continuous in the point $p$.
And what confuses me are functions such as $f(x)=|x|$ which should be continuous by intuition, but is clearly not derivable in $x=0$.
I am almost certain I am getting something wrong here, but I can not even pin-point what.
real-analysis functions derivatives continuity
asked 2 hours ago
fazanfazan
537
$endgroup$
I am reading a definition which claims that a function is continuous in point $p$ iff all its first derivations exist and are continuous in the point $p$.
And what confuses me are functions such as $f(x)=|x|$ which should be continuous by intuition, but is clearly not derivable in $x=0$.
I am almost certain I am getting something wrong here, but I can not even pin-point what.
real-analysis functions derivatives continuity
real-analysis functions derivatives continuity
asked 2 hours ago
fazanfazan
537
asked 2 hours ago
fazanfazan
537
asked 2 hours ago
fazanfazan
537
asked 2 hours ago
fazanfazan
537
asked 2 hours ago
fazanfazan
537
537
$begingroup$
For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
$endgroup$
– avs
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Where did you read that erroneous definition?
$endgroup$
– bof
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
$endgroup$
– fazan
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@avs That is false.
$endgroup$
– zhw.
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
$endgroup$
– avs
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Where did you read that erroneous definition?
$endgroup$
– bof
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
$endgroup$
– fazan
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@avs That is false.
$endgroup$
– zhw.
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
$endgroup$
– avs
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
$endgroup$
– avs
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Where did you read that erroneous definition?
$endgroup$
– bof
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Where did you read that erroneous definition?
$endgroup$
– bof
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
$endgroup$
– fazan
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
$endgroup$
– fazan
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@avs That is false.
$endgroup$
– zhw.
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@avs That is false.
$endgroup$
– zhw.
1 hour ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.
The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.
answered 2 hours ago
Haris GusicHaris Gusic
3,506627
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.
If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
$$f(x,y)=begin{cases}(x^2+y^2)sin(frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+y^2}}) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)end{cases}$$
at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.
answered 2 hours ago
K.PowerK.Power
3,710926
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
$endgroup$
– Haris Gusic
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
$endgroup$
– K.Power
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3181529%2fconfusion-about-non-derivable-continuous-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.
The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.
answered 2 hours ago
Haris GusicHaris Gusic
3,506627
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.
The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.
answered 2 hours ago
Haris GusicHaris Gusic
3,506627
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.
The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.
answered 2 hours ago
Haris GusicHaris Gusic
3,506627
$endgroup$
That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.
The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.
answered 2 hours ago
Haris GusicHaris Gusic
3,506627
edited 2 hours ago
answered 2 hours ago
Haris GusicHaris Gusic
3,506627
answered 2 hours ago
Haris GusicHaris Gusic
3,506627
answered 2 hours ago
Haris GusicHaris Gusic
3,506627
3,506627
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.
If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
$$f(x,y)=begin{cases}(x^2+y^2)sin(frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+y^2}}) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)end{cases}$$
at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.
answered 2 hours ago
K.PowerK.Power
3,710926
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
$endgroup$
– Haris Gusic
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
$endgroup$
– K.Power
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.
If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
$$f(x,y)=begin{cases}(x^2+y^2)sin(frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+y^2}}) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)end{cases}$$
at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.
answered 2 hours ago
K.PowerK.Power
3,710926
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
$endgroup$
– Haris Gusic
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
$endgroup$
– K.Power
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.
If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
$$f(x,y)=begin{cases}(x^2+y^2)sin(frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+y^2}}) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)end{cases}$$
at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.
answered 2 hours ago
K.PowerK.Power
3,710926
$endgroup$
As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.
If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
$$f(x,y)=begin{cases}(x^2+y^2)sin(frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+y^2}}) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)end{cases}$$
at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.
answered 2 hours ago
K.PowerK.Power
3,710926
edited 1 hour ago
answered 2 hours ago
K.PowerK.Power
3,710926
answered 2 hours ago
K.PowerK.Power
3,710926
answered 2 hours ago
K.PowerK.Power
3,710926
3,710926
$begingroup$
The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
$endgroup$
– Haris Gusic
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
$endgroup$
– K.Power
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
$endgroup$
– Haris Gusic
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
$endgroup$
– K.Power
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
$endgroup$
– Haris Gusic
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
$endgroup$
– Haris Gusic
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
$endgroup$
– K.Power
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
$endgroup$
– K.Power
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3181529%2fconfusion-about-non-derivable-continuous-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
$endgroup$
– avs
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Where did you read that erroneous definition?
$endgroup$
– bof
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
$endgroup$
– fazan
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@avs That is false.
$endgroup$
– zhw.
1 hour ago