Natural language into sentence logic The Next CEO of Stack OverflowIs an argument in natural...

Is a stroke of luck acceptable after a series of unfavorable events?

Apart from "berlinern", do any other German dialects have a corresponding verb?

Go Pregnant or Go Home

How can I open an app using Terminal?

What do "high sea" and "carry" mean in this sentence?

Would this house-rule that treats advantage as a +1 to the roll instead (and disadvantage as -1) and allows them to stack be balanced?

Grabbing quick drinks

What is the purpose of the Evocation wizard's Potent Cantrip feature?

How can I quit an app using Terminal?

Was a professor correct to chastise me for writing "Prof. X" rather than "Professor X"?

How to make a variable always equal to the result of some calculations?

Horror movie/show or scene where a horse creature opens its mouth really wide and devours a man in a stables

Can I equip Skullclamp on a creature I am sacrificing?

Trouble understanding the speech of overseas colleagues

Example of a Mathematician/Physicist whose Other Publications during their PhD eclipsed their PhD Thesis

Natural language into sentence logic

What does "Its cash flow is deeply negative" mean?

Visit to the USA with ESTA approved before trip to Iran

How to use tikz in fbox?

Is it my responsibility to learn a new technology in my own time my employer wants to implement?

How do we know the LHC results are robust?

Term for the "extreme-extension" version of a straw man fallacy?

Customer Requests (Sometimes) Drive Me Bonkers!

Why here is plural "We went to the movies last night."



Natural language into sentence logic



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowIs an argument in natural language as logically valid as in formal logic?Questions about the relationship between Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations and TractatusWhere Wittgenstein argues that thinking is done in natural language?












1















Need some help putting these two examples of natural language into sentence logic. For reference, use the transcription guide below:



D = you think so; E = I think so; F = it is true




  1. If you think so, I think so. And if I think so, you think so. (is it possible to express this using just one connective?)


  2. Unless it isn’t true, you don’t think so.











share|improve this question



























    1















    Need some help putting these two examples of natural language into sentence logic. For reference, use the transcription guide below:



    D = you think so; E = I think so; F = it is true




    1. If you think so, I think so. And if I think so, you think so. (is it possible to express this using just one connective?)


    2. Unless it isn’t true, you don’t think so.











    share|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1


      1






      Need some help putting these two examples of natural language into sentence logic. For reference, use the transcription guide below:



      D = you think so; E = I think so; F = it is true




      1. If you think so, I think so. And if I think so, you think so. (is it possible to express this using just one connective?)


      2. Unless it isn’t true, you don’t think so.











      share|improve this question














      Need some help putting these two examples of natural language into sentence logic. For reference, use the transcription guide below:



      D = you think so; E = I think so; F = it is true




      1. If you think so, I think so. And if I think so, you think so. (is it possible to express this using just one connective?)


      2. Unless it isn’t true, you don’t think so.








      natural-language






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 1 hour ago









      A. DelargeA. Delarge

      513




      513






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3















          1. This sentence is a conjunction of two conditionals:


          D→E∧E→D



          You can put it into a single connective by using CB: D↔E




          1. I was taught that "unless" is a flag for the "or" connective, so I will write my answer like that. If you rewrite the sentence to "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true", then the logic you get is:


          ~F∨~D






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





















          • Thank you so much for your response. For #2, however, I was recently taught that “X, unless Y” is the same (usually) as ~Y > X. Would it be possible to write it out then as ~~D > ~F, which would just be D > ~F?

            – A. Delarge
            21 mins ago












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "265"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphilosophy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61465%2fnatural-language-into-sentence-logic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3















          1. This sentence is a conjunction of two conditionals:


          D→E∧E→D



          You can put it into a single connective by using CB: D↔E




          1. I was taught that "unless" is a flag for the "or" connective, so I will write my answer like that. If you rewrite the sentence to "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true", then the logic you get is:


          ~F∨~D






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





















          • Thank you so much for your response. For #2, however, I was recently taught that “X, unless Y” is the same (usually) as ~Y > X. Would it be possible to write it out then as ~~D > ~F, which would just be D > ~F?

            – A. Delarge
            21 mins ago
















          3















          1. This sentence is a conjunction of two conditionals:


          D→E∧E→D



          You can put it into a single connective by using CB: D↔E




          1. I was taught that "unless" is a flag for the "or" connective, so I will write my answer like that. If you rewrite the sentence to "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true", then the logic you get is:


          ~F∨~D






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





















          • Thank you so much for your response. For #2, however, I was recently taught that “X, unless Y” is the same (usually) as ~Y > X. Would it be possible to write it out then as ~~D > ~F, which would just be D > ~F?

            – A. Delarge
            21 mins ago














          3












          3








          3








          1. This sentence is a conjunction of two conditionals:


          D→E∧E→D



          You can put it into a single connective by using CB: D↔E




          1. I was taught that "unless" is a flag for the "or" connective, so I will write my answer like that. If you rewrite the sentence to "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true", then the logic you get is:


          ~F∨~D






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.











          1. This sentence is a conjunction of two conditionals:


          D→E∧E→D



          You can put it into a single connective by using CB: D↔E




          1. I was taught that "unless" is a flag for the "or" connective, so I will write my answer like that. If you rewrite the sentence to "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true", then the logic you get is:


          ~F∨~D







          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer






          New contributor




          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          answered 1 hour ago









          cenicerocenicero

          311




          311




          New contributor




          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          New contributor





          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.













          • Thank you so much for your response. For #2, however, I was recently taught that “X, unless Y” is the same (usually) as ~Y > X. Would it be possible to write it out then as ~~D > ~F, which would just be D > ~F?

            – A. Delarge
            21 mins ago



















          • Thank you so much for your response. For #2, however, I was recently taught that “X, unless Y” is the same (usually) as ~Y > X. Would it be possible to write it out then as ~~D > ~F, which would just be D > ~F?

            – A. Delarge
            21 mins ago

















          Thank you so much for your response. For #2, however, I was recently taught that “X, unless Y” is the same (usually) as ~Y > X. Would it be possible to write it out then as ~~D > ~F, which would just be D > ~F?

          – A. Delarge
          21 mins ago





          Thank you so much for your response. For #2, however, I was recently taught that “X, unless Y” is the same (usually) as ~Y > X. Would it be possible to write it out then as ~~D > ~F, which would just be D > ~F?

          – A. Delarge
          21 mins ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Philosophy Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphilosophy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61465%2fnatural-language-into-sentence-logic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Anexo:Material bélico de la Fuerza Aérea de Chile Índice Aeronaves Defensa...

          Always On Availability groups resolving state after failover - Remote harden of transaction...

          update json value to null Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara ...