Sfrgttk

When can a QA tester start his job?

Consequences of lack of rigour

Gear reduction on large turbofans

What is the purpose of easy combat scenarios that don't need resource expenditure?

SET NOCOUNT Error in handling SQL call after upgrade

Cat is tipping over bed-side lamps during the night

What would the chemical name be for C13H8Cl3NO

It took me a lot of time to make this, pls like. (YouTube Comments #1)

How should I handle players who ignore the session zero agreement?

Why is it that Bernie Sanders is always called a "socialist"?

Why did Luke use his left hand to shoot?

Increment each digit in a number to form a new number

Has any human ever had the choice to leave Earth permanently?

Can we harness gravitational potential energy?

Why zero tolerance on nudity in space?

What is the difference between rolling more dice versus fewer dice?

Using only 1s, make 29 with the minimum number of digits

use of 4/2 chord more compelling than root position?

Is using an 'empty' metaphor considered bad style?

In Linux what happens if 1000 files in a directory are moved to another location while another 300 files were added to the source directory?

Dilemma of explaining to interviewer that he is the reason for declining second interview

How much mayhem could I cause as a sentient fish?

Play Zip, Zap, Zop

Why do neural networks need so many training examples to perform?

use of 4/2 chord more compelling than root position?

Musical Harmony: When to use more than three chordsHow do you write successive, non-functional chord progressions?English name for 3-tone chords that have the bass tone different from the rootShould I use inversion or root position?Can chord substitutions take place unrestrictedly without invalidating a progression?What is the most efficient way to memorize chord changes?Interpretation of this Chord ProgressionThe sudden switch from C major to C minor in Wake me up when September ends and a Solo Acoustic versionF Dm Am C (Lydian?) ProgressionWhy does VII have dominant function in natural minor

2

I came across the following chord progression, which I really like:

The iii4/2 chord adds a lot to the progression in comparison to the following:

I'm sure you could wrap your head around these progressions--I am just sharing the images for reference. My question: is there a reason why the first progression is more satisfying the the second? I looked at the root movement in the two progressions, and the iii-vi features movement of a descending fifth, which should sound stronger than that of the falling fourth in the iii4/2-vi. That's about as far as my analysis goes. I understand this my reaction to the chord changes is somewhat subjective, but can you see any technical reason I find the first progression more compelling/satisfying?

chord-theory harmony chord-progressions chord-inversions

share|improve this question

edited 2 hours ago

Richard

41.6k691176

asked 3 hours ago

286642286642

1018

add a comment | 

2

I came across the following chord progression, which I really like:

The iii4/2 chord adds a lot to the progression in comparison to the following:

I'm sure you could wrap your head around these progressions--I am just sharing the images for reference. My question: is there a reason why the first progression is more satisfying the the second? I looked at the root movement in the two progressions, and the iii-vi features movement of a descending fifth, which should sound stronger than that of the falling fourth in the iii4/2-vi. That's about as far as my analysis goes. I understand this my reaction to the chord changes is somewhat subjective, but can you see any technical reason I find the first progression more compelling/satisfying?

chord-theory harmony chord-progressions chord-inversions

share|improve this question

edited 2 hours ago

Richard

41.6k691176

asked 3 hours ago

286642286642

1018

add a comment | 

I came across the following chord progression, which I really like:

The iii4/2 chord adds a lot to the progression in comparison to the following:

I'm sure you could wrap your head around these progressions--I am just sharing the images for reference. My question: is there a reason why the first progression is more satisfying the the second? I looked at the root movement in the two progressions, and the iii-vi features movement of a descending fifth, which should sound stronger than that of the falling fourth in the iii4/2-vi. That's about as far as my analysis goes. I understand this my reaction to the chord changes is somewhat subjective, but can you see any technical reason I find the first progression more compelling/satisfying?

chord-theory harmony chord-progressions chord-inversions

share|improve this question

edited 2 hours ago

Richard

41.6k691176

asked 3 hours ago

286642286642

1018

share|improve this question

edited 2 hours ago

Richard

41.6k691176

asked 3 hours ago

286642286642

1018

share|improve this question

edited 2 hours ago

Richard

41.6k691176

asked 3 hours ago

286642286642

1018

edited 2 hours ago

Richard

41.6k691176

edited 2 hours ago

Richard

41.6k691176

asked 3 hours ago

286642286642

1018

asked 3 hours ago

286642286642

1018

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

3

I see at least two reasons:

1. Tonal music is really built on the contrast of consonance and dissonance; the inherent tension and release of that dichotomy is what moves tonal music forward. Your second progression only uses consonant major and minor triads, and so it lacks much tension. But your first progression includes a dissonant seventh chord that brings in tension and helps push the music towards its release on the vi triad.


2. Similar to the first point, the second progression is completely made up of root-position chords. Your first progression includes an inverted harmony (the iii42) that adds a new sound and therefore interest to the progression.

Two other comments based on your question:

1. If you're writing your first progression according to the "rules" of college-level music theory, note that chordal sevenths will almost always resolve down by step. As such, the D in the bass of your iii42 should resolve down by step to C, not down by leap to A.


2. If you're interested, play around with making the soprano pitch in m. 2 a G♯ instead of G♮. That makes this chord what we call a secondary dominant that will lead even more strongly to the vi chord.


3. 
   

   You say

   
   
   

   
   

   I looked at the root movement in the two progressions, and the iii-vi features movement of a descending fifth, which should sound stronger than that of the falling fourth in the iii4/2-vi.

   
   

   
   

Note that the root motion is still the same, because the roots of those two chords are still E and A, a descending fifth. It's the bass motion that changes when you change the inversion of that iii chord.

PS: If you really like this chord progression, check out the theme to the US version of "The Office" :-)

share|improve this answer

edited 2 hours ago

answered 2 hours ago

RichardRichard

41.6k691176

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  thanks as always for the amazing answer @richard!
  
  – 286642
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "240"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f80673%2fuse-of-4-2-chord-more-compelling-than-root-position%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

3

I see at least two reasons:

1. Tonal music is really built on the contrast of consonance and dissonance; the inherent tension and release of that dichotomy is what moves tonal music forward. Your second progression only uses consonant major and minor triads, and so it lacks much tension. But your first progression includes a dissonant seventh chord that brings in tension and helps push the music towards its release on the vi triad.


2. Similar to the first point, the second progression is completely made up of root-position chords. Your first progression includes an inverted harmony (the iii42) that adds a new sound and therefore interest to the progression.

Two other comments based on your question:

1. If you're writing your first progression according to the "rules" of college-level music theory, note that chordal sevenths will almost always resolve down by step. As such, the D in the bass of your iii42 should resolve down by step to C, not down by leap to A.


2. If you're interested, play around with making the soprano pitch in m. 2 a G♯ instead of G♮. That makes this chord what we call a secondary dominant that will lead even more strongly to the vi chord.


3. 
   

   You say

   
   
   

   
   

   I looked at the root movement in the two progressions, and the iii-vi features movement of a descending fifth, which should sound stronger than that of the falling fourth in the iii4/2-vi.

   
   

   
   

Note that the root motion is still the same, because the roots of those two chords are still E and A, a descending fifth. It's the bass motion that changes when you change the inversion of that iii chord.

PS: If you really like this chord progression, check out the theme to the US version of "The Office" :-)

share|improve this answer

edited 2 hours ago

answered 2 hours ago

RichardRichard

41.6k691176

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  thanks as always for the amazing answer @richard!
  
  – 286642
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

3

I see at least two reasons:

1. Tonal music is really built on the contrast of consonance and dissonance; the inherent tension and release of that dichotomy is what moves tonal music forward. Your second progression only uses consonant major and minor triads, and so it lacks much tension. But your first progression includes a dissonant seventh chord that brings in tension and helps push the music towards its release on the vi triad.


2. Similar to the first point, the second progression is completely made up of root-position chords. Your first progression includes an inverted harmony (the iii42) that adds a new sound and therefore interest to the progression.

Two other comments based on your question:

1. If you're writing your first progression according to the "rules" of college-level music theory, note that chordal sevenths will almost always resolve down by step. As such, the D in the bass of your iii42 should resolve down by step to C, not down by leap to A.


2. If you're interested, play around with making the soprano pitch in m. 2 a G♯ instead of G♮. That makes this chord what we call a secondary dominant that will lead even more strongly to the vi chord.


3. 
   

   You say

   
   
   

   
   

   I looked at the root movement in the two progressions, and the iii-vi features movement of a descending fifth, which should sound stronger than that of the falling fourth in the iii4/2-vi.

   
   

   
   

Note that the root motion is still the same, because the roots of those two chords are still E and A, a descending fifth. It's the bass motion that changes when you change the inversion of that iii chord.

PS: If you really like this chord progression, check out the theme to the US version of "The Office" :-)

share|improve this answer

edited 2 hours ago

answered 2 hours ago

RichardRichard

41.6k691176

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  thanks as always for the amazing answer @richard!
  
  – 286642
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

I see at least two reasons:

1. Tonal music is really built on the contrast of consonance and dissonance; the inherent tension and release of that dichotomy is what moves tonal music forward. Your second progression only uses consonant major and minor triads, and so it lacks much tension. But your first progression includes a dissonant seventh chord that brings in tension and helps push the music towards its release on the vi triad.


2. Similar to the first point, the second progression is completely made up of root-position chords. Your first progression includes an inverted harmony (the iii42) that adds a new sound and therefore interest to the progression.

Two other comments based on your question:

1. If you're writing your first progression according to the "rules" of college-level music theory, note that chordal sevenths will almost always resolve down by step. As such, the D in the bass of your iii42 should resolve down by step to C, not down by leap to A.


2. If you're interested, play around with making the soprano pitch in m. 2 a G♯ instead of G♮. That makes this chord what we call a secondary dominant that will lead even more strongly to the vi chord.


3. 
   

   You say

   
   
   

   
   

   I looked at the root movement in the two progressions, and the iii-vi features movement of a descending fifth, which should sound stronger than that of the falling fourth in the iii4/2-vi.

   
   

   
   

Note that the root motion is still the same, because the roots of those two chords are still E and A, a descending fifth. It's the bass motion that changes when you change the inversion of that iii chord.

PS: If you really like this chord progression, check out the theme to the US version of "The Office" :-)

share|improve this answer

edited 2 hours ago

answered 2 hours ago

RichardRichard

41.6k691176

share|improve this answer

edited 2 hours ago

answered 2 hours ago

RichardRichard

41.6k691176

answered 2 hours ago

RichardRichard

41.6k691176

answered 2 hours ago

RichardRichard

41.6k691176