Why is there Net Work Done on a Pressure/Volume Cycle? Announcing the arrival of Valued...
Maximum summed subsequences with non-adjacent items
Co-worker has annoying ringtone
QGIS virtual layer functionality does not seem to support memory layers
Find 108 by using 3,4,6
Is there any word for a place full of confusion?
Sum letters are not two different
A term for a woman complaining about things/begging in a cute/childish way
How to dry out epoxy resin faster than usual?
What is "gratricide"?
Belief In God or Knowledge Of God. Which is better?
How to unroll a parameter pack from right to left
Can you explain what "processes and tools" means in the first Agile principle?
Why does it sometimes sound good to play a grace note as a lead in to a note in a melody?
How to draw/optimize this graph with tikz
Why is it faster to reheat something than it is to cook it?
Why weren't discrete x86 CPUs ever used in game hardware?
Proof of work - 51% attack
Significance of Cersei's obsession with elephants?
Generate an RGB colour grid
Lagrange four-squares theorem --- deterministic complexity
Why are vacuum tubes still used in amateur radios?
One-one communication
How to run automated tests after each commit?
What was the first language to use conditional keywords?
Why is there Net Work Done on a Pressure/Volume Cycle?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
2019 Moderator Election Q&A - Question CollectionNet work done for rubber bandsWhy are volume and pressure inversely proportional to each other?Net work output of an engine performing Carnot cycle?Volume quotient in Carnot-cyclePressure vs Volume Calculation for airWork done by pressurePressure Volume graphs and work donePressure-Volume DiagramWhich fundamental reversible thermodynamic process has maximum work associated with it?Which direction will this object move in at the end of this process?Doubt in thermodynamics pressure volume work done
$begingroup$
The area enclosed by the rectangle is said to be the Net Work Done. My question is why would there be any net workdone if it returns to its initial position (W).
Shouldn't it act like a force-extension graph, where the net work done of a sample (eg.rubber), is the Area under the loading curve substracted by the Area under the unloading graph, and the area would be present if the sample undergoes plastic deformation.
I'm currently still in highschool, so any simple concise real-world example might be very helpful.
thermodynamics energy pressure volume carnot-cycle
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The area enclosed by the rectangle is said to be the Net Work Done. My question is why would there be any net workdone if it returns to its initial position (W).
Shouldn't it act like a force-extension graph, where the net work done of a sample (eg.rubber), is the Area under the loading curve substracted by the Area under the unloading graph, and the area would be present if the sample undergoes plastic deformation.
I'm currently still in highschool, so any simple concise real-world example might be very helpful.
thermodynamics energy pressure volume carnot-cycle
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Work is a path function and hence depends on the path followed rather than the initial and final state. So even though it returns to its original position there is a net work done
$endgroup$
– Harsh Wasnik
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Suppose your spring constant depends on temperature, and you stretch the spring at a low temperature and then let it return at a higher temperature. Then, you have done a net amount of work. After letting it return, you change the temperature back to the original temperature and start over.
$endgroup$
– Chet Miller
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
You "apply" energy to increase the pressure. Not to decrease it again. That happens by itself (that energy is lost or absorbed elsewhere).
$endgroup$
– Steeven
3 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Work = force x distance. The distance that the piston moves is the same in either direction. But what the answers below are telling you, in various different ways, is that the force acting on the piston when it moves in one direction is different from the force that acts on it when it moves in the other direction.
$endgroup$
– Solomon Slow
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The area enclosed by the rectangle is said to be the Net Work Done. My question is why would there be any net workdone if it returns to its initial position (W).
Shouldn't it act like a force-extension graph, where the net work done of a sample (eg.rubber), is the Area under the loading curve substracted by the Area under the unloading graph, and the area would be present if the sample undergoes plastic deformation.
I'm currently still in highschool, so any simple concise real-world example might be very helpful.
thermodynamics energy pressure volume carnot-cycle
$endgroup$
The area enclosed by the rectangle is said to be the Net Work Done. My question is why would there be any net workdone if it returns to its initial position (W).
Shouldn't it act like a force-extension graph, where the net work done of a sample (eg.rubber), is the Area under the loading curve substracted by the Area under the unloading graph, and the area would be present if the sample undergoes plastic deformation.
I'm currently still in highschool, so any simple concise real-world example might be very helpful.
thermodynamics energy pressure volume carnot-cycle
thermodynamics energy pressure volume carnot-cycle
asked 4 hours ago
KEVIN IOPKEVIN IOP
61
61
1
$begingroup$
Work is a path function and hence depends on the path followed rather than the initial and final state. So even though it returns to its original position there is a net work done
$endgroup$
– Harsh Wasnik
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Suppose your spring constant depends on temperature, and you stretch the spring at a low temperature and then let it return at a higher temperature. Then, you have done a net amount of work. After letting it return, you change the temperature back to the original temperature and start over.
$endgroup$
– Chet Miller
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
You "apply" energy to increase the pressure. Not to decrease it again. That happens by itself (that energy is lost or absorbed elsewhere).
$endgroup$
– Steeven
3 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Work = force x distance. The distance that the piston moves is the same in either direction. But what the answers below are telling you, in various different ways, is that the force acting on the piston when it moves in one direction is different from the force that acts on it when it moves in the other direction.
$endgroup$
– Solomon Slow
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Work is a path function and hence depends on the path followed rather than the initial and final state. So even though it returns to its original position there is a net work done
$endgroup$
– Harsh Wasnik
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Suppose your spring constant depends on temperature, and you stretch the spring at a low temperature and then let it return at a higher temperature. Then, you have done a net amount of work. After letting it return, you change the temperature back to the original temperature and start over.
$endgroup$
– Chet Miller
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
You "apply" energy to increase the pressure. Not to decrease it again. That happens by itself (that energy is lost or absorbed elsewhere).
$endgroup$
– Steeven
3 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Work = force x distance. The distance that the piston moves is the same in either direction. But what the answers below are telling you, in various different ways, is that the force acting on the piston when it moves in one direction is different from the force that acts on it when it moves in the other direction.
$endgroup$
– Solomon Slow
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Work is a path function and hence depends on the path followed rather than the initial and final state. So even though it returns to its original position there is a net work done
$endgroup$
– Harsh Wasnik
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Work is a path function and hence depends on the path followed rather than the initial and final state. So even though it returns to its original position there is a net work done
$endgroup$
– Harsh Wasnik
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Suppose your spring constant depends on temperature, and you stretch the spring at a low temperature and then let it return at a higher temperature. Then, you have done a net amount of work. After letting it return, you change the temperature back to the original temperature and start over.
$endgroup$
– Chet Miller
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Suppose your spring constant depends on temperature, and you stretch the spring at a low temperature and then let it return at a higher temperature. Then, you have done a net amount of work. After letting it return, you change the temperature back to the original temperature and start over.
$endgroup$
– Chet Miller
4 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
You "apply" energy to increase the pressure. Not to decrease it again. That happens by itself (that energy is lost or absorbed elsewhere).
$endgroup$
– Steeven
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
You "apply" energy to increase the pressure. Not to decrease it again. That happens by itself (that energy is lost or absorbed elsewhere).
$endgroup$
– Steeven
3 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Work = force x distance. The distance that the piston moves is the same in either direction. But what the answers below are telling you, in various different ways, is that the force acting on the piston when it moves in one direction is different from the force that acts on it when it moves in the other direction.
$endgroup$
– Solomon Slow
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Work = force x distance. The distance that the piston moves is the same in either direction. But what the answers below are telling you, in various different ways, is that the force acting on the piston when it moves in one direction is different from the force that acts on it when it moves in the other direction.
$endgroup$
– Solomon Slow
1 hour ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Think about going from X to Y on the diagram.
The volume is constant, but the pressure increases.
Something must be happening to the gas to cause that. One way to make it happen would to add heat energy to the gas and raise its temperature.
The rectangular shape of the pressure-volume diagram doesn't correspond to anything that is physically simple, but you should be able to see that as you go from Y to Z and the volume increases, the gas pressure would decrease unless you continue to add more heat energy to the system and keep the pressure constant as the gas expands.
For the other two sides, Z to W and back to X, the gas is losing heat energy. Don't try to over-think this (because as the previous paragraph said, this diagram doesn't correspond to any simple physical device), but going round the complete cycle, the amount of heat added is not the same as the amount of heat removed.
The net amount of heat added to the system is converted into mechanical work when the gas pressure changes the volume of the system, moving from Y to Z and then from W back to X.
Since the starting and ending conditions at point X are the same, the amount of heat energy added to the system during the cycle is the same as the amount of mechanical work done by the gas.
Similar diagrams (but with curved sides, not straight) are used to understand the behaviour of different types of "heat engines" such as steam engines, gasoline and diesel car engines, jet aircraft engines, etc. Devices where mechanical work is used to remove heat from a system, for example refrigerators and air conditioning systems, can be understood in the same way, moving round a loop on the pressure-volume diagram in the opposite direction.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In effect a “piston” moves the same distance during the volume changes along paths $WX$ and $YZ$ but a greater force needs to be exerted along path $YZ$ than along path $WX$ and so the work done (force $times$ distance) along path $YZ$ is greater than along path $WZ$.
Your example of the force-extension curve for rubber is a good one but in that case the effect is called hysteresis and it is unlike plastic deformation in that there is no permanent deformation of the rubber after it is unloaded.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I see. physics.stackexchange.com/a/149122/226894 . So the small section between the loading & unloading curve is the net work done, right? And if that is so what exactly is meant by NET work done?
$endgroup$
– KEVIN IOP
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you come back to initial position by same path, the work done would be obviously zero.
The PV work is path dependant; not state dependant. So even if you come back to same state , the work done may not be zero. The same physics is used here also, like in a spring the work done is zero if returned back to initial position by same force, but what do you expect when the force applied on backward path is higher? . Think of it like this: The work done is $PDelta V$, (assuming pressure =constant). By referencing to your graph, you can easily understand, that in one path, the pressure is higher than other, i.e., the returning path is not exactly the same. The pressure and forces are different. So in a loop enclosing a non-zero area, a non-zero work is done by gas in cycle.
Hope you got something out of my explanation:)
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f473757%2fwhy-is-there-net-work-done-on-a-pressure-volume-cycle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Think about going from X to Y on the diagram.
The volume is constant, but the pressure increases.
Something must be happening to the gas to cause that. One way to make it happen would to add heat energy to the gas and raise its temperature.
The rectangular shape of the pressure-volume diagram doesn't correspond to anything that is physically simple, but you should be able to see that as you go from Y to Z and the volume increases, the gas pressure would decrease unless you continue to add more heat energy to the system and keep the pressure constant as the gas expands.
For the other two sides, Z to W and back to X, the gas is losing heat energy. Don't try to over-think this (because as the previous paragraph said, this diagram doesn't correspond to any simple physical device), but going round the complete cycle, the amount of heat added is not the same as the amount of heat removed.
The net amount of heat added to the system is converted into mechanical work when the gas pressure changes the volume of the system, moving from Y to Z and then from W back to X.
Since the starting and ending conditions at point X are the same, the amount of heat energy added to the system during the cycle is the same as the amount of mechanical work done by the gas.
Similar diagrams (but with curved sides, not straight) are used to understand the behaviour of different types of "heat engines" such as steam engines, gasoline and diesel car engines, jet aircraft engines, etc. Devices where mechanical work is used to remove heat from a system, for example refrigerators and air conditioning systems, can be understood in the same way, moving round a loop on the pressure-volume diagram in the opposite direction.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Think about going from X to Y on the diagram.
The volume is constant, but the pressure increases.
Something must be happening to the gas to cause that. One way to make it happen would to add heat energy to the gas and raise its temperature.
The rectangular shape of the pressure-volume diagram doesn't correspond to anything that is physically simple, but you should be able to see that as you go from Y to Z and the volume increases, the gas pressure would decrease unless you continue to add more heat energy to the system and keep the pressure constant as the gas expands.
For the other two sides, Z to W and back to X, the gas is losing heat energy. Don't try to over-think this (because as the previous paragraph said, this diagram doesn't correspond to any simple physical device), but going round the complete cycle, the amount of heat added is not the same as the amount of heat removed.
The net amount of heat added to the system is converted into mechanical work when the gas pressure changes the volume of the system, moving from Y to Z and then from W back to X.
Since the starting and ending conditions at point X are the same, the amount of heat energy added to the system during the cycle is the same as the amount of mechanical work done by the gas.
Similar diagrams (but with curved sides, not straight) are used to understand the behaviour of different types of "heat engines" such as steam engines, gasoline and diesel car engines, jet aircraft engines, etc. Devices where mechanical work is used to remove heat from a system, for example refrigerators and air conditioning systems, can be understood in the same way, moving round a loop on the pressure-volume diagram in the opposite direction.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Think about going from X to Y on the diagram.
The volume is constant, but the pressure increases.
Something must be happening to the gas to cause that. One way to make it happen would to add heat energy to the gas and raise its temperature.
The rectangular shape of the pressure-volume diagram doesn't correspond to anything that is physically simple, but you should be able to see that as you go from Y to Z and the volume increases, the gas pressure would decrease unless you continue to add more heat energy to the system and keep the pressure constant as the gas expands.
For the other two sides, Z to W and back to X, the gas is losing heat energy. Don't try to over-think this (because as the previous paragraph said, this diagram doesn't correspond to any simple physical device), but going round the complete cycle, the amount of heat added is not the same as the amount of heat removed.
The net amount of heat added to the system is converted into mechanical work when the gas pressure changes the volume of the system, moving from Y to Z and then from W back to X.
Since the starting and ending conditions at point X are the same, the amount of heat energy added to the system during the cycle is the same as the amount of mechanical work done by the gas.
Similar diagrams (but with curved sides, not straight) are used to understand the behaviour of different types of "heat engines" such as steam engines, gasoline and diesel car engines, jet aircraft engines, etc. Devices where mechanical work is used to remove heat from a system, for example refrigerators and air conditioning systems, can be understood in the same way, moving round a loop on the pressure-volume diagram in the opposite direction.
$endgroup$
Think about going from X to Y on the diagram.
The volume is constant, but the pressure increases.
Something must be happening to the gas to cause that. One way to make it happen would to add heat energy to the gas and raise its temperature.
The rectangular shape of the pressure-volume diagram doesn't correspond to anything that is physically simple, but you should be able to see that as you go from Y to Z and the volume increases, the gas pressure would decrease unless you continue to add more heat energy to the system and keep the pressure constant as the gas expands.
For the other two sides, Z to W and back to X, the gas is losing heat energy. Don't try to over-think this (because as the previous paragraph said, this diagram doesn't correspond to any simple physical device), but going round the complete cycle, the amount of heat added is not the same as the amount of heat removed.
The net amount of heat added to the system is converted into mechanical work when the gas pressure changes the volume of the system, moving from Y to Z and then from W back to X.
Since the starting and ending conditions at point X are the same, the amount of heat energy added to the system during the cycle is the same as the amount of mechanical work done by the gas.
Similar diagrams (but with curved sides, not straight) are used to understand the behaviour of different types of "heat engines" such as steam engines, gasoline and diesel car engines, jet aircraft engines, etc. Devices where mechanical work is used to remove heat from a system, for example refrigerators and air conditioning systems, can be understood in the same way, moving round a loop on the pressure-volume diagram in the opposite direction.
edited 3 hours ago
answered 3 hours ago
alephzeroalephzero
5,68521120
5,68521120
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In effect a “piston” moves the same distance during the volume changes along paths $WX$ and $YZ$ but a greater force needs to be exerted along path $YZ$ than along path $WX$ and so the work done (force $times$ distance) along path $YZ$ is greater than along path $WZ$.
Your example of the force-extension curve for rubber is a good one but in that case the effect is called hysteresis and it is unlike plastic deformation in that there is no permanent deformation of the rubber after it is unloaded.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I see. physics.stackexchange.com/a/149122/226894 . So the small section between the loading & unloading curve is the net work done, right? And if that is so what exactly is meant by NET work done?
$endgroup$
– KEVIN IOP
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In effect a “piston” moves the same distance during the volume changes along paths $WX$ and $YZ$ but a greater force needs to be exerted along path $YZ$ than along path $WX$ and so the work done (force $times$ distance) along path $YZ$ is greater than along path $WZ$.
Your example of the force-extension curve for rubber is a good one but in that case the effect is called hysteresis and it is unlike plastic deformation in that there is no permanent deformation of the rubber after it is unloaded.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I see. physics.stackexchange.com/a/149122/226894 . So the small section between the loading & unloading curve is the net work done, right? And if that is so what exactly is meant by NET work done?
$endgroup$
– KEVIN IOP
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In effect a “piston” moves the same distance during the volume changes along paths $WX$ and $YZ$ but a greater force needs to be exerted along path $YZ$ than along path $WX$ and so the work done (force $times$ distance) along path $YZ$ is greater than along path $WZ$.
Your example of the force-extension curve for rubber is a good one but in that case the effect is called hysteresis and it is unlike plastic deformation in that there is no permanent deformation of the rubber after it is unloaded.
$endgroup$
In effect a “piston” moves the same distance during the volume changes along paths $WX$ and $YZ$ but a greater force needs to be exerted along path $YZ$ than along path $WX$ and so the work done (force $times$ distance) along path $YZ$ is greater than along path $WZ$.
Your example of the force-extension curve for rubber is a good one but in that case the effect is called hysteresis and it is unlike plastic deformation in that there is no permanent deformation of the rubber after it is unloaded.
answered 4 hours ago
FarcherFarcher
52.3k340110
52.3k340110
$begingroup$
I see. physics.stackexchange.com/a/149122/226894 . So the small section between the loading & unloading curve is the net work done, right? And if that is so what exactly is meant by NET work done?
$endgroup$
– KEVIN IOP
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I see. physics.stackexchange.com/a/149122/226894 . So the small section between the loading & unloading curve is the net work done, right? And if that is so what exactly is meant by NET work done?
$endgroup$
– KEVIN IOP
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
I see. physics.stackexchange.com/a/149122/226894 . So the small section between the loading & unloading curve is the net work done, right? And if that is so what exactly is meant by NET work done?
$endgroup$
– KEVIN IOP
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
I see. physics.stackexchange.com/a/149122/226894 . So the small section between the loading & unloading curve is the net work done, right? And if that is so what exactly is meant by NET work done?
$endgroup$
– KEVIN IOP
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you come back to initial position by same path, the work done would be obviously zero.
The PV work is path dependant; not state dependant. So even if you come back to same state , the work done may not be zero. The same physics is used here also, like in a spring the work done is zero if returned back to initial position by same force, but what do you expect when the force applied on backward path is higher? . Think of it like this: The work done is $PDelta V$, (assuming pressure =constant). By referencing to your graph, you can easily understand, that in one path, the pressure is higher than other, i.e., the returning path is not exactly the same. The pressure and forces are different. So in a loop enclosing a non-zero area, a non-zero work is done by gas in cycle.
Hope you got something out of my explanation:)
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you come back to initial position by same path, the work done would be obviously zero.
The PV work is path dependant; not state dependant. So even if you come back to same state , the work done may not be zero. The same physics is used here also, like in a spring the work done is zero if returned back to initial position by same force, but what do you expect when the force applied on backward path is higher? . Think of it like this: The work done is $PDelta V$, (assuming pressure =constant). By referencing to your graph, you can easily understand, that in one path, the pressure is higher than other, i.e., the returning path is not exactly the same. The pressure and forces are different. So in a loop enclosing a non-zero area, a non-zero work is done by gas in cycle.
Hope you got something out of my explanation:)
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you come back to initial position by same path, the work done would be obviously zero.
The PV work is path dependant; not state dependant. So even if you come back to same state , the work done may not be zero. The same physics is used here also, like in a spring the work done is zero if returned back to initial position by same force, but what do you expect when the force applied on backward path is higher? . Think of it like this: The work done is $PDelta V$, (assuming pressure =constant). By referencing to your graph, you can easily understand, that in one path, the pressure is higher than other, i.e., the returning path is not exactly the same. The pressure and forces are different. So in a loop enclosing a non-zero area, a non-zero work is done by gas in cycle.
Hope you got something out of my explanation:)
New contributor
$endgroup$
If you come back to initial position by same path, the work done would be obviously zero.
The PV work is path dependant; not state dependant. So even if you come back to same state , the work done may not be zero. The same physics is used here also, like in a spring the work done is zero if returned back to initial position by same force, but what do you expect when the force applied on backward path is higher? . Think of it like this: The work done is $PDelta V$, (assuming pressure =constant). By referencing to your graph, you can easily understand, that in one path, the pressure is higher than other, i.e., the returning path is not exactly the same. The pressure and forces are different. So in a loop enclosing a non-zero area, a non-zero work is done by gas in cycle.
Hope you got something out of my explanation:)
New contributor
New contributor
answered 3 hours ago
HS SinghHS Singh
562
562
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f473757%2fwhy-is-there-net-work-done-on-a-pressure-volume-cycle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Work is a path function and hence depends on the path followed rather than the initial and final state. So even though it returns to its original position there is a net work done
$endgroup$
– Harsh Wasnik
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Suppose your spring constant depends on temperature, and you stretch the spring at a low temperature and then let it return at a higher temperature. Then, you have done a net amount of work. After letting it return, you change the temperature back to the original temperature and start over.
$endgroup$
– Chet Miller
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
You "apply" energy to increase the pressure. Not to decrease it again. That happens by itself (that energy is lost or absorbed elsewhere).
$endgroup$
– Steeven
3 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Work = force x distance. The distance that the piston moves is the same in either direction. But what the answers below are telling you, in various different ways, is that the force acting on the piston when it moves in one direction is different from the force that acts on it when it moves in the other direction.
$endgroup$
– Solomon Slow
1 hour ago