Alternative to の The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In

How to support a colleague who finds meetings extremely tiring?

Accepted by European university, rejected by all American ones I applied to? Possible reasons?

Kerning for subscripts of sigma?

Why can I use a list index as an indexing variable in a for loop?

Worn-tile Scrabble

Is it okay to consider publishing in my first year of PhD?

Why was M87 targeted for the Event Horizon Telescope instead of Sagittarius A*?

Ubuntu Server install with full GUI

How to type a long/em dash `—`

Likelihood that a superbug or lethal virus could come from a landfill

What is the most efficient way to store a numeric range?

Can we generate random numbers using irrational numbers like π and e?

How come people say “Would of”?

A female thief is not sold to make restitution -- so what happens instead?

What is this business jet?

Button changing its text & action. Good or terrible?

Getting crown tickets for Statue of Liberty

What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?

Can withdrawing asylum be illegal?

Why didn't the Event Horizon Telescope team mention Sagittarius A*?

Will it cause any balance problems to have PCs level up and gain the benefits of a long rest mid-fight?

Loose spokes after only a few rides

Mathematics of imaging the black hole

What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?



Alternative to の



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In












3















I would like to translate this sentence:



In order to compensate the deviation of the actual from the requested output current, the input voltage must be adjusted.



I would try as follows:



実際の出力電流の指令された電流からの逸脱を補正するには、入力電圧を適応させることが必要です。



I think it is correct. However, the expression "実際の出力電流の指令された電流からの逸脱" sounds awkward as "の" is mentioned three times. From my point of view, it is somehow unclear to what the second "の" is referring to.



Does anybody no an alternative for the "実際の出力電流の指令された電流からの逸脱"?
Will it be an option if I say: "実際の出力電流に於ける、指令された電流からの逸脱"?










share|improve this question





























    3















    I would like to translate this sentence:



    In order to compensate the deviation of the actual from the requested output current, the input voltage must be adjusted.



    I would try as follows:



    実際の出力電流の指令された電流からの逸脱を補正するには、入力電圧を適応させることが必要です。



    I think it is correct. However, the expression "実際の出力電流の指令された電流からの逸脱" sounds awkward as "の" is mentioned three times. From my point of view, it is somehow unclear to what the second "の" is referring to.



    Does anybody no an alternative for the "実際の出力電流の指令された電流からの逸脱"?
    Will it be an option if I say: "実際の出力電流に於ける、指令された電流からの逸脱"?










    share|improve this question



























      3












      3








      3








      I would like to translate this sentence:



      In order to compensate the deviation of the actual from the requested output current, the input voltage must be adjusted.



      I would try as follows:



      実際の出力電流の指令された電流からの逸脱を補正するには、入力電圧を適応させることが必要です。



      I think it is correct. However, the expression "実際の出力電流の指令された電流からの逸脱" sounds awkward as "の" is mentioned three times. From my point of view, it is somehow unclear to what the second "の" is referring to.



      Does anybody no an alternative for the "実際の出力電流の指令された電流からの逸脱"?
      Will it be an option if I say: "実際の出力電流に於ける、指令された電流からの逸脱"?










      share|improve this question
















      I would like to translate this sentence:



      In order to compensate the deviation of the actual from the requested output current, the input voltage must be adjusted.



      I would try as follows:



      実際の出力電流の指令された電流からの逸脱を補正するには、入力電圧を適応させることが必要です。



      I think it is correct. However, the expression "実際の出力電流の指令された電流からの逸脱" sounds awkward as "の" is mentioned three times. From my point of view, it is somehow unclear to what the second "の" is referring to.



      Does anybody no an alternative for the "実際の出力電流の指令された電流からの逸脱"?
      Will it be an option if I say: "実際の出力電流に於ける、指令された電流からの逸脱"?







      particles






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 4 hours ago







      Kenny

















      asked 4 hours ago









      KennyKenny

      985




      985






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          I think using the second の makes it really hard to read and it would be better to use と and make it more of a contrast between the expected and actual outputs.




          実際の出力電流指令された電流との逸脱を補正するには



          In order to compensate for the deviation between the actual and expected output current







          share|improve this answer































            1














            Your attempt is not wrong but was difficult for me to grasp which word modifies which. Something like this would be easier to read:




            実際の出力電流と指定した出力電流との差を補正するには、…




            If you want to use における, use it to describe a "broad" scope:




            出力電流における実際値と指定値との差を補正するには、…



            出力電流における、実際値の指定値からの逸脱を補正するには、…




            指定値 can be replaced with 指示値, 指令値 or 要求値 according to your preference.



            In addition, you may want to use 調整する instead of 適応させる. 適応 means adapting to a new environment/configuration, but this sentence seems to be about something simpler.






            share|improve this answer


























              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "257"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fjapanese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f66545%2falternative-to-%25e3%2581%25ae%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              1














              I think using the second の makes it really hard to read and it would be better to use と and make it more of a contrast between the expected and actual outputs.




              実際の出力電流指令された電流との逸脱を補正するには



              In order to compensate for the deviation between the actual and expected output current







              share|improve this answer




























                1














                I think using the second の makes it really hard to read and it would be better to use と and make it more of a contrast between the expected and actual outputs.




                実際の出力電流指令された電流との逸脱を補正するには



                In order to compensate for the deviation between the actual and expected output current







                share|improve this answer


























                  1












                  1








                  1







                  I think using the second の makes it really hard to read and it would be better to use と and make it more of a contrast between the expected and actual outputs.




                  実際の出力電流指令された電流との逸脱を補正するには



                  In order to compensate for the deviation between the actual and expected output current







                  share|improve this answer













                  I think using the second の makes it really hard to read and it would be better to use と and make it more of a contrast between the expected and actual outputs.




                  実際の出力電流指令された電流との逸脱を補正するには



                  In order to compensate for the deviation between the actual and expected output current








                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 2 hours ago









                  RingilRingil

                  4,33821135




                  4,33821135























                      1














                      Your attempt is not wrong but was difficult for me to grasp which word modifies which. Something like this would be easier to read:




                      実際の出力電流と指定した出力電流との差を補正するには、…




                      If you want to use における, use it to describe a "broad" scope:




                      出力電流における実際値と指定値との差を補正するには、…



                      出力電流における、実際値の指定値からの逸脱を補正するには、…




                      指定値 can be replaced with 指示値, 指令値 or 要求値 according to your preference.



                      In addition, you may want to use 調整する instead of 適応させる. 適応 means adapting to a new environment/configuration, but this sentence seems to be about something simpler.






                      share|improve this answer






























                        1














                        Your attempt is not wrong but was difficult for me to grasp which word modifies which. Something like this would be easier to read:




                        実際の出力電流と指定した出力電流との差を補正するには、…




                        If you want to use における, use it to describe a "broad" scope:




                        出力電流における実際値と指定値との差を補正するには、…



                        出力電流における、実際値の指定値からの逸脱を補正するには、…




                        指定値 can be replaced with 指示値, 指令値 or 要求値 according to your preference.



                        In addition, you may want to use 調整する instead of 適応させる. 適応 means adapting to a new environment/configuration, but this sentence seems to be about something simpler.






                        share|improve this answer




























                          1












                          1








                          1







                          Your attempt is not wrong but was difficult for me to grasp which word modifies which. Something like this would be easier to read:




                          実際の出力電流と指定した出力電流との差を補正するには、…




                          If you want to use における, use it to describe a "broad" scope:




                          出力電流における実際値と指定値との差を補正するには、…



                          出力電流における、実際値の指定値からの逸脱を補正するには、…




                          指定値 can be replaced with 指示値, 指令値 or 要求値 according to your preference.



                          In addition, you may want to use 調整する instead of 適応させる. 適応 means adapting to a new environment/configuration, but this sentence seems to be about something simpler.






                          share|improve this answer















                          Your attempt is not wrong but was difficult for me to grasp which word modifies which. Something like this would be easier to read:




                          実際の出力電流と指定した出力電流との差を補正するには、…




                          If you want to use における, use it to describe a "broad" scope:




                          出力電流における実際値と指定値との差を補正するには、…



                          出力電流における、実際値の指定値からの逸脱を補正するには、…




                          指定値 can be replaced with 指示値, 指令値 or 要求値 according to your preference.



                          In addition, you may want to use 調整する instead of 適応させる. 適応 means adapting to a new environment/configuration, but this sentence seems to be about something simpler.







                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited 2 hours ago

























                          answered 2 hours ago









                          narutonaruto

                          165k8158314




                          165k8158314






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Japanese Language Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fjapanese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f66545%2falternative-to-%25e3%2581%25ae%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Anexo:Material bélico de la Fuerza Aérea de Chile Índice Aeronaves Defensa...

                              Always On Availability groups resolving state after failover - Remote harden of transaction...

                              update json value to null Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara ...