Where else does the Shulchan Aruch quote an authority by name?Parashat Metzora+HagadolPesach/PassoverShulchan...

Domain expired, GoDaddy holds it and is asking more money

I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine

Are objects structures and/or vice versa?

Is ipsum/ipsa/ipse a third person pronoun, or can it serve other functions?

Need help identifying/translating a plaque in Tangier, Morocco

Why do UK politicians seemingly ignore opinion polls on Brexit?

How is it possible for user's password to be changed after storage was encrypted? (on OS X, Android)

Is domain driven design an anti-SQL pattern?

If a centaur druid Wild Shapes into a Giant Elk, do their Charge features stack?

Manga about a female worker who got dragged into another world together with this high school girl and she was just told she's not needed anymore

Where to refill my bottle in India?

Email Account under attack (really) - anything I can do?

I see my dog run

Can I find out the caloric content of bread by dehydrating it?

LWC and complex parameters

How to manage monthly salary

Can a planet have a different gravitational pull depending on its location in orbit around its sun?

"listening to me about as much as you're listening to this pole here"

What does it exactly mean if a random variable follows a distribution

Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?

Is Fable (1996) connected in any way to the Fable franchise from Lionhead Studios?

Is there a name of the flying bionic bird?

Does the average primeness of natural numbers tend to zero?

What to wear for invited talk in Canada



Where else does the Shulchan Aruch quote an authority by name?



Parashat Metzora+Hagadol
Pesach/PassoverShulchan Aruch UTF-8Anonymous glosses in the Shulchan AruchWhy is the Shulchan Aruch definitive?Siman 32, Kitzur Shulchan Aruch: UntranslatedLitvaks/Yeshivish and Shulchan AruchBuying a Shulchan AruchEnglish version of SHULCHAN ARUCHIs there any place where Shulchan Aruch rules with the Rosh against the Rif and Rambam?Are there practices where Sepharadim do not hold by Shulchan Aruch?5th part of the shulchan aruch












2















Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.



In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):




הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן



The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].




Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?










share|improve this question























  • I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin

    – Dr. Shmuel
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    There are dozens of such examples

    – Double AA
    45 mins ago
















2















Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.



In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):




הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן



The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].




Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?










share|improve this question























  • I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin

    – Dr. Shmuel
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    There are dozens of such examples

    – Double AA
    45 mins ago














2












2








2








Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.



In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):




הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן



The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].




Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?










share|improve this question














Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.



In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):




הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן



The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].




Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?







shulchan-aruch






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 2 hours ago









DonielFDonielF

17k12689




17k12689













  • I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin

    – Dr. Shmuel
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    There are dozens of such examples

    – Double AA
    45 mins ago



















  • I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin

    – Dr. Shmuel
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    There are dozens of such examples

    – Double AA
    45 mins ago

















I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin

– Dr. Shmuel
1 hour ago





I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin

– Dr. Shmuel
1 hour ago




1




1





There are dozens of such examples

– Double AA
45 mins ago





There are dozens of such examples

– Double AA
45 mins ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:




הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:







share|improve this answer
























  • This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

    – user6591
    1 hour ago













  • First thing to pop on my mind

    – sam
    1 hour ago











  • There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

    – Double AA
    42 mins ago






  • 1





    @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

    – user6591
    40 mins ago



















2














It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:



In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:




סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם




In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:




ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך




In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:




הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר




O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:




והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג




There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.






share|improve this answer































    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:




    הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:







    share|improve this answer
























    • This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

      – user6591
      1 hour ago













    • First thing to pop on my mind

      – sam
      1 hour ago











    • There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

      – Double AA
      42 mins ago






    • 1





      @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

      – user6591
      40 mins ago
















    2














    Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:




    הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:







    share|improve this answer
























    • This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

      – user6591
      1 hour ago













    • First thing to pop on my mind

      – sam
      1 hour ago











    • There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

      – Double AA
      42 mins ago






    • 1





      @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

      – user6591
      40 mins ago














    2












    2








    2







    Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:




    הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:







    share|improve this answer













    Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:




    הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:








    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 1 hour ago









    user6591user6591

    25.8k12758




    25.8k12758













    • This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

      – user6591
      1 hour ago













    • First thing to pop on my mind

      – sam
      1 hour ago











    • There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

      – Double AA
      42 mins ago






    • 1





      @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

      – user6591
      40 mins ago



















    • This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

      – user6591
      1 hour ago













    • First thing to pop on my mind

      – sam
      1 hour ago











    • There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

      – Double AA
      42 mins ago






    • 1





      @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

      – user6591
      40 mins ago

















    This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

    – user6591
    1 hour ago







    This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

    – user6591
    1 hour ago















    First thing to pop on my mind

    – sam
    1 hour ago





    First thing to pop on my mind

    – sam
    1 hour ago













    There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

    – Double AA
    42 mins ago





    There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

    – Double AA
    42 mins ago




    1




    1





    @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

    – user6591
    40 mins ago





    @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

    – user6591
    40 mins ago











    2














    It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:



    In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:




    סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם




    In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:




    ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך




    In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:




    הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר




    O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:




    והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג




    There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.






    share|improve this answer




























      2














      It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:



      In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:




      סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם




      In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:




      ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך




      In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:




      הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר




      O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:




      והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג




      There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.






      share|improve this answer


























        2












        2








        2







        It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:



        In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:




        סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם




        In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:




        ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך




        In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:




        הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר




        O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:




        והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג




        There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.






        share|improve this answer













        It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:



        In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:




        סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם




        In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:




        ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך




        In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:




        הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר




        O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:




        והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג




        There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 39 mins ago









        AlexAlex

        23.4k157133




        23.4k157133















            Popular posts from this blog

            Anexo:Material bélico de la Fuerza Aérea de Chile Índice Aeronaves Defensa...

            Always On Availability groups resolving state after failover - Remote harden of transaction...

            update json value to null Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara ...