Sfrgttk

How can I take a waterfall's effect on a jump into consideration mechanically?

Sensor logger for Raspberry Pi in a stratospheric probe

Word for something that's always reliable, but never the best?

Democratic Socialism vs Social Democracy

Isn't a semicolon (';') needed after a function declaration in C++?

Is it really OK to use "because of"?

What does an unprocessed RAW file look like?

"Starve to death" Vs. "Starve to the point of death"

How do I add a strong "onion flavor" to the biryani (in restaurant style)?

How to put text above column in minipage?

What would be some possible ways of escaping higher gravity planets?

Minimum Viable Product for RTS game?

Why do neural networks need so many examples to perform?

How many proficiencies and languages does a noble half-elf Knowledge Domain cleric start with?

Why is it that Bernie Sanders is always called a "socialist"?

How can I differentiate duration vs starting time

Can I travel from country A to country B to country C without going back to country A?

What does からか mean?

Critique vs nitpicking

Insecure private-key encryption

Taking an academic pseudonym?

Maybe pigeonhole problem?

Was there a pre-determined arrangement for the division of Germany in case it surrendered before any Soviet forces entered its territory?

Why is Shelob considered evil?

Is it legal to point a domain to someone else's ip (website)?

Can you be accused of hotlinking/copyright violation if you use an iframe?Terms and condition for web scrapingLegal issues of a website such as [businessname]sucks.comTrademarked name in domain nameLiabilty for copied website content on a third-party serverIs Google legal?Transfer of Ownership of a Trademarked Domain NameSaving web articles in own databaseWhat happens to the third-person in a copyright-infringement?Can hotlinking of internet content be considered generally legal?When is copyright infringement committed?Can I take mail that is addressed to me from someone else's mailbox?

1

The question is pretty straightforward: Is it legal to point a domain on the web to someone else's ip (website)?

The domain owner is not actually copying the content, but just opening the website in his or her own domain.

The resolution happens in the USA and the domain was bought at Google Domains

united-states copyright online

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

David Siegel

10.8k1944

asked 4 hours ago

Faminha102Faminha102

1061

New contributor

Faminha102 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  What country would this be in? It might matter.
  
  – David Siegel
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  The resolution happens in the USA and the domain was bought at Google Domains.
  
  – Faminha102
  3 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

1

The question is pretty straightforward: Is it legal to point a domain on the web to someone else's ip (website)?

The domain owner is not actually copying the content, but just opening the website in his or her own domain.

The resolution happens in the USA and the domain was bought at Google Domains

united-states copyright online

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

David Siegel

10.8k1944

asked 4 hours ago

Faminha102Faminha102

1061

New contributor

Faminha102 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  What country would this be in? It might matter.
  
  – David Siegel
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  The resolution happens in the USA and the domain was bought at Google Domains.
  
  – Faminha102
  3 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

The question is pretty straightforward: Is it legal to point a domain on the web to someone else's ip (website)?

The domain owner is not actually copying the content, but just opening the website in his or her own domain.

The resolution happens in the USA and the domain was bought at Google Domains

united-states copyright online

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

David Siegel

10.8k1944

asked 4 hours ago

Faminha102Faminha102

1061

New contributor

Faminha102 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

David Siegel

10.8k1944

asked 4 hours ago

Faminha102Faminha102

1061

New contributor

Faminha102 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

David Siegel

10.8k1944

asked 4 hours ago

Faminha102Faminha102

1061

New contributor

Faminha102 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

edited 3 hours ago

David Siegel

10.8k1944

edited 3 hours ago

David Siegel

10.8k1944

asked 4 hours ago

Faminha102Faminha102

1061

New contributor

Faminha102 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked 4 hours ago

Faminha102Faminha102

1061

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

2

Yes

One could certainly put up a site whose only content was a link to another domain. And I can't find any law which this would violate.

If the link is a "deep link", and if it bypasses a log-in page, while the other site is so designed that all access is intended to go through the login, i believe (but cannot at the moment verify) that the owner of the other site could claim that this violates their copyright. In any case it is not a good idea.But a link to an appropriate page should have no problem, nor should pointing your domain at an appropriate entry page.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

David SiegelDavid Siegel

10.8k1944

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  What if the website opens in my domain?
  
  – Faminha102
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  By "opens in your domain" you mean that the displayed URL starts with your domain? I don't see why that would matter.
  
  – David Siegel
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Yes, exactly... as an example, let's say that I configure my domain example.com to display the content of law.stackexchange.com website, so you would be able to see everything that you see right now, but the URL would be example.com. I wouldn't change the content, or ad ads, or anything else.
  
  – Faminha102
  3 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

0

It doesn't work that way. Simply pointing a domain at a server IP won't do what you think, for any number of reasons, i.e., load balancing, proxies, CDNs, shared IPs, the way the webserver is configured, etc. You may be able to display a simple home page on a server with a single IP. But simply pointing the domain isn't going to rewrite the source code of the site and magically make it appear to be your domain.

You could "scrape" the site and download all content and convert the URLs to your own domain, but that requires your own server, and is typically not legal, depending on the TOS of the site you scrape; see Terms and condition for web scraping

What you are probably thinking of is an iframe: HTML iframe tag. You can use an iframe to display the content of another site in a window on your own hosted domain on your own server.

But the legality of iframing a site depends on the TOS of the site you frame and appears to be in legal flux: Can you be accused of hotlinking/copyright violation if you use an iframe?

Many sites forbid the use of iframes as they see it - case law or not - as copyright infringement. And servers can be configured to block iframing by other hosts.

Try using an iframe for law.stackexchange.com; you'll see the error Load denied by X-Frame-Options, because SE forbids iframing their sites, though iframing appears to not be mentioned in SE's TOS language.

share|improve this answer

edited 49 mins ago

answered 58 mins ago

BlueDogRanchBlueDogRanch

10.2k21837

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  This does not answer the question at all. The technical side of things is irrelevant, let alone that some not big sites hosted in old-school way still do work by opening their IP in web browser.
  
  – Greendrake
  30 mins ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Read my answer. Do the terms "legality", "TOS", etc., appear? If you can't understand the technical issues, you won't understand the legal issues that pertain.
  
  – BlueDogRanch
  24 mins ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "617"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

Faminha102 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f37591%2fis-it-legal-to-point-a-domain-to-someone-elses-ip-website%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

2

Yes

One could certainly put up a site whose only content was a link to another domain. And I can't find any law which this would violate.

If the link is a "deep link", and if it bypasses a log-in page, while the other site is so designed that all access is intended to go through the login, i believe (but cannot at the moment verify) that the owner of the other site could claim that this violates their copyright. In any case it is not a good idea.But a link to an appropriate page should have no problem, nor should pointing your domain at an appropriate entry page.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

David SiegelDavid Siegel

10.8k1944

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  What if the website opens in my domain?
  
  – Faminha102
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  By "opens in your domain" you mean that the displayed URL starts with your domain? I don't see why that would matter.
  
  – David Siegel
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Yes, exactly... as an example, let's say that I configure my domain example.com to display the content of law.stackexchange.com website, so you would be able to see everything that you see right now, but the URL would be example.com. I wouldn't change the content, or ad ads, or anything else.
  
  – Faminha102
  3 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

2

Yes

One could certainly put up a site whose only content was a link to another domain. And I can't find any law which this would violate.

If the link is a "deep link", and if it bypasses a log-in page, while the other site is so designed that all access is intended to go through the login, i believe (but cannot at the moment verify) that the owner of the other site could claim that this violates their copyright. In any case it is not a good idea.But a link to an appropriate page should have no problem, nor should pointing your domain at an appropriate entry page.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

David SiegelDavid Siegel

10.8k1944

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  What if the website opens in my domain?
  
  – Faminha102
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  By "opens in your domain" you mean that the displayed URL starts with your domain? I don't see why that would matter.
  
  – David Siegel
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Yes, exactly... as an example, let's say that I configure my domain example.com to display the content of law.stackexchange.com website, so you would be able to see everything that you see right now, but the URL would be example.com. I wouldn't change the content, or ad ads, or anything else.
  
  – Faminha102
  3 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Yes

One could certainly put up a site whose only content was a link to another domain. And I can't find any law which this would violate.

If the link is a "deep link", and if it bypasses a log-in page, while the other site is so designed that all access is intended to go through the login, i believe (but cannot at the moment verify) that the owner of the other site could claim that this violates their copyright. In any case it is not a good idea.But a link to an appropriate page should have no problem, nor should pointing your domain at an appropriate entry page.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

David SiegelDavid Siegel

10.8k1944

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

David SiegelDavid Siegel

10.8k1944

answered 3 hours ago

David SiegelDavid Siegel

10.8k1944

answered 3 hours ago

David SiegelDavid Siegel

10.8k1944

0

It doesn't work that way. Simply pointing a domain at a server IP won't do what you think, for any number of reasons, i.e., load balancing, proxies, CDNs, shared IPs, the way the webserver is configured, etc. You may be able to display a simple home page on a server with a single IP. But simply pointing the domain isn't going to rewrite the source code of the site and magically make it appear to be your domain.

You could "scrape" the site and download all content and convert the URLs to your own domain, but that requires your own server, and is typically not legal, depending on the TOS of the site you scrape; see Terms and condition for web scraping

What you are probably thinking of is an iframe: HTML iframe tag. You can use an iframe to display the content of another site in a window on your own hosted domain on your own server.

But the legality of iframing a site depends on the TOS of the site you frame and appears to be in legal flux: Can you be accused of hotlinking/copyright violation if you use an iframe?

Many sites forbid the use of iframes as they see it - case law or not - as copyright infringement. And servers can be configured to block iframing by other hosts.

Try using an iframe for law.stackexchange.com; you'll see the error Load denied by X-Frame-Options, because SE forbids iframing their sites, though iframing appears to not be mentioned in SE's TOS language.

share|improve this answer

edited 49 mins ago

answered 58 mins ago

BlueDogRanchBlueDogRanch

10.2k21837

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  This does not answer the question at all. The technical side of things is irrelevant, let alone that some not big sites hosted in old-school way still do work by opening their IP in web browser.
  
  – Greendrake
  30 mins ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Read my answer. Do the terms "legality", "TOS", etc., appear? If you can't understand the technical issues, you won't understand the legal issues that pertain.
  
  – BlueDogRanch
  24 mins ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

0

It doesn't work that way. Simply pointing a domain at a server IP won't do what you think, for any number of reasons, i.e., load balancing, proxies, CDNs, shared IPs, the way the webserver is configured, etc. You may be able to display a simple home page on a server with a single IP. But simply pointing the domain isn't going to rewrite the source code of the site and magically make it appear to be your domain.

You could "scrape" the site and download all content and convert the URLs to your own domain, but that requires your own server, and is typically not legal, depending on the TOS of the site you scrape; see Terms and condition for web scraping

What you are probably thinking of is an iframe: HTML iframe tag. You can use an iframe to display the content of another site in a window on your own hosted domain on your own server.

But the legality of iframing a site depends on the TOS of the site you frame and appears to be in legal flux: Can you be accused of hotlinking/copyright violation if you use an iframe?

Many sites forbid the use of iframes as they see it - case law or not - as copyright infringement. And servers can be configured to block iframing by other hosts.

Try using an iframe for law.stackexchange.com; you'll see the error Load denied by X-Frame-Options, because SE forbids iframing their sites, though iframing appears to not be mentioned in SE's TOS language.

share|improve this answer

edited 49 mins ago

answered 58 mins ago

BlueDogRanchBlueDogRanch

10.2k21837

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  This does not answer the question at all. The technical side of things is irrelevant, let alone that some not big sites hosted in old-school way still do work by opening their IP in web browser.
  
  – Greendrake
  30 mins ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Read my answer. Do the terms "legality", "TOS", etc., appear? If you can't understand the technical issues, you won't understand the legal issues that pertain.
  
  – BlueDogRanch
  24 mins ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

It doesn't work that way. Simply pointing a domain at a server IP won't do what you think, for any number of reasons, i.e., load balancing, proxies, CDNs, shared IPs, the way the webserver is configured, etc. You may be able to display a simple home page on a server with a single IP. But simply pointing the domain isn't going to rewrite the source code of the site and magically make it appear to be your domain.

You could "scrape" the site and download all content and convert the URLs to your own domain, but that requires your own server, and is typically not legal, depending on the TOS of the site you scrape; see Terms and condition for web scraping

What you are probably thinking of is an iframe: HTML iframe tag. You can use an iframe to display the content of another site in a window on your own hosted domain on your own server.

But the legality of iframing a site depends on the TOS of the site you frame and appears to be in legal flux: Can you be accused of hotlinking/copyright violation if you use an iframe?

Many sites forbid the use of iframes as they see it - case law or not - as copyright infringement. And servers can be configured to block iframing by other hosts.

Try using an iframe for law.stackexchange.com; you'll see the error Load denied by X-Frame-Options, because SE forbids iframing their sites, though iframing appears to not be mentioned in SE's TOS language.

share|improve this answer

edited 49 mins ago

answered 58 mins ago

BlueDogRanchBlueDogRanch

10.2k21837

share|improve this answer

edited 49 mins ago

answered 58 mins ago

BlueDogRanchBlueDogRanch

10.2k21837

answered 58 mins ago

BlueDogRanchBlueDogRanch

10.2k21837

answered 58 mins ago

BlueDogRanchBlueDogRanch

10.2k21837