Avoid circular reference with configuration tablesDatabase Design: Linking 'vague' entries to...

Why do Australian milk farmers need to protest supermarkets' milk price?

How could a female member of a species produce eggs unto death?

Make a transparent 448*448 image

Is all copper pipe pretty much the same?

Single word request: Harming the benefactor

Time travel short story where dinosaur doesn't taste like chicken

When is a batch class instantiated when you schedule it?

Does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports?

Potentiometer like component

Should we release the security issues we found in our product as CVE or we can just update those on weekly release notes?

Decoding assembly instructions in a Game Boy disassembler

Why does Deadpool say "You're welcome, Canada," after shooting Ryan Reynolds in the end credits?

Latest web browser compatible with Windows 98

Time dilation for a moving electronic clock

What Happens when Passenger Refuses to Fly Boeing 737 Max?

What does it mean when multiple 々 marks follow a 、?

What is the difference between "shut" and "close"?

validation vs test vs training accuracy, which one to compare for claiming overfit?

This equation is outside the page, how to modify it

Silly Sally's Movie

Is it true that real estate prices mainly go up?

Is going from continuous data to categorical always wrong?

What happens with multiple copies of Humility and Glorious Anthem on the battlefield?

How does Dispel Magic work against Stoneskin?



Avoid circular reference with configuration tables


Database Design: Linking 'vague' entries to associations?Using indexes to create multiple relationships to a table in order to enforce data integrity and add meaningPrecautions when designing database schema if tables are going to have billons of rowsWhen normalizing a relational database, should multiple “type” tables be combined into one?How to avoid a cyclic dependency (circular reference) between 3 tables?How can I avoid this circular relation?How to design parent, child, photos relationships in mysql when photos can belong to either parent or child?Ms-access defining additional Index FieldsDatabase Table Schema Circular Reference issueIs the modeling technique changing with column-oriented databases?













2















I've got a few tables that define configuration information. This defines what combination are allowed in the system.



However, I've got a circular reference on ProjectName which can cause potential invalid relationships. I'm wondering how I can enforce this better in the database. I don't want to trust the code to enforce it.



Table Schema (Table / Columns)



Project
ProjectName

Category
CategoryName

ProjectCategory
ProjectCategoryID
ProjectName
CategoryName

Inventory
ProjectName
ProjectCategoryID


Populated Tables (Table/Column/Data)



Project
ProjectName
A
B

Category
CategoryName
X
Y

ProjectCategory
ProjectCategoryID, ProjectName, ProjectCategory
1, A, X
2, A, Y
3, B, Y

Inventory
ProjectName, ProjectCategoryID
A, 1
A, 3


Inventory record (A, 3) is invalid. The inventory belongs to project 'A' yet the configuration belongs to project 'B'. Because of the circular reference, its possible to associate a record incorrectly.










share|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community 1 min ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
















  • Is there a reason why you don't define a ProjectID and use ProjectName everywhere as an identifier instead?

    – Ziggy Crueltyfree Zeitgeister
    Apr 21 '16 at 0:38
















2















I've got a few tables that define configuration information. This defines what combination are allowed in the system.



However, I've got a circular reference on ProjectName which can cause potential invalid relationships. I'm wondering how I can enforce this better in the database. I don't want to trust the code to enforce it.



Table Schema (Table / Columns)



Project
ProjectName

Category
CategoryName

ProjectCategory
ProjectCategoryID
ProjectName
CategoryName

Inventory
ProjectName
ProjectCategoryID


Populated Tables (Table/Column/Data)



Project
ProjectName
A
B

Category
CategoryName
X
Y

ProjectCategory
ProjectCategoryID, ProjectName, ProjectCategory
1, A, X
2, A, Y
3, B, Y

Inventory
ProjectName, ProjectCategoryID
A, 1
A, 3


Inventory record (A, 3) is invalid. The inventory belongs to project 'A' yet the configuration belongs to project 'B'. Because of the circular reference, its possible to associate a record incorrectly.










share|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community 1 min ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
















  • Is there a reason why you don't define a ProjectID and use ProjectName everywhere as an identifier instead?

    – Ziggy Crueltyfree Zeitgeister
    Apr 21 '16 at 0:38














2












2








2








I've got a few tables that define configuration information. This defines what combination are allowed in the system.



However, I've got a circular reference on ProjectName which can cause potential invalid relationships. I'm wondering how I can enforce this better in the database. I don't want to trust the code to enforce it.



Table Schema (Table / Columns)



Project
ProjectName

Category
CategoryName

ProjectCategory
ProjectCategoryID
ProjectName
CategoryName

Inventory
ProjectName
ProjectCategoryID


Populated Tables (Table/Column/Data)



Project
ProjectName
A
B

Category
CategoryName
X
Y

ProjectCategory
ProjectCategoryID, ProjectName, ProjectCategory
1, A, X
2, A, Y
3, B, Y

Inventory
ProjectName, ProjectCategoryID
A, 1
A, 3


Inventory record (A, 3) is invalid. The inventory belongs to project 'A' yet the configuration belongs to project 'B'. Because of the circular reference, its possible to associate a record incorrectly.










share|improve this question
















I've got a few tables that define configuration information. This defines what combination are allowed in the system.



However, I've got a circular reference on ProjectName which can cause potential invalid relationships. I'm wondering how I can enforce this better in the database. I don't want to trust the code to enforce it.



Table Schema (Table / Columns)



Project
ProjectName

Category
CategoryName

ProjectCategory
ProjectCategoryID
ProjectName
CategoryName

Inventory
ProjectName
ProjectCategoryID


Populated Tables (Table/Column/Data)



Project
ProjectName
A
B

Category
CategoryName
X
Y

ProjectCategory
ProjectCategoryID, ProjectName, ProjectCategory
1, A, X
2, A, Y
3, B, Y

Inventory
ProjectName, ProjectCategoryID
A, 1
A, 3


Inventory record (A, 3) is invalid. The inventory belongs to project 'A' yet the configuration belongs to project 'B'. Because of the circular reference, its possible to associate a record incorrectly.







database-design






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 20 '16 at 22:26







csdev

















asked Apr 20 '16 at 21:27









csdevcsdev

112




112





bumped to the homepage by Community 1 min ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







bumped to the homepage by Community 1 min ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.















  • Is there a reason why you don't define a ProjectID and use ProjectName everywhere as an identifier instead?

    – Ziggy Crueltyfree Zeitgeister
    Apr 21 '16 at 0:38



















  • Is there a reason why you don't define a ProjectID and use ProjectName everywhere as an identifier instead?

    – Ziggy Crueltyfree Zeitgeister
    Apr 21 '16 at 0:38

















Is there a reason why you don't define a ProjectID and use ProjectName everywhere as an identifier instead?

– Ziggy Crueltyfree Zeitgeister
Apr 21 '16 at 0:38





Is there a reason why you don't define a ProjectID and use ProjectName everywhere as an identifier instead?

– Ziggy Crueltyfree Zeitgeister
Apr 21 '16 at 0:38










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














You can solve this problem by either removing ProjectName from Inventory (since it is redundant because it is already specified in ProjectCategory), or enforce the relationship via a foreign key:



CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON ProjectCategory (ProjectCategoryID, ProjectName);

ALTER TABLE Inventory ADD
FOREIGN KEY (ProjectCategoryID, ProjectName) REFERENCES (ProjectCategoryID, ProjectName);





share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "182"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f135992%2favoid-circular-reference-with-configuration-tables%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    You can solve this problem by either removing ProjectName from Inventory (since it is redundant because it is already specified in ProjectCategory), or enforce the relationship via a foreign key:



    CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON ProjectCategory (ProjectCategoryID, ProjectName);

    ALTER TABLE Inventory ADD
    FOREIGN KEY (ProjectCategoryID, ProjectName) REFERENCES (ProjectCategoryID, ProjectName);





    share|improve this answer




























      0














      You can solve this problem by either removing ProjectName from Inventory (since it is redundant because it is already specified in ProjectCategory), or enforce the relationship via a foreign key:



      CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON ProjectCategory (ProjectCategoryID, ProjectName);

      ALTER TABLE Inventory ADD
      FOREIGN KEY (ProjectCategoryID, ProjectName) REFERENCES (ProjectCategoryID, ProjectName);





      share|improve this answer


























        0












        0








        0







        You can solve this problem by either removing ProjectName from Inventory (since it is redundant because it is already specified in ProjectCategory), or enforce the relationship via a foreign key:



        CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON ProjectCategory (ProjectCategoryID, ProjectName);

        ALTER TABLE Inventory ADD
        FOREIGN KEY (ProjectCategoryID, ProjectName) REFERENCES (ProjectCategoryID, ProjectName);





        share|improve this answer













        You can solve this problem by either removing ProjectName from Inventory (since it is redundant because it is already specified in ProjectCategory), or enforce the relationship via a foreign key:



        CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON ProjectCategory (ProjectCategoryID, ProjectName);

        ALTER TABLE Inventory ADD
        FOREIGN KEY (ProjectCategoryID, ProjectName) REFERENCES (ProjectCategoryID, ProjectName);






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Apr 21 '16 at 0:40









        Ziggy Crueltyfree ZeitgeisterZiggy Crueltyfree Zeitgeister

        4,2651819




        4,2651819






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f135992%2favoid-circular-reference-with-configuration-tables%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            ORA-01691 (unable to extend lob segment) even though my tablespace has AUTOEXTEND onORA-01692: unable to...

            Always On Availability groups resolving state after failover - Remote harden of transaction...

            Circunscripción electoral de Guipúzcoa Referencias Menú de navegaciónLas claves del sistema electoral en...