How to explain one side of Super Earth is smoother than the other side?How would the inhabitants of one...
How to not forget my phone in the bathroom?
Hands-Free Methods of Firing Arrows for Flying Soldiers
Why does the includeonly command not stepcounter the chaptercounter for omitted chapters?
Who, if anyone, was the first astronaut to return to earth in a different vessel?
Is candidate anonymity at all practical?
if else in jq is not giving expected output
Is it appropriate to give a culturally-traditional gift to a female coworker?
Why do we charge our flashes?
Is there a limit on the layers of encryption a file can have?
Why did the ZX Spectrum use an internal speaker?
Candle stand modeling question
Does limiting the number of sources help simplify the game for a new DM with new and experienced players?
Some of the people in my town pay no taxes, what can I do about it?
Why are these receptacles so difficult to plug into?
Sci fi book, man buys a beat up spaceship and intervenes in a civil war on a planet and eventually becomes a space cop
The Hilbert symbols of quaternion algebras over a totally real field
"Cheaper by the dozen" phrase origin?
Why do most space probes survive for far longer than they were designed for?
If you're falling because of ball bearings, do you automatically land on caltrops in the same space?
How to make clear what a part-humanoid character looks like when they're quite common in their world?
If an area is covered in both Ball Bearings and Caltrops, does the creature need to move at half speed or quarter speed to avoid both their effects?
Ethernet cable only works in certain positions
Someone wants me to use my credit card at a card-only gas/petrol pump in return for cash
How to properly launch tmux on terminal startup?
How to explain one side of Super Earth is smoother than the other side?
How would the inhabitants of one planet kill the inhabitants of the other?How many spaceships would it take to block the Sun from the daylight side of the Earth?Could I create a shock on Earth's crust so strong that it would affect the other side of the Earth?Could a body of moving water be a colour other than blue?How can I find out the length of seasons and solar year on this planet?If there was a Counter-Earth on the other side of the Sun, when would it have been discovered?Humanoids in Super EarthThe Rocky Side of the World Without OilHow would coral reefs thrive on this super-earth world?Is this planetary moon's calendar possible?
$begingroup$
A spaceship flew across an unclassified region of the Milky Way galaxy and found a Super Earth in an unnamed system, the planet is almost twice as massive as Earth and is orbiting fairly far away from it's parent star. Unfortunately there is no liquid water and is deemed too cold for settlement, strangely one side of the planet has a gigantic flat ice sheet covering half of the planet surface while the other side is ridded with craters some as deep as 20km below global mean surface gravity level. How to explain the finding?
planets geology topography
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A spaceship flew across an unclassified region of the Milky Way galaxy and found a Super Earth in an unnamed system, the planet is almost twice as massive as Earth and is orbiting fairly far away from it's parent star. Unfortunately there is no liquid water and is deemed too cold for settlement, strangely one side of the planet has a gigantic flat ice sheet covering half of the planet surface while the other side is ridded with craters some as deep as 20km below global mean surface gravity level. How to explain the finding?
planets geology topography
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Could it be as simple as all the continental crust has accumulated into a supercontinent on one side of the planet, while the other side is frozen ocean?
$endgroup$
– Arkenstein XII
11 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
How is this super Earth if the environment is so different from Earth's? It seems like it's too cold on the far side for life as we know it to be possible, and seemingly too inhospitable on the other. It seems like there's little air, and no plants to turn the air towards oxygen. Meanwhile, it's tide-locked while too far from the sun to get enough energy for life. Considering the millions of stars with untold planets in the galaxy, why come here?
$endgroup$
– Ed Grimm
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@EdGrimm: the definition of super earth is up to debate but I'm following the one used by kelper mission, the spacecraft is on a mission to chart the new region of space and to identify resource hot spot.
$endgroup$
– user6760
10 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A spaceship flew across an unclassified region of the Milky Way galaxy and found a Super Earth in an unnamed system, the planet is almost twice as massive as Earth and is orbiting fairly far away from it's parent star. Unfortunately there is no liquid water and is deemed too cold for settlement, strangely one side of the planet has a gigantic flat ice sheet covering half of the planet surface while the other side is ridded with craters some as deep as 20km below global mean surface gravity level. How to explain the finding?
planets geology topography
$endgroup$
A spaceship flew across an unclassified region of the Milky Way galaxy and found a Super Earth in an unnamed system, the planet is almost twice as massive as Earth and is orbiting fairly far away from it's parent star. Unfortunately there is no liquid water and is deemed too cold for settlement, strangely one side of the planet has a gigantic flat ice sheet covering half of the planet surface while the other side is ridded with craters some as deep as 20km below global mean surface gravity level. How to explain the finding?
planets geology topography
planets geology topography
edited 3 hours ago
user6760
asked 11 hours ago
user6760user6760
12k1366143
12k1366143
$begingroup$
Could it be as simple as all the continental crust has accumulated into a supercontinent on one side of the planet, while the other side is frozen ocean?
$endgroup$
– Arkenstein XII
11 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
How is this super Earth if the environment is so different from Earth's? It seems like it's too cold on the far side for life as we know it to be possible, and seemingly too inhospitable on the other. It seems like there's little air, and no plants to turn the air towards oxygen. Meanwhile, it's tide-locked while too far from the sun to get enough energy for life. Considering the millions of stars with untold planets in the galaxy, why come here?
$endgroup$
– Ed Grimm
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@EdGrimm: the definition of super earth is up to debate but I'm following the one used by kelper mission, the spacecraft is on a mission to chart the new region of space and to identify resource hot spot.
$endgroup$
– user6760
10 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Could it be as simple as all the continental crust has accumulated into a supercontinent on one side of the planet, while the other side is frozen ocean?
$endgroup$
– Arkenstein XII
11 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
How is this super Earth if the environment is so different from Earth's? It seems like it's too cold on the far side for life as we know it to be possible, and seemingly too inhospitable on the other. It seems like there's little air, and no plants to turn the air towards oxygen. Meanwhile, it's tide-locked while too far from the sun to get enough energy for life. Considering the millions of stars with untold planets in the galaxy, why come here?
$endgroup$
– Ed Grimm
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@EdGrimm: the definition of super earth is up to debate but I'm following the one used by kelper mission, the spacecraft is on a mission to chart the new region of space and to identify resource hot spot.
$endgroup$
– user6760
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
Could it be as simple as all the continental crust has accumulated into a supercontinent on one side of the planet, while the other side is frozen ocean?
$endgroup$
– Arkenstein XII
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
Could it be as simple as all the continental crust has accumulated into a supercontinent on one side of the planet, while the other side is frozen ocean?
$endgroup$
– Arkenstein XII
11 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
How is this super Earth if the environment is so different from Earth's? It seems like it's too cold on the far side for life as we know it to be possible, and seemingly too inhospitable on the other. It seems like there's little air, and no plants to turn the air towards oxygen. Meanwhile, it's tide-locked while too far from the sun to get enough energy for life. Considering the millions of stars with untold planets in the galaxy, why come here?
$endgroup$
– Ed Grimm
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
How is this super Earth if the environment is so different from Earth's? It seems like it's too cold on the far side for life as we know it to be possible, and seemingly too inhospitable on the other. It seems like there's little air, and no plants to turn the air towards oxygen. Meanwhile, it's tide-locked while too far from the sun to get enough energy for life. Considering the millions of stars with untold planets in the galaxy, why come here?
$endgroup$
– Ed Grimm
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@EdGrimm: the definition of super earth is up to debate but I'm following the one used by kelper mission, the spacecraft is on a mission to chart the new region of space and to identify resource hot spot.
$endgroup$
– user6760
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@EdGrimm: the definition of super earth is up to debate but I'm following the one used by kelper mission, the spacecraft is on a mission to chart the new region of space and to identify resource hot spot.
$endgroup$
– user6760
10 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I'm reminded strongly of Iapetus, a moon of Saturn that has a dramatic two-tone coloring. One hemisphere is quite light, while the other is dark. It almost looks like you dunked half of the moon in chocolate:
Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/Space Science Institute/Lunar and Planetary Institute. Public domain.
Iapetus is tidally locked, meaning that one side is always the "leading" half of the moon. This means that it easily attracts particles from a giant ring of dust created by the moon Phoebe, which orbits in the opposite direction. One half of Iapetus is dusted by the darker particles, which, a long time ago, kick-started a feedback loop that sublimated ice on one side while keeping it frozen on the other. This self-propagating cycle continued until one hemisphere was dark and one was light.
I can imagine something similar happening here - tidal locking in the past, and a transfer of material from another planet in a nearby retrograde orbit. It's possible that this transfer could have been a true bombardment, rather than the light dusting Iapetus received. A tight system like TRAPPIST-1 could be useful here, but the retrograde orbit could do weird things with the resonances, so maybe that wouldn't be such a great choice after all.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I like real world example👍
$endgroup$
– user6760
10 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Big impact.
Something like this might have happened to Mars.
https://www.space.com/5558-huge-impact-created-mars-split-personality.html
Scientists have been scratching their heads trying to explain the differences between the two sides of Mars for about 30 years. The northern hemisphere of the planet is smooth and low, and some experts think it may have contained a vast ocean long ago. Meanwhile, the southern half of the Martian surface is rough and heavily-cratered, and about 2.5 miles to 5 miles (4 km to 8 km) higher in elevation than the northern basin...
"What we noticed is that the dichotomy boundary around the planet was actually smooth and regular. We tested to see if we could fit this with any shape, and it just so happens that it's almost perfectly fitted by an ellipse. There's only one process that's known to make an elliptical depression like that, and that's a giant impact."
So too your planet. Something big whacked into it hard, flattening out the water side. An impact like that probably softened everything up, and when it equilibrated the new giant hole filled with water, that then froze.
Whatever the big impactor was, it had friends which accounted for the holes on the far side. Or maybe material knocked free from the impact flew out and then eventually back in, digging those craters on the dry side.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Just a shot in the dark, but the planet could be tidally locked, similar to our moon, meaning that one side always faces away from the sun. It could be that the side facing away from the sun would have cooled so much as to create a frozen surface of water, while all water from the other side boiled away. The craters on the inner side are caused by meteors, and they show only because there is no frozen ocean covering them, only bare crust.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f139413%2fhow-to-explain-one-side-of-super-earth-is-smoother-than-the-other-side%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I'm reminded strongly of Iapetus, a moon of Saturn that has a dramatic two-tone coloring. One hemisphere is quite light, while the other is dark. It almost looks like you dunked half of the moon in chocolate:
Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/Space Science Institute/Lunar and Planetary Institute. Public domain.
Iapetus is tidally locked, meaning that one side is always the "leading" half of the moon. This means that it easily attracts particles from a giant ring of dust created by the moon Phoebe, which orbits in the opposite direction. One half of Iapetus is dusted by the darker particles, which, a long time ago, kick-started a feedback loop that sublimated ice on one side while keeping it frozen on the other. This self-propagating cycle continued until one hemisphere was dark and one was light.
I can imagine something similar happening here - tidal locking in the past, and a transfer of material from another planet in a nearby retrograde orbit. It's possible that this transfer could have been a true bombardment, rather than the light dusting Iapetus received. A tight system like TRAPPIST-1 could be useful here, but the retrograde orbit could do weird things with the resonances, so maybe that wouldn't be such a great choice after all.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I like real world example👍
$endgroup$
– user6760
10 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm reminded strongly of Iapetus, a moon of Saturn that has a dramatic two-tone coloring. One hemisphere is quite light, while the other is dark. It almost looks like you dunked half of the moon in chocolate:
Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/Space Science Institute/Lunar and Planetary Institute. Public domain.
Iapetus is tidally locked, meaning that one side is always the "leading" half of the moon. This means that it easily attracts particles from a giant ring of dust created by the moon Phoebe, which orbits in the opposite direction. One half of Iapetus is dusted by the darker particles, which, a long time ago, kick-started a feedback loop that sublimated ice on one side while keeping it frozen on the other. This self-propagating cycle continued until one hemisphere was dark and one was light.
I can imagine something similar happening here - tidal locking in the past, and a transfer of material from another planet in a nearby retrograde orbit. It's possible that this transfer could have been a true bombardment, rather than the light dusting Iapetus received. A tight system like TRAPPIST-1 could be useful here, but the retrograde orbit could do weird things with the resonances, so maybe that wouldn't be such a great choice after all.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I like real world example👍
$endgroup$
– user6760
10 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm reminded strongly of Iapetus, a moon of Saturn that has a dramatic two-tone coloring. One hemisphere is quite light, while the other is dark. It almost looks like you dunked half of the moon in chocolate:
Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/Space Science Institute/Lunar and Planetary Institute. Public domain.
Iapetus is tidally locked, meaning that one side is always the "leading" half of the moon. This means that it easily attracts particles from a giant ring of dust created by the moon Phoebe, which orbits in the opposite direction. One half of Iapetus is dusted by the darker particles, which, a long time ago, kick-started a feedback loop that sublimated ice on one side while keeping it frozen on the other. This self-propagating cycle continued until one hemisphere was dark and one was light.
I can imagine something similar happening here - tidal locking in the past, and a transfer of material from another planet in a nearby retrograde orbit. It's possible that this transfer could have been a true bombardment, rather than the light dusting Iapetus received. A tight system like TRAPPIST-1 could be useful here, but the retrograde orbit could do weird things with the resonances, so maybe that wouldn't be such a great choice after all.
$endgroup$
I'm reminded strongly of Iapetus, a moon of Saturn that has a dramatic two-tone coloring. One hemisphere is quite light, while the other is dark. It almost looks like you dunked half of the moon in chocolate:
Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/Space Science Institute/Lunar and Planetary Institute. Public domain.
Iapetus is tidally locked, meaning that one side is always the "leading" half of the moon. This means that it easily attracts particles from a giant ring of dust created by the moon Phoebe, which orbits in the opposite direction. One half of Iapetus is dusted by the darker particles, which, a long time ago, kick-started a feedback loop that sublimated ice on one side while keeping it frozen on the other. This self-propagating cycle continued until one hemisphere was dark and one was light.
I can imagine something similar happening here - tidal locking in the past, and a transfer of material from another planet in a nearby retrograde orbit. It's possible that this transfer could have been a true bombardment, rather than the light dusting Iapetus received. A tight system like TRAPPIST-1 could be useful here, but the retrograde orbit could do weird things with the resonances, so maybe that wouldn't be such a great choice after all.
edited 9 mins ago
answered 10 hours ago
HDE 226868♦HDE 226868
64.9k13223421
64.9k13223421
$begingroup$
I like real world example👍
$endgroup$
– user6760
10 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I like real world example👍
$endgroup$
– user6760
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
I like real world example👍
$endgroup$
– user6760
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
I like real world example👍
$endgroup$
– user6760
10 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Big impact.
Something like this might have happened to Mars.
https://www.space.com/5558-huge-impact-created-mars-split-personality.html
Scientists have been scratching their heads trying to explain the differences between the two sides of Mars for about 30 years. The northern hemisphere of the planet is smooth and low, and some experts think it may have contained a vast ocean long ago. Meanwhile, the southern half of the Martian surface is rough and heavily-cratered, and about 2.5 miles to 5 miles (4 km to 8 km) higher in elevation than the northern basin...
"What we noticed is that the dichotomy boundary around the planet was actually smooth and regular. We tested to see if we could fit this with any shape, and it just so happens that it's almost perfectly fitted by an ellipse. There's only one process that's known to make an elliptical depression like that, and that's a giant impact."
So too your planet. Something big whacked into it hard, flattening out the water side. An impact like that probably softened everything up, and when it equilibrated the new giant hole filled with water, that then froze.
Whatever the big impactor was, it had friends which accounted for the holes on the far side. Or maybe material knocked free from the impact flew out and then eventually back in, digging those craters on the dry side.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Big impact.
Something like this might have happened to Mars.
https://www.space.com/5558-huge-impact-created-mars-split-personality.html
Scientists have been scratching their heads trying to explain the differences between the two sides of Mars for about 30 years. The northern hemisphere of the planet is smooth and low, and some experts think it may have contained a vast ocean long ago. Meanwhile, the southern half of the Martian surface is rough and heavily-cratered, and about 2.5 miles to 5 miles (4 km to 8 km) higher in elevation than the northern basin...
"What we noticed is that the dichotomy boundary around the planet was actually smooth and regular. We tested to see if we could fit this with any shape, and it just so happens that it's almost perfectly fitted by an ellipse. There's only one process that's known to make an elliptical depression like that, and that's a giant impact."
So too your planet. Something big whacked into it hard, flattening out the water side. An impact like that probably softened everything up, and when it equilibrated the new giant hole filled with water, that then froze.
Whatever the big impactor was, it had friends which accounted for the holes on the far side. Or maybe material knocked free from the impact flew out and then eventually back in, digging those craters on the dry side.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Big impact.
Something like this might have happened to Mars.
https://www.space.com/5558-huge-impact-created-mars-split-personality.html
Scientists have been scratching their heads trying to explain the differences between the two sides of Mars for about 30 years. The northern hemisphere of the planet is smooth and low, and some experts think it may have contained a vast ocean long ago. Meanwhile, the southern half of the Martian surface is rough and heavily-cratered, and about 2.5 miles to 5 miles (4 km to 8 km) higher in elevation than the northern basin...
"What we noticed is that the dichotomy boundary around the planet was actually smooth and regular. We tested to see if we could fit this with any shape, and it just so happens that it's almost perfectly fitted by an ellipse. There's only one process that's known to make an elliptical depression like that, and that's a giant impact."
So too your planet. Something big whacked into it hard, flattening out the water side. An impact like that probably softened everything up, and when it equilibrated the new giant hole filled with water, that then froze.
Whatever the big impactor was, it had friends which accounted for the holes on the far side. Or maybe material knocked free from the impact flew out and then eventually back in, digging those craters on the dry side.
$endgroup$
Big impact.
Something like this might have happened to Mars.
https://www.space.com/5558-huge-impact-created-mars-split-personality.html
Scientists have been scratching their heads trying to explain the differences between the two sides of Mars for about 30 years. The northern hemisphere of the planet is smooth and low, and some experts think it may have contained a vast ocean long ago. Meanwhile, the southern half of the Martian surface is rough and heavily-cratered, and about 2.5 miles to 5 miles (4 km to 8 km) higher in elevation than the northern basin...
"What we noticed is that the dichotomy boundary around the planet was actually smooth and regular. We tested to see if we could fit this with any shape, and it just so happens that it's almost perfectly fitted by an ellipse. There's only one process that's known to make an elliptical depression like that, and that's a giant impact."
So too your planet. Something big whacked into it hard, flattening out the water side. An impact like that probably softened everything up, and when it equilibrated the new giant hole filled with water, that then froze.
Whatever the big impactor was, it had friends which accounted for the holes on the far side. Or maybe material knocked free from the impact flew out and then eventually back in, digging those craters on the dry side.
edited 6 hours ago
G0BLiN
2,91511121
2,91511121
answered 9 hours ago
WillkWillk
108k26204452
108k26204452
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Just a shot in the dark, but the planet could be tidally locked, similar to our moon, meaning that one side always faces away from the sun. It could be that the side facing away from the sun would have cooled so much as to create a frozen surface of water, while all water from the other side boiled away. The craters on the inner side are caused by meteors, and they show only because there is no frozen ocean covering them, only bare crust.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Just a shot in the dark, but the planet could be tidally locked, similar to our moon, meaning that one side always faces away from the sun. It could be that the side facing away from the sun would have cooled so much as to create a frozen surface of water, while all water from the other side boiled away. The craters on the inner side are caused by meteors, and they show only because there is no frozen ocean covering them, only bare crust.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Just a shot in the dark, but the planet could be tidally locked, similar to our moon, meaning that one side always faces away from the sun. It could be that the side facing away from the sun would have cooled so much as to create a frozen surface of water, while all water from the other side boiled away. The craters on the inner side are caused by meteors, and they show only because there is no frozen ocean covering them, only bare crust.
New contributor
$endgroup$
Just a shot in the dark, but the planet could be tidally locked, similar to our moon, meaning that one side always faces away from the sun. It could be that the side facing away from the sun would have cooled so much as to create a frozen surface of water, while all water from the other side boiled away. The craters on the inner side are caused by meteors, and they show only because there is no frozen ocean covering them, only bare crust.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 10 hours ago
Joe FiotiJoe Fioti
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f139413%2fhow-to-explain-one-side-of-super-earth-is-smoother-than-the-other-side%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Could it be as simple as all the continental crust has accumulated into a supercontinent on one side of the planet, while the other side is frozen ocean?
$endgroup$
– Arkenstein XII
11 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
How is this super Earth if the environment is so different from Earth's? It seems like it's too cold on the far side for life as we know it to be possible, and seemingly too inhospitable on the other. It seems like there's little air, and no plants to turn the air towards oxygen. Meanwhile, it's tide-locked while too far from the sun to get enough energy for life. Considering the millions of stars with untold planets in the galaxy, why come here?
$endgroup$
– Ed Grimm
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@EdGrimm: the definition of super earth is up to debate but I'm following the one used by kelper mission, the spacecraft is on a mission to chart the new region of space and to identify resource hot spot.
$endgroup$
– user6760
10 hours ago