Does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports?2019 Community...

Replacing Windows 7 security updates with anti-virus?

How to discourage/prevent PCs from using door choke-points?

What is the dot in “1.2.4."

Single word request: Harming the benefactor

What has been your most complicated TikZ drawing?

Why do Australian milk farmers need to protest supermarkets' milk price?

The three point beverage

Running a subshell from the middle of the current command

How to deal with a cynical class?

What is the likely impact on flights of grounding an entire aircraft series?

Make a transparent 448*448 image

Touchscreen-controlled dentist office snowman collector game

When were linguistics departments first established

Making a sword in the stone, in a medieval world without magic

Good allowance savings plan?

Is King K. Rool's down throw to up-special a true combo?

Can the druid cantrip Thorn Whip really defeat a water weird this easily?

Is it true that real estate prices mainly go up?

A curious inequality concerning binomial coefficients

Should we release the security issues we found in our product as CVE or we can just update those on weekly release notes?

What is the blue range indicating on this manifold pressure gauge?

How do anti-virus programs start at Windows boot?

Counter-example to the existence of left Bousfield localization of combinatorial model category

Straight line with arrows and dots



Does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports?



2019 Community Moderator ElectionBirth is empty on ext4Can I set the “Archive” bit on a file on NTFS on Linux?Can I configure my Linux system for more aggressive file system caching?Which Linux file systems for USB sticks?what is inode for, in FreeBSD or SolarisHow to interact with the concrete file system?file system, archive bitDoes Linux uses the device files for the HDD partitions to access the HDD?Is the Virtual File System (VFS) a program or is it just an interface?How do I format an internal hard drive so that FreeBSD, Linux and Windows can all access it?How does memory mapping a file have significant performance increases over the standard I/O system calls?What is responsible for file permissions in a linux system?












3















Linux supports many file systems (for example: ext3, NTFS, FAT32, etc.).



The following diagram shows how Linux allows a process to access files:



enter image description here



So assume that a process called the read() system call to read a file, what will happen is that the VFS layer will be accessed, and the VFS layer will decide which file system driver to access based on the file system of the partition that the file to be read resides on.



Linux provides many system calls to access files (for example: read(), write(), rename(), etc.).



Now read() and write() and rename() work on all the file systems that Linux supports.



But there are specific features that exist only on some file systems while not existing on others. For example: on a NTFS file system, you can set the Archive bit for a file, while this can't be done on an ext3 file system.



Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports? for example: does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?










share|improve this question







New contributor




user341642 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    3















    Linux supports many file systems (for example: ext3, NTFS, FAT32, etc.).



    The following diagram shows how Linux allows a process to access files:



    enter image description here



    So assume that a process called the read() system call to read a file, what will happen is that the VFS layer will be accessed, and the VFS layer will decide which file system driver to access based on the file system of the partition that the file to be read resides on.



    Linux provides many system calls to access files (for example: read(), write(), rename(), etc.).



    Now read() and write() and rename() work on all the file systems that Linux supports.



    But there are specific features that exist only on some file systems while not existing on others. For example: on a NTFS file system, you can set the Archive bit for a file, while this can't be done on an ext3 file system.



    Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports? for example: does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?










    share|improve this question







    New contributor




    user341642 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      3












      3








      3








      Linux supports many file systems (for example: ext3, NTFS, FAT32, etc.).



      The following diagram shows how Linux allows a process to access files:



      enter image description here



      So assume that a process called the read() system call to read a file, what will happen is that the VFS layer will be accessed, and the VFS layer will decide which file system driver to access based on the file system of the partition that the file to be read resides on.



      Linux provides many system calls to access files (for example: read(), write(), rename(), etc.).



      Now read() and write() and rename() work on all the file systems that Linux supports.



      But there are specific features that exist only on some file systems while not existing on others. For example: on a NTFS file system, you can set the Archive bit for a file, while this can't be done on an ext3 file system.



      Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports? for example: does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?










      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      user341642 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      Linux supports many file systems (for example: ext3, NTFS, FAT32, etc.).



      The following diagram shows how Linux allows a process to access files:



      enter image description here



      So assume that a process called the read() system call to read a file, what will happen is that the VFS layer will be accessed, and the VFS layer will decide which file system driver to access based on the file system of the partition that the file to be read resides on.



      Linux provides many system calls to access files (for example: read(), write(), rename(), etc.).



      Now read() and write() and rename() work on all the file systems that Linux supports.



      But there are specific features that exist only on some file systems while not existing on others. For example: on a NTFS file system, you can set the Archive bit for a file, while this can't be done on an ext3 file system.



      Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports? for example: does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?







      linux filesystems






      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      user341642 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      user341642 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor




      user341642 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 2 hours ago









      user341642user341642

      161




      161




      New contributor




      user341642 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      user341642 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      user341642 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4















          does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?




          For this particular case, the ntfs-3g driver exports the file attributes via extended attributes, see Can I set the "Archive" bit on a file on NTFS on Linux?



          The (V)FAT file system has the similar file attributes, but it uses an ioctl() function to access them, see ioctl_fat(2). (ioctl() is a sort of a multipurpose system call, used for all kinds of device specific stuff that don't warrant a real system call.)




          Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports?




          It's hard to answer for sure, but there has been at least one example of the opposite. ext4 internally supports a "birth time" timestamp for files (like, a real creation time, unlike ctime that changes on inode modification). But even though ext4 is the "standard" filesystem, for a long time, there was no system call to access the birth time.



          It should be supported now, with the statx() system call added in Linux 4.11, in April 2017.



          Related:




          • Birth is empty on ext4

          • A number of articles on lwn.net about statx, including e.g. statx() v3






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            ntfs != fat. At least the kernel version of ntfs does NOT have any way to set or get the archive flag, though its headers define it. Only the fuse based ntfs-3g seems to support it (via extended attributes, not special ioctls).

            – Uncle Billy
            2 hours ago













          • This isn’t directly related to the question, but as a complement to your mention of statx, it’s now supported in the C library and in the latest version of coreutils which was released a few days ago.

            – Stephen Kitt
            2 hours ago











          • @UncleBilly, d'oh, apparently I can't read, but just automatically thought of (v)fat. Thanks for noticing that, I'll see if I can find a more appropriate reference.

            – ilkkachu
            2 hours ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "106"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          user341642 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f506160%2fdoes-linux-have-system-calls-to-access-all-the-features-of-the-file-systems-it-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4















          does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?




          For this particular case, the ntfs-3g driver exports the file attributes via extended attributes, see Can I set the "Archive" bit on a file on NTFS on Linux?



          The (V)FAT file system has the similar file attributes, but it uses an ioctl() function to access them, see ioctl_fat(2). (ioctl() is a sort of a multipurpose system call, used for all kinds of device specific stuff that don't warrant a real system call.)




          Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports?




          It's hard to answer for sure, but there has been at least one example of the opposite. ext4 internally supports a "birth time" timestamp for files (like, a real creation time, unlike ctime that changes on inode modification). But even though ext4 is the "standard" filesystem, for a long time, there was no system call to access the birth time.



          It should be supported now, with the statx() system call added in Linux 4.11, in April 2017.



          Related:




          • Birth is empty on ext4

          • A number of articles on lwn.net about statx, including e.g. statx() v3






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            ntfs != fat. At least the kernel version of ntfs does NOT have any way to set or get the archive flag, though its headers define it. Only the fuse based ntfs-3g seems to support it (via extended attributes, not special ioctls).

            – Uncle Billy
            2 hours ago













          • This isn’t directly related to the question, but as a complement to your mention of statx, it’s now supported in the C library and in the latest version of coreutils which was released a few days ago.

            – Stephen Kitt
            2 hours ago











          • @UncleBilly, d'oh, apparently I can't read, but just automatically thought of (v)fat. Thanks for noticing that, I'll see if I can find a more appropriate reference.

            – ilkkachu
            2 hours ago
















          4















          does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?




          For this particular case, the ntfs-3g driver exports the file attributes via extended attributes, see Can I set the "Archive" bit on a file on NTFS on Linux?



          The (V)FAT file system has the similar file attributes, but it uses an ioctl() function to access them, see ioctl_fat(2). (ioctl() is a sort of a multipurpose system call, used for all kinds of device specific stuff that don't warrant a real system call.)




          Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports?




          It's hard to answer for sure, but there has been at least one example of the opposite. ext4 internally supports a "birth time" timestamp for files (like, a real creation time, unlike ctime that changes on inode modification). But even though ext4 is the "standard" filesystem, for a long time, there was no system call to access the birth time.



          It should be supported now, with the statx() system call added in Linux 4.11, in April 2017.



          Related:




          • Birth is empty on ext4

          • A number of articles on lwn.net about statx, including e.g. statx() v3






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            ntfs != fat. At least the kernel version of ntfs does NOT have any way to set or get the archive flag, though its headers define it. Only the fuse based ntfs-3g seems to support it (via extended attributes, not special ioctls).

            – Uncle Billy
            2 hours ago













          • This isn’t directly related to the question, but as a complement to your mention of statx, it’s now supported in the C library and in the latest version of coreutils which was released a few days ago.

            – Stephen Kitt
            2 hours ago











          • @UncleBilly, d'oh, apparently I can't read, but just automatically thought of (v)fat. Thanks for noticing that, I'll see if I can find a more appropriate reference.

            – ilkkachu
            2 hours ago














          4












          4








          4








          does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?




          For this particular case, the ntfs-3g driver exports the file attributes via extended attributes, see Can I set the "Archive" bit on a file on NTFS on Linux?



          The (V)FAT file system has the similar file attributes, but it uses an ioctl() function to access them, see ioctl_fat(2). (ioctl() is a sort of a multipurpose system call, used for all kinds of device specific stuff that don't warrant a real system call.)




          Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports?




          It's hard to answer for sure, but there has been at least one example of the opposite. ext4 internally supports a "birth time" timestamp for files (like, a real creation time, unlike ctime that changes on inode modification). But even though ext4 is the "standard" filesystem, for a long time, there was no system call to access the birth time.



          It should be supported now, with the statx() system call added in Linux 4.11, in April 2017.



          Related:




          • Birth is empty on ext4

          • A number of articles on lwn.net about statx, including e.g. statx() v3






          share|improve this answer
















          does Linux have a system call to set the Archive bit for a file on a NTFS file system?




          For this particular case, the ntfs-3g driver exports the file attributes via extended attributes, see Can I set the "Archive" bit on a file on NTFS on Linux?



          The (V)FAT file system has the similar file attributes, but it uses an ioctl() function to access them, see ioctl_fat(2). (ioctl() is a sort of a multipurpose system call, used for all kinds of device specific stuff that don't warrant a real system call.)




          Now my question is, does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports?




          It's hard to answer for sure, but there has been at least one example of the opposite. ext4 internally supports a "birth time" timestamp for files (like, a real creation time, unlike ctime that changes on inode modification). But even though ext4 is the "standard" filesystem, for a long time, there was no system call to access the birth time.



          It should be supported now, with the statx() system call added in Linux 4.11, in April 2017.



          Related:




          • Birth is empty on ext4

          • A number of articles on lwn.net about statx, including e.g. statx() v3







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 2 hours ago

























          answered 2 hours ago









          ilkkachuilkkachu

          61.1k1099175




          61.1k1099175








          • 1





            ntfs != fat. At least the kernel version of ntfs does NOT have any way to set or get the archive flag, though its headers define it. Only the fuse based ntfs-3g seems to support it (via extended attributes, not special ioctls).

            – Uncle Billy
            2 hours ago













          • This isn’t directly related to the question, but as a complement to your mention of statx, it’s now supported in the C library and in the latest version of coreutils which was released a few days ago.

            – Stephen Kitt
            2 hours ago











          • @UncleBilly, d'oh, apparently I can't read, but just automatically thought of (v)fat. Thanks for noticing that, I'll see if I can find a more appropriate reference.

            – ilkkachu
            2 hours ago














          • 1





            ntfs != fat. At least the kernel version of ntfs does NOT have any way to set or get the archive flag, though its headers define it. Only the fuse based ntfs-3g seems to support it (via extended attributes, not special ioctls).

            – Uncle Billy
            2 hours ago













          • This isn’t directly related to the question, but as a complement to your mention of statx, it’s now supported in the C library and in the latest version of coreutils which was released a few days ago.

            – Stephen Kitt
            2 hours ago











          • @UncleBilly, d'oh, apparently I can't read, but just automatically thought of (v)fat. Thanks for noticing that, I'll see if I can find a more appropriate reference.

            – ilkkachu
            2 hours ago








          1




          1





          ntfs != fat. At least the kernel version of ntfs does NOT have any way to set or get the archive flag, though its headers define it. Only the fuse based ntfs-3g seems to support it (via extended attributes, not special ioctls).

          – Uncle Billy
          2 hours ago







          ntfs != fat. At least the kernel version of ntfs does NOT have any way to set or get the archive flag, though its headers define it. Only the fuse based ntfs-3g seems to support it (via extended attributes, not special ioctls).

          – Uncle Billy
          2 hours ago















          This isn’t directly related to the question, but as a complement to your mention of statx, it’s now supported in the C library and in the latest version of coreutils which was released a few days ago.

          – Stephen Kitt
          2 hours ago





          This isn’t directly related to the question, but as a complement to your mention of statx, it’s now supported in the C library and in the latest version of coreutils which was released a few days ago.

          – Stephen Kitt
          2 hours ago













          @UncleBilly, d'oh, apparently I can't read, but just automatically thought of (v)fat. Thanks for noticing that, I'll see if I can find a more appropriate reference.

          – ilkkachu
          2 hours ago





          @UncleBilly, d'oh, apparently I can't read, but just automatically thought of (v)fat. Thanks for noticing that, I'll see if I can find a more appropriate reference.

          – ilkkachu
          2 hours ago










          user341642 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          user341642 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          user341642 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          user341642 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f506160%2fdoes-linux-have-system-calls-to-access-all-the-features-of-the-file-systems-it-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Parapolítica Índice Antecedentes El escándalo Proceso judicial Consecuencias Véase...

          How to remove border from elements in the last row?Targeting flex items on the last rowHow to vertically wrap...

          Tecnologías entrañables Índice Antecedentes Desarrollo Tecnologías Entrañables en la...