SQL Server Configuration Manager 64-bit Nodes Missing on 64-bit WIndows 10SQL Server Configuration Manager...
Why is consensus so controversial in Britain?
A case of the sniffles
How do I deal with an unproductive colleague in a small company?
Does detail obscure or enhance action?
How is it possible to have an ability score that is less than 3?
Do I have a twin with permutated remainders?
Why do I get two different answers for this counting problem?
Convert two switches to a dual stack, and add outlet - possible here?
How to format long polynomial?
Why can't we play rap on piano?
A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?
Unable to deploy metadata from Partner Developer scratch org because of extra fields
Can I ask the recruiters in my resume to put the reason why I am rejected?
Are astronomers waiting to see something in an image from a gravitational lens that they've already seen in an adjacent image?
RSA: Danger of using p to create q
Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)
NMaximize is not converging to a solution
How much of data wrangling is a data scientist's job?
Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?
Today is the Center
Modeling an IP Address
How to determine what difficulty is right for the game?
What is a clear way to write a bar that has an extra beat?
Can an x86 CPU running in real mode be considered to be basically an 8086 CPU?
SQL Server Configuration Manager 64-bit Nodes Missing on 64-bit WIndows 10
SQL Server Configuration Manager not display servicesSQL server windows authentication through networkMS SQL Server 2012 Failover Cluster connection issueMicrosoft SQL Server Not Showing Server Name in object ExplorerSQL Server Network Configuration node missing from Configuration Manager after installKerberos Configuration Manager - Does it work with SQL Server 2016?SQL Server 2016 - Configuration Manager WMI ProblemConnect to sql server with windows authentication in different domainsSQL Server compatibility issue helpSQL Server configuration manager - New alias grayed out
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
This problem appears to have been written about quite a lot, and answers posted here too, but I have tried all the suggestions and some of my own to no avail, so please bear with me.
I have Windows 10 V1607, 64-bit. I've used SSMS for a long time, and keep up-to-date with the latest versions, especially now that it is shipped independently, and free, from SQL Server.
When I switched from Windows 7 to Windows 10 on this machine, I installed SSMS V16, and noticed then that there were no 64-bit nodes in SSCM. I didn't think too much of it at the time, and set about creating my 32-bit aliases.
Recently, I changed an old application to 64-bit, compiled and ran it in Visual Studio (2017), and tried to connect to a database. It failed.
I thought it might be that I have not set up any 64-bit aliases, so returned to SSCM to add them. But no 64-bit nodes.
I have seen various suggestions about copying files from a working copy, so I tried that. No difference.
I spotted the latest SSMS V17.1 had just been released, so installed that. It too is missing the 64-bit nodes.
I have tried repairing, reinstalling, turning it off and on again, but still they fail to appear.
Please, does anyone have an insight into why this happens, but more to the point what to do to fix it?
I have SQL Server installed on another machine. I want my application to connect to a database on that machine, remotely. To make it easier to manage the remote database I have SSMS installed locally; in that way, I don't have to use RDP to connect to the server. When I run my application and it connects to the remote database, I want to use an alias, such as 'MyRemoteDatabase', instead of using the IP address and port number directly. In the past, I have run SSCM to create the alias, but my 64-bit applications don't see my 32-bit aliases, which is why I want the 64-bit nodes.
sql-server
migrated from stackoverflow.com May 27 '17 at 7:55
This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.
add a comment |
This problem appears to have been written about quite a lot, and answers posted here too, but I have tried all the suggestions and some of my own to no avail, so please bear with me.
I have Windows 10 V1607, 64-bit. I've used SSMS for a long time, and keep up-to-date with the latest versions, especially now that it is shipped independently, and free, from SQL Server.
When I switched from Windows 7 to Windows 10 on this machine, I installed SSMS V16, and noticed then that there were no 64-bit nodes in SSCM. I didn't think too much of it at the time, and set about creating my 32-bit aliases.
Recently, I changed an old application to 64-bit, compiled and ran it in Visual Studio (2017), and tried to connect to a database. It failed.
I thought it might be that I have not set up any 64-bit aliases, so returned to SSCM to add them. But no 64-bit nodes.
I have seen various suggestions about copying files from a working copy, so I tried that. No difference.
I spotted the latest SSMS V17.1 had just been released, so installed that. It too is missing the 64-bit nodes.
I have tried repairing, reinstalling, turning it off and on again, but still they fail to appear.
Please, does anyone have an insight into why this happens, but more to the point what to do to fix it?
I have SQL Server installed on another machine. I want my application to connect to a database on that machine, remotely. To make it easier to manage the remote database I have SSMS installed locally; in that way, I don't have to use RDP to connect to the server. When I run my application and it connects to the remote database, I want to use an alias, such as 'MyRemoteDatabase', instead of using the IP address and port number directly. In the past, I have run SSCM to create the alias, but my 64-bit applications don't see my 32-bit aliases, which is why I want the 64-bit nodes.
sql-server
migrated from stackoverflow.com May 27 '17 at 7:55
This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.
2
Did you ever resolve this? I've got the same issue
– Jake Smith
Jan 18 '18 at 21:55
add a comment |
This problem appears to have been written about quite a lot, and answers posted here too, but I have tried all the suggestions and some of my own to no avail, so please bear with me.
I have Windows 10 V1607, 64-bit. I've used SSMS for a long time, and keep up-to-date with the latest versions, especially now that it is shipped independently, and free, from SQL Server.
When I switched from Windows 7 to Windows 10 on this machine, I installed SSMS V16, and noticed then that there were no 64-bit nodes in SSCM. I didn't think too much of it at the time, and set about creating my 32-bit aliases.
Recently, I changed an old application to 64-bit, compiled and ran it in Visual Studio (2017), and tried to connect to a database. It failed.
I thought it might be that I have not set up any 64-bit aliases, so returned to SSCM to add them. But no 64-bit nodes.
I have seen various suggestions about copying files from a working copy, so I tried that. No difference.
I spotted the latest SSMS V17.1 had just been released, so installed that. It too is missing the 64-bit nodes.
I have tried repairing, reinstalling, turning it off and on again, but still they fail to appear.
Please, does anyone have an insight into why this happens, but more to the point what to do to fix it?
I have SQL Server installed on another machine. I want my application to connect to a database on that machine, remotely. To make it easier to manage the remote database I have SSMS installed locally; in that way, I don't have to use RDP to connect to the server. When I run my application and it connects to the remote database, I want to use an alias, such as 'MyRemoteDatabase', instead of using the IP address and port number directly. In the past, I have run SSCM to create the alias, but my 64-bit applications don't see my 32-bit aliases, which is why I want the 64-bit nodes.
sql-server
This problem appears to have been written about quite a lot, and answers posted here too, but I have tried all the suggestions and some of my own to no avail, so please bear with me.
I have Windows 10 V1607, 64-bit. I've used SSMS for a long time, and keep up-to-date with the latest versions, especially now that it is shipped independently, and free, from SQL Server.
When I switched from Windows 7 to Windows 10 on this machine, I installed SSMS V16, and noticed then that there were no 64-bit nodes in SSCM. I didn't think too much of it at the time, and set about creating my 32-bit aliases.
Recently, I changed an old application to 64-bit, compiled and ran it in Visual Studio (2017), and tried to connect to a database. It failed.
I thought it might be that I have not set up any 64-bit aliases, so returned to SSCM to add them. But no 64-bit nodes.
I have seen various suggestions about copying files from a working copy, so I tried that. No difference.
I spotted the latest SSMS V17.1 had just been released, so installed that. It too is missing the 64-bit nodes.
I have tried repairing, reinstalling, turning it off and on again, but still they fail to appear.
Please, does anyone have an insight into why this happens, but more to the point what to do to fix it?
I have SQL Server installed on another machine. I want my application to connect to a database on that machine, remotely. To make it easier to manage the remote database I have SSMS installed locally; in that way, I don't have to use RDP to connect to the server. When I run my application and it connects to the remote database, I want to use an alias, such as 'MyRemoteDatabase', instead of using the IP address and port number directly. In the past, I have run SSCM to create the alias, but my 64-bit applications don't see my 32-bit aliases, which is why I want the 64-bit nodes.
sql-server
sql-server
edited Jun 22 '17 at 13:46
Paul White♦
54.1k14287460
54.1k14287460
asked May 26 '17 at 15:01
ckl
migrated from stackoverflow.com May 27 '17 at 7:55
This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.
migrated from stackoverflow.com May 27 '17 at 7:55
This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.
2
Did you ever resolve this? I've got the same issue
– Jake Smith
Jan 18 '18 at 21:55
add a comment |
2
Did you ever resolve this? I've got the same issue
– Jake Smith
Jan 18 '18 at 21:55
2
2
Did you ever resolve this? I've got the same issue
– Jake Smith
Jan 18 '18 at 21:55
Did you ever resolve this? I've got the same issue
– Jake Smith
Jan 18 '18 at 21:55
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
I have no idea what you look for but I guess they may just in front of your eyes.
Here is what I have 64bit Windows, 64bit SQL Server installed.

Maybe you looking for 64bit keyword, they are omitted because it is the default.
4
I don't know how to paste an image, but my image looks like the first six lines of your image. The remaining rows, which are the 64-bit nodes are not present.
– ckl
May 26 '17 at 16:14
add a comment |
Right click the Config Mgr shortcut in the Start Menu, open the file location, change the shortcut Target to:
C:WindowsSysWOW64mmc.exe /32 C:WINDOWSSysWOW64SQLServerManager13.msc
The *.*14.msc was my issue.
add a comment |
In my case, I was dealing with a SQL 2008 R2 installation. I needed to add Read & Execute Permission for the local Users group to:
C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server100Shared even though my user account and all groups of which my account is a member had explicit permissions to that folder.
add a comment |
We ran into this problem because we installed SQL Server 2016 and then the latest version of SSMS (17.9). The problem is that SSMS installed the "SQL Server 2017" folder and configuration tools in the start menu. If you open the config manager for 2017 you only see the 32-bit network settings. You have to open the SQL Server 2016 configuration manager to see everything. Basically the same thing @ericb said - you need to open the config manager that was installed with your server, not the one installed by SSMS.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "182"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f174731%2fsql-server-configuration-manager-64-bit-nodes-missing-on-64-bit-windows-10%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I have no idea what you look for but I guess they may just in front of your eyes.
Here is what I have 64bit Windows, 64bit SQL Server installed.

Maybe you looking for 64bit keyword, they are omitted because it is the default.
4
I don't know how to paste an image, but my image looks like the first six lines of your image. The remaining rows, which are the 64-bit nodes are not present.
– ckl
May 26 '17 at 16:14
add a comment |
I have no idea what you look for but I guess they may just in front of your eyes.
Here is what I have 64bit Windows, 64bit SQL Server installed.

Maybe you looking for 64bit keyword, they are omitted because it is the default.
4
I don't know how to paste an image, but my image looks like the first six lines of your image. The remaining rows, which are the 64-bit nodes are not present.
– ckl
May 26 '17 at 16:14
add a comment |
I have no idea what you look for but I guess they may just in front of your eyes.
Here is what I have 64bit Windows, 64bit SQL Server installed.

Maybe you looking for 64bit keyword, they are omitted because it is the default.
I have no idea what you look for but I guess they may just in front of your eyes.
Here is what I have 64bit Windows, 64bit SQL Server installed.

Maybe you looking for 64bit keyword, they are omitted because it is the default.
answered May 26 '17 at 16:09
WendyWendy
1807
1807
4
I don't know how to paste an image, but my image looks like the first six lines of your image. The remaining rows, which are the 64-bit nodes are not present.
– ckl
May 26 '17 at 16:14
add a comment |
4
I don't know how to paste an image, but my image looks like the first six lines of your image. The remaining rows, which are the 64-bit nodes are not present.
– ckl
May 26 '17 at 16:14
4
4
I don't know how to paste an image, but my image looks like the first six lines of your image. The remaining rows, which are the 64-bit nodes are not present.
– ckl
May 26 '17 at 16:14
I don't know how to paste an image, but my image looks like the first six lines of your image. The remaining rows, which are the 64-bit nodes are not present.
– ckl
May 26 '17 at 16:14
add a comment |
Right click the Config Mgr shortcut in the Start Menu, open the file location, change the shortcut Target to:
C:WindowsSysWOW64mmc.exe /32 C:WINDOWSSysWOW64SQLServerManager13.msc
The *.*14.msc was my issue.
add a comment |
Right click the Config Mgr shortcut in the Start Menu, open the file location, change the shortcut Target to:
C:WindowsSysWOW64mmc.exe /32 C:WINDOWSSysWOW64SQLServerManager13.msc
The *.*14.msc was my issue.
add a comment |
Right click the Config Mgr shortcut in the Start Menu, open the file location, change the shortcut Target to:
C:WindowsSysWOW64mmc.exe /32 C:WINDOWSSysWOW64SQLServerManager13.msc
The *.*14.msc was my issue.
Right click the Config Mgr shortcut in the Start Menu, open the file location, change the shortcut Target to:
C:WindowsSysWOW64mmc.exe /32 C:WINDOWSSysWOW64SQLServerManager13.msc
The *.*14.msc was my issue.
edited Oct 10 '17 at 23:47
Michael Green
15.1k83162
15.1k83162
answered Oct 10 '17 at 22:01
ericbericb
112
112
add a comment |
add a comment |
In my case, I was dealing with a SQL 2008 R2 installation. I needed to add Read & Execute Permission for the local Users group to:
C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server100Shared even though my user account and all groups of which my account is a member had explicit permissions to that folder.
add a comment |
In my case, I was dealing with a SQL 2008 R2 installation. I needed to add Read & Execute Permission for the local Users group to:
C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server100Shared even though my user account and all groups of which my account is a member had explicit permissions to that folder.
add a comment |
In my case, I was dealing with a SQL 2008 R2 installation. I needed to add Read & Execute Permission for the local Users group to:
C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server100Shared even though my user account and all groups of which my account is a member had explicit permissions to that folder.
In my case, I was dealing with a SQL 2008 R2 installation. I needed to add Read & Execute Permission for the local Users group to:
C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server100Shared even though my user account and all groups of which my account is a member had explicit permissions to that folder.
answered Mar 26 '18 at 14:42
Slogmeister ExtraordinaireSlogmeister Extraordinaire
24932
24932
add a comment |
add a comment |
We ran into this problem because we installed SQL Server 2016 and then the latest version of SSMS (17.9). The problem is that SSMS installed the "SQL Server 2017" folder and configuration tools in the start menu. If you open the config manager for 2017 you only see the 32-bit network settings. You have to open the SQL Server 2016 configuration manager to see everything. Basically the same thing @ericb said - you need to open the config manager that was installed with your server, not the one installed by SSMS.
add a comment |
We ran into this problem because we installed SQL Server 2016 and then the latest version of SSMS (17.9). The problem is that SSMS installed the "SQL Server 2017" folder and configuration tools in the start menu. If you open the config manager for 2017 you only see the 32-bit network settings. You have to open the SQL Server 2016 configuration manager to see everything. Basically the same thing @ericb said - you need to open the config manager that was installed with your server, not the one installed by SSMS.
add a comment |
We ran into this problem because we installed SQL Server 2016 and then the latest version of SSMS (17.9). The problem is that SSMS installed the "SQL Server 2017" folder and configuration tools in the start menu. If you open the config manager for 2017 you only see the 32-bit network settings. You have to open the SQL Server 2016 configuration manager to see everything. Basically the same thing @ericb said - you need to open the config manager that was installed with your server, not the one installed by SSMS.
We ran into this problem because we installed SQL Server 2016 and then the latest version of SSMS (17.9). The problem is that SSMS installed the "SQL Server 2017" folder and configuration tools in the start menu. If you open the config manager for 2017 you only see the 32-bit network settings. You have to open the SQL Server 2016 configuration manager to see everything. Basically the same thing @ericb said - you need to open the config manager that was installed with your server, not the one installed by SSMS.
answered 5 mins ago
Element ZeroElement Zero
1686
1686
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f174731%2fsql-server-configuration-manager-64-bit-nodes-missing-on-64-bit-windows-10%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
Did you ever resolve this? I've got the same issue
– Jake Smith
Jan 18 '18 at 21:55