Can someone explain the need for perturbation theory in QM?Perturbation theory“Good” States In Degenerate...
Can I legally make a website about boycotting a certain company?
Why is Shelob considered evil?
Why don't you get burned by the wood benches in a sauna?
Can I do anything else with aspersions other than cast them?
Integral problem. Unsure of the approach.
Is it Safe to Plug an Extension Cord Into a Power Strip?
What's the meaning of #0?
How does holding onto an active but un-used credit card affect your ability to get a loan?
Boss asked me to sign a resignation paper without a date on it along with my new contract
Add number in the string after each letter
Draw triangle with text in vertices/edges
How can I give a Ranger advantage on a check due to Favored Enemy without spoiling the story for the player?
How bad is a Computer Science course that doesn't teach Design Patterns?
Why would you use 2 alternate layout buttons instead of 1, when only one can be selected at once
What's the function of the word "ли" in the following contexts?
Question: "Are you hungry?" Answer: "I feel like eating."
Exploding Numbers
What is formjacking?
How can guns be countered by melee combat without raw-ability or exceptional explanations?
How can I differentiate duration vs starting time
Why does this quiz question say that protons and electrons do not combine to form neutrons?
Reduce Reflections
Do these large-scale, human power-plant-tending robots from the Matrix movies have a name, in-universe or out?
Do the speed limit reductions due to pollution also apply to electric cars in France?
Can someone explain the need for perturbation theory in QM?
Perturbation theory“Good” States In Degenerate Perturbation TheoryWhat does the first order energy correction formula in non-degenerate perturbation theory means?Quantum perturbation theory recommendationsIntuitions on perturbation theory?Degenerate perturbation theoryKleinert's Variational Perturbation TheoryGriffiths's take on degenerate perturbation theorySome questions about the Brillouin-Wigner form of perturbation theoryAssumptions in basic perturbation theory
$begingroup$
I don't seem to understand what perturbation theory really is, and what it is needed for. Can someone please provide an explanation for what it is, and why it is needed in QM?
quantum-mechanics perturbation-theory
edited 2 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
105k121881202
asked 3 hours ago
Claus KlausenClaus Klausen
114
New contributor
Claus Klausen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I don't seem to understand what perturbation theory really is, and what it is needed for. Can someone please provide an explanation for what it is, and why it is needed in QM?
quantum-mechanics perturbation-theory
edited 2 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
105k121881202
asked 3 hours ago
Claus KlausenClaus Klausen
114
New contributor
Claus Klausen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Perturbation theory allows you to calculate the response of a system to a small perturbation. For example, it can tell you, how energy levels shift under the influence of the perturbation, how energy level degeneracies are lifted, and it even allows you to calculate linear response functions. You should be able to find more detailed answers to your question in standard QM books and on the web.
$endgroup$
– flaudemus
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I don't seem to understand what perturbation theory really is, and what it is needed for. Can someone please provide an explanation for what it is, and why it is needed in QM?
quantum-mechanics perturbation-theory
edited 2 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
105k121881202
asked 3 hours ago
Claus KlausenClaus Klausen
114
New contributor
Claus Klausen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
I don't seem to understand what perturbation theory really is, and what it is needed for. Can someone please provide an explanation for what it is, and why it is needed in QM?
quantum-mechanics perturbation-theory
quantum-mechanics perturbation-theory
edited 2 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
105k121881202
asked 3 hours ago
Claus KlausenClaus Klausen
114
New contributor
Claus Klausen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 2 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
105k121881202
asked 3 hours ago
Claus KlausenClaus Klausen
114
New contributor
Claus Klausen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 2 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
105k121881202
edited 2 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
105k121881202
edited 2 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
105k121881202
105k121881202
asked 3 hours ago
Claus KlausenClaus Klausen
114
New contributor
Claus Klausen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 3 hours ago
Claus KlausenClaus Klausen
114
asked 3 hours ago
Claus KlausenClaus Klausen
114
114
New contributor
Claus Klausen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Claus Klausen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Claus Klausen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$begingroup$
Perturbation theory allows you to calculate the response of a system to a small perturbation. For example, it can tell you, how energy levels shift under the influence of the perturbation, how energy level degeneracies are lifted, and it even allows you to calculate linear response functions. You should be able to find more detailed answers to your question in standard QM books and on the web.
$endgroup$
– flaudemus
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Perturbation theory allows you to calculate the response of a system to a small perturbation. For example, it can tell you, how energy levels shift under the influence of the perturbation, how energy level degeneracies are lifted, and it even allows you to calculate linear response functions. You should be able to find more detailed answers to your question in standard QM books and on the web.
$endgroup$
– flaudemus
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Perturbation theory allows you to calculate the response of a system to a small perturbation. For example, it can tell you, how energy levels shift under the influence of the perturbation, how energy level degeneracies are lifted, and it even allows you to calculate linear response functions. You should be able to find more detailed answers to your question in standard QM books and on the web.
$endgroup$
– flaudemus
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Perturbation theory allows you to calculate the response of a system to a small perturbation. For example, it can tell you, how energy levels shift under the influence of the perturbation, how energy level degeneracies are lifted, and it even allows you to calculate linear response functions. You should be able to find more detailed answers to your question in standard QM books and on the web.
$endgroup$
– flaudemus
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There are two main reasons.
The first is practical, and it is that QM is hard. Very few systems are solvable, particularly in the presence of interactions. There's a wide variety of situations where perturbation theory is the only available way to make any headway at all.
The second one is conceptual and it is basically that it allows us to establish a hierarchy in the strengths of the different components of a system, and it allows us to have a clearer picture of how this strengths scale with the parameters of the system. Thus, even if you can solve the full system, if one component is weak, it often makes sense to treat it explicitly as a perturbation, so that you can keep a clearer track of how the different aspects of the solution (energies, eigenfunctions, dipole moments, what have you) scale.
answered 2 hours ago
Emilio PisantyEmilio Pisanty
83.5k22204420
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– Claus Klausen
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Does your answer work well for all controlled approximations, perturbative or otherwise? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Dvij Mankad
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@DvijMankad I have no idea what scope you're thinking of. Ask separately.
$endgroup$
– Emilio Pisanty
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
I was thinking schemes where we have a small parameter but we are not doing perturbation theory, for example, the adiabatic approximation. I will try to formulate a separate question.
$endgroup$
– Dvij Mankad
42 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Claus Klausen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f462242%2fcan-someone-explain-the-need-for-perturbation-theory-in-qm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There are two main reasons.
The first is practical, and it is that QM is hard. Very few systems are solvable, particularly in the presence of interactions. There's a wide variety of situations where perturbation theory is the only available way to make any headway at all.
The second one is conceptual and it is basically that it allows us to establish a hierarchy in the strengths of the different components of a system, and it allows us to have a clearer picture of how this strengths scale with the parameters of the system. Thus, even if you can solve the full system, if one component is weak, it often makes sense to treat it explicitly as a perturbation, so that you can keep a clearer track of how the different aspects of the solution (energies, eigenfunctions, dipole moments, what have you) scale.
answered 2 hours ago
Emilio PisantyEmilio Pisanty
83.5k22204420
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– Claus Klausen
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Does your answer work well for all controlled approximations, perturbative or otherwise? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Dvij Mankad
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@DvijMankad I have no idea what scope you're thinking of. Ask separately.
$endgroup$
– Emilio Pisanty
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
I was thinking schemes where we have a small parameter but we are not doing perturbation theory, for example, the adiabatic approximation. I will try to formulate a separate question.
$endgroup$
– Dvij Mankad
42 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There are two main reasons.
The first is practical, and it is that QM is hard. Very few systems are solvable, particularly in the presence of interactions. There's a wide variety of situations where perturbation theory is the only available way to make any headway at all.
The second one is conceptual and it is basically that it allows us to establish a hierarchy in the strengths of the different components of a system, and it allows us to have a clearer picture of how this strengths scale with the parameters of the system. Thus, even if you can solve the full system, if one component is weak, it often makes sense to treat it explicitly as a perturbation, so that you can keep a clearer track of how the different aspects of the solution (energies, eigenfunctions, dipole moments, what have you) scale.
answered 2 hours ago
Emilio PisantyEmilio Pisanty
83.5k22204420
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– Claus Klausen
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Does your answer work well for all controlled approximations, perturbative or otherwise? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Dvij Mankad
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@DvijMankad I have no idea what scope you're thinking of. Ask separately.
$endgroup$
– Emilio Pisanty
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
I was thinking schemes where we have a small parameter but we are not doing perturbation theory, for example, the adiabatic approximation. I will try to formulate a separate question.
$endgroup$
– Dvij Mankad
42 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There are two main reasons.
The first is practical, and it is that QM is hard. Very few systems are solvable, particularly in the presence of interactions. There's a wide variety of situations where perturbation theory is the only available way to make any headway at all.
The second one is conceptual and it is basically that it allows us to establish a hierarchy in the strengths of the different components of a system, and it allows us to have a clearer picture of how this strengths scale with the parameters of the system. Thus, even if you can solve the full system, if one component is weak, it often makes sense to treat it explicitly as a perturbation, so that you can keep a clearer track of how the different aspects of the solution (energies, eigenfunctions, dipole moments, what have you) scale.
answered 2 hours ago
Emilio PisantyEmilio Pisanty
83.5k22204420
$endgroup$
There are two main reasons.
The first is practical, and it is that QM is hard. Very few systems are solvable, particularly in the presence of interactions. There's a wide variety of situations where perturbation theory is the only available way to make any headway at all.
The second one is conceptual and it is basically that it allows us to establish a hierarchy in the strengths of the different components of a system, and it allows us to have a clearer picture of how this strengths scale with the parameters of the system. Thus, even if you can solve the full system, if one component is weak, it often makes sense to treat it explicitly as a perturbation, so that you can keep a clearer track of how the different aspects of the solution (energies, eigenfunctions, dipole moments, what have you) scale.
answered 2 hours ago
Emilio PisantyEmilio Pisanty
83.5k22204420
answered 2 hours ago
Emilio PisantyEmilio Pisanty
83.5k22204420
answered 2 hours ago
Emilio PisantyEmilio Pisanty
83.5k22204420
answered 2 hours ago
Emilio PisantyEmilio Pisanty
83.5k22204420
83.5k22204420
$begingroup$
Thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– Claus Klausen
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Does your answer work well for all controlled approximations, perturbative or otherwise? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Dvij Mankad
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@DvijMankad I have no idea what scope you're thinking of. Ask separately.
$endgroup$
– Emilio Pisanty
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
I was thinking schemes where we have a small parameter but we are not doing perturbation theory, for example, the adiabatic approximation. I will try to formulate a separate question.
$endgroup$
– Dvij Mankad
42 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– Claus Klausen
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Does your answer work well for all controlled approximations, perturbative or otherwise? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Dvij Mankad
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@DvijMankad I have no idea what scope you're thinking of. Ask separately.
$endgroup$
– Emilio Pisanty
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
I was thinking schemes where we have a small parameter but we are not doing perturbation theory, for example, the adiabatic approximation. I will try to formulate a separate question.
$endgroup$
– Dvij Mankad
42 mins ago
$begingroup$
Thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– Claus Klausen
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– Claus Klausen
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Does your answer work well for all controlled approximations, perturbative or otherwise? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Dvij Mankad
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Does your answer work well for all controlled approximations, perturbative or otherwise? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Dvij Mankad
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@DvijMankad I have no idea what scope you're thinking of. Ask separately.
$endgroup$
– Emilio Pisanty
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@DvijMankad I have no idea what scope you're thinking of. Ask separately.
$endgroup$
– Emilio Pisanty
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
I was thinking schemes where we have a small parameter but we are not doing perturbation theory, for example, the adiabatic approximation. I will try to formulate a separate question.
$endgroup$
– Dvij Mankad
42 mins ago
$begingroup$
I was thinking schemes where we have a small parameter but we are not doing perturbation theory, for example, the adiabatic approximation. I will try to formulate a separate question.
$endgroup$
– Dvij Mankad
42 mins ago
add a comment |
Claus Klausen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Claus Klausen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Claus Klausen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Claus Klausen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f462242%2fcan-someone-explain-the-need-for-perturbation-theory-in-qm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Perturbation theory allows you to calculate the response of a system to a small perturbation. For example, it can tell you, how energy levels shift under the influence of the perturbation, how energy level degeneracies are lifted, and it even allows you to calculate linear response functions. You should be able to find more detailed answers to your question in standard QM books and on the web.
$endgroup$
– flaudemus
2 hours ago