Postgresql Streaming Replication Error: WAL segment removedPostgreSQL 9.1 Hot Backup Error: the database...
What is the greatest age difference between a married couple in Tanach?
Science-fiction short story where space navy wanted hospital ships and settlers had guns mounted everywhere
PlotLabels with equations not expressions
Is it possible that AIC = BIC?
Can hydraulic brake levers get hot when brakes overheat?
Should we release the security issues we found in our product as CVE or we can just update those on weekly release notes?
Life insurance that covers only simultaneous/dual deaths
Can the damage from a Talisman of Pure Good (or Ultimate Evil) be non-lethal?
Rules about breaking the rules. How do I do it well?
I need to drive a 7/16" nut but am unsure how to use the socket I bought for my screwdriver
Where is the 1/8 CR apprentice in Volo's Guide to Monsters?
Connecting top and bottom SMD component pads using via
How to make healing in an exploration game interesting
What has been your most complicated TikZ drawing?
Theorems like the Lovász Local Lemma?
How could a female member of a species produce eggs unto death?
Instead of Universal Basic Income, why not Universal Basic NEEDS?
Welcoming 2019 Pi day: How to draw the letter π?
What are the possible solutions of the given equation?
Can elves maintain concentration in a trance?
Why doesn't the EU now just force the UK to choose between referendum and no-deal?
How to write cleanly even if my character uses expletive language?
How to deal with taxi scam when on vacation?
Employee lack of ownership
Postgresql Streaming Replication Error: WAL segment removed
PostgreSQL 9.1 Hot Backup Error: the database system is starting upStreaming Replication in PostgreSQLPostgresql streaming replication and wal archive?Streaming replication Postgresql 9.3 using two different serversPostgreSQL streaming versus file-based replication (In terms of server behavior & configuration)Recovery when failoverrequested WAL segment ***** has already been removedPostgres ignoring wal_level setting in confWal segment still exists on master, but logs on slave and master say it's been removedWAL archiving w/ streaming replication
I want to set up PostgreSQL streaming replication, but get the following error:
FATAL: could not receive data from WAL stream:
ERROR: requested WAL segment 00000001000000000000006A has already been removed.
Master IP : 192.168.0.30
Slave IP : 192.168.0.36
On Master:
I have created a user rep
which is used solely for replication.
The relevant files inside Postgres config directory (/opt/Postgres/9.3/data
):
pg_hba.conf
:
host replication rep 192.168.0.36/32 trust
postgresql.conf
:
listen_addresses = 'localhost,192.168.0.30'
wal_level = 'hot_standby'
archive_mode = on
archive_command = 'cd .'
max_wal_senders = 1
hot_standby = on
I've restarted the postgres
service.
On Slave:
I've stopped the postgres
service, then applied the changes to the two files:
pg_hba.conf
:
host replication rep 192.168.0.30/32 trust
postgresql.conf
:
listen_addresses = 'localhost,192.168.0.36'
wal_level = 'hot_standby'
archive_mode = on
archive_command = 'cd .'
max_wal_senders = 1
hot_standby = on
For replicating the initial database I have done:
On Master:
Internal postgres backup start command to create a backup label:
psql -c "select pg_start_backup('initial_backup');"
... for transferring the database data to slave:
rsync -cva --inplace --exclude=*pg_xlog* /opt/Postgresql/9.3/data/ 192.168.0.36:/opt/Postgresql/9.3/data/
...for internal backup stop to clean up:
psql -c "select pg_stop_backup();"
On Slave:
I've created the following recovery.conf
:
standby_mode = 'on'
primary_conninfo = 'host=192.168.0.30 port=5432 user=rep password=yourpassword'
trigger_file = '/tmp/postgresql.trigger.5432'
Starting the postgres
service on the slave starts without any errors but is still waiting:
ps -ef | grep -i postgres
postgres 12959 1 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 /opt/PostgreSQL/9.3/bin/postgres -D /opt/PostgreSQL/9.3/data
postgres 12969 12959 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: logger process
postgres 12970 12959 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: startup process waiting 00000001000000000000006A
Meanwhile, on master:
ps -ef | grep -i postgres
postgres 5930 1 0 13:39 ? 00:00:01 /opt/PostgreSQL/9.3/bin/postgres -D /opt/PostgreSQL/9.3/data
postgres 5931 5930 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: logger process
postgres 5933 5930 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: checkpointer process
postgres 5934 5930 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: writer process
postgres 5935 5930 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: wal writer process
postgres 5936 5930 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: autovacuum launcher process
postgres 5937 5930 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: archiver process
postgres 5938 5930 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: stats collector process
psql
command on the slave gives:
psql.bin: FATAL: the database system is starting up
--> cd pg_log gives reason for waiting:-
FATAL: could not receive data from WAL stream: ERROR: requested WAL segment has already been removed
00000001000000000000006A segment is not in master's pg_xlog but it is in slaves pg_xlog
How can I solve this error?
postgresql replication postgresql-9.3
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 2 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
I want to set up PostgreSQL streaming replication, but get the following error:
FATAL: could not receive data from WAL stream:
ERROR: requested WAL segment 00000001000000000000006A has already been removed.
Master IP : 192.168.0.30
Slave IP : 192.168.0.36
On Master:
I have created a user rep
which is used solely for replication.
The relevant files inside Postgres config directory (/opt/Postgres/9.3/data
):
pg_hba.conf
:
host replication rep 192.168.0.36/32 trust
postgresql.conf
:
listen_addresses = 'localhost,192.168.0.30'
wal_level = 'hot_standby'
archive_mode = on
archive_command = 'cd .'
max_wal_senders = 1
hot_standby = on
I've restarted the postgres
service.
On Slave:
I've stopped the postgres
service, then applied the changes to the two files:
pg_hba.conf
:
host replication rep 192.168.0.30/32 trust
postgresql.conf
:
listen_addresses = 'localhost,192.168.0.36'
wal_level = 'hot_standby'
archive_mode = on
archive_command = 'cd .'
max_wal_senders = 1
hot_standby = on
For replicating the initial database I have done:
On Master:
Internal postgres backup start command to create a backup label:
psql -c "select pg_start_backup('initial_backup');"
... for transferring the database data to slave:
rsync -cva --inplace --exclude=*pg_xlog* /opt/Postgresql/9.3/data/ 192.168.0.36:/opt/Postgresql/9.3/data/
...for internal backup stop to clean up:
psql -c "select pg_stop_backup();"
On Slave:
I've created the following recovery.conf
:
standby_mode = 'on'
primary_conninfo = 'host=192.168.0.30 port=5432 user=rep password=yourpassword'
trigger_file = '/tmp/postgresql.trigger.5432'
Starting the postgres
service on the slave starts without any errors but is still waiting:
ps -ef | grep -i postgres
postgres 12959 1 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 /opt/PostgreSQL/9.3/bin/postgres -D /opt/PostgreSQL/9.3/data
postgres 12969 12959 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: logger process
postgres 12970 12959 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: startup process waiting 00000001000000000000006A
Meanwhile, on master:
ps -ef | grep -i postgres
postgres 5930 1 0 13:39 ? 00:00:01 /opt/PostgreSQL/9.3/bin/postgres -D /opt/PostgreSQL/9.3/data
postgres 5931 5930 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: logger process
postgres 5933 5930 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: checkpointer process
postgres 5934 5930 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: writer process
postgres 5935 5930 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: wal writer process
postgres 5936 5930 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: autovacuum launcher process
postgres 5937 5930 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: archiver process
postgres 5938 5930 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: stats collector process
psql
command on the slave gives:
psql.bin: FATAL: the database system is starting up
--> cd pg_log gives reason for waiting:-
FATAL: could not receive data from WAL stream: ERROR: requested WAL segment has already been removed
00000001000000000000006A segment is not in master's pg_xlog but it is in slaves pg_xlog
How can I solve this error?
postgresql replication postgresql-9.3
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 2 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
I want to set up PostgreSQL streaming replication, but get the following error:
FATAL: could not receive data from WAL stream:
ERROR: requested WAL segment 00000001000000000000006A has already been removed.
Master IP : 192.168.0.30
Slave IP : 192.168.0.36
On Master:
I have created a user rep
which is used solely for replication.
The relevant files inside Postgres config directory (/opt/Postgres/9.3/data
):
pg_hba.conf
:
host replication rep 192.168.0.36/32 trust
postgresql.conf
:
listen_addresses = 'localhost,192.168.0.30'
wal_level = 'hot_standby'
archive_mode = on
archive_command = 'cd .'
max_wal_senders = 1
hot_standby = on
I've restarted the postgres
service.
On Slave:
I've stopped the postgres
service, then applied the changes to the two files:
pg_hba.conf
:
host replication rep 192.168.0.30/32 trust
postgresql.conf
:
listen_addresses = 'localhost,192.168.0.36'
wal_level = 'hot_standby'
archive_mode = on
archive_command = 'cd .'
max_wal_senders = 1
hot_standby = on
For replicating the initial database I have done:
On Master:
Internal postgres backup start command to create a backup label:
psql -c "select pg_start_backup('initial_backup');"
... for transferring the database data to slave:
rsync -cva --inplace --exclude=*pg_xlog* /opt/Postgresql/9.3/data/ 192.168.0.36:/opt/Postgresql/9.3/data/
...for internal backup stop to clean up:
psql -c "select pg_stop_backup();"
On Slave:
I've created the following recovery.conf
:
standby_mode = 'on'
primary_conninfo = 'host=192.168.0.30 port=5432 user=rep password=yourpassword'
trigger_file = '/tmp/postgresql.trigger.5432'
Starting the postgres
service on the slave starts without any errors but is still waiting:
ps -ef | grep -i postgres
postgres 12959 1 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 /opt/PostgreSQL/9.3/bin/postgres -D /opt/PostgreSQL/9.3/data
postgres 12969 12959 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: logger process
postgres 12970 12959 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: startup process waiting 00000001000000000000006A
Meanwhile, on master:
ps -ef | grep -i postgres
postgres 5930 1 0 13:39 ? 00:00:01 /opt/PostgreSQL/9.3/bin/postgres -D /opt/PostgreSQL/9.3/data
postgres 5931 5930 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: logger process
postgres 5933 5930 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: checkpointer process
postgres 5934 5930 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: writer process
postgres 5935 5930 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: wal writer process
postgres 5936 5930 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: autovacuum launcher process
postgres 5937 5930 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: archiver process
postgres 5938 5930 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: stats collector process
psql
command on the slave gives:
psql.bin: FATAL: the database system is starting up
--> cd pg_log gives reason for waiting:-
FATAL: could not receive data from WAL stream: ERROR: requested WAL segment has already been removed
00000001000000000000006A segment is not in master's pg_xlog but it is in slaves pg_xlog
How can I solve this error?
postgresql replication postgresql-9.3
I want to set up PostgreSQL streaming replication, but get the following error:
FATAL: could not receive data from WAL stream:
ERROR: requested WAL segment 00000001000000000000006A has already been removed.
Master IP : 192.168.0.30
Slave IP : 192.168.0.36
On Master:
I have created a user rep
which is used solely for replication.
The relevant files inside Postgres config directory (/opt/Postgres/9.3/data
):
pg_hba.conf
:
host replication rep 192.168.0.36/32 trust
postgresql.conf
:
listen_addresses = 'localhost,192.168.0.30'
wal_level = 'hot_standby'
archive_mode = on
archive_command = 'cd .'
max_wal_senders = 1
hot_standby = on
I've restarted the postgres
service.
On Slave:
I've stopped the postgres
service, then applied the changes to the two files:
pg_hba.conf
:
host replication rep 192.168.0.30/32 trust
postgresql.conf
:
listen_addresses = 'localhost,192.168.0.36'
wal_level = 'hot_standby'
archive_mode = on
archive_command = 'cd .'
max_wal_senders = 1
hot_standby = on
For replicating the initial database I have done:
On Master:
Internal postgres backup start command to create a backup label:
psql -c "select pg_start_backup('initial_backup');"
... for transferring the database data to slave:
rsync -cva --inplace --exclude=*pg_xlog* /opt/Postgresql/9.3/data/ 192.168.0.36:/opt/Postgresql/9.3/data/
...for internal backup stop to clean up:
psql -c "select pg_stop_backup();"
On Slave:
I've created the following recovery.conf
:
standby_mode = 'on'
primary_conninfo = 'host=192.168.0.30 port=5432 user=rep password=yourpassword'
trigger_file = '/tmp/postgresql.trigger.5432'
Starting the postgres
service on the slave starts without any errors but is still waiting:
ps -ef | grep -i postgres
postgres 12959 1 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 /opt/PostgreSQL/9.3/bin/postgres -D /opt/PostgreSQL/9.3/data
postgres 12969 12959 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: logger process
postgres 12970 12959 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: startup process waiting 00000001000000000000006A
Meanwhile, on master:
ps -ef | grep -i postgres
postgres 5930 1 0 13:39 ? 00:00:01 /opt/PostgreSQL/9.3/bin/postgres -D /opt/PostgreSQL/9.3/data
postgres 5931 5930 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: logger process
postgres 5933 5930 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: checkpointer process
postgres 5934 5930 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: writer process
postgres 5935 5930 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: wal writer process
postgres 5936 5930 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: autovacuum launcher process
postgres 5937 5930 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: archiver process
postgres 5938 5930 0 13:39 ? 00:00:00 postgres: stats collector process
psql
command on the slave gives:
psql.bin: FATAL: the database system is starting up
--> cd pg_log gives reason for waiting:-
FATAL: could not receive data from WAL stream: ERROR: requested WAL segment has already been removed
00000001000000000000006A segment is not in master's pg_xlog but it is in slaves pg_xlog
How can I solve this error?
postgresql replication postgresql-9.3
postgresql replication postgresql-9.3
edited Jan 5 '16 at 11:38
dezso
22.3k116096
22.3k116096
asked Jan 5 '16 at 10:41
danishdanish
1612
1612
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 2 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 2 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
From Streaming Replication in the PostgreSQL documentation:
If you use streaming replication without file-based continuous archiving, the server might recycle old WAL segments before the standby has received them. If this occurs, the standby will need to be reinitialized from a new base backup. You can avoid this by setting
wal_keep_segments
to a value large enough to ensure that WAL segments are not recycled too early, or by configuring a replication slot for the standby. If you set up a WAL archive that's accessible from the standby, these solutions are not required, since the standby can always use the archive to catch up provided it retains enough segments.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "182"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f125220%2fpostgresql-streaming-replication-error-wal-segment-removed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
From Streaming Replication in the PostgreSQL documentation:
If you use streaming replication without file-based continuous archiving, the server might recycle old WAL segments before the standby has received them. If this occurs, the standby will need to be reinitialized from a new base backup. You can avoid this by setting
wal_keep_segments
to a value large enough to ensure that WAL segments are not recycled too early, or by configuring a replication slot for the standby. If you set up a WAL archive that's accessible from the standby, these solutions are not required, since the standby can always use the archive to catch up provided it retains enough segments.
add a comment |
From Streaming Replication in the PostgreSQL documentation:
If you use streaming replication without file-based continuous archiving, the server might recycle old WAL segments before the standby has received them. If this occurs, the standby will need to be reinitialized from a new base backup. You can avoid this by setting
wal_keep_segments
to a value large enough to ensure that WAL segments are not recycled too early, or by configuring a replication slot for the standby. If you set up a WAL archive that's accessible from the standby, these solutions are not required, since the standby can always use the archive to catch up provided it retains enough segments.
add a comment |
From Streaming Replication in the PostgreSQL documentation:
If you use streaming replication without file-based continuous archiving, the server might recycle old WAL segments before the standby has received them. If this occurs, the standby will need to be reinitialized from a new base backup. You can avoid this by setting
wal_keep_segments
to a value large enough to ensure that WAL segments are not recycled too early, or by configuring a replication slot for the standby. If you set up a WAL archive that's accessible from the standby, these solutions are not required, since the standby can always use the archive to catch up provided it retains enough segments.
From Streaming Replication in the PostgreSQL documentation:
If you use streaming replication without file-based continuous archiving, the server might recycle old WAL segments before the standby has received them. If this occurs, the standby will need to be reinitialized from a new base backup. You can avoid this by setting
wal_keep_segments
to a value large enough to ensure that WAL segments are not recycled too early, or by configuring a replication slot for the standby. If you set up a WAL archive that's accessible from the standby, these solutions are not required, since the standby can always use the archive to catch up provided it retains enough segments.
edited Feb 8 at 9:42
answered Feb 8 at 9:41
Comment ConverterComment Converter
1,3221325
1,3221325
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f125220%2fpostgresql-streaming-replication-error-wal-segment-removed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown