Sfrgttk

How to format long polynomial?

Arrow those variables!

How much RAM could one put in a typical 80386 setup?

How old can references or sources in a thesis be?

Why can't I see bouncing of switch on oscilloscope screen?

Can a vampire attack twice with their claws using Multiattack?

What would happen to a modern skyscraper if it rains micro blackholes?

A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?

How can I prevent hyper evolved versions of regular creatures from wiping out their cousins?

Java Casting: Java 11 throws LambdaConversionException while 1.8 does not

meaning of に in 本当に?

Why is consensus so controversial in Britain?

How is the claim "I am in New York only if I am in America" the same as "If I am in New York, then I am in America?

What's the output of a record needle playing an out-of-speed record

Horror movie about a virus at the prom; beginning and end are stylized as a cartoon

DC-DC converter from low voltage at high current, to high voltage at low current

Can an x86 CPU running in real mode be considered to be basically an 8086 CPU?

High voltage LED indicator 40-1000 VDC without additional power supply

Convert two switches to a dual stack, and add outlet - possible here?

Paid for article while in US on F-1 visa?

Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?

Which country benefited the most from UN Security Council vetoes?

Are astronomers waiting to see something in an image from a gravitational lens that they've already seen in an adjacent image?

Why can't we play rap on piano?

Do other languages have an “irreversible aspect”?

What is permansive aspect?How do languages with imperfect aspect typically convey distinctions between habitual, iterative, and progressive aspects?Why does English have progressive aspect but German does not?Can every language express any lexical aspect?Grammatical Aspect and Lexical AspectDoes English have [ inchoative aspect ]?Syntactic vs Morphological features for generation of English VGsIs the obligatory omission of tense/aspect/mood marking in polar interrogatives common?habitual aspect in englishAre there any languages which inflect the noun for morphosyntactic categories normally reserved for verbs (e.g. tense, aspect, etc.)?

4

Like many languages, Lingála combines tense, aspect, and mood into a single TAM marking. Three of these TAMs pertain to the past:

• 
  a-kɛnd-ákí "he left earlier today" (hodiernal/recent past)


• 
  a-kɛnd-áká "he left a long time ago" (distant past)


• 
  a-kɛnd-á "he left, and he's never coming back" ("irreversible aspect")

This third tense, sometimes called the "irreversible", "ultimate", or "dead" TAM, describes an action that's happened and now can never be reversed. According to one native speaker, responding to a-kɛnd-á with "so when will he be coming back?" is a breach of conversational maxims and will get you a lot of blank stares.

I've never come across this aspect in other languages, and so I'm curious: are there other languages that have a specific grammatical marking for this meaning? And if so, is there a standard or commonly accepted name for it?

---

P.S. I'm ignoring vowel harmony in the examples for simplicity. What I'm actually interested in is the meaning.

morphology list-of-languages aspect tense-aspect-mood bantu

share|improve this question

asked 3 hours ago

DraconisDraconis

12.8k12054

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Is not it related to telicity ?
  
  – amegnunsen
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @amegnunsen It could be, potentially! I'd say it's telic in that the action is done: but there's an additional "…and it's done for good" aspect to it. If you'd call that some form of telicity, that would make a good answer!
  
  – Draconis
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  There is something like that in Tuareg, it is called by some linguists "accompli résultatif" (resultive perfective) or "préterit intensif" (intensive preterit).
  
  – amegnunsen
  11 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

4

Like many languages, Lingála combines tense, aspect, and mood into a single TAM marking. Three of these TAMs pertain to the past:

• 
  a-kɛnd-ákí "he left earlier today" (hodiernal/recent past)


• 
  a-kɛnd-áká "he left a long time ago" (distant past)


• 
  a-kɛnd-á "he left, and he's never coming back" ("irreversible aspect")

This third tense, sometimes called the "irreversible", "ultimate", or "dead" TAM, describes an action that's happened and now can never be reversed. According to one native speaker, responding to a-kɛnd-á with "so when will he be coming back?" is a breach of conversational maxims and will get you a lot of blank stares.

I've never come across this aspect in other languages, and so I'm curious: are there other languages that have a specific grammatical marking for this meaning? And if so, is there a standard or commonly accepted name for it?

---

P.S. I'm ignoring vowel harmony in the examples for simplicity. What I'm actually interested in is the meaning.

morphology list-of-languages aspect tense-aspect-mood bantu

share|improve this question

asked 3 hours ago

DraconisDraconis

12.8k12054

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Is not it related to telicity ?
  
  – amegnunsen
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @amegnunsen It could be, potentially! I'd say it's telic in that the action is done: but there's an additional "…and it's done for good" aspect to it. If you'd call that some form of telicity, that would make a good answer!
  
  – Draconis
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  There is something like that in Tuareg, it is called by some linguists "accompli résultatif" (resultive perfective) or "préterit intensif" (intensive preterit).
  
  – amegnunsen
  11 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Like many languages, Lingála combines tense, aspect, and mood into a single TAM marking. Three of these TAMs pertain to the past:

• 
  a-kɛnd-ákí "he left earlier today" (hodiernal/recent past)


• 
  a-kɛnd-áká "he left a long time ago" (distant past)


• 
  a-kɛnd-á "he left, and he's never coming back" ("irreversible aspect")

This third tense, sometimes called the "irreversible", "ultimate", or "dead" TAM, describes an action that's happened and now can never be reversed. According to one native speaker, responding to a-kɛnd-á with "so when will he be coming back?" is a breach of conversational maxims and will get you a lot of blank stares.

I've never come across this aspect in other languages, and so I'm curious: are there other languages that have a specific grammatical marking for this meaning? And if so, is there a standard or commonly accepted name for it?

---

P.S. I'm ignoring vowel harmony in the examples for simplicity. What I'm actually interested in is the meaning.

morphology list-of-languages aspect tense-aspect-mood bantu

share|improve this question

asked 3 hours ago

DraconisDraconis

12.8k12054

share|improve this question

asked 3 hours ago

DraconisDraconis

12.8k12054

share|improve this question

asked 3 hours ago

DraconisDraconis

12.8k12054

asked 3 hours ago

DraconisDraconis

12.8k12054

asked 3 hours ago

DraconisDraconis

12.8k12054

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

2

I have not heard of such a thing, but I have heard of similar things in other Bantu languages. Generally, when you investigate the pragmatics and semantics of a Bantu language's tense system, you will find many subtle conditions of usage, for example "when you say it this way, you are disputing someone else's claim", or "you say it this way if you want to know where the thing went to". The things that inflectional categories encode are not at all limited to classical utterance-time etc. Neo-Reichenbachian distinctions. Sometimes the distinctions are common enough that we invent special terms (e.g. "perstitive" or "persistive", which has only recently spread outside Bantu). I have heard of this being described as "present grounded in distant past" for Lingala, and perhaps Michael Meeuwis (who works on Lingala tense) has an analysis and terminology to go with it. I just located an instance in Nurse's book Tense and Aspect in Bantu p. 113 where he calls this the "anterior" aspect, P2 tense.

A strategy that I don't entirely disagree with is to assume that the Neo-Reichenbachian approach is somewhat reasonable, and try to figure out what kind of aspect this could be, for example "perfective", and see if that predicts anything else. I would especially focus on the question of defeasibility in deciding whether a certain property is part of the literal meaning of the form.

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 2 hours ago

user6726user6726

35.9k12471

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Thank you! This is exactly what I was looking for. I'm looking for a copy of Nurse's book now, but: what does "P2" mean here? "Past tense #2"?
  
  – Draconis
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  P2 is "degree 2 past" with P1 being most recent. Lingala has only two degrees, AFAIK.
  
  – user6726
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Interesting, thanks!
  
  – Draconis
  45 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "312"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flinguistics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31083%2fdo-other-languages-have-an-irreversible-aspect%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

2

I have not heard of such a thing, but I have heard of similar things in other Bantu languages. Generally, when you investigate the pragmatics and semantics of a Bantu language's tense system, you will find many subtle conditions of usage, for example "when you say it this way, you are disputing someone else's claim", or "you say it this way if you want to know where the thing went to". The things that inflectional categories encode are not at all limited to classical utterance-time etc. Neo-Reichenbachian distinctions. Sometimes the distinctions are common enough that we invent special terms (e.g. "perstitive" or "persistive", which has only recently spread outside Bantu). I have heard of this being described as "present grounded in distant past" for Lingala, and perhaps Michael Meeuwis (who works on Lingala tense) has an analysis and terminology to go with it. I just located an instance in Nurse's book Tense and Aspect in Bantu p. 113 where he calls this the "anterior" aspect, P2 tense.

A strategy that I don't entirely disagree with is to assume that the Neo-Reichenbachian approach is somewhat reasonable, and try to figure out what kind of aspect this could be, for example "perfective", and see if that predicts anything else. I would especially focus on the question of defeasibility in deciding whether a certain property is part of the literal meaning of the form.

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 2 hours ago

user6726user6726

35.9k12471

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Thank you! This is exactly what I was looking for. I'm looking for a copy of Nurse's book now, but: what does "P2" mean here? "Past tense #2"?
  
  – Draconis
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  P2 is "degree 2 past" with P1 being most recent. Lingala has only two degrees, AFAIK.
  
  – user6726
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Interesting, thanks!
  
  – Draconis
  45 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

2

I have not heard of such a thing, but I have heard of similar things in other Bantu languages. Generally, when you investigate the pragmatics and semantics of a Bantu language's tense system, you will find many subtle conditions of usage, for example "when you say it this way, you are disputing someone else's claim", or "you say it this way if you want to know where the thing went to". The things that inflectional categories encode are not at all limited to classical utterance-time etc. Neo-Reichenbachian distinctions. Sometimes the distinctions are common enough that we invent special terms (e.g. "perstitive" or "persistive", which has only recently spread outside Bantu). I have heard of this being described as "present grounded in distant past" for Lingala, and perhaps Michael Meeuwis (who works on Lingala tense) has an analysis and terminology to go with it. I just located an instance in Nurse's book Tense and Aspect in Bantu p. 113 where he calls this the "anterior" aspect, P2 tense.

A strategy that I don't entirely disagree with is to assume that the Neo-Reichenbachian approach is somewhat reasonable, and try to figure out what kind of aspect this could be, for example "perfective", and see if that predicts anything else. I would especially focus on the question of defeasibility in deciding whether a certain property is part of the literal meaning of the form.

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 2 hours ago

user6726user6726

35.9k12471

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Thank you! This is exactly what I was looking for. I'm looking for a copy of Nurse's book now, but: what does "P2" mean here? "Past tense #2"?
  
  – Draconis
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  P2 is "degree 2 past" with P1 being most recent. Lingala has only two degrees, AFAIK.
  
  – user6726
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Interesting, thanks!
  
  – Draconis
  45 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

I have not heard of such a thing, but I have heard of similar things in other Bantu languages. Generally, when you investigate the pragmatics and semantics of a Bantu language's tense system, you will find many subtle conditions of usage, for example "when you say it this way, you are disputing someone else's claim", or "you say it this way if you want to know where the thing went to". The things that inflectional categories encode are not at all limited to classical utterance-time etc. Neo-Reichenbachian distinctions. Sometimes the distinctions are common enough that we invent special terms (e.g. "perstitive" or "persistive", which has only recently spread outside Bantu). I have heard of this being described as "present grounded in distant past" for Lingala, and perhaps Michael Meeuwis (who works on Lingala tense) has an analysis and terminology to go with it. I just located an instance in Nurse's book Tense and Aspect in Bantu p. 113 where he calls this the "anterior" aspect, P2 tense.

A strategy that I don't entirely disagree with is to assume that the Neo-Reichenbachian approach is somewhat reasonable, and try to figure out what kind of aspect this could be, for example "perfective", and see if that predicts anything else. I would especially focus on the question of defeasibility in deciding whether a certain property is part of the literal meaning of the form.

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 2 hours ago

user6726user6726

35.9k12471

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 2 hours ago

user6726user6726

35.9k12471

answered 2 hours ago

user6726user6726

35.9k12471

answered 2 hours ago

user6726user6726

35.9k12471