How do I avoid eval and parse? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowAvoiding the infamous...
How powerful is the invisibility granted by the Gloom Stalker ranger's Umbral Sight feature?
I believe this to be a fraud - hired, then asked to cash check and send cash as Bitcoin
Is there a way to save my career from absolute disaster?
Why has the US not been more assertive in confronting Russia in recent years?
Would a galaxy be visible from outside, but nearby?
How did the Bene Gesserit know how to make a Kwisatz Haderach?
Is it my responsibility to learn a new technology in my own time my employer wants to implement?
Are there any limitations on attacking while grappling?
sp_blitzCache results Memory grants
Written every which way
If/When UK leaves the EU, can a future goverment conduct a referendum to join the EU?
Why does standard notation not preserve intervals (visually)
What does "Its cash flow is deeply negative" mean?
How to Reset Passwords on Multiple Websites Easily?
How fast would a person need to move to trick the eye?
Complex fractions
Contours of a clandestine nature
Why don't programming languages automatically manage the synchronous/asynchronous problem?
What was the first Unix version to run on a microcomputer?
Return the Closest Prime Number
Is it ever safe to open a suspicious html file (e.g. email attachment)?
How do I make a variable always equal to the result of some calculations?
Skipping indices in a product
What flight has the highest ratio of time difference to flight time?
How do I avoid eval and parse?
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowAvoiding the infamous “eval(parse())” constructR: eval(parse(…)) is often suboptimalWhy is using the JavaScript eval function a bad idea?When is JavaScript's eval() not evil?How to sort a dataframe by multiple column(s)?How to join (merge) data frames (inner, outer, left, right)What's the difference between eval, exec, and compile?How to make a great R reproducible exampleWhat does Python's eval() do? Avoiding the infamous “eval(parse())” constructUse argument value as variable name in R during function runR: eval parse function call not accessing correct environments
I have written a function that sources files that contain scripts for other functions and stores these functions in an alternative environment so that they aren't cluttering up the global environment. The code works, but contains two instances of eval(parse(...))
:
# sourceFunctionHidden ---------------------------
# source a function and hide the function from the global environment
sourceFunctionHidden <- function(functions, environment = "env", ...) {
if (environment %in% search()) {
while (environment %in% search()) {
if (!exists("counter", inherits = F)) counter <- 0
eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")")))
counter <- counter + 1
}
cat("detached", counter, environment, "sn")
} else {cat("no", environment, "attachedn")}
if (!environment %in% ls(.GlobalEnv, all.names = T)) {
assign(environment, new.env(), pos = .GlobalEnv)
cat("created", environment, "n")
} else {cat(environment, "already existsn")}
sapply(functions, function(func) {
# source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), .env)
source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"))
eval(parse(text = paste0(environment, "$", func," <- ", func)))
cat(func, "created in", environment, "n")
})
# rm(list = functions, pos = .GlobalEnv)
eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")")))
cat("attached", environment, "nn")
}
Much has been written about the sub-optimality of the eval(parse(...))
construction (see here and here). However, the discussions that I've found mostly deal with alternate strategies for subsetting. The first instance of eval(parse(...))
in my code doesn't involve subsetting (the second instance might be related to subsetting).
Is there a way to call new.env(...)
and [environment name]$[function name] <- [function name]
without resorting to eval(parse(...))
? Thanks.
N.B.: I don't want to change the names of my functions to .name
to hide them in the global environment
r eval
add a comment |
I have written a function that sources files that contain scripts for other functions and stores these functions in an alternative environment so that they aren't cluttering up the global environment. The code works, but contains two instances of eval(parse(...))
:
# sourceFunctionHidden ---------------------------
# source a function and hide the function from the global environment
sourceFunctionHidden <- function(functions, environment = "env", ...) {
if (environment %in% search()) {
while (environment %in% search()) {
if (!exists("counter", inherits = F)) counter <- 0
eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")")))
counter <- counter + 1
}
cat("detached", counter, environment, "sn")
} else {cat("no", environment, "attachedn")}
if (!environment %in% ls(.GlobalEnv, all.names = T)) {
assign(environment, new.env(), pos = .GlobalEnv)
cat("created", environment, "n")
} else {cat(environment, "already existsn")}
sapply(functions, function(func) {
# source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), .env)
source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"))
eval(parse(text = paste0(environment, "$", func," <- ", func)))
cat(func, "created in", environment, "n")
})
# rm(list = functions, pos = .GlobalEnv)
eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")")))
cat("attached", environment, "nn")
}
Much has been written about the sub-optimality of the eval(parse(...))
construction (see here and here). However, the discussions that I've found mostly deal with alternate strategies for subsetting. The first instance of eval(parse(...))
in my code doesn't involve subsetting (the second instance might be related to subsetting).
Is there a way to call new.env(...)
and [environment name]$[function name] <- [function name]
without resorting to eval(parse(...))
? Thanks.
N.B.: I don't want to change the names of my functions to .name
to hide them in the global environment
r eval
Just discovered thateval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")")))
can be replaced withdetach(environment, character.only = T)
. The question about improvingeval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")")))
remains.
– Josh
12 mins ago
add a comment |
I have written a function that sources files that contain scripts for other functions and stores these functions in an alternative environment so that they aren't cluttering up the global environment. The code works, but contains two instances of eval(parse(...))
:
# sourceFunctionHidden ---------------------------
# source a function and hide the function from the global environment
sourceFunctionHidden <- function(functions, environment = "env", ...) {
if (environment %in% search()) {
while (environment %in% search()) {
if (!exists("counter", inherits = F)) counter <- 0
eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")")))
counter <- counter + 1
}
cat("detached", counter, environment, "sn")
} else {cat("no", environment, "attachedn")}
if (!environment %in% ls(.GlobalEnv, all.names = T)) {
assign(environment, new.env(), pos = .GlobalEnv)
cat("created", environment, "n")
} else {cat(environment, "already existsn")}
sapply(functions, function(func) {
# source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), .env)
source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"))
eval(parse(text = paste0(environment, "$", func," <- ", func)))
cat(func, "created in", environment, "n")
})
# rm(list = functions, pos = .GlobalEnv)
eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")")))
cat("attached", environment, "nn")
}
Much has been written about the sub-optimality of the eval(parse(...))
construction (see here and here). However, the discussions that I've found mostly deal with alternate strategies for subsetting. The first instance of eval(parse(...))
in my code doesn't involve subsetting (the second instance might be related to subsetting).
Is there a way to call new.env(...)
and [environment name]$[function name] <- [function name]
without resorting to eval(parse(...))
? Thanks.
N.B.: I don't want to change the names of my functions to .name
to hide them in the global environment
r eval
I have written a function that sources files that contain scripts for other functions and stores these functions in an alternative environment so that they aren't cluttering up the global environment. The code works, but contains two instances of eval(parse(...))
:
# sourceFunctionHidden ---------------------------
# source a function and hide the function from the global environment
sourceFunctionHidden <- function(functions, environment = "env", ...) {
if (environment %in% search()) {
while (environment %in% search()) {
if (!exists("counter", inherits = F)) counter <- 0
eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")")))
counter <- counter + 1
}
cat("detached", counter, environment, "sn")
} else {cat("no", environment, "attachedn")}
if (!environment %in% ls(.GlobalEnv, all.names = T)) {
assign(environment, new.env(), pos = .GlobalEnv)
cat("created", environment, "n")
} else {cat(environment, "already existsn")}
sapply(functions, function(func) {
# source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), .env)
source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"))
eval(parse(text = paste0(environment, "$", func," <- ", func)))
cat(func, "created in", environment, "n")
})
# rm(list = functions, pos = .GlobalEnv)
eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")")))
cat("attached", environment, "nn")
}
Much has been written about the sub-optimality of the eval(parse(...))
construction (see here and here). However, the discussions that I've found mostly deal with alternate strategies for subsetting. The first instance of eval(parse(...))
in my code doesn't involve subsetting (the second instance might be related to subsetting).
Is there a way to call new.env(...)
and [environment name]$[function name] <- [function name]
without resorting to eval(parse(...))
? Thanks.
N.B.: I don't want to change the names of my functions to .name
to hide them in the global environment
r eval
r eval
asked 4 hours ago
JoshJosh
19512
19512
Just discovered thateval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")")))
can be replaced withdetach(environment, character.only = T)
. The question about improvingeval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")")))
remains.
– Josh
12 mins ago
add a comment |
Just discovered thateval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")")))
can be replaced withdetach(environment, character.only = T)
. The question about improvingeval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")")))
remains.
– Josh
12 mins ago
Just discovered that
eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")")))
can be replaced with detach(environment, character.only = T)
. The question about improving eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")")))
remains.– Josh
12 mins ago
Just discovered that
eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")")))
can be replaced with detach(environment, character.only = T)
. The question about improving eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")")))
remains.– Josh
12 mins ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
If you want to keep it off global_env, put it into a package. It's common for people in the R community to put a bunch of frequently used helper functions into their own personal package.
I agree. I eventually need to learn how to do this.
– Josh
11 mins ago
add a comment |
For what its worth, the function source
actually uses eval(parse(...))
, albeit in a somewhat subtle way. First, .Internal(parse(...))
is used to create expressions, which after more processing are later passed to eval
. So eval(parse(...))
seems to be good enough for the R core team in this instance.
That said, you don't need to jump through hoops to source functions into a new environment. source
provides an argument local
that can be used for precisely this.
local: TRUE, FALSE or an environment, determining where the parsed expressions are evaluated.
An example:
env = new.env()
source('test.r', local = env)
testing it works:
env$test('hello', 'world')
# [1] "hello world"
ls(pattern = 'test')
# character(0)
And an example test.r
file to use this on:
test = function(a,b) paste(a,b)
Thank you, I missed that aspect ofsource()
. However, if I change that line of code tosource(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment)
I get the errorError in source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) : 'local' must be TRUE, FALSE or an environment
. Is there a way to convert the"env"
that comes fromenvironment
toenv
?
– Josh
4 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55426015%2fhow-do-i-avoid-eval-and-parse%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
If you want to keep it off global_env, put it into a package. It's common for people in the R community to put a bunch of frequently used helper functions into their own personal package.
I agree. I eventually need to learn how to do this.
– Josh
11 mins ago
add a comment |
If you want to keep it off global_env, put it into a package. It's common for people in the R community to put a bunch of frequently used helper functions into their own personal package.
I agree. I eventually need to learn how to do this.
– Josh
11 mins ago
add a comment |
If you want to keep it off global_env, put it into a package. It's common for people in the R community to put a bunch of frequently used helper functions into their own personal package.
If you want to keep it off global_env, put it into a package. It's common for people in the R community to put a bunch of frequently used helper functions into their own personal package.
answered 3 hours ago
thcthc
5,37611224
5,37611224
I agree. I eventually need to learn how to do this.
– Josh
11 mins ago
add a comment |
I agree. I eventually need to learn how to do this.
– Josh
11 mins ago
I agree. I eventually need to learn how to do this.
– Josh
11 mins ago
I agree. I eventually need to learn how to do this.
– Josh
11 mins ago
add a comment |
For what its worth, the function source
actually uses eval(parse(...))
, albeit in a somewhat subtle way. First, .Internal(parse(...))
is used to create expressions, which after more processing are later passed to eval
. So eval(parse(...))
seems to be good enough for the R core team in this instance.
That said, you don't need to jump through hoops to source functions into a new environment. source
provides an argument local
that can be used for precisely this.
local: TRUE, FALSE or an environment, determining where the parsed expressions are evaluated.
An example:
env = new.env()
source('test.r', local = env)
testing it works:
env$test('hello', 'world')
# [1] "hello world"
ls(pattern = 'test')
# character(0)
And an example test.r
file to use this on:
test = function(a,b) paste(a,b)
Thank you, I missed that aspect ofsource()
. However, if I change that line of code tosource(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment)
I get the errorError in source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) : 'local' must be TRUE, FALSE or an environment
. Is there a way to convert the"env"
that comes fromenvironment
toenv
?
– Josh
4 mins ago
add a comment |
For what its worth, the function source
actually uses eval(parse(...))
, albeit in a somewhat subtle way. First, .Internal(parse(...))
is used to create expressions, which after more processing are later passed to eval
. So eval(parse(...))
seems to be good enough for the R core team in this instance.
That said, you don't need to jump through hoops to source functions into a new environment. source
provides an argument local
that can be used for precisely this.
local: TRUE, FALSE or an environment, determining where the parsed expressions are evaluated.
An example:
env = new.env()
source('test.r', local = env)
testing it works:
env$test('hello', 'world')
# [1] "hello world"
ls(pattern = 'test')
# character(0)
And an example test.r
file to use this on:
test = function(a,b) paste(a,b)
Thank you, I missed that aspect ofsource()
. However, if I change that line of code tosource(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment)
I get the errorError in source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) : 'local' must be TRUE, FALSE or an environment
. Is there a way to convert the"env"
that comes fromenvironment
toenv
?
– Josh
4 mins ago
add a comment |
For what its worth, the function source
actually uses eval(parse(...))
, albeit in a somewhat subtle way. First, .Internal(parse(...))
is used to create expressions, which after more processing are later passed to eval
. So eval(parse(...))
seems to be good enough for the R core team in this instance.
That said, you don't need to jump through hoops to source functions into a new environment. source
provides an argument local
that can be used for precisely this.
local: TRUE, FALSE or an environment, determining where the parsed expressions are evaluated.
An example:
env = new.env()
source('test.r', local = env)
testing it works:
env$test('hello', 'world')
# [1] "hello world"
ls(pattern = 'test')
# character(0)
And an example test.r
file to use this on:
test = function(a,b) paste(a,b)
For what its worth, the function source
actually uses eval(parse(...))
, albeit in a somewhat subtle way. First, .Internal(parse(...))
is used to create expressions, which after more processing are later passed to eval
. So eval(parse(...))
seems to be good enough for the R core team in this instance.
That said, you don't need to jump through hoops to source functions into a new environment. source
provides an argument local
that can be used for precisely this.
local: TRUE, FALSE or an environment, determining where the parsed expressions are evaluated.
An example:
env = new.env()
source('test.r', local = env)
testing it works:
env$test('hello', 'world')
# [1] "hello world"
ls(pattern = 'test')
# character(0)
And an example test.r
file to use this on:
test = function(a,b) paste(a,b)
answered 2 hours ago
dwwdww
15.9k32659
15.9k32659
Thank you, I missed that aspect ofsource()
. However, if I change that line of code tosource(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment)
I get the errorError in source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) : 'local' must be TRUE, FALSE or an environment
. Is there a way to convert the"env"
that comes fromenvironment
toenv
?
– Josh
4 mins ago
add a comment |
Thank you, I missed that aspect ofsource()
. However, if I change that line of code tosource(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment)
I get the errorError in source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) : 'local' must be TRUE, FALSE or an environment
. Is there a way to convert the"env"
that comes fromenvironment
toenv
?
– Josh
4 mins ago
Thank you, I missed that aspect of
source()
. However, if I change that line of code to source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment)
I get the error Error in source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) : 'local' must be TRUE, FALSE or an environment
. Is there a way to convert the "env"
that comes from environment
to env
?– Josh
4 mins ago
Thank you, I missed that aspect of
source()
. However, if I change that line of code to source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment)
I get the error Error in source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) : 'local' must be TRUE, FALSE or an environment
. Is there a way to convert the "env"
that comes from environment
to env
?– Josh
4 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55426015%2fhow-do-i-avoid-eval-and-parse%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Just discovered that
eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")")))
can be replaced withdetach(environment, character.only = T)
. The question about improvingeval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")")))
remains.– Josh
12 mins ago