How do I avoid eval and parse? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowAvoiding the infamous...

How powerful is the invisibility granted by the Gloom Stalker ranger's Umbral Sight feature?

I believe this to be a fraud - hired, then asked to cash check and send cash as Bitcoin

Is there a way to save my career from absolute disaster?

Why has the US not been more assertive in confronting Russia in recent years?

Would a galaxy be visible from outside, but nearby?

How did the Bene Gesserit know how to make a Kwisatz Haderach?

Is it my responsibility to learn a new technology in my own time my employer wants to implement?

Are there any limitations on attacking while grappling?

sp_blitzCache results Memory grants

Written every which way

If/When UK leaves the EU, can a future goverment conduct a referendum to join the EU?

Why does standard notation not preserve intervals (visually)

What does "Its cash flow is deeply negative" mean?

How to Reset Passwords on Multiple Websites Easily?

How fast would a person need to move to trick the eye?

Complex fractions

Contours of a clandestine nature

Why don't programming languages automatically manage the synchronous/asynchronous problem?

What was the first Unix version to run on a microcomputer?

Return the Closest Prime Number

Is it ever safe to open a suspicious html file (e.g. email attachment)?

How do I make a variable always equal to the result of some calculations?

Skipping indices in a product

What flight has the highest ratio of time difference to flight time?



How do I avoid eval and parse?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowAvoiding the infamous “eval(parse())” constructR: eval(parse(…)) is often suboptimalWhy is using the JavaScript eval function a bad idea?When is JavaScript's eval() not evil?How to sort a dataframe by multiple column(s)?How to join (merge) data frames (inner, outer, left, right)What's the difference between eval, exec, and compile?How to make a great R reproducible exampleWhat does Python's eval() do? Avoiding the infamous “eval(parse())” constructUse argument value as variable name in R during function runR: eval parse function call not accessing correct environments












10















I have written a function that sources files that contain scripts for other functions and stores these functions in an alternative environment so that they aren't cluttering up the global environment. The code works, but contains two instances of eval(parse(...)):



# sourceFunctionHidden ---------------------------
# source a function and hide the function from the global environment
sourceFunctionHidden <- function(functions, environment = "env", ...) {
if (environment %in% search()) {
while (environment %in% search()) {
if (!exists("counter", inherits = F)) counter <- 0
eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")")))
counter <- counter + 1
}
cat("detached", counter, environment, "sn")
} else {cat("no", environment, "attachedn")}
if (!environment %in% ls(.GlobalEnv, all.names = T)) {
assign(environment, new.env(), pos = .GlobalEnv)
cat("created", environment, "n")
} else {cat(environment, "already existsn")}
sapply(functions, function(func) {
# source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), .env)
source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"))
eval(parse(text = paste0(environment, "$", func," <- ", func)))
cat(func, "created in", environment, "n")
})
# rm(list = functions, pos = .GlobalEnv)
eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")")))
cat("attached", environment, "nn")
}


Much has been written about the sub-optimality of the eval(parse(...)) construction (see here and here). However, the discussions that I've found mostly deal with alternate strategies for subsetting. The first instance of eval(parse(...)) in my code doesn't involve subsetting (the second instance might be related to subsetting).



Is there a way to call new.env(...) and [environment name]$[function name] <- [function name] without resorting to eval(parse(...))? Thanks.



N.B.: I don't want to change the names of my functions to .name to hide them in the global environment










share|improve this question























  • Just discovered that eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")"))) can be replaced with detach(environment, character.only = T). The question about improving eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")"))) remains.

    – Josh
    12 mins ago


















10















I have written a function that sources files that contain scripts for other functions and stores these functions in an alternative environment so that they aren't cluttering up the global environment. The code works, but contains two instances of eval(parse(...)):



# sourceFunctionHidden ---------------------------
# source a function and hide the function from the global environment
sourceFunctionHidden <- function(functions, environment = "env", ...) {
if (environment %in% search()) {
while (environment %in% search()) {
if (!exists("counter", inherits = F)) counter <- 0
eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")")))
counter <- counter + 1
}
cat("detached", counter, environment, "sn")
} else {cat("no", environment, "attachedn")}
if (!environment %in% ls(.GlobalEnv, all.names = T)) {
assign(environment, new.env(), pos = .GlobalEnv)
cat("created", environment, "n")
} else {cat(environment, "already existsn")}
sapply(functions, function(func) {
# source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), .env)
source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"))
eval(parse(text = paste0(environment, "$", func," <- ", func)))
cat(func, "created in", environment, "n")
})
# rm(list = functions, pos = .GlobalEnv)
eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")")))
cat("attached", environment, "nn")
}


Much has been written about the sub-optimality of the eval(parse(...)) construction (see here and here). However, the discussions that I've found mostly deal with alternate strategies for subsetting. The first instance of eval(parse(...)) in my code doesn't involve subsetting (the second instance might be related to subsetting).



Is there a way to call new.env(...) and [environment name]$[function name] <- [function name] without resorting to eval(parse(...))? Thanks.



N.B.: I don't want to change the names of my functions to .name to hide them in the global environment










share|improve this question























  • Just discovered that eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")"))) can be replaced with detach(environment, character.only = T). The question about improving eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")"))) remains.

    – Josh
    12 mins ago
















10












10








10








I have written a function that sources files that contain scripts for other functions and stores these functions in an alternative environment so that they aren't cluttering up the global environment. The code works, but contains two instances of eval(parse(...)):



# sourceFunctionHidden ---------------------------
# source a function and hide the function from the global environment
sourceFunctionHidden <- function(functions, environment = "env", ...) {
if (environment %in% search()) {
while (environment %in% search()) {
if (!exists("counter", inherits = F)) counter <- 0
eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")")))
counter <- counter + 1
}
cat("detached", counter, environment, "sn")
} else {cat("no", environment, "attachedn")}
if (!environment %in% ls(.GlobalEnv, all.names = T)) {
assign(environment, new.env(), pos = .GlobalEnv)
cat("created", environment, "n")
} else {cat(environment, "already existsn")}
sapply(functions, function(func) {
# source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), .env)
source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"))
eval(parse(text = paste0(environment, "$", func," <- ", func)))
cat(func, "created in", environment, "n")
})
# rm(list = functions, pos = .GlobalEnv)
eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")")))
cat("attached", environment, "nn")
}


Much has been written about the sub-optimality of the eval(parse(...)) construction (see here and here). However, the discussions that I've found mostly deal with alternate strategies for subsetting. The first instance of eval(parse(...)) in my code doesn't involve subsetting (the second instance might be related to subsetting).



Is there a way to call new.env(...) and [environment name]$[function name] <- [function name] without resorting to eval(parse(...))? Thanks.



N.B.: I don't want to change the names of my functions to .name to hide them in the global environment










share|improve this question














I have written a function that sources files that contain scripts for other functions and stores these functions in an alternative environment so that they aren't cluttering up the global environment. The code works, but contains two instances of eval(parse(...)):



# sourceFunctionHidden ---------------------------
# source a function and hide the function from the global environment
sourceFunctionHidden <- function(functions, environment = "env", ...) {
if (environment %in% search()) {
while (environment %in% search()) {
if (!exists("counter", inherits = F)) counter <- 0
eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")")))
counter <- counter + 1
}
cat("detached", counter, environment, "sn")
} else {cat("no", environment, "attachedn")}
if (!environment %in% ls(.GlobalEnv, all.names = T)) {
assign(environment, new.env(), pos = .GlobalEnv)
cat("created", environment, "n")
} else {cat(environment, "already existsn")}
sapply(functions, function(func) {
# source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), .env)
source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"))
eval(parse(text = paste0(environment, "$", func," <- ", func)))
cat(func, "created in", environment, "n")
})
# rm(list = functions, pos = .GlobalEnv)
eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")")))
cat("attached", environment, "nn")
}


Much has been written about the sub-optimality of the eval(parse(...)) construction (see here and here). However, the discussions that I've found mostly deal with alternate strategies for subsetting. The first instance of eval(parse(...)) in my code doesn't involve subsetting (the second instance might be related to subsetting).



Is there a way to call new.env(...) and [environment name]$[function name] <- [function name] without resorting to eval(parse(...))? Thanks.



N.B.: I don't want to change the names of my functions to .name to hide them in the global environment







r eval






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 4 hours ago









JoshJosh

19512




19512













  • Just discovered that eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")"))) can be replaced with detach(environment, character.only = T). The question about improving eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")"))) remains.

    – Josh
    12 mins ago





















  • Just discovered that eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")"))) can be replaced with detach(environment, character.only = T). The question about improving eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")"))) remains.

    – Josh
    12 mins ago



















Just discovered that eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")"))) can be replaced with detach(environment, character.only = T). The question about improving eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")"))) remains.

– Josh
12 mins ago







Just discovered that eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")"))) can be replaced with detach(environment, character.only = T). The question about improving eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")"))) remains.

– Josh
12 mins ago














2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














If you want to keep it off global_env, put it into a package. It's common for people in the R community to put a bunch of frequently used helper functions into their own personal package.






share|improve this answer
























  • I agree. I eventually need to learn how to do this.

    – Josh
    11 mins ago



















3














For what its worth, the function source actually uses eval(parse(...)), albeit in a somewhat subtle way. First, .Internal(parse(...)) is used to create expressions, which after more processing are later passed to eval. So eval(parse(...)) seems to be good enough for the R core team in this instance.



That said, you don't need to jump through hoops to source functions into a new environment. source provides an argument local that can be used for precisely this.




local: TRUE, FALSE or an environment, determining where the parsed expressions are evaluated.




An example:



env = new.env()
source('test.r', local = env)


testing it works:



env$test('hello', 'world')
# [1] "hello world"
ls(pattern = 'test')
# character(0)


And an example test.r file to use this on:



test = function(a,b) paste(a,b)





share|improve this answer
























  • Thank you, I missed that aspect of source(). However, if I change that line of code to source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) I get the error Error in source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) : 'local' must be TRUE, FALSE or an environment. Is there a way to convert the "env" that comes from environment to env?

    – Josh
    4 mins ago














Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55426015%2fhow-do-i-avoid-eval-and-parse%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














If you want to keep it off global_env, put it into a package. It's common for people in the R community to put a bunch of frequently used helper functions into their own personal package.






share|improve this answer
























  • I agree. I eventually need to learn how to do this.

    – Josh
    11 mins ago
















3














If you want to keep it off global_env, put it into a package. It's common for people in the R community to put a bunch of frequently used helper functions into their own personal package.






share|improve this answer
























  • I agree. I eventually need to learn how to do this.

    – Josh
    11 mins ago














3












3








3







If you want to keep it off global_env, put it into a package. It's common for people in the R community to put a bunch of frequently used helper functions into their own personal package.






share|improve this answer













If you want to keep it off global_env, put it into a package. It's common for people in the R community to put a bunch of frequently used helper functions into their own personal package.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 3 hours ago









thcthc

5,37611224




5,37611224













  • I agree. I eventually need to learn how to do this.

    – Josh
    11 mins ago



















  • I agree. I eventually need to learn how to do this.

    – Josh
    11 mins ago

















I agree. I eventually need to learn how to do this.

– Josh
11 mins ago





I agree. I eventually need to learn how to do this.

– Josh
11 mins ago













3














For what its worth, the function source actually uses eval(parse(...)), albeit in a somewhat subtle way. First, .Internal(parse(...)) is used to create expressions, which after more processing are later passed to eval. So eval(parse(...)) seems to be good enough for the R core team in this instance.



That said, you don't need to jump through hoops to source functions into a new environment. source provides an argument local that can be used for precisely this.




local: TRUE, FALSE or an environment, determining where the parsed expressions are evaluated.




An example:



env = new.env()
source('test.r', local = env)


testing it works:



env$test('hello', 'world')
# [1] "hello world"
ls(pattern = 'test')
# character(0)


And an example test.r file to use this on:



test = function(a,b) paste(a,b)





share|improve this answer
























  • Thank you, I missed that aspect of source(). However, if I change that line of code to source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) I get the error Error in source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) : 'local' must be TRUE, FALSE or an environment. Is there a way to convert the "env" that comes from environment to env?

    – Josh
    4 mins ago


















3














For what its worth, the function source actually uses eval(parse(...)), albeit in a somewhat subtle way. First, .Internal(parse(...)) is used to create expressions, which after more processing are later passed to eval. So eval(parse(...)) seems to be good enough for the R core team in this instance.



That said, you don't need to jump through hoops to source functions into a new environment. source provides an argument local that can be used for precisely this.




local: TRUE, FALSE or an environment, determining where the parsed expressions are evaluated.




An example:



env = new.env()
source('test.r', local = env)


testing it works:



env$test('hello', 'world')
# [1] "hello world"
ls(pattern = 'test')
# character(0)


And an example test.r file to use this on:



test = function(a,b) paste(a,b)





share|improve this answer
























  • Thank you, I missed that aspect of source(). However, if I change that line of code to source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) I get the error Error in source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) : 'local' must be TRUE, FALSE or an environment. Is there a way to convert the "env" that comes from environment to env?

    – Josh
    4 mins ago
















3












3








3







For what its worth, the function source actually uses eval(parse(...)), albeit in a somewhat subtle way. First, .Internal(parse(...)) is used to create expressions, which after more processing are later passed to eval. So eval(parse(...)) seems to be good enough for the R core team in this instance.



That said, you don't need to jump through hoops to source functions into a new environment. source provides an argument local that can be used for precisely this.




local: TRUE, FALSE or an environment, determining where the parsed expressions are evaluated.




An example:



env = new.env()
source('test.r', local = env)


testing it works:



env$test('hello', 'world')
# [1] "hello world"
ls(pattern = 'test')
# character(0)


And an example test.r file to use this on:



test = function(a,b) paste(a,b)





share|improve this answer













For what its worth, the function source actually uses eval(parse(...)), albeit in a somewhat subtle way. First, .Internal(parse(...)) is used to create expressions, which after more processing are later passed to eval. So eval(parse(...)) seems to be good enough for the R core team in this instance.



That said, you don't need to jump through hoops to source functions into a new environment. source provides an argument local that can be used for precisely this.




local: TRUE, FALSE or an environment, determining where the parsed expressions are evaluated.




An example:



env = new.env()
source('test.r', local = env)


testing it works:



env$test('hello', 'world')
# [1] "hello world"
ls(pattern = 'test')
# character(0)


And an example test.r file to use this on:



test = function(a,b) paste(a,b)






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 2 hours ago









dwwdww

15.9k32659




15.9k32659













  • Thank you, I missed that aspect of source(). However, if I change that line of code to source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) I get the error Error in source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) : 'local' must be TRUE, FALSE or an environment. Is there a way to convert the "env" that comes from environment to env?

    – Josh
    4 mins ago





















  • Thank you, I missed that aspect of source(). However, if I change that line of code to source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) I get the error Error in source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) : 'local' must be TRUE, FALSE or an environment. Is there a way to convert the "env" that comes from environment to env?

    – Josh
    4 mins ago



















Thank you, I missed that aspect of source(). However, if I change that line of code to source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) I get the error Error in source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) : 'local' must be TRUE, FALSE or an environment. Is there a way to convert the "env" that comes from environment to env?

– Josh
4 mins ago







Thank you, I missed that aspect of source(). However, if I change that line of code to source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) I get the error Error in source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) : 'local' must be TRUE, FALSE or an environment. Is there a way to convert the "env" that comes from environment to env?

– Josh
4 mins ago




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55426015%2fhow-do-i-avoid-eval-and-parse%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

ORA-01691 (unable to extend lob segment) even though my tablespace has AUTOEXTEND onORA-01692: unable to...

Always On Availability groups resolving state after failover - Remote harden of transaction...

Circunscripción electoral de Guipúzcoa Referencias Menú de navegaciónLas claves del sistema electoral en...