Why doesn't Shulchan Aruch include the laws of destroying fruit trees? The Next CEO of Stack...
Find the majority element, which appears more than half the time
Early programmable calculators with RS-232
Why does freezing point matter when picking cooler ice packs?
How can a day be of 24 hours?
Which acid/base does a strong base/acid react when added to a buffer solution?
Raspberry pi 3 B with Ubuntu 18.04 server arm64: what pi version
How do I keep Mac Emacs from trapping M-`?
What is the difference between 'contrib' and 'non-free' packages repositories?
Is it okay to majorly distort historical facts while writing a fiction story?
Can I cast Thunderwave and be at the center of its bottom face, but not be affected by it?
A hang glider, sudden unexpected lift to 25,000 feet altitude, what could do this?
Car headlights in a world without electricity
How to show a landlord what we have in savings?
Mathematica command that allows it to read my intentions
My boss doesn't want me to have a side project
Compilation of a 2d array and a 1d array
How can I prove that a state of equilibrium is unstable?
Horror film about a man brought out of cryogenic suspension without a soul, around 1990
Cannot restore registry to default in Windows 10?
Why do we say “un seul M” and not “une seule M” even though M is a “consonne”?
How to pronounce fünf in 45
What did the word "leisure" mean in late 18th Century usage?
Does int main() need a declaration on C++?
Why was Sir Cadogan fired?
Why doesn't Shulchan Aruch include the laws of destroying fruit trees?
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowAnonymous glosses in the Shulchan AruchWhy do we make a blessing on the blossoming of fruit trees (birkat hailanot)?Why is the Shulchan Aruch definitive?Why is there such fervor to say the blessing on blossoming fruit trees?Who authored the topic - division headings in the Shulchan Aruch?Why isn't maakeh in the Tur?5th part of the shulchan aruchWhat is the Shulchan Aruch Ha'Arizal?Consistent philosophy in the Shulchan AruchLearning to translate the Shulchan Aruch
Despite clear halachos that apply nowadays and codification in Rambam's Mishneh Torah, Rif, Rosh and Semag, and discussion by a host of other commentaries, as far as I (and the Taz, YD 116:6) can tell, the Tur and Shulchan Aruch do not discuss the laws of destroying trees/Bal Tashchis anywhere. Why is this? (Sources, please!)
halacha shulchan-aruch trees tur
asked 4 hours ago
רבות מחשבותרבות מחשבות
14.6k129122
add a comment |
Despite clear halachos that apply nowadays and codification in Rambam's Mishneh Torah, Rif, Rosh and Semag, and discussion by a host of other commentaries, as far as I (and the Taz, YD 116:6) can tell, the Tur and Shulchan Aruch do not discuss the laws of destroying trees/Bal Tashchis anywhere. Why is this? (Sources, please!)
halacha shulchan-aruch trees tur
asked 4 hours ago
רבות מחשבותרבות מחשבות
14.6k129122
1
It's not the only thing missing
– Double AA♦
3 hours ago
2
@DoubleAA certainly true, but I would ask questions on other cases that were discussed in earlier codes as well...
– רבות מחשבות
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Despite clear halachos that apply nowadays and codification in Rambam's Mishneh Torah, Rif, Rosh and Semag, and discussion by a host of other commentaries, as far as I (and the Taz, YD 116:6) can tell, the Tur and Shulchan Aruch do not discuss the laws of destroying trees/Bal Tashchis anywhere. Why is this? (Sources, please!)
halacha shulchan-aruch trees tur
asked 4 hours ago
רבות מחשבותרבות מחשבות
14.6k129122
Despite clear halachos that apply nowadays and codification in Rambam's Mishneh Torah, Rif, Rosh and Semag, and discussion by a host of other commentaries, as far as I (and the Taz, YD 116:6) can tell, the Tur and Shulchan Aruch do not discuss the laws of destroying trees/Bal Tashchis anywhere. Why is this? (Sources, please!)
halacha shulchan-aruch trees tur
halacha shulchan-aruch trees tur
asked 4 hours ago
רבות מחשבותרבות מחשבות
14.6k129122
asked 4 hours ago
רבות מחשבותרבות מחשבות
14.6k129122
edited 3 hours ago
רבות מחשבות
asked 4 hours ago
רבות מחשבותרבות מחשבות
14.6k129122
asked 4 hours ago
רבות מחשבותרבות מחשבות
14.6k129122
asked 4 hours ago
רבות מחשבותרבות מחשבות
14.6k129122
14.6k129122
1
It's not the only thing missing
– Double AA♦
3 hours ago
2
@DoubleAA certainly true, but I would ask questions on other cases that were discussed in earlier codes as well...
– רבות מחשבות
3 hours ago
add a comment |
1
It's not the only thing missing
– Double AA♦
3 hours ago
2
@DoubleAA certainly true, but I would ask questions on other cases that were discussed in earlier codes as well...
– רבות מחשבות
3 hours ago
1
1
It's not the only thing missing
– Double AA♦
3 hours ago
It's not the only thing missing
– Double AA♦
3 hours ago
2
2
@DoubleAA certainly true, but I would ask questions on other cases that were discussed in earlier codes as well...
– רבות מחשבות
3 hours ago
@DoubleAA certainly true, but I would ask questions on other cases that were discussed in earlier codes as well...
– רבות מחשבות
3 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
R. Jacob Reischer addresses this in a responsum:
Shu"t Shevut Yaakov 1:159
גם על הטור אין תימא כל כך דאף דלאו בפירוש אתמר מכללא אתמר כיון דאיסור לקצוץ אילנות הוא לאו דוקא אלא ה"ה כל המאבד דרך השחתה עובר בלא תשחית כלשון הרמב"ם ואיסורא דבל תשחית מוזכר כמה פעמים בטור וכמבואר בי"ד הל' אבילות סי' שמ"ט וסי' ש"ן ע"ש והיתרא דמותר לקוץ במקום דמזיק לאחריני מבואר כמה פעמים בטור ח"מ סי' קנ"ה יע"ש כל זה נ"ל ברור
There is also not such a question on the Tur, because even if it is not said explicitly it is said implicitly – since the prohibition of cutting trees is not specific, rather anyone who destroys in a destructive manner violates bal tashchit, as expressed by Rambam. And the prohibition of bal tashchit is mentioned many times in the Tur, as is clarified in Y.D. Hilchot Aveilut 349 and 350 see there. And the exemption that it is permissible to cut in a place where it harms others is clarified many times in the Tur, in C.M. 155 see there. All this seems clear to me.
answered 3 hours ago
AlexAlex
22.9k156130
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
R. Jacob Reischer addresses this in a responsum:
Shu"t Shevut Yaakov 1:159
גם על הטור אין תימא כל כך דאף דלאו בפירוש אתמר מכללא אתמר כיון דאיסור לקצוץ אילנות הוא לאו דוקא אלא ה"ה כל המאבד דרך השחתה עובר בלא תשחית כלשון הרמב"ם ואיסורא דבל תשחית מוזכר כמה פעמים בטור וכמבואר בי"ד הל' אבילות סי' שמ"ט וסי' ש"ן ע"ש והיתרא דמותר לקוץ במקום דמזיק לאחריני מבואר כמה פעמים בטור ח"מ סי' קנ"ה יע"ש כל זה נ"ל ברור
There is also not such a question on the Tur, because even if it is not said explicitly it is said implicitly – since the prohibition of cutting trees is not specific, rather anyone who destroys in a destructive manner violates bal tashchit, as expressed by Rambam. And the prohibition of bal tashchit is mentioned many times in the Tur, as is clarified in Y.D. Hilchot Aveilut 349 and 350 see there. And the exemption that it is permissible to cut in a place where it harms others is clarified many times in the Tur, in C.M. 155 see there. All this seems clear to me.
answered 3 hours ago
AlexAlex
22.9k156130
add a comment |
R. Jacob Reischer addresses this in a responsum:
Shu"t Shevut Yaakov 1:159
גם על הטור אין תימא כל כך דאף דלאו בפירוש אתמר מכללא אתמר כיון דאיסור לקצוץ אילנות הוא לאו דוקא אלא ה"ה כל המאבד דרך השחתה עובר בלא תשחית כלשון הרמב"ם ואיסורא דבל תשחית מוזכר כמה פעמים בטור וכמבואר בי"ד הל' אבילות סי' שמ"ט וסי' ש"ן ע"ש והיתרא דמותר לקוץ במקום דמזיק לאחריני מבואר כמה פעמים בטור ח"מ סי' קנ"ה יע"ש כל זה נ"ל ברור
There is also not such a question on the Tur, because even if it is not said explicitly it is said implicitly – since the prohibition of cutting trees is not specific, rather anyone who destroys in a destructive manner violates bal tashchit, as expressed by Rambam. And the prohibition of bal tashchit is mentioned many times in the Tur, as is clarified in Y.D. Hilchot Aveilut 349 and 350 see there. And the exemption that it is permissible to cut in a place where it harms others is clarified many times in the Tur, in C.M. 155 see there. All this seems clear to me.
answered 3 hours ago
AlexAlex
22.9k156130
add a comment |
R. Jacob Reischer addresses this in a responsum:
Shu"t Shevut Yaakov 1:159
גם על הטור אין תימא כל כך דאף דלאו בפירוש אתמר מכללא אתמר כיון דאיסור לקצוץ אילנות הוא לאו דוקא אלא ה"ה כל המאבד דרך השחתה עובר בלא תשחית כלשון הרמב"ם ואיסורא דבל תשחית מוזכר כמה פעמים בטור וכמבואר בי"ד הל' אבילות סי' שמ"ט וסי' ש"ן ע"ש והיתרא דמותר לקוץ במקום דמזיק לאחריני מבואר כמה פעמים בטור ח"מ סי' קנ"ה יע"ש כל זה נ"ל ברור
There is also not such a question on the Tur, because even if it is not said explicitly it is said implicitly – since the prohibition of cutting trees is not specific, rather anyone who destroys in a destructive manner violates bal tashchit, as expressed by Rambam. And the prohibition of bal tashchit is mentioned many times in the Tur, as is clarified in Y.D. Hilchot Aveilut 349 and 350 see there. And the exemption that it is permissible to cut in a place where it harms others is clarified many times in the Tur, in C.M. 155 see there. All this seems clear to me.
answered 3 hours ago
AlexAlex
22.9k156130
R. Jacob Reischer addresses this in a responsum:
Shu"t Shevut Yaakov 1:159
גם על הטור אין תימא כל כך דאף דלאו בפירוש אתמר מכללא אתמר כיון דאיסור לקצוץ אילנות הוא לאו דוקא אלא ה"ה כל המאבד דרך השחתה עובר בלא תשחית כלשון הרמב"ם ואיסורא דבל תשחית מוזכר כמה פעמים בטור וכמבואר בי"ד הל' אבילות סי' שמ"ט וסי' ש"ן ע"ש והיתרא דמותר לקוץ במקום דמזיק לאחריני מבואר כמה פעמים בטור ח"מ סי' קנ"ה יע"ש כל זה נ"ל ברור
There is also not such a question on the Tur, because even if it is not said explicitly it is said implicitly – since the prohibition of cutting trees is not specific, rather anyone who destroys in a destructive manner violates bal tashchit, as expressed by Rambam. And the prohibition of bal tashchit is mentioned many times in the Tur, as is clarified in Y.D. Hilchot Aveilut 349 and 350 see there. And the exemption that it is permissible to cut in a place where it harms others is clarified many times in the Tur, in C.M. 155 see there. All this seems clear to me.
answered 3 hours ago
AlexAlex
22.9k156130
answered 3 hours ago
AlexAlex
22.9k156130
answered 3 hours ago
AlexAlex
22.9k156130
answered 3 hours ago
AlexAlex
22.9k156130
22.9k156130
add a comment |
add a comment |
1
It's not the only thing missing
– Double AA♦
3 hours ago
2
@DoubleAA certainly true, but I would ask questions on other cases that were discussed in earlier codes as well...
– רבות מחשבות
3 hours ago