Sfrgttk

Specific list manipulation

How do I narratively explain how in-game circumstances do not mechanically allow a PC to instantly kill an NPC?

Dealing with an internal ScriptKiddie

my cron command doesn’t work

Does stroke to path essentially create two different objects?

Count repetitions of an array

Crack the bank account's password!

Homeostasis logic/math problem

Stuck to wireframe

Bug in VectorFieldPlot[] with InterpolatingFunction[]?

Writing dialogues for characters whose first language is not English

Players preemptively rolling, even though their rolls are useless or are checking the wrong skills

Why do objects rebound after hitting the ground?

How does a Warlock with Pact of the Blade visually appear to fight?

What's the reason that we have a different number of days each month?

How can I prevent an oracle who can see into the past from knowing everything that has happened?

Rigorous justification for non-relativistic QM perturbation theory assumptions?

How can I automatically launch GPSD on startup?

If angels and devils are the same species, why would their mortal offspring appear physically different?

What's the winning box for the King in a Queen against 7th rank Bishop-pawn endgame?

Piano music notation conventions

Taking an academic pseudonym?

Do we still track damage on indestructible creatures?

Fraction within another fraction

How to fly a direct entry holding pattern when approaching from an awkward angle?

How to properly enter a holding pattern?How do airplanes get stacked in a holding pattern?Have there ever been any accidents within holding stacks?How do you hold at a non-towered airport?How to correct for crosswind in VOR holding pattern without wind information?Are we expected to fly distanced leg (instead of timed leg) in holding pattern in GPS approaches?Am I required to report entering the hold in lieu, persuant to the IFR mandatory reporting points?Are 360s by a B777 common in the holding pattern?When/how to set the inbound or outbound course when intercepting a VOR for a DME hold?What vertical separation is required in a holding stack to avoid wake turbulence?

2

$begingroup$

If my course lies anywhere between 30 deg. adjacent to the 'direct entry' sector borders, do I fly the holding pattern as depicted below?

holding

share|improve this question

asked 4 hours ago

177177

1014

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

2

$begingroup$

If my course lies anywhere between 30 deg. adjacent to the 'direct entry' sector borders, do I fly the holding pattern as depicted below?

holding

share|improve this question

asked 4 hours ago

177177

1014

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

If my course lies anywhere between 30 deg. adjacent to the 'direct entry' sector borders, do I fly the holding pattern as depicted below?

holding

share|improve this question

asked 4 hours ago

177177

1014

$endgroup$

share|improve this question

asked 4 hours ago

177177

1014

share|improve this question

asked 4 hours ago

177177

1014

asked 4 hours ago

177177

1014

asked 4 hours ago

177177

1014

3 Answers
3

active

oldest

votes

2

$begingroup$

The answer is yes, you would enter holding just as you depicted.

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

Michael HallMichael Hall

1,391412

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

2

$begingroup$

To add to Michael Hall's answer, the direct entry is the one where you get straight on to the "racetrack" with minimum maneuvering and that is possible from anywhere within the direct entry sector. The other two entries involve initial maneuvering "off the racetrack" so to speak.

That entry diagram is a procedural convention, not a hard regulation you must follow exactly. The whole area is protected airspace, so it's not all that critical that you fly exactly this or exactly that as long as you stay in the protected airspace. You'll get dinged on a check ride for using a bad entry (using a sector's procedure while significantly outside of the boundary of that sector), but ATC would never bust you because you didn't follow the entry protocol perfectly, as long as you didn't leave the protected airspace and you got established properly without too much meandering around.

share|improve this answer

answered 25 mins ago

John KJohn K

19.2k12355

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

-1

$begingroup$

The red arrow has me a little worried, as it cuts across 2 lanes of traffic in the pattern plus potentially a third if another plane was blue. I might try, if possible, to over fly the pattern and drop into the blue "slot" with a right turn, still above the pattern altitude. Look and see.

If clear, make a descending right turn into the pattern, entering at a 45 degree angle outside the pattern. This gives you an extra few looks and keeps you further away from departing traffic.

If not, circle higher up until clear. There should be no awkward angle is you use some
vertical and circle.

It would be very helpful to check with the airport and their normal traffic patterns, as these can vary, and practice with your instructor.

share|improve this answer

answered 52 mins ago

Robert DiGiovanniRobert DiGiovanni

2,2291316

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @ Robert DiGiovanni that's an instrument hold entry not an airport traffic pattern or circuit entry.
  $endgroup$
  – John K
  49 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  From red you can also over fly and make a descending left turn into a 45 degree entry if traffic allows.
  $endgroup$
  – Robert DiGiovanni
  48 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @ John K would the aircraft be under traffic control for an instrument hold entry?
  $endgroup$
  – Robert DiGiovanni
  43 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Yes it's an ATC clearance but generally you won't be close to an airport, and could be anywhere. You will just be cleared with instructions on what is the hold fix, and if not to an existing published hold, you will get the direction of the inbound hold track and whether it is a right or left racetrack pattern in the hold, and the time to expect a clearance out of the hold (this in case of comm failure). How you enter it is totally up to you. The entry sectors are a procedural convention, not a regulation.
  $endgroup$
  – John K
  37 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Very good video on this at MzeroA.com. Thanks!
  $endgroup$
  – Robert DiGiovanni
  12 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "528"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f60486%2fhow-to-fly-a-direct-entry-holding-pattern-when-approaching-from-an-awkward-angle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

2

$begingroup$

The answer is yes, you would enter holding just as you depicted.

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

Michael HallMichael Hall

1,391412

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

2

$begingroup$

The answer is yes, you would enter holding just as you depicted.

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

Michael HallMichael Hall

1,391412

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

The answer is yes, you would enter holding just as you depicted.

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

Michael HallMichael Hall

1,391412

$endgroup$

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

Michael HallMichael Hall

1,391412

answered 1 hour ago

Michael HallMichael Hall

1,391412

answered 1 hour ago

Michael HallMichael Hall

1,391412

2

$begingroup$

To add to Michael Hall's answer, the direct entry is the one where you get straight on to the "racetrack" with minimum maneuvering and that is possible from anywhere within the direct entry sector. The other two entries involve initial maneuvering "off the racetrack" so to speak.

That entry diagram is a procedural convention, not a hard regulation you must follow exactly. The whole area is protected airspace, so it's not all that critical that you fly exactly this or exactly that as long as you stay in the protected airspace. You'll get dinged on a check ride for using a bad entry (using a sector's procedure while significantly outside of the boundary of that sector), but ATC would never bust you because you didn't follow the entry protocol perfectly, as long as you didn't leave the protected airspace and you got established properly without too much meandering around.

share|improve this answer

answered 25 mins ago

John KJohn K

19.2k12355

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

2

$begingroup$

To add to Michael Hall's answer, the direct entry is the one where you get straight on to the "racetrack" with minimum maneuvering and that is possible from anywhere within the direct entry sector. The other two entries involve initial maneuvering "off the racetrack" so to speak.

That entry diagram is a procedural convention, not a hard regulation you must follow exactly. The whole area is protected airspace, so it's not all that critical that you fly exactly this or exactly that as long as you stay in the protected airspace. You'll get dinged on a check ride for using a bad entry (using a sector's procedure while significantly outside of the boundary of that sector), but ATC would never bust you because you didn't follow the entry protocol perfectly, as long as you didn't leave the protected airspace and you got established properly without too much meandering around.

share|improve this answer

answered 25 mins ago

John KJohn K

19.2k12355

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

To add to Michael Hall's answer, the direct entry is the one where you get straight on to the "racetrack" with minimum maneuvering and that is possible from anywhere within the direct entry sector. The other two entries involve initial maneuvering "off the racetrack" so to speak.

That entry diagram is a procedural convention, not a hard regulation you must follow exactly. The whole area is protected airspace, so it's not all that critical that you fly exactly this or exactly that as long as you stay in the protected airspace. You'll get dinged on a check ride for using a bad entry (using a sector's procedure while significantly outside of the boundary of that sector), but ATC would never bust you because you didn't follow the entry protocol perfectly, as long as you didn't leave the protected airspace and you got established properly without too much meandering around.

share|improve this answer

answered 25 mins ago

John KJohn K

19.2k12355

$endgroup$

share|improve this answer

answered 25 mins ago

John KJohn K

19.2k12355

answered 25 mins ago

John KJohn K

19.2k12355

answered 25 mins ago

John KJohn K

19.2k12355

-1

$begingroup$

The red arrow has me a little worried, as it cuts across 2 lanes of traffic in the pattern plus potentially a third if another plane was blue. I might try, if possible, to over fly the pattern and drop into the blue "slot" with a right turn, still above the pattern altitude. Look and see.

If clear, make a descending right turn into the pattern, entering at a 45 degree angle outside the pattern. This gives you an extra few looks and keeps you further away from departing traffic.

If not, circle higher up until clear. There should be no awkward angle is you use some
vertical and circle.

It would be very helpful to check with the airport and their normal traffic patterns, as these can vary, and practice with your instructor.

share|improve this answer

answered 52 mins ago

Robert DiGiovanniRobert DiGiovanni

2,2291316

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @ Robert DiGiovanni that's an instrument hold entry not an airport traffic pattern or circuit entry.
  $endgroup$
  – John K
  49 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  From red you can also over fly and make a descending left turn into a 45 degree entry if traffic allows.
  $endgroup$
  – Robert DiGiovanni
  48 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @ John K would the aircraft be under traffic control for an instrument hold entry?
  $endgroup$
  – Robert DiGiovanni
  43 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Yes it's an ATC clearance but generally you won't be close to an airport, and could be anywhere. You will just be cleared with instructions on what is the hold fix, and if not to an existing published hold, you will get the direction of the inbound hold track and whether it is a right or left racetrack pattern in the hold, and the time to expect a clearance out of the hold (this in case of comm failure). How you enter it is totally up to you. The entry sectors are a procedural convention, not a regulation.
  $endgroup$
  – John K
  37 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Very good video on this at MzeroA.com. Thanks!
  $endgroup$
  – Robert DiGiovanni
  12 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

-1

$begingroup$

The red arrow has me a little worried, as it cuts across 2 lanes of traffic in the pattern plus potentially a third if another plane was blue. I might try, if possible, to over fly the pattern and drop into the blue "slot" with a right turn, still above the pattern altitude. Look and see.

If clear, make a descending right turn into the pattern, entering at a 45 degree angle outside the pattern. This gives you an extra few looks and keeps you further away from departing traffic.

If not, circle higher up until clear. There should be no awkward angle is you use some
vertical and circle.

It would be very helpful to check with the airport and their normal traffic patterns, as these can vary, and practice with your instructor.

share|improve this answer

answered 52 mins ago

Robert DiGiovanniRobert DiGiovanni

2,2291316

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @ Robert DiGiovanni that's an instrument hold entry not an airport traffic pattern or circuit entry.
  $endgroup$
  – John K
  49 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  From red you can also over fly and make a descending left turn into a 45 degree entry if traffic allows.
  $endgroup$
  – Robert DiGiovanni
  48 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @ John K would the aircraft be under traffic control for an instrument hold entry?
  $endgroup$
  – Robert DiGiovanni
  43 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Yes it's an ATC clearance but generally you won't be close to an airport, and could be anywhere. You will just be cleared with instructions on what is the hold fix, and if not to an existing published hold, you will get the direction of the inbound hold track and whether it is a right or left racetrack pattern in the hold, and the time to expect a clearance out of the hold (this in case of comm failure). How you enter it is totally up to you. The entry sectors are a procedural convention, not a regulation.
  $endgroup$
  – John K
  37 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Very good video on this at MzeroA.com. Thanks!
  $endgroup$
  – Robert DiGiovanni
  12 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

The red arrow has me a little worried, as it cuts across 2 lanes of traffic in the pattern plus potentially a third if another plane was blue. I might try, if possible, to over fly the pattern and drop into the blue "slot" with a right turn, still above the pattern altitude. Look and see.

If clear, make a descending right turn into the pattern, entering at a 45 degree angle outside the pattern. This gives you an extra few looks and keeps you further away from departing traffic.

If not, circle higher up until clear. There should be no awkward angle is you use some
vertical and circle.

It would be very helpful to check with the airport and their normal traffic patterns, as these can vary, and practice with your instructor.

share|improve this answer

answered 52 mins ago

Robert DiGiovanniRobert DiGiovanni

2,2291316

$endgroup$

share|improve this answer

answered 52 mins ago

Robert DiGiovanniRobert DiGiovanni

2,2291316

answered 52 mins ago

Robert DiGiovanniRobert DiGiovanni

2,2291316

answered 52 mins ago

Robert DiGiovanniRobert DiGiovanni

2,2291316