SQL Server Instance Root Directory & Shared Feature Directory on Partition with 64k Allocation Unit Size?
1 John in Luther’s Bibel
Writing in a Christian voice
Checking @@ROWCOUNT failing
Exposing a company lying about themselves in a tightly knit industry (videogames) : Is my career at risk on the long run?
Do I have to take mana from my deck or hand when tapping this card?
What do the positive and negative (+/-) transmit and receive pins mean on Ethernet cables?
Why is "la Gestapo" feminine?
What is this high flying aircraft over Pennsylvania?
Why does the frost depth increase when the surface temperature warms up?
Pre-Employment Background Check With Consent For Future Checks
Recursively move files within sub directories
Extract substring according to regexp with sed or grep
What is the purpose of using a decision tree?
New Order #2: Turn My Way
Should a narrator ever describe things based on a character's view instead of facts?
Why doesn't Gödel's incompleteness theorem apply to false statements?
Why didn't Voldemort know what Grindelwald looked like?
Rendered textures different to 3D View
Hashing password to increase entropy
Derivative of an interpolated function
Connection Between Knot Theory and Number Theory
Why can't I get pgrep output right to variable on bash script?
Do people actually use the word "kaputt" in conversation?
Amorphous proper classes in MK
SQL Server Instance Root Directory & Shared Feature Directory on Partition with 64k Allocation Unit Size?
I am in the process of setting up new test servers to migrate to SQL Server 2017. For certain reasons I dont have the option to have a separate drive partition for just SQL binaries so my options are to put the SQL binaries on C: with default allocation unit size or G: with 64k allocation unit size along with the data files.
I would prefer to avoid C: and put the binaries on G: but am not sure if there would be any negative performance impact with them being on a disk with 64k format.
Is one better than the other or does it not really make any difference for the binaries?
sql-server installation sql-server-2017
asked 1 min ago
davszurdavszur
254
add a comment |
I am in the process of setting up new test servers to migrate to SQL Server 2017. For certain reasons I dont have the option to have a separate drive partition for just SQL binaries so my options are to put the SQL binaries on C: with default allocation unit size or G: with 64k allocation unit size along with the data files.
I would prefer to avoid C: and put the binaries on G: but am not sure if there would be any negative performance impact with them being on a disk with 64k format.
Is one better than the other or does it not really make any difference for the binaries?
sql-server installation sql-server-2017
asked 1 min ago
davszurdavszur
254
add a comment |
I am in the process of setting up new test servers to migrate to SQL Server 2017. For certain reasons I dont have the option to have a separate drive partition for just SQL binaries so my options are to put the SQL binaries on C: with default allocation unit size or G: with 64k allocation unit size along with the data files.
I would prefer to avoid C: and put the binaries on G: but am not sure if there would be any negative performance impact with them being on a disk with 64k format.
Is one better than the other or does it not really make any difference for the binaries?
sql-server installation sql-server-2017
asked 1 min ago
davszurdavszur
254
I am in the process of setting up new test servers to migrate to SQL Server 2017. For certain reasons I dont have the option to have a separate drive partition for just SQL binaries so my options are to put the SQL binaries on C: with default allocation unit size or G: with 64k allocation unit size along with the data files.
I would prefer to avoid C: and put the binaries on G: but am not sure if there would be any negative performance impact with them being on a disk with 64k format.
Is one better than the other or does it not really make any difference for the binaries?
sql-server installation sql-server-2017
sql-server installation sql-server-2017
asked 1 min ago
davszurdavszur
254
asked 1 min ago
davszurdavszur
254
asked 1 min ago
davszurdavszur
254
asked 1 min ago
davszurdavszur
254
asked 1 min ago
davszurdavszur
254
254
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "182"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f232580%2fsql-server-instance-root-directory-shared-feature-directory-on-partition-with%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f232580%2fsql-server-instance-root-directory-shared-feature-directory-on-partition-with%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
