Salesforce package error error “You can't specify version for namespace sf_com_apps because this namespace...
Play Zip, Zap, Zop
Why exactly do action photographers need high fps burst cameras?
Why avoid shared user accounts?
Consequences of lack of rigour
What would be the rarity of this magic item(s)?
Is it a fallacy if someone claims they need an explanation for every word of your argument to the point where they don't understand common terms?
Removing disk while game is suspended
Non-Cancer terminal illness that can affect young (age 10-13) girls?
Why zero tolerance on nudity in space?
What does it mean for a caliber to be flat shooting?
Citing paywalled articles accessed via illegal web sharing
A starship is travelling at 0.9c and collides with a small rock. Will it leave a clean hole through, or will more happen?
What evolutionary advantage do viruses have in host specificity?
Nested word series [humans only]
What is the use of 'de' preposition in 'Yo voy *de* compras todos los sábados'
Why is it that Bernie Sanders is always called a "socialist"?
What to look for when criticizing poetry?
Is there a weight limit to Feather Fall?
Early credit roll before the end of the film
Is boss over stepping boundary/micromanaging?
use of 4/2 chord more compelling than root position?
How can I get my players to come to the game session after agreeing to a date?
Has any human ever had the choice to leave Earth permanently?
Is a new Boolean field better than a null reference when a value can be meaningfully absent?
Salesforce package error error “You can't specify version for namespace sf_com_apps because this namespace is not installed to your organization.”
Can a managed package cease to depend on another managed package?Managed app installation on Salesforce Production OrgWhen building a package with a dependency how is the minimum version of the dependent package determined?Why does code coverage consider pre-installed packages?When does it make sense to add a Connected App to a Managed Package?Does post-install script run when a patch version of the package is installed?From inside a Salesforce packaging org, how do you query the list of created versions for a managed package?What namespace to use when developing Lightning components for a managed package?How to specify namespace and partition for Org Cache when creating managed package?Is there a way to figure out how a previously installed package was installed when upgrading?
I'm having an odd issue where a package I've been maintaining for a while has now decided it is dependent on Salesforce Connected Apps (namespace sf_com_apps). Even when I try to remove the dependency by editing the metadata of the pages, components and lightning components it's being automatically added back. I don't believe any of my code is actually using anything from this package and I don't want my users to have to install it (as there isn't an easy way to do it, you seem to have to log into the org through workbench for it to install).
The only thing I can think that might have had something to do with this is upgrading API versions for all my code to 45.
The error the org will receive if installing my package but sf_com_apps doesn't exist is: "You can't specify version for namespace sf_com_apps because this namespace is not installed to your organization."
managed-package
edited 1 hour ago
Matt Lacey♦
20.9k547120
asked 2 hours ago
Kenji776Kenji776
285412
add a comment |
I'm having an odd issue where a package I've been maintaining for a while has now decided it is dependent on Salesforce Connected Apps (namespace sf_com_apps). Even when I try to remove the dependency by editing the metadata of the pages, components and lightning components it's being automatically added back. I don't believe any of my code is actually using anything from this package and I don't want my users to have to install it (as there isn't an easy way to do it, you seem to have to log into the org through workbench for it to install).
The only thing I can think that might have had something to do with this is upgrading API versions for all my code to 45.
The error the org will receive if installing my package but sf_com_apps doesn't exist is: "You can't specify version for namespace sf_com_apps because this namespace is not installed to your organization."
managed-package
edited 1 hour ago
Matt Lacey♦
20.9k547120
asked 2 hours ago
Kenji776Kenji776
285412
I've had this in sandboxes and have always managed to remove the dependancy, never with the actual package though.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
So packages always have this dependency now? Like all packages created now will have this error if sf_com_apps isn't installed?
– Kenji776
1 hour ago
I wasn't sure where it was coming from tbh, but workbench makes sense. It's not always a dependency.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I'm having an odd issue where a package I've been maintaining for a while has now decided it is dependent on Salesforce Connected Apps (namespace sf_com_apps). Even when I try to remove the dependency by editing the metadata of the pages, components and lightning components it's being automatically added back. I don't believe any of my code is actually using anything from this package and I don't want my users to have to install it (as there isn't an easy way to do it, you seem to have to log into the org through workbench for it to install).
The only thing I can think that might have had something to do with this is upgrading API versions for all my code to 45.
The error the org will receive if installing my package but sf_com_apps doesn't exist is: "You can't specify version for namespace sf_com_apps because this namespace is not installed to your organization."
managed-package
edited 1 hour ago
Matt Lacey♦
20.9k547120
asked 2 hours ago
Kenji776Kenji776
285412
I'm having an odd issue where a package I've been maintaining for a while has now decided it is dependent on Salesforce Connected Apps (namespace sf_com_apps). Even when I try to remove the dependency by editing the metadata of the pages, components and lightning components it's being automatically added back. I don't believe any of my code is actually using anything from this package and I don't want my users to have to install it (as there isn't an easy way to do it, you seem to have to log into the org through workbench for it to install).
The only thing I can think that might have had something to do with this is upgrading API versions for all my code to 45.
The error the org will receive if installing my package but sf_com_apps doesn't exist is: "You can't specify version for namespace sf_com_apps because this namespace is not installed to your organization."
managed-package
managed-package
edited 1 hour ago
Matt Lacey♦
20.9k547120
asked 2 hours ago
Kenji776Kenji776
285412
edited 1 hour ago
Matt Lacey♦
20.9k547120
asked 2 hours ago
Kenji776Kenji776
285412
edited 1 hour ago
Matt Lacey♦
20.9k547120
edited 1 hour ago
Matt Lacey♦
20.9k547120
edited 1 hour ago
Matt Lacey♦
20.9k547120
20.9k547120
asked 2 hours ago
Kenji776Kenji776
285412
asked 2 hours ago
Kenji776Kenji776
285412
asked 2 hours ago
Kenji776Kenji776
285412
285412
I've had this in sandboxes and have always managed to remove the dependancy, never with the actual package though.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
So packages always have this dependency now? Like all packages created now will have this error if sf_com_apps isn't installed?
– Kenji776
1 hour ago
I wasn't sure where it was coming from tbh, but workbench makes sense. It's not always a dependency.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I've had this in sandboxes and have always managed to remove the dependancy, never with the actual package though.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
So packages always have this dependency now? Like all packages created now will have this error if sf_com_apps isn't installed?
– Kenji776
1 hour ago
I wasn't sure where it was coming from tbh, but workbench makes sense. It's not always a dependency.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
I've had this in sandboxes and have always managed to remove the dependancy, never with the actual package though.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
I've had this in sandboxes and have always managed to remove the dependancy, never with the actual package though.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
So packages always have this dependency now? Like all packages created now will have this error if sf_com_apps isn't installed?
– Kenji776
1 hour ago
So packages always have this dependency now? Like all packages created now will have this error if sf_com_apps isn't installed?
– Kenji776
1 hour ago
I wasn't sure where it was coming from tbh, but workbench makes sense. It's not always a dependency.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
I wasn't sure where it was coming from tbh, but workbench makes sense. It's not always a dependency.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You can't directly "undo" a dependency once you upload a "released" version that causes the dependency. What you need to do is open a case with Partner Support and request that they roll back all versions that caused the dependency to "beta," at which point you should be able to fix the problem. This will involve uninstalling all affected versions from any orgs they are installed in. It would be ideal to uninstall/delete any apps that should not be in your org, as that can cause packaging issues (as you've unfortunately discovered).
answered 1 hour ago
sfdcfoxsfdcfox
257k12201444
Awesome, thank you for the info. What I suspect happened is when I copied all my code from my dev into the packaging org the SF connected apps dependency got somehow included. This is going to sound really dumb, but since this is a developer org I'm not able to open a case from that account. How would I go about logging a case with them for this org?
– Kenji776
1 hour ago
@Kenji776 If you're an ISV, you'd just log a case through your ISV account. If not, there's probably nothing you can do about it short of building a new package. Managed packages are not to be trifled with, they are very finicky.
– sfdcfox
1 hour ago
I'd log something through the partner portal and provide the org ID. Good luck though.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
Alright, thanks guys. I'll see about getting a case opened. This package is being developed for a client and they already have a released version that went through security review and all that so building a new package is all but off the table. Lets hope support can help fix this mess or else I'm hosed.
– Kenji776
45 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "459"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f252011%2fsalesforce-package-error-error-you-cant-specify-version-for-namespace-sf-com-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You can't directly "undo" a dependency once you upload a "released" version that causes the dependency. What you need to do is open a case with Partner Support and request that they roll back all versions that caused the dependency to "beta," at which point you should be able to fix the problem. This will involve uninstalling all affected versions from any orgs they are installed in. It would be ideal to uninstall/delete any apps that should not be in your org, as that can cause packaging issues (as you've unfortunately discovered).
answered 1 hour ago
sfdcfoxsfdcfox
257k12201444
Awesome, thank you for the info. What I suspect happened is when I copied all my code from my dev into the packaging org the SF connected apps dependency got somehow included. This is going to sound really dumb, but since this is a developer org I'm not able to open a case from that account. How would I go about logging a case with them for this org?
– Kenji776
1 hour ago
@Kenji776 If you're an ISV, you'd just log a case through your ISV account. If not, there's probably nothing you can do about it short of building a new package. Managed packages are not to be trifled with, they are very finicky.
– sfdcfox
1 hour ago
I'd log something through the partner portal and provide the org ID. Good luck though.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
Alright, thanks guys. I'll see about getting a case opened. This package is being developed for a client and they already have a released version that went through security review and all that so building a new package is all but off the table. Lets hope support can help fix this mess or else I'm hosed.
– Kenji776
45 mins ago
add a comment |
You can't directly "undo" a dependency once you upload a "released" version that causes the dependency. What you need to do is open a case with Partner Support and request that they roll back all versions that caused the dependency to "beta," at which point you should be able to fix the problem. This will involve uninstalling all affected versions from any orgs they are installed in. It would be ideal to uninstall/delete any apps that should not be in your org, as that can cause packaging issues (as you've unfortunately discovered).
answered 1 hour ago
sfdcfoxsfdcfox
257k12201444
Awesome, thank you for the info. What I suspect happened is when I copied all my code from my dev into the packaging org the SF connected apps dependency got somehow included. This is going to sound really dumb, but since this is a developer org I'm not able to open a case from that account. How would I go about logging a case with them for this org?
– Kenji776
1 hour ago
@Kenji776 If you're an ISV, you'd just log a case through your ISV account. If not, there's probably nothing you can do about it short of building a new package. Managed packages are not to be trifled with, they are very finicky.
– sfdcfox
1 hour ago
I'd log something through the partner portal and provide the org ID. Good luck though.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
Alright, thanks guys. I'll see about getting a case opened. This package is being developed for a client and they already have a released version that went through security review and all that so building a new package is all but off the table. Lets hope support can help fix this mess or else I'm hosed.
– Kenji776
45 mins ago
add a comment |
You can't directly "undo" a dependency once you upload a "released" version that causes the dependency. What you need to do is open a case with Partner Support and request that they roll back all versions that caused the dependency to "beta," at which point you should be able to fix the problem. This will involve uninstalling all affected versions from any orgs they are installed in. It would be ideal to uninstall/delete any apps that should not be in your org, as that can cause packaging issues (as you've unfortunately discovered).
answered 1 hour ago
sfdcfoxsfdcfox
257k12201444
You can't directly "undo" a dependency once you upload a "released" version that causes the dependency. What you need to do is open a case with Partner Support and request that they roll back all versions that caused the dependency to "beta," at which point you should be able to fix the problem. This will involve uninstalling all affected versions from any orgs they are installed in. It would be ideal to uninstall/delete any apps that should not be in your org, as that can cause packaging issues (as you've unfortunately discovered).
answered 1 hour ago
sfdcfoxsfdcfox
257k12201444
answered 1 hour ago
sfdcfoxsfdcfox
257k12201444
answered 1 hour ago
sfdcfoxsfdcfox
257k12201444
answered 1 hour ago
sfdcfoxsfdcfox
257k12201444
257k12201444
Awesome, thank you for the info. What I suspect happened is when I copied all my code from my dev into the packaging org the SF connected apps dependency got somehow included. This is going to sound really dumb, but since this is a developer org I'm not able to open a case from that account. How would I go about logging a case with them for this org?
– Kenji776
1 hour ago
@Kenji776 If you're an ISV, you'd just log a case through your ISV account. If not, there's probably nothing you can do about it short of building a new package. Managed packages are not to be trifled with, they are very finicky.
– sfdcfox
1 hour ago
I'd log something through the partner portal and provide the org ID. Good luck though.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
Alright, thanks guys. I'll see about getting a case opened. This package is being developed for a client and they already have a released version that went through security review and all that so building a new package is all but off the table. Lets hope support can help fix this mess or else I'm hosed.
– Kenji776
45 mins ago
add a comment |
Awesome, thank you for the info. What I suspect happened is when I copied all my code from my dev into the packaging org the SF connected apps dependency got somehow included. This is going to sound really dumb, but since this is a developer org I'm not able to open a case from that account. How would I go about logging a case with them for this org?
– Kenji776
1 hour ago
@Kenji776 If you're an ISV, you'd just log a case through your ISV account. If not, there's probably nothing you can do about it short of building a new package. Managed packages are not to be trifled with, they are very finicky.
– sfdcfox
1 hour ago
I'd log something through the partner portal and provide the org ID. Good luck though.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
Alright, thanks guys. I'll see about getting a case opened. This package is being developed for a client and they already have a released version that went through security review and all that so building a new package is all but off the table. Lets hope support can help fix this mess or else I'm hosed.
– Kenji776
45 mins ago
Awesome, thank you for the info. What I suspect happened is when I copied all my code from my dev into the packaging org the SF connected apps dependency got somehow included. This is going to sound really dumb, but since this is a developer org I'm not able to open a case from that account. How would I go about logging a case with them for this org?
– Kenji776
1 hour ago
Awesome, thank you for the info. What I suspect happened is when I copied all my code from my dev into the packaging org the SF connected apps dependency got somehow included. This is going to sound really dumb, but since this is a developer org I'm not able to open a case from that account. How would I go about logging a case with them for this org?
– Kenji776
1 hour ago
@Kenji776 If you're an ISV, you'd just log a case through your ISV account. If not, there's probably nothing you can do about it short of building a new package. Managed packages are not to be trifled with, they are very finicky.
– sfdcfox
1 hour ago
@Kenji776 If you're an ISV, you'd just log a case through your ISV account. If not, there's probably nothing you can do about it short of building a new package. Managed packages are not to be trifled with, they are very finicky.
– sfdcfox
1 hour ago
I'd log something through the partner portal and provide the org ID. Good luck though.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
I'd log something through the partner portal and provide the org ID. Good luck though.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
Alright, thanks guys. I'll see about getting a case opened. This package is being developed for a client and they already have a released version that went through security review and all that so building a new package is all but off the table. Lets hope support can help fix this mess or else I'm hosed.
– Kenji776
45 mins ago
Alright, thanks guys. I'll see about getting a case opened. This package is being developed for a client and they already have a released version that went through security review and all that so building a new package is all but off the table. Lets hope support can help fix this mess or else I'm hosed.
– Kenji776
45 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f252011%2fsalesforce-package-error-error-you-cant-specify-version-for-namespace-sf-com-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I've had this in sandboxes and have always managed to remove the dependancy, never with the actual package though.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
So packages always have this dependency now? Like all packages created now will have this error if sf_com_apps isn't installed?
– Kenji776
1 hour ago
I wasn't sure where it was coming from tbh, but workbench makes sense. It's not always a dependency.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago