Differential and Linear trail propagation in Noekeondifferential and linear cryptanalysisDifference between...
Using Past-Perfect interchangeably with the Past Continuous
What is the term when voters “dishonestly” choose something that they do not want to choose?
Is honey really a supersaturated solution? Does heating to un-crystalize redissolve it or melt it?
Probably overheated black color SMD pads
Turning a hard to access nut?
How can my new character not be a role-playing handicap to the party?
How to generate binary array whose elements with values 1 are randomly drawn
Is it correct to say "which country do you like the most?"
Why is there so much iron?
In the 1924 version of The Thief of Bagdad, no character is named, right?
How are passwords stolen from companies if they only store hashes?
Is it true that good novels will automatically sell themselves on Amazon (and so on) and there is no need for one to waste time promoting?
What is the relationship between relativity and the Doppler effect?
Writing in a Christian voice
Should I use acronyms in dialogues before telling the readers what it stands for in fiction?
What exactly term 'companion plants' means?
In Aliens, how many people were on LV-426 before the Marines arrived?
How can an organ that provides biological immortality be unable to regenerate?
What can I do if I am asked to learn different programming languages very frequently?
Does .bashrc contain syntax errors?
What is the significance behind "40 days" that often appears in the Bible?
Is it insecure to send a password in a `curl` command?
Is there a term for accumulated dirt on the outside of your hands and feet?
What does "^L" mean in C?
Differential and Linear trail propagation in Noekeon
differential and linear cryptanalysisDifference between linear cryptanalysis and differential cryptanalysisWhat is the complexity for attacking 3DES in linear or differential cryptanalysis?Differential CryptanalysisDifferential & linear characteristics for integer multiplicationWhat is the meaning of Maximum Expected Differential/Linear Probability (MEDP/MELP)?Understanding the wide trail design strategyit is possible to use quantum algorithm search (Grover's algorithm) for new searching strategies for differential and linear attacksLinear cryptanalysis and number of linear approximationsHow does linear vs. non-linear operations relate to cryptographic security and differential cryptanalysis?
$begingroup$
In the Noekeon Cipher Specification they write the following :
The propagation through Lambda is denoted by $(a rightarrow A)$, also called a
step. Because of the linearity of Lambda it is fully deterministic:
both for LC and DC patterns, we have: $A = operatorname{Lambda}(a)$. The fact that the
relation is the same for LC and DC is thanks to the fact that the
Lambda is an orthogonal function. If represented in a matrix, its
inverse is its transpose.
I'm having a hard time understanding why the orthogonality of Lambda affects the relation with regards to selection patterns (LC).
Why does the orthogonality of Lambda make it so that the relationship is the same as for DC ? How would the selection pattern propagate through the linear layer if Lambda was not orthogonal ?
cryptanalysis block-cipher linear-cryptanalysis differential-analysis
asked 6 hours ago
YuonYuon
737
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the Noekeon Cipher Specification they write the following :
The propagation through Lambda is denoted by $(a rightarrow A)$, also called a
step. Because of the linearity of Lambda it is fully deterministic:
both for LC and DC patterns, we have: $A = operatorname{Lambda}(a)$. The fact that the
relation is the same for LC and DC is thanks to the fact that the
Lambda is an orthogonal function. If represented in a matrix, its
inverse is its transpose.
I'm having a hard time understanding why the orthogonality of Lambda affects the relation with regards to selection patterns (LC).
Why does the orthogonality of Lambda make it so that the relationship is the same as for DC ? How would the selection pattern propagate through the linear layer if Lambda was not orthogonal ?
cryptanalysis block-cipher linear-cryptanalysis differential-analysis
asked 6 hours ago
YuonYuon
737
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the Noekeon Cipher Specification they write the following :
The propagation through Lambda is denoted by $(a rightarrow A)$, also called a
step. Because of the linearity of Lambda it is fully deterministic:
both for LC and DC patterns, we have: $A = operatorname{Lambda}(a)$. The fact that the
relation is the same for LC and DC is thanks to the fact that the
Lambda is an orthogonal function. If represented in a matrix, its
inverse is its transpose.
I'm having a hard time understanding why the orthogonality of Lambda affects the relation with regards to selection patterns (LC).
Why does the orthogonality of Lambda make it so that the relationship is the same as for DC ? How would the selection pattern propagate through the linear layer if Lambda was not orthogonal ?
cryptanalysis block-cipher linear-cryptanalysis differential-analysis
asked 6 hours ago
YuonYuon
737
$endgroup$
In the Noekeon Cipher Specification they write the following :
The propagation through Lambda is denoted by $(a rightarrow A)$, also called a
step. Because of the linearity of Lambda it is fully deterministic:
both for LC and DC patterns, we have: $A = operatorname{Lambda}(a)$. The fact that the
relation is the same for LC and DC is thanks to the fact that the
Lambda is an orthogonal function. If represented in a matrix, its
inverse is its transpose.
I'm having a hard time understanding why the orthogonality of Lambda affects the relation with regards to selection patterns (LC).
Why does the orthogonality of Lambda make it so that the relationship is the same as for DC ? How would the selection pattern propagate through the linear layer if Lambda was not orthogonal ?
cryptanalysis block-cipher linear-cryptanalysis differential-analysis
cryptanalysis block-cipher linear-cryptanalysis differential-analysis
asked 6 hours ago
YuonYuon
737
asked 6 hours ago
YuonYuon
737
edited 6 hours ago
Yuon
asked 6 hours ago
YuonYuon
737
asked 6 hours ago
YuonYuon
737
asked 6 hours ago
YuonYuon
737
737
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is due to the duality between linear and differential trails.
Let $L$ be an invertible linear map on $mathbb{F}_2^n$, think of it as a matrix for convenience.
In general, a nonzero differential $Delta_1 to Delta_2$ over $L$ must satisfy
$$Delta_2 = L,Delta_1.$$
A nonzero linear approximation $u_1 to u_2$, however, must satisfy
$$u_2 = L^{-top},u_1$$
An elementary way to see this is to observe that $u_1^top x = u_2^top (Lx)$ is equivalent to $u_1^top x = (L^top,u_2)^top x$. This holds for all $x in mathbb{F}_2^n$ whenever $u_2 = L^{-top},u_1$, and otherwise for half (some hyperplane) the $x$.
If $L$ is orthogonal, then $L^{-T} = L$. So then we have both $Delta_2 = LDelta_1$ and $u_2 = L u_1$.
answered 3 hours ago
AlephAleph
1,2961220
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I suspected it was because of something like that. Could you just give some intuition as to why we want $u^T_1 x = u^T_2(Lx)$ in first place ? If I had to come up with that, I'd think it's the other way around $u^T_2 x = u^T_1 (Lx)$ just like the differential case.
$endgroup$
– Yuon
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "281"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcrypto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f68085%2fdifferential-and-linear-trail-propagation-in-noekeon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is due to the duality between linear and differential trails.
Let $L$ be an invertible linear map on $mathbb{F}_2^n$, think of it as a matrix for convenience.
In general, a nonzero differential $Delta_1 to Delta_2$ over $L$ must satisfy
$$Delta_2 = L,Delta_1.$$
A nonzero linear approximation $u_1 to u_2$, however, must satisfy
$$u_2 = L^{-top},u_1$$
An elementary way to see this is to observe that $u_1^top x = u_2^top (Lx)$ is equivalent to $u_1^top x = (L^top,u_2)^top x$. This holds for all $x in mathbb{F}_2^n$ whenever $u_2 = L^{-top},u_1$, and otherwise for half (some hyperplane) the $x$.
If $L$ is orthogonal, then $L^{-T} = L$. So then we have both $Delta_2 = LDelta_1$ and $u_2 = L u_1$.
answered 3 hours ago
AlephAleph
1,2961220
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I suspected it was because of something like that. Could you just give some intuition as to why we want $u^T_1 x = u^T_2(Lx)$ in first place ? If I had to come up with that, I'd think it's the other way around $u^T_2 x = u^T_1 (Lx)$ just like the differential case.
$endgroup$
– Yuon
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is due to the duality between linear and differential trails.
Let $L$ be an invertible linear map on $mathbb{F}_2^n$, think of it as a matrix for convenience.
In general, a nonzero differential $Delta_1 to Delta_2$ over $L$ must satisfy
$$Delta_2 = L,Delta_1.$$
A nonzero linear approximation $u_1 to u_2$, however, must satisfy
$$u_2 = L^{-top},u_1$$
An elementary way to see this is to observe that $u_1^top x = u_2^top (Lx)$ is equivalent to $u_1^top x = (L^top,u_2)^top x$. This holds for all $x in mathbb{F}_2^n$ whenever $u_2 = L^{-top},u_1$, and otherwise for half (some hyperplane) the $x$.
If $L$ is orthogonal, then $L^{-T} = L$. So then we have both $Delta_2 = LDelta_1$ and $u_2 = L u_1$.
answered 3 hours ago
AlephAleph
1,2961220
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I suspected it was because of something like that. Could you just give some intuition as to why we want $u^T_1 x = u^T_2(Lx)$ in first place ? If I had to come up with that, I'd think it's the other way around $u^T_2 x = u^T_1 (Lx)$ just like the differential case.
$endgroup$
– Yuon
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is due to the duality between linear and differential trails.
Let $L$ be an invertible linear map on $mathbb{F}_2^n$, think of it as a matrix for convenience.
In general, a nonzero differential $Delta_1 to Delta_2$ over $L$ must satisfy
$$Delta_2 = L,Delta_1.$$
A nonzero linear approximation $u_1 to u_2$, however, must satisfy
$$u_2 = L^{-top},u_1$$
An elementary way to see this is to observe that $u_1^top x = u_2^top (Lx)$ is equivalent to $u_1^top x = (L^top,u_2)^top x$. This holds for all $x in mathbb{F}_2^n$ whenever $u_2 = L^{-top},u_1$, and otherwise for half (some hyperplane) the $x$.
If $L$ is orthogonal, then $L^{-T} = L$. So then we have both $Delta_2 = LDelta_1$ and $u_2 = L u_1$.
answered 3 hours ago
AlephAleph
1,2961220
$endgroup$
This is due to the duality between linear and differential trails.
Let $L$ be an invertible linear map on $mathbb{F}_2^n$, think of it as a matrix for convenience.
In general, a nonzero differential $Delta_1 to Delta_2$ over $L$ must satisfy
$$Delta_2 = L,Delta_1.$$
A nonzero linear approximation $u_1 to u_2$, however, must satisfy
$$u_2 = L^{-top},u_1$$
An elementary way to see this is to observe that $u_1^top x = u_2^top (Lx)$ is equivalent to $u_1^top x = (L^top,u_2)^top x$. This holds for all $x in mathbb{F}_2^n$ whenever $u_2 = L^{-top},u_1$, and otherwise for half (some hyperplane) the $x$.
If $L$ is orthogonal, then $L^{-T} = L$. So then we have both $Delta_2 = LDelta_1$ and $u_2 = L u_1$.
answered 3 hours ago
AlephAleph
1,2961220
answered 3 hours ago
AlephAleph
1,2961220
answered 3 hours ago
AlephAleph
1,2961220
answered 3 hours ago
AlephAleph
1,2961220
1,2961220
$begingroup$
I suspected it was because of something like that. Could you just give some intuition as to why we want $u^T_1 x = u^T_2(Lx)$ in first place ? If I had to come up with that, I'd think it's the other way around $u^T_2 x = u^T_1 (Lx)$ just like the differential case.
$endgroup$
– Yuon
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I suspected it was because of something like that. Could you just give some intuition as to why we want $u^T_1 x = u^T_2(Lx)$ in first place ? If I had to come up with that, I'd think it's the other way around $u^T_2 x = u^T_1 (Lx)$ just like the differential case.
$endgroup$
– Yuon
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
I suspected it was because of something like that. Could you just give some intuition as to why we want $u^T_1 x = u^T_2(Lx)$ in first place ? If I had to come up with that, I'd think it's the other way around $u^T_2 x = u^T_1 (Lx)$ just like the differential case.
$endgroup$
– Yuon
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
I suspected it was because of something like that. Could you just give some intuition as to why we want $u^T_1 x = u^T_2(Lx)$ in first place ? If I had to come up with that, I'd think it's the other way around $u^T_2 x = u^T_1 (Lx)$ just like the differential case.
$endgroup$
– Yuon
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Cryptography Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcrypto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f68085%2fdifferential-and-linear-trail-propagation-in-noekeon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
